Right Wing Discussion Thread the Third

[Conserative Morality]

Fox or Huffington?

Huffpo.

[Aelex]

Which is annoying. A little more annoying than Right Wingers always saying Islam is pure evil I'd say. I'm fime with Right wingers saying all kinds of shit about Islam. I am not okay with being associated with SJWs every time I try to defend my own religion.

Anyway, a pro ethnic/religious diversity Traditional Conservative who disregards PC and throws crimimals and extremists out regardless of race or religion is what the West needs. And every country probably.

Sadly, it's too late for that. Libs got you already and they ain't going to let go of using you for P.R purposes, even if that mean fucking you by antagonizing to you the rest of the population.

Anyway, the best response to this situation wouldn't be so much a pro ethnic diversity Traditional Conservative (if such a politician ever exist given that most Traditionals and or Conservatives are Patriots and usually also nativists) but rather a Patriotic (or Nationalist as you would call) Socialist Conservative who could curb down religious extremism and break the ghettos while encouraging a better assimilation of the muslims communities inside the National one.

[Aelex]

>Hillary's pandering
lol, pokemon go to the POLLS, amirite

Don't let your memes be dreams!

[Soadino]

Still waiting for Huffington post to give their two cents on how bad she is... More then likely they wont.

Huffpo's a rag, but I'd be surprised if they didn't comment on her pandering.

Send me the links, kiddo. I can't seem to find it. And I pay attention to this because it's fun to watch libs cry over the Trumpinator.

Which ones can't you find? I offered several possible sources; which did you want to confirm but could not?

Here it is, you saying the several sources

[Conserative Morality]

Here it is, you saying the several sources

I said I offered several possible sources, and asked "which did you want to confirm but could not?"

A little reading comprehension goes a long way.

[Soadino]

Here it is, you saying the several sources

I said I offered several possible sources, and asked "which did you want to confirm but could not?"

A little reading comprehension goes a long way.

But you offered CNN, Daily Show, BBC, etc. Doesn't change the fact that you had offered sources and said you had offered them. I guess you don't even know what you type.

[Conserative Morality]

But you offered CNN, Daily Show, BBC, etc. Doesn't change the fact that you had offered sources and said you had offered them. I guess you don't even know what you type.

I offered several possible sources and asked which ones you wanted me to back up. I said I never provided several sources, which is completely true. I provided the BBC source when you said you couldn't find it. It's all very simple if you take a moment and read instead of skimming.

[Soadino]

But you offered CNN, Daily Show, BBC, etc. Doesn't change the fact that you had offered sources and said you had offered them. I guess you don't even know what you type.

I offered several possible sources and asked which ones you wanted me to back up. I said I never provided several sources, which is completely true. I provided the BBC source when you said you couldn't find it. It's all very simple if you take a moment and read instead of skimming.

I'm not skimming, you had said that you provided the possible sources. The fact that you still actually said the news outlets means you provided the sources.

[Conserative Morality]

I'm not skimming, you had said that you provided the possible sources. The fact that you still actually said the news outlets means you provided the sources.

I offered several possible sources; which did you want to confirm but could not?

TIL 'offer' = 'provide'.

I'll remember that next time I'm at the car dealership and the salesman 'provides' me a car.

[Soadino]

I'm not skimming, you had said that you provided the possible sources. The fact that you still actually said the news outlets means you provided the sources.

I offered several possible sources; which did you want to confirm but could not?

TIL 'offer' = 'provide'.

I'll remember that next time I'm at the car dealership and the salesman 'provides' me a car.

You provided the sources by providing the news outlets and said they talked about Clinton. It's thay simple, sorry that you don't understand

[Conserative Morality]

You provided the sources by providing the news outlets and said they talked about Clinton. It's thay simple, sorry that you don't understand

I was offered a house the other day, but the realtor acted surprised when I showed up with all my furniture. What do?

[Soadino]

You provided the sources by providing the news outlets and said they talked about Clinton. It's thay simple, sorry that you don't understand

I was offered a house the other day, but the realtor acted surprised when I showed up with all my furniture. What do?

I said that you had provided the sources by listing the outlets and referring to Clinton. Sorry you don't know what you type.

