NATION

PASSWORD

Social Democracy

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:05 am

Isn't, uh, democratic socialism, uh, socialist? I was under the impression that social democracy, while evolving out of many of the same sentiments, still fundamentally espouses a mixed economy.

Oh, and yes, I'm a Social Democrat.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:14 am

The Steel Magnolia wrote:Isn't, uh, democratic socialism, uh, socialist? I was under the impression that social democracy, while evolving out of many of the same sentiments, still fundamentally espouses a mixed economy.

Oh, and yes, I'm a Social Democrat.

Welcome to the club.

User avatar
Trotskylvania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17217
Founded: Jul 07, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Trotskylvania » Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:30 am

Gideus wrote:
Trotskylvania wrote:Social democracy is in retreat across the world. And it's been so-called social democratic parties that have been leading the charge.

It cannot survive the increasingly atomized, faux-individualist ideology of late capitalism. And since the events that led to the birth of social democracy are essentially no longer in the living memory, and the ruling classes have no experience of their own privation or dealing with radicalism, neo-liberal capitalism has been the order of the day. And your social democrats have been the ones selling you out, one battle at a time.

And the reason is simple: as Marx noted in the Grundrisse, capital cannot abide a limit. Market relations have to penetrate every sphere of existence, and all aspects of life must be comodified. Welfare states are anathema to the interests of capital. Hence, the inexorable retreat since the 70s.


I'd like to direct you to the democratic revolution of Iceland recently.

Yes, a small rebellion against international capital that results in the maintenance of the status quo. Hardly a rebirth of classic social democracy. It's a holding action and nothing more.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in Posadism


"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

User avatar
Jafas United
Minister
 
Posts: 3396
Founded: Jul 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Jafas United » Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:43 am

Divair wrote:
Jafas United wrote:Well I shouldn't ignore the good features of a social democracy i.e. national healthcare, a mixed economy, decent levels of education etc.

But social democracy isn't perfect. Far from it. What regulations are you referring to?

By the way, the country is New Zealand.

There are ways to ensure a government is earning enough to prevent a bubble (ensuring state companies are successful, closing tax loopholes, etc), there are ways to prevent welfare abuse (inspections, background checks, etc), and there are ways to ensure stability between unions and employers.

Of course there are. But by doing things such as welfare checks and controlling the power of unions, it would be going further away from what social democracy really is, would it not?

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:44 am

Jafas United wrote:
Divair wrote:There are ways to ensure a government is earning enough to prevent a bubble (ensuring state companies are successful, closing tax loopholes, etc), there are ways to prevent welfare abuse (inspections, background checks, etc), and there are ways to ensure stability between unions and employers.

Of course there are. But by doing things such as welfare checks and controlling the power of unions, it would be going further away from what social democracy really is, would it not?

Nope. At least not in my book.

User avatar
Jafas United
Minister
 
Posts: 3396
Founded: Jul 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Jafas United » Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:48 am

Divair wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
How dare you be peaceful with me. This is NSG. :lol:

Democratic socialism and social democracy have fairly similar goals. We just have different means of achieving those goals.

Both of you have the same means of achieving your goals, actually. Through democratic processes.

Social Democracy is closer to capitalism, except it's against unrestricted capitalism and is for placing restrictions on it. Which is why some place it in the "socialist" category, when it really isn't.

Democratic Socialism refers to a society where the means of production and distribution are ordered democratically and by society as a whole.

I know I'm oversimplifying it, but yeah.

User avatar
Audacious Huxley
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 497
Founded: Apr 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Audacious Huxley » Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:14 am

Trotskylvania wrote:Social democracy is in retreat across the world. And it's been so-called social democratic parties that have been leading the charge.

It cannot survive the increasingly atomized, faux-individualist ideology of late capitalism. And since the events that led to the birth of social democracy are essentially no longer in the living memory, and the ruling classes have no experience of their own privation or dealing with radicalism, neo-liberal capitalism has been the order of the day. And your social democrats have been the ones selling you out, one battle at a time.

And the reason is simple: as Marx noted in the Grundrisse, capital cannot abide a limit. Market relations have to penetrate every sphere of existence, and all aspects of life must be comodified. Welfare states are anathema to the interests of capital. Hence, the inexorable retreat since the 70s.


Are you putting forth the proposal that once the pacifying aspects of social democracy are torn away, the masses will turn to radical leftist thought with great alacrity?
Yours Truly and Unequivocally, Audacious Barrington Huxley Rightful Heir to the County of Tyrone and Duchy of Nassau, Muse of the Lumpenproletariat and General Rapscallion, Ankh Mautan Superintendent of Tweed, Chairman of the Figtree Club, a Gentleman and a Radical, Loyal Subject of the Lizard King and Interim Scarlett Pimpernel of the Internet.

And Here: My Official Website.

