NATION

PASSWORD

NSG Senate Chamber [NSG Senate] - Version 4

A resting-place for threads that might have otherwise been lost.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:29 am

Well No prizes for guessing the LGA failed. Exact count will be up soon.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Britanno
Minister
 
Posts: 2992
Founded: Apr 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Britanno » Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:18 am

Britanno wrote:
Reformation of Government Act

Category: Miscellaneous | Urgency: Moderate | Author: Senator James Brit (Independent) | Co-Sponsors: Senator James Pace (Independent), Minister Emilia Nuckerburg (Modern Whig Party), Senator Rupert Weinthal (Aurentine Liberals and Moderates), Senator Boris Johnson (Aurentine Liberals and Moderates), Senator Sachindra Kshetri (National Centre Party)

Applauding the Ministry Foundation Act for establishing an efficient form of governance.

However Understanding that the system created by the act is no longer effective and is needed of replacement.

Section I - Repeal of the MFA
1. The Ministry Foundation Act is hereby repealed and its content rendered null and void.
Section II - Establishment of the Cabinet
1. The Cabinet of the Commonwealth of Aurentina shall be formally established .
a) The cabinet shall be lead by the Head of Government.
b) The Head of Government shall have the power to appoint and dismiss members of the cabinet.
c) The Head of Government shall be the Prime Minister.
d) The cabinet shall be made up of the Prime Minister, the Deputy Prime Minister, the Secretary of State for the Interior, the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, the Secretary of State for Finance, the Secretary of State for Labour, the Secretary of State for Education, the Secretary of State for Health, the Secretary of State for Defence, the Secretary of State for the Environment and the Secretary of State for Culture.
e) No more members of the cabinet may be appointed without the permission of the senate.
Section III - Reformation of Government
1. The Ministry of the Interior is formally established and shall deal with all matters concerning law enforcement, immigration, justice and security.
a) The Ministry of the Interior shall be lead by the Secretary of State for the Interior.
b) The position of the Secretary of State for the Interior shall be mandated to be filled.
c) The Secretary of State for the Interior shall have the power to appoint the Law Enforcement Minister, the Immigration Minister, the Justice Minister and the Security Minister.
d) The Law Enforcement Minister shall be in charge of law enforcement agencies and events, but shall not have the power to overrule the orders of the Interior Minister.
e) The position of the Law Enforcement Minister shall not be mandated to be filled.
f) The Immigration Minister shall be in charge of immigration agencies and events, but shall not have the power to overrule the orders of the Secretary of State for the Interior.
g) The position of the Immigration Minister shall not be mandated to be filled.
h) The Justice Minister shall be in charge of judicial agencies and events, but shall not have the power to overrule the orders of the Secretary of State for the Interior.
i) The position of the Justice Minister shall not be mandated to be filled.
j) The Security Minister shall be in charge of security agencies and events, but shall not have the power to overrule the orders of the Secretary of State for the Interior.
k) The position of the Security Minister shall not be mandated to be filled.
2. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is formally established and shall deal with all matters concerning foreign affairs and international development.
a) The Ministry of Foreign Affairs shall be lead by the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.
b) The position of the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs shall be mandated to be filled.
c) The Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs shall have the power to appoint the International Development Minister.
d) The International Development Minister shall be in charge of international development agencies and events, but shall not have the power to overrule the orders of the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.
e) The position of the International Development Minister shall not be mandated to be filled.
3. The Ministry of Finance is formally established and shall deal with all matters concerning finance and the Treasury
a) The Ministry of Finance shall be lead by the Secretary of State for Finance.
b) The position of the Secretary of State for Finance shall be mandated to be filled.
c) The Secretary of State for Finance shall have the power to appoint the Treasurer, the Trade Minister and the Primary Resources Minister.
d) The Treasurer shall be in charge of national budget agencies and events, but shall not have the power to overrule the orders of the Secretary of State for Finance.
e) The position of the Treasurer shall not be mandated to be filled.
f) The Trade Minister shall be in charge of trade agencies and events, but shall not have the power to overrule the orders of the Secretary of State for Finance.
g) The position of the Trade Minister shall not be mandated to be filled.
h) The Primary Resources Minister shall be in charge of primary resources agencies and events, but shall not have the power to overrule the orders of the Secretary of State for Finance.
