NATION

PASSWORD

Ban the Burqa?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What are your opinions on a Burqa ban?

I support it.
98
32%
I'm opposed to it.
171
56%
*Rambles inanely about the Paris Commune*
36
12%
 
Total votes : 305

User avatar
National Socialist Republics of Europe
Diplomat
 
Posts: 816
Founded: Dec 31, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby National Socialist Republics of Europe » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:37 pm

Senyosu wrote:
Gezi Park wrote:
All Muslims dress their children like that? hell no. Stop with provocative accusations. You're the one giving Islam a bad image here, advocating for Salafism and all bullshit.

However, these who dress their children in a burqa can take offense, of course.

It isn't even a burqa that child is wearing, it's a freaking al-khimar!


He has exaggerated. I think the moderators should do something.
Pro: Nationalism, Socialism, Republicanism, Positivism, Secularism, Transhumanism, Islam, Venezuela, Iran, Palestine, Ukraine.

Against: Liberalism, Marxism, Gender Equality, Monarchy, USA, UK, Israel, Russia.

User avatar
Pan-America under the United States
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 385
Founded: Sep 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Pan-America under the United States » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:38 pm

I wouldn't want to see someone driving down the street with a balaclava. I think there should be a double standard.

User avatar
National Socialist Republics of Europe
Diplomat
 
Posts: 816
Founded: Dec 31, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby National Socialist Republics of Europe » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:38 pm

Galloism wrote:
Gezi Park wrote:
You know what burqa is all about? it's all sexual. Those who dress their children like that actually see their children as sexual object and this is disgusting.

Wow. Let's have some proof of that too.


No, let's give a sanction, instead.
Pro: Nationalism, Socialism, Republicanism, Positivism, Secularism, Transhumanism, Islam, Venezuela, Iran, Palestine, Ukraine.

Against: Liberalism, Marxism, Gender Equality, Monarchy, USA, UK, Israel, Russia.

User avatar
Sebastianbourg
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5717
Founded: Apr 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sebastianbourg » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:38 pm

Gezi Park wrote:
The Confederacy of Nationalism wrote:They can dress their children however they like.


You know what burqa is all about? it's all sexual. Those who dress their children like that actually see their children as sexual object and this is disgusting.

We're going to need some proof, sir.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 204149
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:38 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Galloism wrote:Well, they would be... "free" in the most literal sense.

Unrestrained, some might say.


Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
It's so cold, my nips can cut glass.

Don't go thinking about a future in cat burglary.


Why must you shit on my plans?
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26742
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Senkaku » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:39 pm

Murkwood wrote:In 2010, there was a debate in France over a potential Burqa ban. This passed with an extremely large majority and was later upheld by the European Court of Human Rights. The ban had major support, with the bill was passing the National Assembly by a vote of 335–1. This idea has since gained traction throughout Europe. Even some Muslims support it:

Dalil Boubakeur, the grand mufti of the Paris Mosque, the largest and most influential in France, testified to parliament during the bill's preparation. He commented that the niqāb was not prescribed in Islam, that in the French and contemporary context its spread was associated with radicalisation and criminal behavior, and that its wearing was inconsistent with France's concept of the secular state; but that due to expected difficulties in applying a legal ban, he would prefer to see the issue handled "case by case".


What are your thoughts on a Burqa ban: An Islamophobic violation of rights, or a common sense safety measure?

I'm no Islamophobe. While there are Radical elements, I, as a Catholic, respect their faith. Still, I support a Burqa ban. Even when the female consents to wear it, which is probably very rare, we cannot allow people to fully or even partially obstruct their face in public where ever they go. This is a huge safety risk.

By that argument we should also ban hoodies, hats with large brims, ski masks, sunglasses, non-Muslim religious head coverings similar to the niqāb (such as those worn by some Orthodox Jewish women), and excessively long hair. And almost every Halloween costume ever.

So it seems like you're just an Islamophobe.
Last edited by Senkaku on Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Biden-Santos Thought cadre

User avatar
The Confederacy of Nationalism
Minister
 
Posts: 2334
Founded: Sep 05, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Confederacy of Nationalism » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:39 pm

Gezi Park wrote:
The Confederacy of Nationalism wrote:They can dress their children however they like.


You know what burqa is all about? it's all sexual. Those who dress their children like that actually see their children as sexual object and this is disgusting.

So? Until they're 18, children are responsibility of their parents, that's no business of the state as long as they aren't physically or mentally abusing their children. Dressing a child up in a burqa is not mental or physical abuse, it's their tradition.
Keep right -->
Don't give in to degeneracy,

My honor, my dignity, my pride above my life. No regrets.
American Ultranationalist
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" - Voltaire / "If you want to shine like the sun, first you have to burn like it!" - Adolf Hitler
Resident Social Darwinist

User avatar
WestRedMaple
Minister
 
Posts: 3068
Founded: Aug 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby WestRedMaple » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:40 pm

Gezi Park wrote:
Senyosu wrote:Gezi, are you a woman? You aren't so calm down. This is the woman's choice. A woman's opinion on the matter is worth more than your drivel.


