Worst Leader your (RL) Country ever had?

[Kingdom of Viana]

He helped end Communism in the USSR and ended the Cold War. Seriously you guys ignore the facts.

No he didn't, and even if he did, that hardly makes up for even half of the shit he did.

By what I'm reading I get the impression that you think Raegan drove america into the ground, am I correct?

[Harpers Ferry]

No, he didn't. If anything, the increased spending of the arms race helped keep the Soviet economy afloat.

Yes, he did.

Did he I troduce Perestroika and Glasnost? Did he orchestrate the numerous revoloutions in the Bloc? Please, explain how he personally brought down the USSR.

[Harpers Ferry]

No he didn't, and even if he did, that hardly makes up for even half of the shit he did.

By what I'm reading I get the impression that you think Raegan drove america into the ground, am I correct?

Nothing so dramatic. His foreign and domestic policies were just atrocious.

[Dyakovo]

No, he didn't. If anything, the increased spending of the arms race helped keep the Soviet economy afloat.

Yes, he did.

Apparently you missed the second sentence...

[Kingdom of Viana]

Yes, he did.

Did he I troduce Perestroika and Glasnost? Did he orchestrate the numerous revoloutions in the Bloc? Please, explain how he personally brought down the USSR.

He worked along side Glasnot to bring an end to the USSR. If he hadn't, then the Soviet Union would have lasted a lot longer.

[Laerod]

You don't have to say Obama. You could mention a slaver or someone so ridiculously incompetent the country fell apart.

yeah but i live in america right now

If the questions was who is the worst leader of your country right at this very moment it would be a pretty dumb thread, wouldn't it?

[Harpers Ferry]

Did he I troduce Perestroika and Glasnost? Did he orchestrate the numerous revoloutions in the Bloc? Please, explain how he personally brought down the USSR.

He worked along side Glasnot to bring an end to the USSR. If he hadn't, then the Soviet Union would have lasted a lot longer.

How did he do this? And again he somehow diserves credit for singlehandedly ending the CW and the USSR?

[Kingdom of Viana]

Yes, he did.

Apparently you missed the second sentence...

No, I'm just referencing that to your first line. I'm pretty sure Raegan's efforts didn't benefit the USSR in any way shape or form.

[Dyakovo]

Did he I troduce Perestroika and Glasnost? Did he orchestrate the numerous revoloutions in the Bloc? Please, explain how he personally brought down the USSR.

He worked along side Glasnot to bring an end to the USSR. If he hadn't, then the Soviet Union would have lasted a lot longer.

[Harpers Ferry]

Apparently you missed the second sentence...

No, I'm just referencing that to your first line. I'm pretty sure Raegan's efforts didn't benefit the USSR in any way shape or form.

So do you have any evidence other than vague nonspecific claims?

[Dyakovo]

Apparently you missed the second sentence...

No, I'm just referencing that to your first line. I'm pretty sure Raegan's efforts didn't benefit the USSR in any way shape or form.

Your surety has as much accuracy as your spelling does.

[Kingdom of Viana]

He worked along side Glasnot to bring an end to the USSR. If he hadn't, then the Soviet Union would have lasted a lot longer.

Is there anything funny? Other than you laughing because you as a liberal can't handle truth?

[Bezombia]

No, I'm just referencing that to your first line. I'm pretty sure Raegan's efforts didn't benefit the USSR in any way shape or form.

Your surety has as much accuracy as your spelling does.

Rhonald Raegain

[Kingdom of Viana]

No, I'm just referencing that to your first line. I'm pretty sure Raegan's efforts didn't benefit the USSR in any way shape or form.

Your surety has as much accuracy as your spelling does.

Oh how Ironic.

[Harpers Ferry]

Is there anything funny? Other than you laughing because you as a liberal can't handle truth?

How about actually citing evidence instead of spouting out liberal as an insult when people don't immediately believe your bullshit? That'd be great.

[Kingdom of Viana]

Is there anything funny? Other than you laughing because you as a liberal can't handle truth?

How about actually citing evidence instead of spouting out liberal as an insult when people don't immediately believe your bullshit? That'd be great.

I don't need specific evidence to prove something that is obviously true.

[Bezombia]

Your surety has as much accuracy as your spelling does.

Oh how Ironic.

...ironic that you're trying to claim that he misspelled a word that he didn't misspell?

Yes, that is ironic.

[Dyakovo]

Your surety has as much accuracy as your spelling does.

Oh how Ironic.

And the supposed irony there is?
Your
Surety

[Kingdom of Viana]

Oh how Ironic.

...ironic that you're trying to claim that he misspelled a word that he didn't misspell?

Yes, that is ironic.

Where have I misspelled a word may I ask? She obviously ran out of ideas to argue with so she has resorted to criticizing my spelling.

[Harpers Ferry]

How about actually citing evidence instead of spouting out liberal as an insult when people don't immediately believe your bullshit? That'd be great.

I don't need specific evidence to prove something that is obviously true.

Oh good Lord you are hilarious.

Yeah no, that's debate 101. Prove your claim or it's bullshit.

[Bezombia]

How about actually citing evidence instead of spouting out liberal as an insult when people don't immediately believe your bullshit? That'd be great.

I don't need specific evidence to prove something that is obviously true.

Well if we no longer need evidence to prove something that is true, then I've got a couple truths that you now have to accept:

-Reagan was a Pastafarian and had statues of Cthulhu in his bed every night.
-Vladimir Lenin was married to Reagan's wife. Make of that what you will.

[Dyakovo]

How about actually citing evidence instead of spouting out liberal as an insult when people don't immediately believe your bullshit? That'd be great.

I don't need specific evidence to prove something that is obviously true.

If there is no evidence to support your assertion then it is, by definition, not something that is obvious.

[Kingdom of Viana]

I don't need specific evidence to prove something that is obviously true.

Oh good Lord you are hilarious.

Yeah no, that's debate 101. Prove your claim or it's bullshit.

Then half of the stuff you say has been bullshit?

[Bezombia]

...ironic that you're trying to claim that he misspelled a word that he didn't misspell?

Yes, that is ironic.

Where have I misspelled a word may I ask? She obviously ran out of ideas to argue with so she has resorted to criticizing my spelling.

It's Reagan, not Raegan.



Also Dya ran out of things to argue against because you literally have not made a single point that's actually meaningful and grounded in logic or fact.

[Harpers Ferry]

Oh good Lord you are hilarious.

Yeah no, that's debate 101. Prove your claim or it's bullshit.

Then half of the stuff you say has been bullshit?

You made the assertion, burden of proof is on you.

Hint: claiming things then calling people who question it liberals who can't handle the truth is not a source.