Advertisement
by Germanic Templars » Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:38 pm
by Sebastianbourg » Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:52 pm
Germanic Templars wrote:Ladies and Gentlemen, I present you, 10 things you need to know about ISIS.
by Shnercropolis » Thu Oct 16, 2014 9:19 pm
by Gauthier » Fri Oct 17, 2014 12:33 am
The Fascist American Empire wrote:I remember reading somewhere that in order to put down an Islamic uprising in the Philippines one American general supposedly had his soldiers dip their bullets in pig blood, then bury the dead rebels with pigs. Nobody's sure if those rumors were ever true but the revolt ended right quick.
Time for history to repeat itself?
by Baltenstein » Fri Oct 17, 2014 12:42 am
by Herskerstad » Fri Oct 17, 2014 12:49 am
Gauthier wrote:The Fascist American Empire wrote:I remember reading somewhere that in order to put down an Islamic uprising in the Philippines one American general supposedly had his soldiers dip their bullets in pig blood, then bury the dead rebels with pigs. Nobody's sure if those rumors were ever true but the revolt ended right quick.
Time for history to repeat itself?
Because using a tactic that specifically profanes a religious prohibition against an extremist subset won't hideously backfire in the information age.
by Herargon » Fri Oct 17, 2014 12:57 am
Baltenstein wrote:The majority of the Turkish landmass is in the Middle East geographically, being separated from Europe by the Dardanelles in the West and the Caucasus in the North. No such natural land barrier separates Turkey from the Middle East.
Now culturally speaking, that's a different topic. Turkey belongs to a different linguistic group, they use a different alphabet then all the others and they have their unique state ideology. Being Muslim doesn't mean that you're Middle Eastern - nobody would call Bosnia or Albania part of the ME.
But if Erdogan would have his way, Turkey would not only become part of the Middle East but its very heartland. He's probably angry that Turkey lost the Arabian lands after WW1 and is now seeking ways to reestablish the connection. Which means that the Turkish people have to get rid of him fucking pronto.
Oh, and give the Kurds more autonomy please, since Turkey apparently doesn't feel the need to protect them, let them do so themselves.
How scifi alliances actually work.Ifreann wrote:That would certainly save the local regiment of American troops the trouble of plugging your head in ye olde shittere.
by Herargon » Fri Oct 17, 2014 12:59 am
Sebastianbourg wrote:Germanic Templars wrote:Ladies and Gentlemen, I present you, 10 things you need to know about ISIS.
When Al-Qaeda says your too extreme you're just a normal guy...beheading journalists and aid workers.
How scifi alliances actually work.Ifreann wrote:That would certainly save the local regiment of American troops the trouble of plugging your head in ye olde shittere.
by Socialist Czechia » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:01 am
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta
by The balkens » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:03 am
Socialist Czechia wrote:A little offtopic, but is there any theoretical possibility of Ottoman's return? That Erdogan's approach would end with annexed Syria and Iraq and re-establishment of Ottoman Empire with sultan as a puppet?
by Herskerstad » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:03 am
Socialist Czechia wrote:A little offtopic, but is there any theoretical possibility of Ottoman's return? That Erdogan's approach would end with annexed Syria and Iraq and re-establishment of Ottoman Empire with sultan as a puppet?
by Baltenstein » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:04 am
Socialist Czechia wrote:A little offtopic, but is there any theoretical possibility of Ottoman's return? That Erdogan's approach would end with annexed Syria and Iraq and re-establishment of Ottoman Empire with sultan as a puppet?
by Herargon » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:04 am
Socialist Czechia wrote:A little offtopic, but is there any theoretical possibility of Ottoman's return? That Erdogan's approach would end with annexed Syria and Iraq and re-establishment of Ottoman Empire with sultan as a puppet?
How scifi alliances actually work.Ifreann wrote:That would certainly save the local regiment of American troops the trouble of plugging your head in ye olde shittere.
by Socialist Czechia » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:11 am
The balkens wrote:Socialist Czechia wrote:A little offtopic, but is there any theoretical possibility of Ottoman's return? That Erdogan's approach would end with annexed Syria and Iraq and re-establishment of Ottoman Empire with sultan as a puppet?
Doubtful, considering that Araturk is still a factor.
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta
by Socialist Czechia » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:12 am
Herskerstad wrote:Socialist Czechia wrote:A little offtopic, but is there any theoretical possibility of Ottoman's return? That Erdogan's approach would end with annexed Syria and Iraq and re-establishment of Ottoman Empire with sultan as a puppet?
About the same chance as Spain going on a crusade to reconquer the Philippines.
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta
by Socialist Czechia » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:13 am
Herargon wrote:Socialist Czechia wrote:A little offtopic, but is there any theoretical possibility of Ottoman's return? That Erdogan's approach would end with annexed Syria and Iraq and re-establishment of Ottoman Empire with sultan as a puppet?