Practically, it's the man's choice so that's what I'm fighting because I'm concerned unlike fake liberals in here.


The man's choice....exactly what YOU'RE supporting.

User avatar
The Confederacy of Nationalism
Minister
 
Posts: 2334
Founded: Sep 05, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Confederacy of Nationalism » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:43 pm

I think islamophobia is justified in Europe, where there are large amounts of islamic immigrants, but as an American, I don't see a reason to be islamophobic here.
Last edited by The Confederacy of Nationalism on Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Keep right -->
Don't give in to degeneracy,

My honor, my dignity, my pride above my life. No regrets.
American Ultranationalist
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" - Voltaire / "If you want to shine like the sun, first you have to burn like it!" - Adolf Hitler
Resident Social Darwinist

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73183
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:45 pm

Pan-America under the United States wrote:I wouldn't want to see someone driving down the street with a balaclava. I think there should be a double standard.

I feel much safer when I see this:

Image
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Senyosu
Senator
 
Posts: 3609
Founded: Mar 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Senyosu » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:52 pm

Senkaku wrote:So it seems like you're just an Islamophobe.

Oh. My. God.

The burqa ban is not Islamophobic, just extremely flawed in design. The French don't know the difference b/w a niqab and a burqa and a chador. And really, all three are loosely tied to Islam, and are more regional. It's more racist if anything, but in practicality only the burqa is bannable under the pretense that it is a safety hazard to the wearer.

here
It is very regional
Very regional
ffs
Senyosu is under reconstruction, however, former tropes still apply

The State of Senyosu ― Senñosy-ül Jür

Your resident Frugal, Nationalistic, Quasi-Jingoist, Buddhist-Tengrist, North-East Asian, Technocratic, Democratic Khanate
anything u want me to be babe ;)

User avatar
National Socialist Republics of Europe
Diplomat
 
Posts: 816
Founded: Dec 31, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby National Socialist Republics of Europe » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:56 pm

Senyosu wrote:
Senkaku wrote:So it seems like you're just an Islamophobe.

Oh. My. God.

The burqa ban is not Islamophobic, just extremely flawed in design.


Why not simply establish mandatory unveiling only when requested by the police, instead of banning burqa entirely?
Pro: Nationalism, Socialism, Republicanism, Positivism, Secularism, Transhumanism, Islam, Venezuela, Iran, Palestine, Ukraine.

Against: Liberalism, Marxism, Gender Equality, Monarchy, USA, UK, Israel, Russia.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:57 pm

There really is no safety issue with Burqas.

User avatar
The Cobalt Sky
Minister
 
Posts: 2009
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Cobalt Sky » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:58 pm

The Confederacy of Nationalism wrote:I think islamophobia is justified in Europe, where there are large amounts of islamic immigrants, but as an American, I don't see a reason to be islamophobic here.

It's not right anywhere. It's irrational. There's no way of saying every immigrant is definitely a radical.
I TRY TO KEEP MY WILD ASSERTIONS, AND I WILL DO MY BEST TO HOLD OFF POSTING WITH THIS NATION UNTIL 2016

User avatar
The Confederacy of Nationalism
Minister
 
Posts: 2334
Founded: Sep 05, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Confederacy of Nationalism » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:58 pm

National Socialist Republics of Europe wrote:
Senyosu wrote:Oh. My. God.

The burqa ban is not Islamophobic, just extremely flawed in design.


Why not simply establish mandatory unveiling only when requested by the police, instead of banning burqa entirely?

fuck no, that alone is a violation of people's rights. Not unless the individual has already been detained. Europeans are too paranoid.
Keep right -->
Don't give in to degeneracy,

My honor, my dignity, my pride above my life. No regrets.
American Ultranationalist
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" - Voltaire / "If you want to shine like the sun, first you have to burn like it!" - Adolf Hitler
Resident Social Darwinist

User avatar
Archeuland and Baughistan
Minister
 
Posts: 2614
Founded: Aug 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Archeuland and Baughistan » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:59 pm

I definitely think we should be working to stop the spread of the Islamic culture, because Islam, if left unchecked, will dominate Europe, Israel, and anyone else who stands in the way. Christianity could very well cease to exist in the eastern hemisphere if the radical Islamists and the secularists continue their crusade.
Standing on the truth of God's word and the gospel.
Learn more about the true history of the world here.
You must be born again? What does that mean?
Islam, the religion of peace? What does history tell us?
The Israelites were "genocidal"? No they weren't!
Agenda 21 map - it affects us all!
Let's rebuild Noah's Ark to serve as a reminder about the true history of Earth!
Proud Foreign Minister of the Christian Liberty Alliance

☩Founder of the Alliance of Protestant Nations - Join today! Learn more here

User avatar
The Confederacy of Nationalism
Minister
 
Posts: 2334
Founded: Sep 05, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Confederacy of Nationalism » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:00 pm

The Cobalt Sky wrote:
The Confederacy of Nationalism wrote:I think islamophobia is justified in Europe, where there are large amounts of islamic immigrants, but as an American, I don't see a reason to be islamophobic here.

