NATION

PASSWORD

White Pride: A good thing?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

White Pride: Good or Bad

Good
279
46%
Bad
332
54%
 
Total votes : 611

User avatar
Fanosolia
Senator
 
Posts: 3796
Founded: Apr 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fanosolia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:36 am

Neither. I just don't see why white pride needs to be a thing. Mind you I don't think there's anything prideful or shameful about being in a certain you had no choice in the matter, but the difference is you can at least say that historically the one's that have these pride parades faced, and in some cases still face, discrimination and hate for the smallest of reasons.
Last edited by Fanosolia on Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
This user is a Canadian who identifies as Social Market Liberal with shades of Civil Libertarianism.


User avatar
Liberty and Linguistics
Senator
 
Posts: 4565
Founded: Jan 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberty and Linguistics » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:36 am

Ifreann wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Indeed.

Well, sort of. Institutionalized, as opposed to societal, discrimination ended after the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s. Granted, blacks still do face discrimination today, but if a black man is called a "nigger" by a random KKK asshole, the natural reaction shouldn't be "BLACK POWER."

Why not?


Let's reverse the tables, then.

If you, an Irishman, were called a "dirty cracker" by some random black man, would your natural reaction be "WHITE POWER?"
I am: Cynic, Depressive, Junior in HS, Arizonan, Sarcastic, Wannabe Psychologist, Lover of Cinema and Rum.


Ziggy played guitar....
For ISIS | On Israel and its settlements | Flat Taxes are beneficial for all | OOC, Baby | Probably Accurate.

User avatar
Aidannadia
Senator
 
Posts: 4928
Founded: Nov 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Aidannadia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:38 am

This is something that sounds great on the surface but doesn't upon actually looking at definitions and word usage:

pride
prīd/Submit
noun
1.
a feeling or deep pleasure or satisfaction derived from one's own achievements, the achievements of those with whom one is closely associated, or from qualities or possessions that are widely admired.

Innate traits are not something to be proud of. They are not achievements or traits/possessions that should be widely admired. They're just... innate traits. That's it.

You can be proud that you are COMFORTABLE with your race I suppose or that you somehow overcame some obstacle that was caused by your race but just being proud because you ARE a race is... wrong by definition.
Last edited by Aidannadia on Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Hey, my name is Aidan and I am still figuring out who I really am. Most of my views are some form of leftism someone could probably tell me is not leftism. I'm a guy.

User avatar
Blakk Metal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6738
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Blakk Metal » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:41 am

Race is too broad and large a category to identify with. If you're proud of your race, you're pathetic.

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:41 am

Aidannadia wrote:This is something that sounds great on the surface but doesn't upon actually looking at definitions and word usage:

pride
prīd/Submit
noun
1.
a feeling or deep pleasure or satisfaction derived from one's own achievements, the achievements of those with whom one is closely associated, or from qualities or possessions that are widely admired.

Innate traits are not something to be proud of. They are not achievements or traits/possessions that should be widely admired. They're just... innate traits. That's it.

You can be proud that you are COMFORTABLE with your race I suppose or that you somehow overcame some obstacle that was caused by your race but just being proud because you ARE a race is... wrong by definition.

While I agree, I should point out a lot of people are proud of attributes they have.

User avatar
Aidannadia
Senator
 
Posts: 4928
Founded: Nov 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Aidannadia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:44 am

Kelinfort wrote:
Aidannadia wrote:This is something that sounds great on the surface but doesn't upon actually looking at definitions and word usage:

pride
prīd/Submit
noun
1.
a feeling or deep pleasure or satisfaction derived from one's own achievements, the achievements of those with whom one is closely associated, or from qualities or possessions that are widely admired.

Innate traits are not something to be proud of. They are not achievements or traits/possessions that should be widely admired. They're just... innate traits. That's it.

You can be proud that you are COMFORTABLE with your race I suppose or that you somehow overcame some obstacle that was caused by your race but just being proud because you ARE a race is... wrong by definition.

While I agree, I should point out a lot of people are proud of attributes they have.

Attributes=/=Innate traits essentially. Such as someone may be proud that they are... considered intelligent or widely accepted as attractive. Those are traits that someone is really born with but rather achievements or widely admired traits.
Hey, my name is Aidan and I am still figuring out who I really am. Most of my views are some form of leftism someone could probably tell me is not leftism. I'm a guy.

