NATION

PASSWORD

Ban the Burqa?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What are your opinions on a Burqa ban?

I support it.
98
32%
I'm opposed to it.
171
56%
*Rambles inanely about the Paris Commune*
36
12%
 
Total votes : 305

User avatar
The Confederacy of Nationalism
Minister
 
Posts: 2334
Founded: Sep 05, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Confederacy of Nationalism » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:11 pm

The Cobalt Sky wrote:
The Confederacy of Nationalism wrote:I do not approve of the ban. There are far better ways to combat immigration than to ban burqas.

If you think it should be combatted, why are you against the ban? I'm Not sure there's a way of getting rid of immigraBR's without bending the law one way or another to fit prejudice.

Or you could just impose immigration quotas, like the US has been doing since just about forever. I don't like the ban because it violates the individual's sovereignty, you can combat immigration without violating individual sovereignty.
Keep right -->
Don't give in to degeneracy,

My honor, my dignity, my pride above my life. No regrets.
American Ultranationalist
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" - Voltaire / "If you want to shine like the sun, first you have to burn like it!" - Adolf Hitler
Resident Social Darwinist

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 204149
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:12 pm

Why do people argue with A&B? It's obvious what he'll say, over and over and that there's no reasoning there. It just derails the thread.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
The Cobalt Sky
Minister
 
Posts: 2009
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Cobalt Sky » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:12 pm

Galloism wrote:
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
Actually, yes. Judeo-Christian principles are the backbone of this nation. We should never persecute anyone or rob or murder them because they don't follow the true God, but we shouldn't be allowing their ideals to run rampant, either.

We're better off without secularism, paganism, or anything that stands in the way of the truth of God's word and the gospel. As a society, as a nation, we are indeed better off.

Once again, no stoning or anything like that - definitely not. But neither should we allow their lifestyle to go unchecked. There should be punishments for assaults on our culture - the culture of this nation.

How awful. People need to give up practicing their beliefs so you won't be troubled by people with differing beliefs than you.

I really hope he's just a troll.
I TRY TO KEEP MY WILD ASSERTIONS, AND I WILL DO MY BEST TO HOLD OFF POSTING WITH THIS NATION UNTIL 2016

User avatar
Senyosu
Senator
 
Posts: 3609
Founded: Mar 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Senyosu » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:13 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Why do people argue with A&B? It's obvious what he'll say, over and over and that there's no reasoning there. It just derails the thread.

Because he may slip up.
Senyosu is under reconstruction, however, former tropes still apply

The State of Senyosu ― Senñosy-ül Jür

Your resident Frugal, Nationalistic, Quasi-Jingoist, Buddhist-Tengrist, North-East Asian, Technocratic, Democratic Khanate
anything u want me to be babe ;)

User avatar
Auroya
Minister
 
Posts: 2742
Founded: Feb 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Auroya » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:13 pm

The Confederacy of Nationalism wrote:Or you could just impose immigration quotas


No, there's no need for that, it's unethical on a few levels and the often the arguments for it are nothing but irrational nationalism.
Last edited by Auroya on Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Social progressive, libertarian socialist, trans girl. she/her pls.
Buckminster Fuller on earning a living

Navisva: 2100

User avatar
The Confederacy of Nationalism
Minister
 
Posts: 2334
Founded: Sep 05, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Confederacy of Nationalism » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:13 pm

Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
Galloism wrote:Only Christianity, amirite?


Actually, yes. Judeo-Christian principles are the backbone of this nation. We should never persecute anyone or rob or murder them because they don't follow the true God, but we shouldn't be allowing their ideals to run rampant, either.

We're better off without secularism, paganism, or anything that stands in the way of the truth of God's word and the gospel. As a society, as a nation, we are indeed better off.

Once again, no stoning or anything like that - definitely not. But neither should we allow their lifestyle to go unchecked. There should be punishments for assaults on our culture - the culture of this nation.

You should start by hating on the Irish for bringing Catholicism to America. Why do you support Jews and Israel so much? Christianity has a loooong history of oppressing Jews.
Keep right -->
Don't give in to degeneracy,

My honor, my dignity, my pride above my life. No regrets.
American Ultranationalist
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" - Voltaire / "If you want to shine like the sun, first you have to burn like it!" - Adolf Hitler
Resident Social Darwinist

User avatar
The Confederacy of Nationalism
Minister
 
Posts: 2334
Founded: Sep 05, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Confederacy of Nationalism » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:14 pm

Auroya wrote:
The Confederacy of Nationalism wrote:Or you could just impose immigration quotas


No, there's no need for that, it's unethical on a few levels and the often the arguments for it are nothing but irrational nationalism.