It's not right anywhere. It's irrational. There's no way of saying every immigrant is definitely a radical.

No, but they don't need to be radicals to be immigrants. There's such a large amount of them immigrating to Europe, I think the European countries have a right to defend their cultures.
Keep right -->
Don't give in to degeneracy,

My honor, my dignity, my pride above my life. No regrets.
American Ultranationalist
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" - Voltaire / "If you want to shine like the sun, first you have to burn like it!" - Adolf Hitler
Resident Social Darwinist

User avatar
Senyosu
Senator
 
Posts: 3609
Founded: Mar 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Senyosu » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:00 pm

National Socialist Republics of Europe wrote:
Senyosu wrote:Oh. My. God.

The burqa ban is not Islamophobic, just extremely flawed in design.


Why not simply establish mandatory unveiling only when requested by the police, instead of banning burqa entirely?

invasion of privacy and bodily sovreignity?

idk
Senyosu is under reconstruction, however, former tropes still apply

The State of Senyosu ― Senñosy-ül Jür

Your resident Frugal, Nationalistic, Quasi-Jingoist, Buddhist-Tengrist, North-East Asian, Technocratic, Democratic Khanate
anything u want me to be babe ;)

User avatar
The Confederacy of Nationalism
Minister
 
Posts: 2334
Founded: Sep 05, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Confederacy of Nationalism » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:01 pm

Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:I definitely think we should be working to stop the spread of the Islamic culture, because Islam, if left unchecked, will dominate Europe, Israel, and anyone else who stands in the way. Christianity could very well cease to exist in the eastern hemisphere if the radical Islamists and the secularists continue their crusade.

le double standard faec
it's alright if Christians dominate and oppress the world, but not Muslims, amirite? :^)
Keep right -->
Don't give in to degeneracy,

My honor, my dignity, my pride above my life. No regrets.
American Ultranationalist
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" - Voltaire / "If you want to shine like the sun, first you have to burn like it!" - Adolf Hitler
Resident Social Darwinist

User avatar
Archeuland and Baughistan
Minister
 
Posts: 2614
Founded: Aug 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Archeuland and Baughistan » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:01 pm

Senyosu wrote:
National Socialist Republics of Europe wrote:
Why not simply establish mandatory unveiling only when requested by the police, instead of banning burqa entirely?

invasion of privacy and bodily sovreignity?

idk


People do not have complete ownership of their own body, you know. Not if it threatens others. What if you're carrying a bomb around?
Standing on the truth of God's word and the gospel.
Learn more about the true history of the world here.
You must be born again? What does that mean?
Islam, the religion of peace? What does history tell us?
The Israelites were "genocidal"? No they weren't!
Agenda 21 map - it affects us all!
Let's rebuild Noah's Ark to serve as a reminder about the true history of Earth!
Proud Foreign Minister of the Christian Liberty Alliance

☩Founder of the Alliance of Protestant Nations - Join today! Learn more here

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73183
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:01 pm

Senyosu wrote:
National Socialist Republics of Europe wrote:
Why not simply establish mandatory unveiling only when requested by the police, instead of banning burqa entirely?

invasion of privacy and bodily sovreignity?

idk

Simultaneous regulations requiring a female officer do the unveiling in accordance with Islamic rules would be sufficient to cover the possible privacy considerations.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:01 pm

Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:I definitely think we should be working to stop the spread of the Islamic culture, because Islam, if left unchecked, will dominate Europe, Israel, and anyone else who stands in the way. Christianity could very well cease to exist in the eastern hemisphere if the radical Islamists and the secularists continue their crusade.

Fundamentalist Christianity is a far worse threat to the US then Islam is, and that is a fact.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73183
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:01 pm

Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
Senyosu wrote:invasion of privacy and bodily sovreignity?

idk


People do not have complete ownership of their own body, you know. Not if it threatens others. What if you're carrying a bomb around?

We don't ban fat people.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Senyosu
Senator
 
Posts: 3609
Founded: Mar 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Senyosu » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:01 pm

Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
Senyosu wrote:invasion of privacy and bodily sovreignity?

idk


People do not have complete ownership of their own body, you know. Not if it threatens others. What if you're carrying a bomb around?

Did you just?

You just did.

Ok bye.
Senyosu is under reconstruction, however, former tropes still apply

The State of Senyosu ― Senñosy-ül Jür

Your resident Frugal, Nationalistic, Quasi-Jingoist, Buddhist-Tengrist, North-East Asian, Technocratic, Democratic Khanate
anything u want me to be babe ;)

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:01 pm

Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
Senyosu wrote:invasion of privacy and bodily sovreignity?

idk


People do not have complete ownership of their own body, you know. Not if it threatens others. What if you're carrying a bomb around?

.......A bomb is not their body.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Castelia, Elejamie, Emotional Support Crocodile, Free Nations People and Polities, Galimencia, Majestic-12 [Bot], Norse Inuit Union, The Huskar Social Union, The Jamesian Republic

Advertisement

Remove ads