User avatar
Fanosolia
Senator
 
Posts: 3796
Founded: Apr 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fanosolia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:44 am

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Kelinfort wrote:White pride makes as little sense as black pride.

But at least black pride can root itself in systemic discrimination.


Indeed.

Well, sort of. Institutionalized, as opposed to societal, discrimination ended after the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s. Granted, blacks still do face discrimination today, but if a black man is called a "nigger" by a random KKK asshole, the natural reaction shouldn't be "BLACK POWER."


When you say that do you mean discrimination rules and laws that say a store or a governmental service must a bid by, as opposed to say the biases of an individual person?
Last edited by Fanosolia on Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:45 am, edited 2 times in total.
This user is a Canadian who identifies as Social Market Liberal with shades of Civil Libertarianism.


User avatar
Liberty and Linguistics
Senator
 
Posts: 4565
Founded: Jan 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberty and Linguistics » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:46 am

Fanosolia wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Indeed.

Well, sort of. Institutionalized, as opposed to societal, discrimination ended after the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s. Granted, blacks still do face discrimination today, but if a black man is called a "nigger" by a random KKK asshole, the natural reaction shouldn't be "BLACK POWER."


When you say that do you mean discrimination rules and laws that say a store or a governmental service must a bid by, as opposed say the biases of a person?


Sort of. Institutionalized racism refers to government sanctioned racism, such as segregation, or not allowing blacks to vote, etc. Societal discrimination refers to some inbred man from West Virginia putting a sign on his truck that says "fuck dem negroes."
I am: Cynic, Depressive, Junior in HS, Arizonan, Sarcastic, Wannabe Psychologist, Lover of Cinema and Rum.


Ziggy played guitar....
For ISIS | On Israel and its settlements | Flat Taxes are beneficial for all | OOC, Baby | Probably Accurate.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164100
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:47 am

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Why not?


Let's reverse the tables, then.

No, let's not, because what I would do in the reverse situation you went on to describe does not answer my question to you.
Last edited by Ifreann on Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Bari
Diplomat
 
Posts: 896
Founded: Jun 27, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Bari » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:50 am

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Fanosolia wrote:
When you say that do you mean discrimination rules and laws that say a store or a governmental service must a bid by, as opposed say the biases of a person?


Sort of. Institutionalized racism refers to government sanctioned racism, such as segregation, or not allowing blacks to vote, etc. Societal discrimination refers to some inbred man from West Virginia putting a sign on his truck that says "fuck dem negroes."

Have you ever encountered an inbred man from West Virginia with such a sign on his truck?
Que Dieu bénisse la Bari
Pour la plus grande gloire de Dieu

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:51 am

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Fanosolia wrote:
When you say that do you mean discrimination rules and laws that say a store or a governmental service must a bid by, as opposed say the biases of a person?


Sort of. Institutionalized racism refers to government sanctioned racism, such as segregation, or not allowing blacks to vote, etc. Societal discrimination refers to some inbred man from West Virginia putting a sign on his truck that says "fuck dem negroes."

No. Institutionalized racism does not require explicit legislation. Racial profiling, unequal opportunity, and unequal drug laws all contribute to the current system of institutionalized racism.

User avatar
Liberty and Linguistics
Senator
 
Posts: 4565
Founded: Jan 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberty and Linguistics » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:53 am

Ifreann wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Let's reverse the tables, then.

No, let's not, because what I would do in the reverse situation you went on to describe does not answer my question to you.


You're joking. You have to be joking. Let's address this beautiful double standard of yours, shall we, because you basically just condoned black power.

When I say "if a man calls a black man something insulting, then the natural reaction shouldn't be black power" you responded with "why not?"

When I said "if a black man calls a white man something insulting, then the natural reaction shouldn't be white power" you responded with a cop out response.

What the hell? Be honest, do you condone black pride/black power? With that logic, do you condone white pride/white power?
I am: Cynic, Depressive, Junior in HS, Arizonan, Sarcastic, Wannabe Psychologist, Lover of Cinema and Rum.


Ziggy played guitar....
For ISIS | On Israel and its settlements | Flat Taxes are beneficial for all | OOC, Baby | Probably Accurate.

User avatar
New Skaaneland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 749
Founded: Dec 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Skaaneland » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:53 am

I wouldn't have picked one of those two options.
Undo the Taylor report!
Club over group. Club over country. Club over race. Club over sex. Club over God.

OOOOO HELSINGBORGS IF OOOOO

User avatar
Liberty and Linguistics
Senator
 
Posts: 4565
Founded: Jan 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberty and Linguistics » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:54 am

Bari wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Sort of. Institutionalized racism refers to government sanctioned racism, such as segregation, or not allowing blacks to vote, etc. Societal discrimination refers to some inbred man from West Virginia putting a sign on his truck that says "fuck dem negroes."

Have you ever encountered an inbred man from West Virginia with such a sign on his truck?


I saw a sign in Missouri that read "fuck niggers." It's the same thing I suppose, I was providing a hypothetical.
I am: Cynic, Depressive, Junior in HS, Arizonan, Sarcastic, Wannabe Psychologist, Lover of Cinema and Rum.


Ziggy played guitar....
For ISIS | On Israel and its settlements | Flat Taxes are beneficial for all | OOC, Baby | Probably Accurate.

User avatar
New Waterford
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1393
Founded: Apr 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby New Waterford » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:54 am

I don't think pride in anything is a good thing, especially if it's for something you have no control over such as your skin colour.
Economic Left/Right: -8.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.49
Now known IC'ly as An Déise.

User avatar
Liberty and Linguistics
Senator
 
Posts: 4565
Founded: Jan 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberty and Linguistics » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:55 am

Merizoc wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Sort of. Institutionalized racism refers to government sanctioned racism, such as segregation, or not allowing blacks to vote, etc. Societal discrimination refers to some inbred man from West Virginia putting a sign on his truck that says "fuck dem negroes."

No. Institutionalized racism does not require explicit legislation. Racial profiling, unequal opportunity, and unequal drug laws all contribute to the current system of institutionalized racism.


Unequal opportunity? Blacks are given affirmative action and equal economic rights. They have the opportunity, and they're moving up.
I am: Cynic, Depressive, Junior in HS, Arizonan, Sarcastic, Wannabe Psychologist, Lover of Cinema and Rum.


Ziggy played guitar....
For ISIS | On Israel and its settlements | Flat Taxes are beneficial for all | OOC, Baby | Probably Accurate.

User avatar
Fanosolia
Senator
 
Posts: 3796
Founded: Apr 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fanosolia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:55 am

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Fanosolia wrote:
When you say that do you mean discrimination rules and laws that say a store or a governmental service must a bid by, as opposed say the biases of a person?


Sort of. Institutionalized racism refers to government sanctioned racism, such as segregation, or not allowing blacks to vote, etc. Societal discrimination refers to some inbred man from West Virginia putting a sign on his truck that says "fuck dem negroes."


I don't know if institutional racism (or other types discrimination) is necessarily ended though. Don't get me wrong governments have made progress in what you said. Though I do sometimes wonder if the biases of societal racism influence the decisions of say a police officer or a judge.
Last edited by Fanosolia on Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
This user is a Canadian who identifies as Social Market Liberal with shades of Civil Libertarianism.


User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164100
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:55 am

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Ifreann wrote:No, let's not, because what I would do in the reverse situation you went on to describe does not answer my question to you.


You're joking. You have to be joking.

Not right now, but did you ever hear the one about the man who walked into a bar with a giraffe?
Let's address this beautiful double standard of yours, shall we, because you basically just condoned black power.

I would need to have a double standard for us to address any such thing. How about instead you answer my question instead of asking what I'd do in different situations than the one you describe.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Aidannadia
Senator
 
Posts: 4928
Founded: Nov 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Aidannadia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:55 am

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Bari wrote:Have you ever encountered an inbred man from West Virginia with such a sign on his truck?


I saw a sign in Missouri that read "fuck niggers." It's the same thing I suppose, I was providing a hypothetical.

I can confirm that this sign exists. I've seen some as well actually. I go to Missouri a lot to visit family.
Hey, my name is Aidan and I am still figuring out who I really am. Most of my views are some form of leftism someone could probably tell me is not leftism. I'm a guy.

User avatar
Bezombia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29250
Founded: Apr 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Bezombia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:57 am

Ifreann wrote:Not right now, but did you ever hear the one about the man who walked into a bar with a giraffe?


Ooh ooh, I know this one!
He goes up to the bar and says, "Ain't this a quack!"