i) The position of the Primary Resources Minister shall not be mandated to be filled.
4. The Ministry of Labour is formally established and shall deal with all matters concerning welfare and business safety.
a) The Ministry of Labour shall be lead by the Secretary of State for Labour.
b) The position of the Secretary of State for Labour shall be mandated to be filled.
c) The Secretary of State for Labour shall have the power to appoint the Business Safety Minister.
d) The Business Safety Minister shall be in charge of business safety agencies and events, but shall not have the power to overrule the orders of the Secretary of State for Labour.
e) The position of the Business Safety Minister shall not be mandated to be filled.
5. The Ministry of Education is formally established and shall deal with all matters concerning education.
a) The Ministry of Education shall be lead by the Secretary of State for Education.
b) The position of the Secretary of State for Education shall be mandated to be filled.
c) The Secretary of State for Education shall have the power to appoint the Schools Minister and the Universities Minister.
d) The Schools Minister shall be in charge of educational institutional agencies and events, but shall not have the power to overrule the orders of the Secretary of State for Education.
e) The position of the Schools Minister shall not be mandated to be filled.
f) The Universities Minister shall be in charge of university related agencies and events, but shall not have the power to overrule the orders of the Secretary of State for Education.
g) The position of the Universities Minister shall not be mandated to be filled.
6. The Ministry of Health is formally established and shall deal with all matters concerning health and hospitals.
a) The Ministry of Health shall be lead by the Secretary of State for Health.
b) The position of the Secretary of State for Health shall be mandated to be filled.
c) The Secretary of State for Health shall have the power to appoint the Hospitals Minister.
d) The Hospitals Minister shall be in charge of hospital agencies and events, but shall not have the power to overrule the orders of the Secretary of State for Health.
e) The position of the Hospitals Minister shall not be mandated to be filled.
7. The Ministry of Defence is formally established and shall deal with all matters concerning national defence and veterans.
a) The Ministry of Defence shall be lead by the Secretary of State for Defence.
b) The position of the Secretary of State for Defence shall be mandated to be filled.
c) The Secretary of State for Defence shall have the power to appoint the Veterans Minister.
d) The Veterans Minister shall be in charge of veteran agencies and events, but shall not have the power to overrule the orders of the Secretary of State for Defence.
e) The position of the Veterans Minister shall not be mandated to be filled.
8. The Ministry of Environment is formally established and shall deal with all matters concerning the environment and energy.
a) The Ministry of Environment shall be lead by the Secretary of State for the Environment.
b) The position of the Secretary of State for the Environment shall be mandated to be filled.
c) The Secretary of State for the Environment shall have the power to appoint the Energy Minister.
d) The Energy Minister shall be in charge of energy agencies and events, but shall not have the power to overrule the orders of the Secretary of State for the Environment.
e) The position of the Energy Minister shall not be mandated to be filled.
9. The Ministry of Culture is formally established and shall deal with all matters concerning culture, media and sport
a) The Ministry of Culture shall be lead by the Secretary of State for Culture.
b) The position of the Secretary of State for Culture shall be mandated to be filled.
c) The Secretary of State for Culture shall have the power to appoint the Media Minister and the Sports Minister.
d) The Media Minister shall be in charge of media agencies and events (including telecommunications), but shall not have the power to overrule the orders of the Secretary of State for Culture.
e) The position of the Media Minister shall not be mandated to be filled.
f) The Sports Minister shall be in charge of sport agencies and events, but shall not have the power to overrule the orders of the Secretary of State for Culture.
g) The position of the Sports Minister shall not be mandated to be filled.
10. The Ministry of Transportation is formally established and shall deal with all matters concerning transport.
a) The Ministry of Transportation shall be lead by the Secretary of State for Transportation.
b) The position of the Secretary of State for Transportation shall be mandated to be filled.
11. The Ministry of Research is formally established and shall deal with all matters concerning research and astronomy.
a) The Ministry of Research shall be lead by the Secretary of State for Research.
b) The position of the Secretary of State for Research shall be mandated to be filled.
c) The Secretary of State for Research shall have the power to appoint the Astronomy Minister.
d) The Astronomy Minister shall be in charge of astronomy agencies and events, but shall not have the power to overrule the orders of the Secretary of State for Resarch.
e) The position of the Astronomy Minister shall not be mandated to be filled.
Section IV - On Previously Passed Bills
1. All bills previously passed by the senate that refer to any of the previous titles belonging to members of the cabinet shall be interpretation as the relevant new title.


