Violet. Or Blaat nothing better then a sheep for the vp
Advertisement
by Neutraligon » Sun Apr 26, 2015 10:38 pm
by Tarsonis Survivors » Sun Apr 26, 2015 10:44 pm
Othelos wrote:
Yeah, look at the platform.-some
platform-blatantly false
really? Cause it's not like they're very inclusive.-only the hard right, but Dems are no better
I guess to some degree, but I haven't heard of many democrats using "this is a christian nation" rhetoric. Correct me if I'm wrong.- generally speaking the Repubs are actually far better in this area than Democracts
I was talking about drug legalization, which dems are the only ones I've seen actually do anything meaningful towards. If you meant that stupid soda size drink thing, that doesn't count because you can still get soda.
by Othelos » Sun Apr 26, 2015 11:05 pm
Tarsonis Survivors wrote:Othelos wrote:Yeah, look at the platform.
platform
really? Cause it's not like they're very inclusive.
I guess to some degree, but I haven't heard of many democrats using "this is a christian nation" rhetoric. Correct me if I'm wrong.
I was talking about drug legalization, which dems are the only ones I've seen actually do anything meaningful towards. If you meant that stupid soda size drink thing, that doesn't count because you can still get soda.
-An illminded pitch to the far right.
-Sorry I forgot Adoption and Foster care is code for turn women into baby factories.
-I forgot, all those minority republicans are just the token ones we keep around for show.
-There are, especially with the fiasco over the 2012 Convention putting God in the platform. Even though they were outvoted they put it in anyway.
True. And good on them for voicing their support for choice in that case. But vaccines aren't as big of an issue as the drug war has been, because the drug war or restrictions on use have effected most people.- That assumes that drugs should be legalized in the first place. But regardless, Republicans are the one arguing in support of anti-vax.
by Insaeldor » Sun Apr 26, 2015 11:18 pm
by Ashmoria » Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:49 am
The Fair Republic wrote:Probably O'Mally or Webb but Hillary is going to win. Her war chest is too large
by Dyakovo » Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:54 am
by Tarsonis Survivors » Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:55 am
by Morr » Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:56 am
New Werpland wrote:Hillary, because she's going to be a big advantage over the Republicans and I'm not taking a chance while the Kochs raise 500 million or whatever.
by Tarsonis Survivors » Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:58 am
Morr wrote:New Werpland wrote:Hillary, because she's going to be a big advantage over the Republicans and I'm not taking a chance while the Kochs raise 500 million or whatever.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CCmliSLWMAAABGv.png:large
Don't vote for this woman. She is a shill and no better than Republicans.
by Morr » Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:59 am
by Morr » Mon Apr 27, 2015 6:01 am
Tarsonis Survivors wrote:Morr wrote:https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CCmliSLWMAAABGv.png:large
Don't vote for this woman. She is a shill and no better than Republicans.
Unless Hillary fires her campaign manager, she won't get elected. So far it's been nothing but blunder after blunder after scandal after blunder.
by Dyakovo » Mon Apr 27, 2015 6:09 am
Morr wrote:Tarsonis Survivors wrote:
Unless Hillary fires her campaign manager, she won't get elected. So far it's been nothing but blunder after blunder after scandal after blunder.
I hope not. Obama backstabbed his base, but I shudder to think of what Clinton will do with her already taking the pro corporation position before she even started the primaries.
by Ashmoria » Mon Apr 27, 2015 6:10 am
Tarsonis Survivors wrote:Ashmoria wrote:
and they'll take insurance away from millions of people and make it worse for the rest of us. and they will scuttle the nuclear deal we are making with iran.
Except there is no deal. And with the Shah running around tweeting how they're vanquishing America, on wonders if we should pursue one at all
by Ashmoria » Mon Apr 27, 2015 6:11 am
Tarsonis Survivors wrote:Morr wrote:https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CCmliSLWMAAABGv.png:large
Don't vote for this woman. She is a shill and no better than Republicans.
Unless Hillary fires her campaign manager, she won't get elected. So far it's been nothing but blunder after blunder after scandal after blunder.
by Romalae » Mon Apr 27, 2015 6:15 am
by Ashmoria » Mon Apr 27, 2015 6:19 am
by Morr » Mon Apr 27, 2015 6:19 am
by Dyakovo » Mon Apr 27, 2015 6:20 am
by Havenburgh » Mon Apr 27, 2015 6:25 am
Clinton has a huge downside. Like raising taxes, furthering a welfare state, taking guns from the people and introducing new laws. Vote Libertarian people.Ashmoria wrote:Romalae wrote:Right-wingers like to make it seem like Hillary is permanently scandal-plagued because it appears to be their only combat tool against her.
yeah
its one of the reasons I went with Obama in '08. now we know that it doesn't matter who the democrat is, they will make shit up constantly so being a Clinton has no real downside.
by Morr » Mon Apr 27, 2015 6:27 am
by Romalae » Mon Apr 27, 2015 6:27 am
Morr wrote:Romalae wrote:Right-wingers like to make it seem like Hillary is permanently scandal-plagued because it appears to be their only combat tool against her.
Pfft, I seriously doubt the Republicans are going to put up more than a superficial fight. Hillary is going to be doing things very pleasing for the people who are funding the GOP, after all.
by Morr » Mon Apr 27, 2015 6:29 am
Romalae wrote:Morr wrote:Pfft, I seriously doubt the Republicans are going to put up more than a superficial fight. Hillary is going to be doing things very pleasing for the people who are funding the GOP, after all.
I don't doubt it. The Republicans have already begun their torrent of defamation and demonization. I'm not particularly fond of Hillary, but it's clear that they're gonna try to make a big stink about everything they can in her past. Her "baggage", as Marco Rubio (I think it was) said recently.
Notice also how they've given interviews in the recent past where they use the phrase "the Obama-Clinton foreign policy." They're so transparently trying to tie her down to Obama, who their base already viciously hates. Their strategists and consultants must be telling them that if you link her permanently to Obama, then people will be conditioned to have negativity associated with her.
by Tarleria » Mon Apr 27, 2015 6:31 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bienenhalde, Big Eyed Animation, Camtropia, Cyptopir, Duvniask, Elejamie, Fartsniffage, Fort Viorlia, Fractalnavel, Gorutimania, Hidrandia, Lagene, Nebulana, Ohnoh, Ors Might, Port Carverton, So uh lab here, Soviet Haaregrad, Statesburg, Tiami, Vonum
Advertisement