they didn't make any of them xd
not one on /pol/ is original
Advertisement
by Great Kauthar » Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:10 pm
by Aelex » Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:15 pm
Great Kauthar wrote:they didn't make any of them xd
not one on /pol/ is original
by The imperial canadian dutchy » Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:20 pm
by Aelex » Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:21 pm
The imperial canadian dutchy wrote:What do people have against /pol/ it's great fun
by Dagashi Shojo » Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:22 pm
by Eisarn-Ara » Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:25 pm
Dagashi Shojo wrote:Following up on my previous HoI3 question, I'm a fan of Hitler parodies and wondered what RWDT's thoughts were on who our HP counterparts would be.
by Conscentia » Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:25 pm
Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
by Eisarn-Ara » Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:27 pm
by Dagashi Shojo » Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:34 pm
by Old Tyrannia » Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:42 pm
Jochizyd Republic wrote:Anyway, a pro ethnic/religious diversity Traditional Conservative who disregards PC and throws crimimals and extremists out regardless of race or religion is what the West needs. And every country probably.
by Jumalariik » Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:47 pm
by The East Marches » Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:50 pm
by Living Stones » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:05 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:United Marxist Nations wrote:I would honestly have to question how seriously he takes Islamic doctrine.
There really is a problem nowadays with people liberalizing faith to get rid of doctrine. The Apostolic faiths have done pretty good in weeding it out, but several protestants I know have said things to the tune of "If Jesus was alive today, he would have been more tolerant", which is pretty nonsensical, given that Christ was God.
Probably about seriously as most American Christians ie not at all.
Teryia wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:Obama is president. He has limited power over the federal government. This is basic civics. Do you really not understand this?
You act like State's rights actually exist.
In more seriousness, illegals don't have the rights that American citizens have, i.e. getting a drivers license and LIVING HERE. Basic civics mate.
Jumalariik wrote:Thoughts on Plato's Republic?
by Jumalariik » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:18 pm
Living Stones wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:Probably about seriously as most American Christians ie not at all.
As someone who attended a high school attended by large amounts of "Christians" & "Muslims", I was surrounded by enough drunkenness, fornication, & debauchery in general to agree w/ this statement 100%. I would imagine only a small fraction of the members of any major religion actually makes a decent attempt to follow their own religion's teachings.Teryia wrote:
You act like State's rights actually exist.
In more seriousness, illegals don't have the rights that American citizens have, i.e. getting a drivers license and LIVING HERE. Basic civics mate.
Minor nitpick; a driver's license is not a right according to the laws or constitution of any country I know of.
Operating heavy machinery on government property is a privilege that needs to be earned by demonstrating competence.Jumalariik wrote:Thoughts on Plato's Republic?
I don't know what to think about overall; I read it over the course of a day or two, so perhaps I should read it again to let it sink in.
I thought all the stuff about music was pretty weird, though the work overall was an interesting read. The governmental ideas are interesting, to say the least.
by Diopolis » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:25 pm
Living Stones wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:Probably about seriously as most American Christians ie not at all.
As someone who attended a high school attended by large amounts of "Christians" & "Muslims", I was surrounded by enough drunkenness, fornication, & debauchery in general to agree w/ this statement 100%. I would imagine only a small fraction of the members of any major religion actually makes a decent attempt to follow their own religion's teachings.
by Minzerland II » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:42 pm
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)
by Soadino » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:49 pm
Minzerland II wrote:I'll repost this question before I sleep, seeing as it was drowned out by our awesome shitposting:
Question RWDT, who is your favourite Right-Wing philosopher? This may be a philosopher whom was considered Left-Wing for their time but are considered Right-Wing today. You may list a single philosopher or a list of philosophers.
Mine is John Locke, although the 'Father of Liberalism' would be considered Left-Wing in his time, he would be considered Right-Wing by today's standards, using this standard; he is my favourite *Right-Wing* philosopher who created Classical Liberalism, my own ideological basis, which is associated with the Right-Wing. This is arguable, btw.
The United Farms wrote:Hispanic girl, 16 yo, living in the southern US. Likes juice and wears black hoodie.
by The East Marches » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:59 pm
Minzerland II wrote:I'll repost this question before I sleep, seeing as it was drowned out by our awesome shitposting:
Question RWDT, who is your favourite Right-Wing philosopher? This may be a philosopher whom was considered Left-Wing for their time but are considered Right-Wing today. You may list a single philosopher or a list of philosophers.
Mine is John Locke, although the 'Father of Liberalism' would be considered Left-Wing in his time, he would be considered Right-Wing by today's standards, using this standard; he is my favourite *Right-Wing* philosopher who created Classical Liberalism, my own ideological basis, which is associated with the Right-Wing. This is arguable, btw.
by Jochizyd Republic » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:06 pm
Old Tyrannia wrote:Jochizyd Republic wrote:Anyway, a pro ethnic/religious diversity Traditional Conservative who disregards PC and throws crimimals and extremists out regardless of race or religion is what the West needs. And every country probably.
I'm not sure such a thing could exist in most Western countries.
by The Kievan People » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:09 pm
by -Fahrong- » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:20 pm
Minzerland II wrote:I'll repost this question before I sleep, seeing as it was drowned out by our awesome shitposting:
Question RWDT, who is your favourite Right-Wing philosopher? This may be a philosopher whom was considered Left-Wing for their time but are considered Right-Wing today. You may list a single philosopher or a list of philosophers.
Mine is John Locke, although the 'Father of Liberalism' would be considered Left-Wing in his time, he would be considered Right-Wing by today's standards, using this standard; he is my favourite *Right-Wing* philosopher who created Classical Liberalism, my own ideological basis, which is associated with the Right-Wing. This is arguable, btw.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Al-Haqiqah, Deblar, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Floofybit, Google [Bot], Gorutimania, Keltionialang, Kostane, La Xinga, Liberal Malaysia, Neanderthaland, New Chappystan, New Ciencia, Nu Elysium, Olmanar, Rosartemis, Sarduri, Shrillland, Statesburg, Stratonesia, The Black Forrest, The Golden Pig, The Snazzylands, The Xenopolis Confederation
Advertisement