It's the most humane way of defending the European nations' individual cultures.
Keep right -->
Don't give in to degeneracy,

My honor, my dignity, my pride above my life. No regrets.
American Ultranationalist
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" - Voltaire / "If you want to shine like the sun, first you have to burn like it!" - Adolf Hitler
Resident Social Darwinist

User avatar
Auroya
Minister
 
Posts: 2742
Founded: Feb 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Auroya » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:15 pm

The Confederacy of Nationalism wrote:
Auroya wrote:
No, there's no need for that, it's unethical on a few levels and the often the arguments for it are nothing but irrational nationalism.

It's the most humane way of defending the European nations' individual cultures.


Cultures are not at risk; even if they were, their 'preservation' isn't a matter of any immideate importance.

I do feel this may be a threadjack though.
Last edited by Auroya on Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Social progressive, libertarian socialist, trans girl. she/her pls.
Buckminster Fuller on earning a living

Navisva: 2100

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 204149
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:16 pm

Senyosu wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Why do people argue with A&B? It's obvious what he'll say, over and over and that there's no reasoning there. It just derails the thread.

Because he may slip up.


You mean he hasn't already?
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Sebastianbourg
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5717
Founded: Apr 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sebastianbourg » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:16 pm

The Cobalt Sky wrote:
Galloism wrote:How awful. People need to give up practicing their beliefs so you won't be troubled by people with differing beliefs than you.

I really hope he's just a troll.

Try not to call people trolls in case the mods come after you.

User avatar
Jamjai
Minister
 
Posts: 2348
Founded: Jul 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Jamjai » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:17 pm

banning the burqa is just a double-standard bull crap

people dressing as clowns and walking at night

I would be terrified at that scene
RP: 34 million

User avatar
The Confederacy of Nationalism
Minister
 
Posts: 2334
Founded: Sep 05, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Confederacy of Nationalism » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:18 pm

Auroya wrote:
The Confederacy of Nationalism wrote:It's the most humane way of defending the European nations' individual cultures.


Cultures are not at risk.

If the majority of the people in a country aren't ethnically of that nation's descent, then yes, their culture and the culture of the nation is at risk. That's why America is considered uncultured in the eyes of Europeans, there isn't a dominant culture here.
Keep right -->
Don't give in to degeneracy,

My honor, my dignity, my pride above my life. No regrets.
American Ultranationalist
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" - Voltaire / "If you want to shine like the sun, first you have to burn like it!" - Adolf Hitler
Resident Social Darwinist

User avatar
Ardoki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14496
Founded: Sep 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ardoki » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:18 pm

The Burqa is not required by Islam, so therefore banning it would not be a breach of religious freedom. While I admit there may be a security risk inovlolved with the wearing of it, it is only about 50% worse than a balaclava or motorcycle helmet. It is kind of a breach of personal freedoms if you ban it.

In my opinion I don't really like it, as it was originally designed to oppress women, and is a violation of the principle of equality.
However I would not try to ban it. I would support the banning of beards though.
Greater Ardokian Empire | It is Ardoki's destiny to rule the whole world!
Unitary Parliamentary Constitutional Republic

Head of State: Grand Emperor Alistair Killian Moriarty
Head of Government: Grand Imperial Chancellor Kennedy Rowan Coleman
Legislature: Imperial Senate
Ruling Party: Imperial Progressive Party
Technology Level: MT (Primary) | PMT, FanT (Secondary)
Politics: Social Democrat
Religion: None
Personality Type: ENTP 3w4

User avatar
Pan-America under the United States
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 385
Founded: Sep 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Pan-America under the United States » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:19 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Pan-America under the United States wrote:I wouldn't want to see someone driving down the street with a balaclava. I think there should be a double standard.

Image



Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Why must you shit on my plans?

My own amusement, why else? :P

eheheh.

User avatar
Auroya
Minister
 
Posts: 2742
Founded: Feb 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Auroya » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:20 pm

The Confederacy of Nationalism wrote:
Auroya wrote:
Cultures are not at risk.

If the majority of the people in a country aren't ethnically of that nation's descent, then yes, their culture and the culture of the nation is at risk. That's why America is considered uncultured in the eyes of Europeans, there isn't a dominant culture here.


Even if this ever became the case I feel that the only real opposiiton to it is just irrational nationalism and nothing more.