I'd like to submit this to the queue please.
NSGS Liberal Democrats - The Centrist Alternative
British, male, heterosexual, aged 26, liberal conservative, unitarian universalist
Pro: marriage equality, polygamy, abortion up to viability, UK Lib Dems, US Democrats
Anti: discrimination, euroscepticism, UKIP, immigrant bashing, UK Labour, US Republicans
British Home Counties wrote:
Alyakia wrote:our nations greatest achievement is slowly but surely being destroyed
America is doing fine atm

User avatar
Zurkerx
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 12353
Founded: Jan 20, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Zurkerx » Sat Apr 19, 2014 6:44 am

Zurkerx wrote:Okay, let's try this again. I would like to submit this under Domestic Development.

Re-Innovation of the Broadcasting Act

Urgency: High| Author(s): Zurkerx| Category: Domestic Development

Co-sponsors: The Liberated Territories [LPA], Skeckoa [LPA], McKleigh [LPA], Panmerica [LPA], New Zepuha [ALM]



RECOGNIZING that the Aurentina Television Network Revision Act was passed to sustain the Aurentisë Televisënetwörk.

UNDERSTANDING that the Second Amendment to the Broadcasting Act was passed due to concern of bias advertisement from private companies.

CONCERN that the Second Amendment to the Broadcasting Act significantly cuts funds from the Aurentisë Televisënetwörk.

BELIEVING that less of a burden will not only be put on the Citizens of Aurentina, but the Aurentine Government as well.

REALIZING that the Aurentisë Televisënetwörk can survive through other means of funding.

HEREBY ENACTS the following clauses:

Clause 1- Aurentisë Televisënetwörk will no longer be supported by the Aurentine Government to keep it funded.

Clause 2- The Second Amendment to the Broadcasting Act is hereby null and void in its entirely.

Clause 3- The Aurentisë Televisënetwörk shall become a Commercial Broadcaster.

Clause 4- The Aurentina Television Network Revision Act will still be in affect until the first day of 2016.

THE FOLLOWING is defined:

- A Commercial Broadcaster is a broadcaster by corporate media that broadcasts private television programs and radio programming.

Funding will proceed as the following:

-The Aurentisë Televisënetwörk shall be funded by grants from charities or individuals.

-The Aurentisë Televisënetwörk shall be funded by paid advertisers as well.

IN THE EVENT that the Aurentisë Televisënetwörk has loses on their financial report, the Aurentina Government can underwrite the losses.

-The Aurentina Government cannot underwrite anything else in the Aurentisë Televisënetwörk.

-Underwriting will occur on December 31 of every year, IF there are any loses in the financial report.

THIS BILL shall take affect on January 1, 2016.


Alright, hopefully this is the last time I have to ask.
A Golden Civic: The New Pragmatic Libertarian
My Words: Indeed, Indubitably & Malarkey
Retired Admin in NSGS and NS Parliament

Accountant, Author, History Buff, Political Junkie
“Has ambition so eclipsed principle?” ~ Mitt Romney
"Try not to become a person of success, but rather try to become a person of value." ~ Albert Einstein
"Trust, but verify." ~ Ronald Reagan

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:03 am

The Nihilistic view wrote:Well No prizes for guessing the LGA failed. Exact count will be up soon.



I forgot to post this yesterday.

LGA, 6-21, 2 abst.
Last edited by The Nihilistic view on Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Lamaredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1546
Founded: May 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamaredia » Sat Apr 19, 2014 2:04 pm

President Pro-Tempore of the Senate wrote:
Business & Finance
To deal with issues pertinent to the Work, Commerce, and Treasury ministries


Section A:
- Minimum Wage Act

This is the bill currently up for debate, debate will last for 24 hours.
Currently representing the SLP/R, Leading to a brighter future, in the NS Parliament RP as Representative Jonas Trägårdh Apelstierna.

Currently a co-admin of the NS Parliament RP

Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 15%
Communistic - 44%
Anarchistic - 28%
Visionary - 50%
Secular - 53%
Pacifist - 12%
Anthropocentric– 16%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result
Last edited by Lamaredia on Fri June 07, 2019 1:05 AM, edited 52 times in total.

User avatar
Battlion
Diplomat
 
Posts: 588
Founded: Aug 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Battlion » Sat Apr 19, 2014 2:26 pm

Fully support, the original minimum wage was far too high for a nation our own size.

User avatar
Kamchastkia
Senator
 
Posts: 3943
Founded: Jan 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kamchastkia » Sat Apr 19, 2014 2:38 pm

I suggest the bill include portions requiring that the Living Wage Commission be made up by union representatives and owners of companies to ensure that neither side unfairly benefits.

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Sat Apr 19, 2014 2:40 pm

I am opposed to the new bill as it takes control over the NMW out of the hands of the senate and into the hands of unelected bureaucrats. Whilst I think we need some lower rates for young workers and apprentices to make them more attractive this should be done through us passing a bill specifying what these new rates will be exactly.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Calimera II
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8790
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Calimera II » Sat Apr 19, 2014 2:45 pm

So this bill basically takes all power away from unions, the government and employers?

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Sat Apr 19, 2014 2:49 pm

Kamchastkia wrote:I suggest the bill include portions requiring that the Living Wage Commission be made up by union representatives and owners of companies to ensure that neither side unfairly benefits.

I dont think we should have representatives of unions or owners but civil servants who have enough experience in economics to decide minimum living income needed...

The Nihilistic view wrote:I am opposed to the new bill as it takes control over the NMW out of the hands of the senate and into the hands of unelected bureaucrats. Whilst I think we need some lower rates for young workers and apprentices to make them more attractive this should be done through us passing a bill specifying what these new rates will be exactly.

Such numbers are going to be arbitrary, this way wage is going to be determined in manner consistent and ensures that 1) Work always pays more than benefits and 2) People in work always have enough to live on.
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Sat Apr 19, 2014 2:52 pm

Calimera II wrote:So this bill basically takes all power away from unions, the government and employers?

No, it ties minimum wage with maximum benefits and ensures that it is calculated accurately rather than in arbitrary numbers picked from air. Unions can still negotiate with employers for higher than minimum wage.
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Kamchastkia
Senator
 
Posts: 3943
Founded: Jan 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kamchastkia » Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:01 pm

Great Nepal wrote:
Kamchastkia wrote:I suggest the bill include portions requiring that the Living Wage Commission be made up by union representatives and owners of companies to ensure that neither side unfairly benefits.

I dont think we should have representatives of unions or owners but civil servants who have enough experience in economics to decide minimum living income needed...

This allows for heavy bias in favor of the owners as the owners have more money and more influence among individuals than unions.

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:11 pm

Kamchastkia wrote:
Great Nepal wrote:I dont think we should have representatives of unions or owners but civil servants who have enough experience in economics to decide minimum living income needed...

This allows for heavy bias in favor of the owners as the owners have more money and more influence among individuals than unions.

I dont see how that has a issue, I am sure bribing civil servants is criminal offence and frankly we shouldn't have representatives from either stakeholders but people who are experts at what they are doing: ie. economists. I dont see how having union leaders or CEOs in trying to determine how much people need to survive is good idea or will result in anything but partisan results. I mean surely having economists who are independent and know what they are doing will result in more accurate result?
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11859
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Capitalizt

Postby The Liberated Territories » Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:14 pm

Umm :unsure:
Left Wing Market Anarchism

Yes, I am back(ish)

User avatar
Kamchastkia
Senator
 
Posts: 3943
Founded: Jan 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kamchastkia » Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:14 pm

Great Nepal wrote:
Kamchastkia wrote:This allows for heavy bias in favor of the owners as the owners have more money and more influence among individuals than unions.

I dont see how that has a issue, I am sure bribing civil servants is criminal offence and frankly we shouldn't have representatives from either stakeholders but people who are experts at what they are doing: ie. economists. I dont see how having union leaders or CEOs in trying to determine how much people need to survive is good idea or will result in anything but partisan results. I mean surely having economists who are independent and know what they are doing will result in more accurate result?

Economists are almost never independent.

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:17 pm

The fairest way is to let the people decide, why they do through voting for their senator and his stated policy on the NMW. We then vote based on our backing. Giving unelected bureaucrats power over such things is not a good idea for the people.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Britcan
Senator
 
Posts: 3961
Founded: Jun 27, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Britcan » Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:17 pm

In regards to section 4aii, the bill should specify the period of time over which the additional £1000 is given.

This nation should not be taken to be representative of my real-life views, nor should any of the nonsense I posted on here as a teenager.

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:20 pm

Britcan wrote:In regards to section 4aii, the bill should specify the period of time over which the additional £1000 is given.

Yes, I forgot to include that. Thanks; its supposed to be pcy fixed.

Kamchastkia wrote:
Great Nepal wrote:I dont see how that has a issue, I am sure bribing civil servants is criminal offence and frankly we shouldn't have representatives from either stakeholders but people who are experts at what they are doing: ie. economists. I dont see how having union leaders or CEOs in trying to determine how much people need to survive is good idea or will result in anything but partisan results. I mean surely having economists who are independent and know what they are doing will result in more accurate result?

Economists are almost never independent.

Well, I am sure civil service can find few who are to appoint to this body. Never the less, it is less partisan than having direct representatives as what we dont want it situation where minimum living wage is being determined not based on actual economics but based on what unions want and what companies want; that discussion can be done between those to parties in some fancy hotel. The membership of the body should be made entirely on merit and nothing else as this ensures we have non partisan, independent calculations.
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
The New World Oceania
Minister
 
Posts: 2525
Founded: May 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The New World Oceania » Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:26 pm

Great Nepal wrote:
Britcan wrote:In regards to section 4aii, the bill should specify the period of time over which the additional £1000 is given.

Yes, I forgot to include that. Thanks; its supposed to be pcy fixed.

Kamchastkia wrote:Economists are almost never independent.

...we dont want it situation where minimum living wage is being determined not based on actual economics but based on what unions want and what companies want…


Define "actual economics."
Woman-made-woman.
Formerly Not a Bang but a Whimper.
Mario Cerce, Member of the Red - Green Alliance, Fighting for your Fernão!
Elizia
Joyce Wu, Eternal President of Elizia
Wen Lin, Governor of Jinyu
Ahmed Alef, Member for South Hutnegeri
Dagmar
Elise Marlowe, Member for Varland
Calaverde
Alsafyr Njil, Minister of Justice
Vienna Eliot et. al, Poets
Dick Njil, Journalist
Assad Hazouri, Mayor of Masalbhumi
Baltonia
Clint Webb, Member of the Seima
Ment-Al Li, United Nations Agent
Aurentina
Clint Webb, Senator

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:31 pm

The New World Oceania wrote:
Great Nepal wrote:Yes, I forgot to include that. Thanks; its supposed to be pcy fixed.