User avatar
Socialist EU
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1825
Founded: Aug 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist EU » Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:24 am

Divair wrote:Ever since I discovered social democracy many years ago, I've been a staunch supporter of social democrat ideals being implemented wherever possible. It's a great system that allows individuals to have maximum freedom while ensuring that society as a whole continues to progress forwards.


Er, according to Moshé Machover, the welfare state in Israel is effectively non-existent now. The Israeli Labor party has gone down with it!
Last edited by Socialist EU on Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
Egypt:
Spontaneous protests will not produce organisation, it is more likely to lead to an oppressive clampdown! There needs to be a long-term strategy to build the left towards..
-mass parties of the left
-mass trade unions
-mass left-wing publications

Europe
For a United socialist Europe under democratic working class rule.
For the unity of the working class across Europe and eventually* take power.
*'Towards a communist party of the EU'

Britain
For a voluntary federated democratic republic.

Scotland
Abstain on independence referendum, Salmond wants to keep within the union!

User avatar
Socialist EU
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1825
Founded: Aug 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist EU » Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:28 am

Trotskylvania wrote:Social democracy is in retreat across the world. And it's been so-called social democratic parties that have been leading the charge.

It cannot survive the increasingly atomized, faux-individualist ideology of late capitalism. And since the events that led to the birth of social democracy are essentially no longer in the living memory, and the ruling classes have no experience of their own privation or dealing with radicalism, neo-liberal capitalism has been the order of the day. And your social democrats have been the ones selling you out, one battle at a time.

And the reason is simple: as Marx noted in the Grundrisse, capital cannot abide a limit. Market relations have to penetrate every sphere of existence, and all aspects of life must be comodified. Welfare states are anathema to the interests of capital. Hence, the inexorable retreat since the 70s.


^This^
Egypt:
Spontaneous protests will not produce organisation, it is more likely to lead to an oppressive clampdown! There needs to be a long-term strategy to build the left towards..
-mass parties of the left
-mass trade unions
-mass left-wing publications

Europe
For a United socialist Europe under democratic working class rule.
For the unity of the working class across Europe and eventually* take power.
*'Towards a communist party of the EU'

Britain
For a voluntary federated democratic republic.

Scotland
Abstain on independence referendum, Salmond wants to keep within the union!

User avatar
Keronians
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18231
Founded: Oct 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Keronians » Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:32 am

Its mostly free market principles, emphasis on human rights and social justice, its recognition of the need for the State for setting up important institutions necessary for a functioning economy, as well as the provision of safety nets for the poor, sick, disabled, and old.
Proud Indian. Spanish citizen. European federalist.
Political compass
Awarded the Bronze Medal for General Debating at the 11th Annual Posters' Awards. Awarded Best New Poster at the 11th Annual Posters' Awards.
It is almost universally felt that when we call a country democratic we are praising it; consequently, the defenders of every kind of regime claim that it is a democracy, and fear that they might have to stop using the word if it were tied down to any one meaning.
George Orwell
· Private property
· Free foreign trade
· Exchange of goods and services
· Free formation of prices

· Market regulation
· Social security
· Universal healthcare
· Unemployment insurance

This is a capitalist model.

User avatar
Chestaan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6977
Founded: Sep 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chestaan » Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:58 am

It seems to me that most of the social democratic parties are abandoning or have abandoned their ideals. Look at the British Labour party, they're essentially just another centre right party now.
Council Communist
TG me if you want to chat, especially about economics, you can never have enough discussions on economics.Especially game theory :)
Economic Left/Right: -9.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.62

Getting the Guillotine

User avatar
Konzekwenzia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 126
Founded: Jul 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Konzekwenzia » Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:05 am

Audacious Huxley wrote:Are you putting forth the proposal that once the pacifying aspects of social democracy are torn away, the masses will turn to radical leftist thought with great alacrity?

Well seeing as social democracy was a way for the ruling classes to placate the masses in the first place...
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////\

User avatar
Audacious Huxley
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 497
Founded: Apr 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Audacious Huxley » Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:07 am

Konzekwenzia wrote:
Audacious Huxley wrote:Are you putting forth the proposal that once the pacifying aspects of social democracy are torn away, the masses will turn to radical leftist thought with great alacrity?

Well seeing as social democracy was a way for the ruling classes to placate the masses in the first place...


I've always thought so. But I like hearing bold visions of the future.
Yours Truly and Unequivocally, Audacious Barrington Huxley Rightful Heir to the County of Tyrone and Duchy of Nassau, Muse of the Lumpenproletariat and General Rapscallion, Ankh Mautan Superintendent of Tweed, Chairman of the Figtree Club, a Gentleman and a Radical, Loyal Subject of the Lizard King and Interim Scarlett Pimpernel of the Internet.

And Here: My Official Website.

User avatar
Konzekwenzia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 126
Founded: Jul 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Konzekwenzia » Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:12 am

Audacious Huxley wrote:
Konzekwenzia wrote:Well seeing as social democracy was a way for the ruling classes to placate the masses in the first place...