Anyway this is probably threadjacking, so it's probably best we don't.
Social progressive, libertarian socialist, trans girl. she/her pls.
Buckminster Fuller on earning a living

Navisva: 2100

User avatar
Jamjai
Minister
 
Posts: 2348
Founded: Jul 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Jamjai » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:20 pm

Ardoki wrote:The Burqa is not required by Islam, so therefore banning it would not be a breach of religious freedom. While I admit there may be a security risk inovlolved with the wearing of it, it is only about 50% worse than a balaclava or motorcycle helmet. It is kind of a breach of personal freedoms if you ban it.

In my opinion I don't really like it, as it was originally designed to oppress women, and is a violation of the principle of equality.
However I would not try to ban it. I would support the banning of beards though.

thats stupid

beards are natural
RP: 34 million

User avatar
Pan-America under the United States
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 385
Founded: Sep 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Pan-America under the United States » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:20 pm

Ardoki wrote:The Burqa is not required by Islam, so therefore banning it would not be a breach of religious freedom. While I admit there may be a security risk inovlolved with the wearing of it, it is only about 50% worse than a balaclava or motorcycle helmet. It is kind of a breach of personal freedoms if you ban it.

In my opinion I don't really like it, as it was originally designed to oppress women, and is a violation of the principle of equality.
However I would not try to ban it. I would support the banning of beards though.

A motorcycle helmet is for safety. Burqas and Balaclavas aren't.
Last edited by Pan-America under the United States on Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Cobalt Sky
Minister
 
Posts: 2009
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Cobalt Sky » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:21 pm

Sebastianbourg wrote:
The Cobalt Sky wrote:I really hope he's just a troll.

Try not to call people trolls in case the mods come after you.

Dang. Thanks for the warning, though. Wouldn't want that to happen to me.
I TRY TO KEEP MY WILD ASSERTIONS, AND I WILL DO MY BEST TO HOLD OFF POSTING WITH THIS NATION UNTIL 2016

User avatar
Sebastianbourg
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5717
Founded: Apr 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sebastianbourg » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:22 pm

The Cobalt Sky wrote:
Sebastianbourg wrote:Try not to call people trolls in case the mods come after you.

Dang. Thanks for the warning, though. Wouldn't want that to happen to me.

No worries.

User avatar
Ardoki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14496
Founded: Sep 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ardoki » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:23 pm

Pan-America under the United States wrote:
Ardoki wrote:The Burqa is not required by Islam, so therefore banning it would not be a breach of religious freedom. While I admit there may be a security risk inovlolved with the wearing of it, it is only about 50% worse than a balaclava or motorcycle helmet. It is kind of a breach of personal freedoms if you ban it.

In my opinion I don't really like it, as it was originally designed to oppress women, and is a violation of the principle of equality.
However I would not try to ban it. I would support the banning of beards though.

A motorcycle helmet is for safety. Burqas and Balaclavas aren't.

You could hide your identity with each of those.
And I never said a motorcycle helmet wasn't for safety ( you could argue that a burqa can protect you from the sun, and a balaclava from the cold), nor did I say it should be prohibited.
Greater Ardokian Empire | It is Ardoki's destiny to rule the whole world!
Unitary Parliamentary Constitutional Republic

Head of State: Grand Emperor Alistair Killian Moriarty
Head of Government: Grand Imperial Chancellor Kennedy Rowan Coleman
Legislature: Imperial Senate
Ruling Party: Imperial Progressive Party
Technology Level: MT (Primary) | PMT, FanT (Secondary)
Politics: Social Democrat
Religion: None
Personality Type: ENTP 3w4

User avatar
Ardoki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14496
Founded: Sep 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ardoki » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:24 pm

Jamjai wrote:
Ardoki wrote:The Burqa is not required by Islam, so therefore banning it would not be a breach of religious freedom. While I admit there may be a security risk inovlolved with the wearing of it, it is only about 50% worse than a balaclava or motorcycle helmet. It is kind of a breach of personal freedoms if you ban it.

In my opinion I don't really like it, as it was originally designed to oppress women, and is a violation of the principle of equality.
However I would not try to ban it. I would support the banning of beards though.

thats stupid

beards are natural

Well I don't like them, I personally find them repulsive.
Greater Ardokian Empire | It is Ardoki's destiny to rule the whole world!
Unitary Parliamentary Constitutional Republic

Head of State: Grand Emperor Alistair Killian Moriarty
Head of Government: Grand Imperial Chancellor Kennedy Rowan Coleman
Legislature: Imperial Senate
Ruling Party: Imperial Progressive Party
Technology Level: MT (Primary) | PMT, FanT (Secondary)
Politics: Social Democrat
Religion: None
Personality Type: ENTP 3w4

User avatar
Pan-America under the United States
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 385
Founded: Sep 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Pan-America under the United States » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:25 pm

Ardoki wrote:
Pan-America under the United States wrote:A motorcycle helmet is for safety. Burqas and Balaclavas aren't.