[The East Marches]

You provided the sources by providing the news outlets and said they talked about Clinton. It's thay simple, sorry that you don't understand

I was offered a house the other day, but the realtor acted surprised when I showed up with all my furniture. What do?

Call greed and death, have him sue the realtor for you.

[The Liberated Territories]

>mfw peering into the left-wing discussion thread:

[Eisarn-Ara]

kebab

They do peg me as cannibals.

Considering those videos that got leaked of a Legit Human Slaughterhouse a ways back......................

[Great Kauthar]

>mfw peering into the left-wing discussion thread:

(Image)

>ifunny watermark
ye man these memes are dead now. it was bad enough they made it to /pol/ but now ifunny. At least it isn't... funnyjunk

[The East Marches]

>mfw peering into the left-wing discussion thread:

(Image)

>ifunny watermark
ye man these memes are dead now. it was bad enough they made it to /pol/ but now ifunny. At least it isn't... funnyjunk

Scotland is a fucking joke too but you don't see us ragging on it m8

[Baltican Union]

>mfw peering into the left-wing discussion thread:

(Image)

>ifunny watermark
ye man these memes are dead now. it was bad enough they made it to /pol/ but now ifunny. At least it isn't... funnyjunk

/Pol/ are spammed with these memes and they are gold.

[Germanic Templars]

>mfw peering into the left-wing discussion thread:

(Image)

[Jumalariik]

Thoughts on Plato's Republic?

[The Kievan People]

Anyway, a pro ethnic/religious diversity Traditional Conservative who disregards PC and throws crimimals and extremists out regardless of race or religion is what the West needs. And every country probably.

It's not a viable electoral strategy. It still doesn't get SJW votes. And SJWs can always outshill them by pandering to everyone including extremists, which is all the minority masses need to throw them under a bus. The number of muslims who will vote against pandering to Islamists is trivial. The number of mainland Chinese who will vote against pandering to CCP zealots is trivial. The number of Sikhs who will vote against pandering to Silkh militants is trivial.

And so on.

The ethnic nationalist vote is much more reliable for right wing parties. They pretty much always vote right anyways and it is virtually impossible for left wing parties to peel them off, though they may be too demotivated to vote if they dislike the right wing offerings. As long as they can be mobilized without scaring away everyone else it's basically free votes, often in traditionally left wing working class strongholds. On the other side the left wing anti-extremist vote has basically ceased to exist; SJWs, people who say they aren't SJWs but vote for them anyways no matter what, and ethnic/racial/religious minorities are the bedrock of modern left wing parties.

The only reason most right wing parties still insist they are committed to diversity is because this is the bar you must pass to be "respectable" politician. It is not a real position that you can build an electoral coalition from. When this stigma falls away this sort of rhetoric, and the small number of politicians and activists who are genuinely not rhetorically committed to it, will quickly go extinct.

There was actually a nice book about this in Canada (I forget the name), written by one of our top public opinion researchers, about how Canada was becoming a naturally Conservative country as the Conservatives had successfully built a coalition of right wing white anglo Canadians and conservative minority immigrants. Needless to say he was a bit embarrassed by the the last election and we don't hear much about this theory anymore. And the Conservative politician who built his career around Conservative minority outreach, Jason Kenny (second picture), quit federal politics and went back to Alberta. Which is a really white province.

The CPC is still pursuing this line, but they will probably lose the next Federal election badly too because they can't deliver minority votes. And that will probably be the end of the idea.

[Soadino]

>mfw peering into the left-wing discussion thread:

(Image)

[Grand Britannia]

>mfw peering into the left-wing discussion thread:

(Image)

>ifunny watermark
ye man these memes are dead now. it was bad enough they made it to /pol/ but now ifunny. At least it isn't... funnyjunk

At least BuzzFeed hasn't gotten to them.

[Jumalariik]

>ifunny watermark
ye man these memes are dead now. it was bad enough they made it to /pol/ but now ifunny. At least it isn't... funnyjunk

At least BuzzFeed hasn't gotten to them.

Never. We will fight on the beaches.

[Jumalariik]

I found a youtube channel with a big diversity of fascist music if anybody likes that kind of thing. I don't like the message, but a lot is well done music.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0pMaT ... LGqfXgospA