I've always thought so. But I like hearing bold visions of the future.

Death. Death everywhere.
Last edited by Konzekwenzia on Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////\

User avatar
Socialist EU
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1825
Founded: Aug 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist EU » Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:12 am

Chestaan wrote:It seems to me that most of the social democratic parties are abandoning or have abandoned their ideals. Look at the British Labour party, they're essentially just another centre rightparty now.


It's not quite as bad as that, but I know what you mean.
Egypt:
Spontaneous protests will not produce organisation, it is more likely to lead to an oppressive clampdown! There needs to be a long-term strategy to build the left towards..
-mass parties of the left
-mass trade unions
-mass left-wing publications

Europe
For a United socialist Europe under democratic working class rule.
For the unity of the working class across Europe and eventually* take power.
*'Towards a communist party of the EU'

Britain
For a voluntary federated democratic republic.

Scotland
Abstain on independence referendum, Salmond wants to keep within the union!

User avatar
The Finnish Republic (Ancient)
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 42
Founded: Jul 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Finnish Republic (Ancient) » Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:14 am

I'm a Democratic Socialist and Left-wing nationalist, but I was a social democrat until about August last year. I'm sympathetic to quite a few social democratic ideas, I just think it's not left-wing enough for me. But, Social democracy is better than 3rd way :lol:

User avatar
Vecherd
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6161
Founded: Jun 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Vecherd » Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:17 am

I might be in a special position, living in Norway, where Social Democracy includes Traditionalism, Conservatism, Nationalism and Authoritarianism. So I might be a bit Nordic-centric when I say it is an extremely unfair and authoritarian way to rule a country.
[align=center]Frie markeder Frie folk
[spoiler=Political Stuff]Left/Right: 8.12
Authoritarian/Libertarian: -10.00

User avatar
The Finnish Republic (Ancient)
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 42
Founded: Jul 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Finnish Republic (Ancient) » Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:19 am

Socialist EU wrote:
Chestaan wrote:It seems to me that most of the social democratic parties are abandoning or have abandoned their ideals. Look at the British Labour party, they're essentially just another centre rightparty now.


It's not quite as bad as that, but I know what you mean.


That's why I left Social democracy; the rightward drift :(

User avatar
New Freedomstan
Minister
 
Posts: 2822
Founded: Dec 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby New Freedomstan » Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:22 am

I dislike it, but it certainly beats raw capitalism. The socialdemocrats here in Norway have been responsible for betrayal after betrayal of the socialist cause, the unions and the rural communities. Then again, I'm a patriotic agrarian communist/revolutionary socialist, so I don't have much options outside of Leninism.

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:25 am

If people want to swap shit then let them swap shit, jaysus.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:58 pm

Socialist EU wrote:
Divair wrote:Ever since I discovered social democracy many years ago, I've been a staunch supporter of social democrat ideals being implemented wherever possible. It's a great system that allows individuals to have maximum freedom while ensuring that society as a whole continues to progress forwards.


Er, according to Moshé Machover, the welfare state in Israel is effectively non-existent now. The Israeli Labor party has gone down with it!

Aye, Israel has been moving towards centrist ideals for quite a while now, but it still has a mixed economy and larger than normal welfare programs.
Last edited by Divair on Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 11, 2012 3:00 pm

Jafas United wrote:Both of you have the same means of achieving your goals, actually. Through democratic processes.

Social Democracy is closer to capitalism, except it's against unrestricted capitalism and is for placing restrictions on it. Which is why some place it in the "socialist" category, when it really isn't.

Democratic Socialism refers to a society where the means of production and distribution are ordered democratically and by society as a whole.

I know I'm oversimplifying it, but yeah.


That's a good explanation.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Veladio
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1360
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Veladio » Wed Jul 11, 2012 3:02 pm

I guess i would agree with social democracy as far as civil liberties go...but what is your economic stance?
I am a Wiccan. Do not assume I am an Atheist in Religion threads simply because I support complete Secularization of Government Entities.

Social Libertarian (could care less about Economics, there are people who are more educated at it, so it is a waste of time to try and debate me on it.). As stated above I am a Wiccan, and I find solidarity with the Egyptian Deities. I support government secularization as well as complete freedom of religion, as I believe that to truly be secular, the state must respect all beliefs, and favor none. And I recently enlisted in the United States Navy.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Wed Jul 11, 2012 3:03 pm

Veladio wrote:I guess i would agree with social democracy as far as civil liberties go...but what is your economic stance?

Its basically a sort of regulated capitalism.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 11, 2012 3:03 pm

Veladio wrote:I guess i would agree with social democracy as far as civil liberties go...but what is your economic stance?


Regulated capitalism and a strong safety net.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Carameon, Haganham, Ineva, Infected Mushroom, Paappapapa, Tillania, Tremereika

Advertisement

Remove ads