You could hide your identity with each of those.
And I never said a motorcycle helmet wasn't for safety ( you could argue that a burqa can protect you from the sun, and a balaclava from the cold), nor did I say it should be prohibited.

Your point was "it was 50% worse" so how exactly would that be comparable? Surely, you can't say that Motorcycle helmets can be grouped with balaclavas and Burqas. A motorcycle helmet is for protection. That's the sole reason, you don't see people walking around with motorcycle helmets on.
Last edited by Pan-America under the United States on Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Archeuland and Baughistan
Minister
 
Posts: 2614
Founded: Aug 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Archeuland and Baughistan » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:26 pm

The Confederacy of Nationalism wrote:
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
Actually, yes. Judeo-Christian principles are the backbone of this nation. We should never persecute anyone or rob or murder them because they don't follow the true God, but we shouldn't be allowing their ideals to run rampant, either.

We're better off without secularism, paganism, or anything that stands in the way of the truth of God's word and the gospel. As a society, as a nation, we are indeed better off.

Once again, no stoning or anything like that - definitely not. But neither should we allow their lifestyle to go unchecked. There should be punishments for assaults on our culture - the culture of this nation.

You should start by hating on the Irish for bringing Catholicism to America. Why do you support Jews and Israel so much? Christianity has a loooong history of oppressing Jews.


Jews and Catholics, Orthodox and Protestants - we all follow the same great God, and we all make this nation a great place to live. I have no issue with any of them.
Standing on the truth of God's word and the gospel.
Learn more about the true history of the world here.
You must be born again? What does that mean?
Islam, the religion of peace? What does history tell us?
The Israelites were "genocidal"? No they weren't!
Agenda 21 map - it affects us all!
Let's rebuild Noah's Ark to serve as a reminder about the true history of Earth!
Proud Foreign Minister of the Christian Liberty Alliance

☩Founder of the Alliance of Protestant Nations - Join today! Learn more here

User avatar
Ardoki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14496
Founded: Sep 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ardoki » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:26 pm

Pan-America under the United States wrote:
Ardoki wrote:You could hide your identity with each of those.
And I never said a motorcycle helmet wasn't for safety ( you could argue that a burqa can protect you from the sun, and a balaclava from the cold), nor did I say it should be prohibited.

Your point was "it was 50% worse" so how exactly would that be comparable? Surely, you can't say that Motorcycle helmets can be grouped with balaclavas and Burqas.

The whole security argument lies on the assumption that someone can hide their identity and commit a crime with a burqa. The same can be said about a motorcycle helmet and a balaclava.
Greater Ardokian Empire | It is Ardoki's destiny to rule the whole world!
Unitary Parliamentary Constitutional Republic

Head of State: Grand Emperor Alistair Killian Moriarty
Head of Government: Grand Imperial Chancellor Kennedy Rowan Coleman
Legislature: Imperial Senate
Ruling Party: Imperial Progressive Party
Technology Level: MT (Primary) | PMT, FanT (Secondary)
Politics: Social Democrat
Religion: None
Personality Type: ENTP 3w4

User avatar
Ardoki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14496
Founded: Sep 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ardoki » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:27 pm

Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
The Confederacy of Nationalism wrote:You should start by hating on the Irish for bringing Catholicism to America. Why do you support Jews and Israel so much? Christianity has a loooong history of oppressing Jews.


Jews and Catholics, Orthodox and Protestants - we all follow the same great God, and we all make this nation a great place to live. I have no issue with any of them.

Muslims also worship the same god.
Greater Ardokian Empire | It is Ardoki's destiny to rule the whole world!
Unitary Parliamentary Constitutional Republic

Head of State: Grand Emperor Alistair Killian Moriarty
Head of Government: Grand Imperial Chancellor Kennedy Rowan Coleman
Legislature: Imperial Senate
Ruling Party: Imperial Progressive Party
Technology Level: MT (Primary) | PMT, FanT (Secondary)
Politics: Social Democrat
Religion: None
Personality Type: ENTP 3w4

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Castelia, Elejamie, Emotional Support Crocodile, Free Nations People and Polities, Galimencia, Majestic-12 [Bot], Norse Inuit Union, The Jamesian Republic

Advertisement

Remove ads