No
Because:
Iraq and Syrian minorities
Most countries won't like a lebensraum annexation
Erdogans reputation
Pro-europeanism/secularism
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta
by Papait » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:31 am
Socialist Czechia wrote:A little offtopic, but is there any theoretical possibility of Ottoman's return? That Erdogan's approach would end with annexed Syria and Iraq and re-establishment of Ottoman Empire with sultan as a puppet?
by Herskerstad » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:35 am
by Socialist Czechia » Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:49 am
Herskerstad wrote:Socialist Czechia wrote:
Well, people under his command are indoctrinated enough to believe, that ottoman hero, Mustafa Kemal Pasha, revolted from desperation, not because he was so much against Ottomans
While it technically is possible that Turkey could become de-jure imperialist, and even probable that they will claim spheres of influence with directives to how the Ottoman empire used to be or part of it, becoming an Ottoman state would be committing international suicide, they'd lose any ties with the EU, the left-leaning portions of the nation would despise them, even though they are largely irrelevant at this point, and the relations with both internationally and regionally would decline rapidly.
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta
by Baltenstein » Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:50 am
Socialist Czechia wrote:Herargon wrote:
No
Because:
Iraq and Syrian minorities
Most countries won't like a lebensraum annexation
Erdogans reputation
Pro-europeanism/secularism
Well, Europe has no problem with half of Cyprus occupied by Turkish armed forces for decades. Syria as Turkish protectorate, de facto annexed? Why not.
by Baltenstein » Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:53 am
Socialist Czechia wrote:Herskerstad wrote:
While it technically is possible that Turkey could become de-jure imperialist, and even probable that they will claim spheres of influence with directives to how the Ottoman empire used to be or part of it, becoming an Ottoman state would be committing international suicide, they'd lose any ties with the EU, the left-leaning portions of the nation would despise them, even though they are largely irrelevant at this point, and the relations with both internationally and regionally would decline rapidly.
Which is highly probable, if (when) EU will collapse.
However, I presume, that irredentist Turkey would mean Third Balkan War and Siege of Istanbul, very at least: Greece and Bulgaria wouldn't tolerate Turkish inverventions and claims, and Iranian regime or Armenia would join them too.
by Socialist Czechia » Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:54 am
Baltenstein wrote:Socialist Czechia wrote:
Which is highly probable, if (when) EU will collapse.
However, I presume, that irredentist Turkey would mean Third Balkan War and Siege of Istanbul, very at least: Greece and Bulgaria wouldn't tolerate Turkish inverventions and claims, and Iranian regime or Armenia would join them too.
Siege of Istanbul? Dude, The greater city area has almost as many citizens as Greece and Bulgaria combined. The Greeks and Bulgarians would be more busy with fortifying their borders from the flood of refugees in such a scenario.
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta
by Baltenstein » Fri Oct 17, 2014 3:00 am
Socialist Czechia wrote:Baltenstein wrote:
Siege of Istanbul? Dude, The greater city area has almost as many citizens as Greece and Bulgaria combined. The Greeks and Bulgarians would be more busy with fortifying their borders from the flood of refugees in such a scenario.
If both states did join attack against Istanbul, I highly doubt turkish refugees would run towards artillery fire, machine guns and tank brigades
by Socialist Czechia » Fri Oct 17, 2014 3:07 am
Baltenstein wrote:Socialist Czechia wrote:
If both states did join attack against Istanbul, I highly doubt turkish refugees would run towards artillery fire, machine guns and tank brigades
Not only are you ignoring that Bulgaria and Greece are not exactly friendly neighbors (there are issues regarding FYROM and the Slavophone minority in Northern Greece), so there would hardly be a joint effort, you are not answering the question as to why those two would want to conquer a city which has a bigger Muslim population than their entire countries.
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta
by The balkens » Fri Oct 17, 2014 3:09 am
Socialist Czechia wrote:Baltenstein wrote:
Not only are you ignoring that Bulgaria and Greece are not exactly friendly neighbors (there are issues regarding FYROM and the Slavophone minority in Northern Greece), so there would hardly be a joint effort, you are not answering the question as to why those two would want to conquer a city which has a bigger Muslim population than their entire countries.
Despite Bulgarian imperialism, they were more than once anti-Ottoman allies. For example, my people doesn't like Poles much, but if they will invade Germany one day, we would help them, of course
And do you realize what would happen to Turkish state, if Istanbul was under artillery, rocket and gunfire and millions of it's inhabitants would try escape to Anatolia?
Of course this is all theoretical talk.
Today, only few people thinks that such destructive wars, Kursk-like battles or Leningrad-like sieges are gone forever, which is kinda silly assumption.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Andavarast, Daphomir, Floofybit, Fort Viorlia, Freezerville, Ifreann, Juristonia, Mtwara, Reantreet, Senkaku, Stellar Colonies
Advertisement