Wait shit that was a different joke.
Our weary eyes still stray to the horizon...but down this road we've been so many times...
Please, call me Benomia. Post count +14623, founded Oct. 23, 2012.
Sauritican wrote:We've all been spending too much time with Ben
Verdum wrote:Hey girl, is your name Karl Marx? Because your starting an uprising in my lower classes.
Black Hand wrote:New plan is to just make thousands of disposable firearms and dump them out of cargo planes with tiny drag chutes attached.
Spreewerke wrote:The metric system is the only measurement system that truly meters.
Spreewerke wrote:Salt the women, rape the earth.
Equestican wrote:Ben is love, Ben is life.
Sediczja wrote:real eyes realize real lies
I'm a poet. Come read my poems!

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:57 am

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Ifreann wrote:No, let's not, because what I would do in the reverse situation you went on to describe does not answer my question to you.


You're joking. You have to be joking. Let's address this beautiful double standard of yours, shall we, because you basically just condoned black power.

When I say "if a man calls a black man something insulting, then the natural reaction shouldn't be black power" you responded with "why not?"

When I said "if a black man calls a white man something insulting, then the natural reaction shouldn't be white power" you responded with a cop out response.

What the hell? Be honest, do you condone black pride/black power? With that logic, do you condone white pride/white power?

One has roots in the backlash against widespread abuse and discrimination. The other has roots in the facilitation of widespread abuse and discrimination. Reflect on that for a second.

Black pride isn't about being proud of having dark skin. It's about being proud to identify with those who face(d) that aforementioned abuse. It's about taking pride in standing up to protect a cultural heritage under attack. White pride is about how all the darkies should be picking our cotton.

User avatar
Bari
Diplomat
 
Posts: 896
Founded: Jun 27, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Bari » Wed Jul 08, 2015 10:00 am

Ifreann wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
You're joking. You have to be joking.

Not right now, but did you ever hear the one about the man who walked into a bar with a giraffe?
Let's address this beautiful double standard of yours, shall we, because you basically just condoned black power.

I would need to have a double standard for us to address any such thing. How about instead you answer my question instead of asking what I'd do in different situations than the one you describe.

He's saying the reason a black man shouldn't respond with "Black power!" after being insulted racially is the same reasons a white man shouldn't respond with "White power!" after being insulted racially. So, if you think it is inappropriate for a white man to yell "White power!" after being insulted racially by a minority, then apply that reasoning to the example of a black man yelling "Black power!" after being insulted racially by a white man. This really is not that hard to understand.

If you think it is appropriate in both cases or in neither cases, then you don't have a double standard.
If you think it is appropriate in one case but not the other, you likely have a double standard.
Que Dieu bénisse la Bari
Pour la plus grande gloire de Dieu

User avatar
Aidannadia
Senator
 
Posts: 4928
Founded: Nov 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Aidannadia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 10:00 am

Merizoc wrote:Black pride isn't about being proud of having dark skin. It's about being proud to identify with those who face(d) that aforementioned abuse. It's about taking pride in standing up to protect a cultural heritage under attack.

I agree however I can't condone the linguistics involved with the term. It's too simple and misleading from simply saying the words Black pride. I suppose that's hardly relevant though.
Hey, my name is Aidan and I am still figuring out who I really am. Most of my views are some form of leftism someone could probably tell me is not leftism. I'm a guy.

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Wed Jul 08, 2015 10:01 am

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Merizoc wrote:No. Institutionalized racism does not require explicit legislation. Racial profiling, unequal opportunity, and unequal drug laws all contribute to the current system of institutionalized racism.


Unequal opportunity? Blacks are given affirmative action and equal economic rights. They have the opportunity, and they're moving up.

Ah yes. The Fox News approach. I should have expected this.

Well Bill, for starters, people in poverty find it very hard to move out of it, in part because of the nature of capitalism, in part because of the specific system we have today. Now, many black people are in poverty right now because of the system that we had a few decades back, called Jim Crow. That enforced discriminatory economic policies against black people, and since then, they've never been able to recover.

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54805
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Wed Jul 08, 2015 10:01 am

Merizoc wrote:One has roots in the backlash against widespread abuse and discrimination. The other has roots in the facilitation of widespread abuse and discrimination. Reflect on that for a second.

Black pride isn't about being proud of having dark skin. It's about being proud to identify with those who face(d) that aforementioned abuse. It's about taking pride in standing up to protect a cultural heritage under attack. White pride is about how all the darkies should be picking our cotton.


You act as if there are only one group of people in each category. Plenty of people who believe in black pride are proud to have black skin and plenty of people who believe in white pride are proud to have white skin.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Emotional Support Crocodile, Google [Bot], Port Carverton, Simonia

Advertisement

Remove ads