Advertisement
by The Steel Magnolia » Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:05 am
by Divair » Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:14 am
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Isn't, uh, democratic socialism, uh, socialist? I was under the impression that social democracy, while evolving out of many of the same sentiments, still fundamentally espouses a mixed economy.
Oh, and yes, I'm a Social Democrat.
by Trotskylvania » Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:30 am
Gideus wrote:Trotskylvania wrote:Social democracy is in retreat across the world. And it's been so-called social democratic parties that have been leading the charge.
It cannot survive the increasingly atomized, faux-individualist ideology of late capitalism. And since the events that led to the birth of social democracy are essentially no longer in the living memory, and the ruling classes have no experience of their own privation or dealing with radicalism, neo-liberal capitalism has been the order of the day. And your social democrats have been the ones selling you out, one battle at a time.
And the reason is simple: as Marx noted in the Grundrisse, capital cannot abide a limit. Market relations have to penetrate every sphere of existence, and all aspects of life must be comodified. Welfare states are anathema to the interests of capital. Hence, the inexorable retreat since the 70s.
I'd like to direct you to the democratic revolution of Iceland recently.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga
by Jafas United » Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:43 am
Divair wrote:Jafas United wrote:Well I shouldn't ignore the good features of a social democracy i.e. national healthcare, a mixed economy, decent levels of education etc.
But social democracy isn't perfect. Far from it. What regulations are you referring to?
By the way, the country is New Zealand.
There are ways to ensure a government is earning enough to prevent a bubble (ensuring state companies are successful, closing tax loopholes, etc), there are ways to prevent welfare abuse (inspections, background checks, etc), and there are ways to ensure stability between unions and employers.
by Divair » Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:44 am
Jafas United wrote:Divair wrote:There are ways to ensure a government is earning enough to prevent a bubble (ensuring state companies are successful, closing tax loopholes, etc), there are ways to prevent welfare abuse (inspections, background checks, etc), and there are ways to ensure stability between unions and employers.
Of course there are. But by doing things such as welfare checks and controlling the power of unions, it would be going further away from what social democracy really is, would it not?
by Jafas United » Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:48 am
by Audacious Huxley » Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:14 am
Trotskylvania wrote:Social democracy is in retreat across the world. And it's been so-called social democratic parties that have been leading the charge.
It cannot survive the increasingly atomized, faux-individualist ideology of late capitalism. And since the events that led to the birth of social democracy are essentially no longer in the living memory, and the ruling classes have no experience of their own privation or dealing with radicalism, neo-liberal capitalism has been the order of the day. And your social democrats have been the ones selling you out, one battle at a time.
And the reason is simple: as Marx noted in the Grundrisse, capital cannot abide a limit. Market relations have to penetrate every sphere of existence, and all aspects of life must be comodified. Welfare states are anathema to the interests of capital. Hence, the inexorable retreat since the 70s.
by Socialist EU » Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:24 am
Divair wrote:Ever since I discovered social democracy many years ago, I've been a staunch supporter of social democrat ideals being implemented wherever possible. It's a great system that allows individuals to have maximum freedom while ensuring that society as a whole continues to progress forwards.
by Socialist EU » Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:28 am
Trotskylvania wrote:Social democracy is in retreat across the world. And it's been so-called social democratic parties that have been leading the charge.
It cannot survive the increasingly atomized, faux-individualist ideology of late capitalism. And since the events that led to the birth of social democracy are essentially no longer in the living memory, and the ruling classes have no experience of their own privation or dealing with radicalism, neo-liberal capitalism has been the order of the day. And your social democrats have been the ones selling you out, one battle at a time.
And the reason is simple: as Marx noted in the Grundrisse, capital cannot abide a limit. Market relations have to penetrate every sphere of existence, and all aspects of life must be comodified. Welfare states are anathema to the interests of capital. Hence, the inexorable retreat since the 70s.
by Keronians » Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:32 am
by Chestaan » Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:58 am
by Konzekwenzia » Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:05 am
Audacious Huxley wrote:Are you putting forth the proposal that once the pacifying aspects of social democracy are torn away, the masses will turn to radical leftist thought with great alacrity?
by Audacious Huxley » Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:07 am
Konzekwenzia wrote:Audacious Huxley wrote:Are you putting forth the proposal that once the pacifying aspects of social democracy are torn away, the masses will turn to radical leftist thought with great alacrity?
Well seeing as social democracy was a way for the ruling classes to placate the masses in the first place...
by Konzekwenzia » Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:12 am
by Socialist EU » Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:12 am
Chestaan wrote:It seems to me that most of the social democratic parties are abandoning or have abandoned their ideals. Look at the British Labour party, they're essentially just another centrerightparty now.
by The Finnish Republic (Ancient) » Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:14 am
by Vecherd » Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:17 am
by The Finnish Republic (Ancient) » Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:19 am
by New Freedomstan » Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:22 am
by Divair » Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:58 pm
Socialist EU wrote:Divair wrote:Ever since I discovered social democracy many years ago, I've been a staunch supporter of social democrat ideals being implemented wherever possible. It's a great system that allows individuals to have maximum freedom while ensuring that society as a whole continues to progress forwards.
Er, according to Moshé Machover, the welfare state in Israel is effectively non-existent now. The Israeli Labor party has gone down with it!
by Mavorpen » Wed Jul 11, 2012 3:00 pm
Jafas United wrote:Both of you have the same means of achieving your goals, actually. Through democratic processes.
Social Democracy is closer to capitalism, except it's against unrestricted capitalism and is for placing restrictions on it. Which is why some place it in the "socialist" category, when it really isn't.
Democratic Socialism refers to a society where the means of production and distribution are ordered democratically and by society as a whole.
I know I'm oversimplifying it, but yeah.
by Veladio » Wed Jul 11, 2012 3:02 pm
by Mavorpen » Wed Jul 11, 2012 3:03 pm
Veladio wrote:I guess i would agree with social democracy as far as civil liberties go...but what is your economic stance?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Carameon, Haganham, Ineva, Infected Mushroom, Paappapapa, Tillania, Tremereika
Advertisement