...we dont want it situation where minimum living wage is being determined not based on actual economics but based on what unions want and what companies want…

Define "actual economics."

In this context living circumstances of people in the country, the average costs, retail prices etc. Essentially it should be based on how much people can live on rather than based on partisan self interests of unions and CEO's.
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:35 pm

Economics is the study of partisan self interests and how two or more parties with different interests interact in the market place. The phase "Actual Economics" is nothing more that a logical fallacy.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:47 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:Economics is the study of partisan self interests and how two or more parties with different interests interact in the market place. The phase "Actual Economics" is nothing more that a logical fallacy.

So you believe having people who haven't got experience with economics, or representatives with vested interest like CEO's and union leaders will result in more accurate value than employing people who have studied and have experience with economics?
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
The New World Oceania
Minister
 
Posts: 2525
Founded: May 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The New World Oceania » Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:57 pm

Great Nepal wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:Economics is the study of partisan self interests and how two or more parties with different interests interact in the market place. The phase "Actual Economics" is nothing more that a logical fallacy.

So you believe having people who haven't got experience with economics, or representatives with vested interest like CEO's and union leaders will result in more accurate value than employing people who have studied and have experience with economics?


The people who control economics surely don't have experience in it.
Woman-made-woman.
Formerly Not a Bang but a Whimper.
Mario Cerce, Member of the Red - Green Alliance, Fighting for your Fernão!
Elizia
Joyce Wu, Eternal President of Elizia
Wen Lin, Governor of Jinyu
Ahmed Alef, Member for South Hutnegeri
Dagmar
Elise Marlowe, Member for Varland
Calaverde
Alsafyr Njil, Minister of Justice
Vienna Eliot et. al, Poets
Dick Njil, Journalist
Assad Hazouri, Mayor of Masalbhumi
Baltonia
Clint Webb, Member of the Seima
Ment-Al Li, United Nations Agent
Aurentina
Clint Webb, Senator

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Sat Apr 19, 2014 4:01 pm

Great Nepal wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:Economics is the study of partisan self interests and how two or more parties with different interests interact in the market place. The phase "Actual Economics" is nothing more that a logical fallacy.

So you believe having people who haven't got experience with economics, or representatives with vested interest like CEO's and union leaders will result in more accurate value than employing people who have studied and have experience with economics?


Of course, The CEO's and Union leaders would come together and what they agree on would be not just a minimum wage but the market wage for unskilled labour. It would actually be much more accurate than somebody from outside the market place setting the rate as it would represent the equilibrium point between the supply of unskilled labour and the demand of unskilled labour.

Having thought about it I think Kam's idea is a good one.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Sat Apr 19, 2014 4:06 pm

The New World Oceania wrote:
Great Nepal wrote:So you believe having people who haven't got experience with economics, or representatives with vested interest like CEO's and union leaders will result in more accurate value than employing people who have studied and have experience with economics?


The people who control economics surely don't have experience in it.

Of course they do, they also have vested interest. Its the same reason we dont let pharmacology companies set safety requirements before offering their product to general public but use independent body composed of people who know what they are doing and who ideally dont have vested interest.

The Nihilistic view wrote:Of course, The CEO's and Union leaders would come together and what they agree on would be not just a minimum wage but the market wage for unskilled labour. It would actually be much more accurate than somebody from outside the market place setting the rate as it would represent the equilibrium point between the supply of unskilled labour and the demand of unskilled labour.
Having thought about it I think Kam's idea is a good one.

1. And if the market rate is lower than living wage, tax payer would effectively be subsidising businesses by paying its workers money they need to survive. By ensuring its imposed upon by neural party, we ensure that it is fair to all stakeholders.
2. If that worked, surely they could just meet and discuss wage without minimum wage.
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sat Apr 19, 2014 4:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads