NATION

PASSWORD

Should india ban all pakistani films and artists

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Ryccia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 913
Founded: Apr 25, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ryccia » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:39 pm

Naushantiya wrote:Pakistan has always been a source of our everlasting miseries, it is the prime exporter of terrorism throughout the globe and supported movements Islamic separatists and even aided north korea in developing nuclear weapons. Pakistan has attacked India thrice and generally committed genocide towards Hindus and other communities, yet we allow people from these kind of countries inside our border and let them work in our film industry, while at the same time Pakistan has a ban on Indian films, I think it is high time that we ban any actor of Pakistani origin from working in an Indian film and expel all cricketers of Pakistan. These people ban our films and we give them so much leeway. If they ban our films than why should we let their actors work in our movies and work in their third class movie industry. They also eat up revenues from our films, I hate the idea of allowing somebody from Pakistan working in an Indian movie.

So NSG should India ban pakistani actors and films like they have banned our films ?

The same films where we employ their horrible actors


This is discrimination, so, no. Not all pakistanis are against you. This will only make you more like Pakistan because:

1. This is discrimination, and this will be a similarity that you will have.
2. You are doing the same thing to them for revenge.

And also, India is a secular country, right?

Furthermore...

Give Kashmir to Pakistan. Im not a Pakistani, but I believe that Kashmir is the source of all your conflict, and the Kashmiri people want to unite with Pakistan. So, if you want your hostilities to cease, give Kashmir to Pakistan. Is the right thing to do.
Some person
TSPer and Lazarene
Ex-Member of the Council on Lazarene Security
"Ryccia you got it wrong"
- Xoriet, 2019

User avatar
Amuaplye
Minister
 
Posts: 2978
Founded: Dec 07, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Amuaplye » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:40 pm

Naushantiya wrote:
Amuaplye wrote:Explain why and your source for all of these facts.


Isn't Mr jinnah being obvious

Presidential address by Muhammad Ali Jinnah to the Muslim League

http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/prit ... _1940.html

Who is this "Mr. Jinnah"?
I'm a dude.
Also, call me Amuaplye, not Amuapyle, or Amu.

Electrum on Discord wrote:Please do not ping me a list of body parts.

User avatar
Nelson R Mandela
Envoy
 
Posts: 254
Founded: Jun 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Nelson R Mandela » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:41 pm

Naushantiya wrote:Pakistan has always been a source of our everlasting miseries, it is the prime exporter of terrorism throughout the globe and supported movements Islamic separatists and even aided north korea in developing nuclear weapons. Pakistan has attacked India thrice and generally committed genocide towards Hindus and other communities, yet we allow people from these kind of countries inside our border and let them work in our film industry, while at the same time Pakistan has a ban on Indian films, I think it is high time that we ban any actor of Pakistani origin from working in an Indian film and expel all cricketers of Pakistan. These people ban our films and we give them so much leeway. If they ban our films than why should we let their actors work in our movies and work in their third class movie industry. They also eat up revenues from our films, I hate the idea of allowing somebody from Pakistan working in an Indian movie.

So NSG should India ban pakistani actors and films like they have banned our films ?

The same films where we employ their horrible actors

Even though India is culturally a rival with Pakistan, I see no reason movies in either nation should be banned. Banning the movies from either side would only add more gas to the flame that you happen to claim existing.
Don't hesitate to telegram me any questions.

User avatar
Salus Maior
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27813
Founded: Jun 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Salus Maior » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:41 pm

The Huskar Social Union wrote:
New Werpland wrote:Bollywood isn't that good either.

Yeah the Bollywood films ive seen have been pretty shit.

Or just flat out random as fuck... which im still trying to decide is good or bad.

Anyway no India should not ban them.


It's probably due to cultural differences. For instance, Japanese films and humor I find to be the weirdest shit out there...But, apparently, there's people who like it.
Traditionalist Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist, Habsburg Nostalgic, Distributist, Disillusioned Millennial.

"In any case we clearly see....That some opportune remedy must be found quickly for the misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class...it has come to pass that working men have been surrendered, isolated and helpless, to the hardheartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition." -Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum

User avatar
Naushantiya
Diplomat
 
Posts: 701
Founded: Mar 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Naushantiya » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:41 pm

Ryccia wrote:
Naushantiya wrote:Pakistan has always been a source of our everlasting miseries, it is the prime exporter of terrorism throughout the globe and supported movements Islamic separatists and even aided north korea in developing nuclear weapons. Pakistan has attacked India thrice and generally committed genocide towards Hindus and other communities, yet we allow people from these kind of countries inside our border and let them work in our film industry, while at the same time Pakistan has a ban on Indian films, I think it is high time that we ban any actor of Pakistani origin from working in an Indian film and expel all cricketers of Pakistan. These people ban our films and we give them so much leeway. If they ban our films than why should we let their actors work in our movies and work in their third class movie industry. They also eat up revenues from our films, I hate the idea of allowing somebody from Pakistan working in an Indian movie.

So NSG should India ban pakistani actors and films like they have banned our films ?

The same films where we employ their horrible actors


This is discrimination, so, no. Not all pakistanis are against you. This will only make you more like Pakistan because:

1. This is discrimination, and this will be a similarity that you will have.
2. You are doing the same thing to them for revenge.

And also, India is a secular country, right?

Furthermore...

Give Kashmir to Pakistan. Im not a Pakistani, but I believe that Kashmir is the source of all your conflict, and the Kashmiri people want to unite with Pakistan. So, if you want your hostilities to cease, give Kashmir to Pakistan. Is the right thing to do.



Bullshit only 2% of Kashmiris want to join Pakistan

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/indi ... 982710.cms

User avatar
Sungai Pusat
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15048
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sungai Pusat » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:43 pm

Naushantiya wrote:
Sungai Pusat wrote:...yes, because banning films from another country is certainly the best way of dealing with such a conflict. Clearly.


It would send them a message that they are not welcome here

Certainly, it would. I mean, just considering the hundreds of films that could potentially flood into Pakistan every year, I'd say that the same could happen in reverse and if they banned Pakistani films, it would have just as big of an effect.

Oh wait. The government doesn't give a shit and they're coming out of a ghetto of filming. And one of those films that was realised was realised to critical acclaim... with a nomination for an Oscar.
Last edited by Sungai Pusat on Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Now mostly a politik discuss account.

User avatar
Salus Maior
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27813
Founded: Jun 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Salus Maior » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:43 pm

Ryccia wrote:

And also, India is a secular country, right?


From what I've heard, no. The government seems to have a heavy Hindu bias. Of course, considering I'm rather uneducated about India, I'm probably wrong.
Traditionalist Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist, Habsburg Nostalgic, Distributist, Disillusioned Millennial.

"In any case we clearly see....That some opportune remedy must be found quickly for the misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class...it has come to pass that working men have been surrendered, isolated and helpless, to the hardheartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition." -Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum

User avatar
Naushantiya
Diplomat
 
Posts: 701
Founded: Mar 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Naushantiya » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:44 pm

Amuaplye wrote:
Naushantiya wrote:
Isn't Mr jinnah being obvious

Presidential address by Muhammad Ali Jinnah to the Muslim League

http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/prit ... _1940.html

Who is this "Mr. Jinnah"?


I am sorry but this is the most ignorant thing I have ever heard, please google jinnah, this is extremely ignorant of you

User avatar
Arana
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6305
Founded: Dec 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arana » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:45 pm

Naushantiya wrote:
Amuaplye wrote:Who is this "Mr. Jinnah"?


I am sorry but this is the most ignorant thing I have ever heard, please google jinnah, this is extremely ignorant of you

Yeah, how dare you not immediately recognize the names of Pakistani politicians from the 1940s?
Prophet of Lavanthulhu -- A Proud Portal Nationalist -- Bet on Bernie 2016

Arana wrote:Fuck you and your raps,
And all your stupid rhyming.
Haiku master race.

*Drops mic*
Seventeen year old probably straight Christian socialist from New England.

"Aran is basically a very pissed-off Chihuahua combined with a bisexual Billy Graham, minus the bisexuality." -Lavan Tiri

User avatar
Naushantiya
Diplomat
 
Posts: 701
Founded: Mar 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Naushantiya » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:46 pm

Salus Maior wrote:
Ryccia wrote:

And also, India is a secular country, right?


From what I've heard, no. The government seems to have a heavy Hindu bias. Of course, considering I'm rather uneducated about India, I'm probably wrong.


The constitution prohibits the BJP from making this into a hindu state, anything like that would be reversed, anways our hopes for a hindu country died 1100 years, it's just a miracle we survived thousand years of servitude and shame

User avatar
Nelson R Mandela
Envoy
 
Posts: 254
Founded: Jun 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Nelson R Mandela » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:46 pm

Ryccia wrote:And also, India is a secular country, right?

India is most certainly not secular.
Don't hesitate to telegram me any questions.

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:47 pm

Because….reasons.

User avatar
Salus Maior
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27813
Founded: Jun 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Salus Maior » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:48 pm

Nelson R Mandela wrote:
Ryccia wrote:And also, India is a secular country, right?

India is most certainly not secular.


Erm, just because a large number of the population practices a religion, does not mean that the government is not secular.
Traditionalist Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist, Habsburg Nostalgic, Distributist, Disillusioned Millennial.

"In any case we clearly see....That some opportune remedy must be found quickly for the misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class...it has come to pass that working men have been surrendered, isolated and helpless, to the hardheartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition." -Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum

User avatar
Naushantiya
Diplomat
 
Posts: 701
Founded: Mar 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Naushantiya » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:48 pm

Nelson R Mandela wrote:
Ryccia wrote:And also, India is a secular country, right?

India is most certainly not secular.

Lol this was funny, India is secular as per the constitution of India

This was again an ignorant western assumption

User avatar
Page
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17497
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Page » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:48 pm

Naushantiya wrote:
Salus Maior wrote:
From what I've heard, no. The government seems to have a heavy Hindu bias. Of course, considering I'm rather uneducated about India, I'm probably wrong.


The constitution prohibits the BJP from making this into a hindu state, anything like that would be reversed, anways our hopes for a hindu country died 1100 years, it's just a miracle we survived thousand years of servitude and shame


Your nation has a Hindu majority. Whatever you think about Pakistan, don't you think Hindus are inherently more privileged in India than Muslims?
Anarcho-Communist Against: Bolsheviks, Fascists, TERFs, Putin, Autocrats, Conservatives, Ancaps, Bourgeoisie, Bigots, Liberals, Maoists

I don't believe in kink-shaming unless your kink is submitting to the state.

User avatar
Ryccia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 913
Founded: Apr 25, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ryccia » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:48 pm

Naushantiya wrote:
Ryccia wrote:
This is discrimination, so, no. Not all pakistanis are against you. This will only make you more like Pakistan because:

1. This is discrimination, and this will be a similarity that you will have.
2. You are doing the same thing to them for revenge.

And also, India is a secular country, right?

Furthermore...

Give Kashmir to Pakistan. Im not a Pakistani, but I believe that Kashmir is the source of all your conflict, and the Kashmiri people want to unite with Pakistan. So, if you want your hostilities to cease, give Kashmir to Pakistan. Is the right thing to do.



Bullshit only 2% of Kashmiris want to join Pakistan

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/indi ... 982710.cms


Oh really? I thought differently. Anyway, I still say that Kashmir is the source of all your hatred. You should really resolve this.
Some person
TSPer and Lazarene
Ex-Member of the Council on Lazarene Security
"Ryccia you got it wrong"
- Xoriet, 2019

User avatar
Salus Maior
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27813
Founded: Jun 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Salus Maior » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:49 pm

Naushantiya wrote:
Salus Maior wrote:
From what I've heard, no. The government seems to have a heavy Hindu bias. Of course, considering I'm rather uneducated about India, I'm probably wrong.


The constitution prohibits the BJP from making this into a hindu state, anything like that would be reversed, anways our hopes for a hindu country died 1100 years, it's just a miracle we survived thousand years of servitude and shame


Just because the constitution "forbids" it, doesn't mean that there isn't a bias.
Traditionalist Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist, Habsburg Nostalgic, Distributist, Disillusioned Millennial.

"In any case we clearly see....That some opportune remedy must be found quickly for the misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class...it has come to pass that working men have been surrendered, isolated and helpless, to the hardheartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition." -Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum

User avatar
Naushantiya
Diplomat
 
Posts: 701
Founded: Mar 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Naushantiya » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:50 pm

Page wrote:
Naushantiya wrote:
The constitution prohibits the BJP from making this into a hindu state, anything like that would be reversed, anways our hopes for a hindu country died 1100 years, it's just a miracle we survived thousand years of servitude and shame


Your nation has a Hindu majority. Whatever you think about Pakistan, don't you think Hindus are inherently more privileged in India than Muslims?


The constitution does not recognize any official priviledges, and to answer your question, it depends upon the social standings, which vary from community to community just like in hindus

User avatar
Naushantiya
Diplomat
 
Posts: 701
Founded: Mar 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Naushantiya » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:50 pm

Salus Maior wrote:
Naushantiya wrote:
The constitution prohibits the BJP from making this into a hindu state, anything like that would be reversed, anways our hopes for a hindu country died 1100 years, it's just a miracle we survived thousand years of servitude and shame


Just because the constitution "forbids" it, doesn't mean that there isn't a bias.

The BJP cannot make anti xyz laws as the courts would overule such laws
why are we arguing over the stupid
Last edited by Naushantiya on Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Page
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17497
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Page » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:51 pm

Naushantiya wrote:
Page wrote:
Your nation has a Hindu majority. Whatever you think about Pakistan, don't you think Hindus are inherently more privileged in India than Muslims?


The constitution does not recognize any official priviledges, and to answer your question, it depends upon the social standings, which vary from community to community just like in hindus


The US Constitution is officially secular but Christians here are privileged and they enact their religious will on secular law often.
Anarcho-Communist Against: Bolsheviks, Fascists, TERFs, Putin, Autocrats, Conservatives, Ancaps, Bourgeoisie, Bigots, Liberals, Maoists

I don't believe in kink-shaming unless your kink is submitting to the state.

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:51 pm

Naushantiya wrote:
Ryccia wrote:
This is discrimination, so, no. Not all pakistanis are against you. This will only make you more like Pakistan because:

1. This is discrimination, and this will be a similarity that you will have.
2. You are doing the same thing to them for revenge.

And also, India is a secular country, right?

Furthermore...

Give Kashmir to Pakistan. Im not a Pakistani, but I believe that Kashmir is the source of all your conflict, and the Kashmiri people want to unite with Pakistan. So, if you want your hostilities to cease, give Kashmir to Pakistan. Is the right thing to do.



Bullshit only 2% of Kashmiris want to join Pakistan

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/indi ... 982710.cms

Yeah, that's a load of shit.
Which is one reason why the Kashmiri perspective on life in Kashmir is quite different to that of the tourists. Kashmiris have learnt to live with both political violence and the Indian intelligence agencies. If you are talking politics in a café in Srinagar and a stranger sits at the next table - you stop talking. If a foreign journalist asks you how many people in the Kashmir Valley support union with Pakistan, off the record you say 25% but on the record you adjust the number down to 10%.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-26847362

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:51 pm

Amuaplye wrote:
Naushantiya wrote:
Isn't Mr jinnah being obvious

Presidential address by Muhammad Ali Jinnah to the Muslim League

http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/prit ... _1940.html

Who is this "Mr. Jinnah"?

He was Pakistan's first Governor-general.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Naushantiya
Diplomat
 
Posts: 701
Founded: Mar 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Naushantiya » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:53 pm

Page wrote:
Naushantiya wrote:
The constitution does not recognize any official priviledges, and to answer your question, it depends upon the social standings, which vary from community to community just like in hindus


The US Constitution is officially secular but Christians here are privileged and they enact their religious will on secular law often.

The Indian constitution is superior to the government and all such laws can be declared ultra vires as they go against the fundamental principles of the constitution as per the interpretation of the court

User avatar
Naushantiya
Diplomat
 
Posts: 701
Founded: Mar 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Naushantiya » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:53 pm

Page wrote:
Naushantiya wrote:
The constitution does not recognize any official priviledges, and to answer your question, it depends upon the social standings, which vary from community to community just like in hindus


The US Constitution is officially secular but Christians here are privileged and they enact their religious will on secular law often.

The Indian constitution is superior to the government and all such laws can be declared ultra vires as they go against the fundamental principles of the constitution as per the interpretation of the court

User avatar
Nelson R Mandela
Envoy
 
Posts: 254
Founded: Jun 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Nelson R Mandela » Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:53 pm

Salus Maior wrote:


Erm, just because a large number of the population practices a religion, does not mean that the government is not secular.

But you never specified if the Indian government was secular, just India in general.
Don't hesitate to telegram me any questions.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Almighty Biden, Atrito, Baidu [Spider], Hidrandia, Hurdergaryp, Nanatsu no Tsuki, New Heldervinia, Pale Dawn, Philjia, Solstice Isle, Stellar Colonies, The Freakin Guardians of the Galaxy, Uiiop, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads