NATION

PASSWORD

Islamic State Crisis Megathread (ISIS/ISIL/IS)

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Germanic Templars
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20685
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Germanic Templars » Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:38 pm

Ladies and Gentlemen, I present you, 10 things you need to know about ISIS.

  • INTP
  • All American Patriotic Constitutionalist/Classic libertarian (with fiscal conservatism)
  • Religiously Tolerant
  • Roman Catholic
  • Hoplophilic/ammosexual
  • X=3.13, Y=2.41
  • Supports the Blue


I support Capitalism do you? If so, put this in your sig.

XY = Male, XX = Female

User avatar
Sebastianbourg
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5717
Founded: Apr 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sebastianbourg » Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:52 pm

Germanic Templars wrote:Ladies and Gentlemen, I present you, 10 things you need to know about ISIS.

When Al-Qaeda says your too extreme you're just a normal guy...beheading journalists and aid workers.

User avatar
Shnercropolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9391
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Shnercropolis » Thu Oct 16, 2014 9:19 pm

Hey guys.
Guys.
Wanna hear my opinion?
Russia should intervene.

I mean, I'm 100% all-American who (mostly) hates Putin, and even I think that. Hell, it's better than America spending our own monies on it.
it is my firm belief that I should never have to justify my beliefs.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Fri Oct 17, 2014 12:33 am

The Fascist American Empire wrote:I remember reading somewhere that in order to put down an Islamic uprising in the Philippines one American general supposedly had his soldiers dip their bullets in pig blood, then bury the dead rebels with pigs. Nobody's sure if those rumors were ever true but the revolt ended right quick.

Time for history to repeat itself?


Because using a tactic that specifically profanes a religious prohibition against an extremist subset won't hideously backfire in the information age.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Fri Oct 17, 2014 12:42 am

The majority of the Turkish landmass is in the Middle East geographically, being separated from Europe by the Dardanelles in the West and the Caucasus in the North. No such natural land barrier separates Turkey from the Middle East.

Now culturally speaking, that's a different topic. Turkey belongs to a different linguistic group, they use a different alphabet then all the others and they have their unique state ideology. Being Muslim doesn't mean that you're Middle Eastern - nobody would call Bosnia or Albania part of the ME.

But if Erdogan would have his way, Turkey would not only become part of the Middle East but its very heartland. He's probably angry that Turkey lost the Arabian lands after WW1 and is now seeking ways to reestablish the connection. Which means that the Turkish people have to get rid of him fucking pronto.
Oh, and give the Kurds more autonomy please, since Turkey apparently doesn't feel the need to protect them, let them do so themselves.
Last edited by Baltenstein on Fri Oct 17, 2014 12:43 am, edited 2 times in total.
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
Herskerstad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10259
Founded: Dec 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Herskerstad » Fri Oct 17, 2014 12:49 am

Gauthier wrote:
The Fascist American Empire wrote:I remember reading somewhere that in order to put down an Islamic uprising in the Philippines one American general supposedly had his soldiers dip their bullets in pig blood, then bury the dead rebels with pigs. Nobody's sure if those rumors were ever true but the revolt ended right quick.

Time for history to repeat itself?


Because using a tactic that specifically profanes a religious prohibition against an extremist subset won't hideously backfire in the information age.


In the hypothetical universe where the Islamic deity is the right one, and the failjihadists would, by virtue of that, be denied access to paradise. Would be comedy gold and completely worth it.
Although the stars do not speak, even in being silent they cry out. - John Calvin

User avatar
Herargon
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7472
Founded: Apr 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Herargon » Fri Oct 17, 2014 12:57 am

Baltenstein wrote:The majority of the Turkish landmass is in the Middle East geographically, being separated from Europe by the Dardanelles in the West and the Caucasus in the North. No such natural land barrier separates Turkey from the Middle East.

Now culturally speaking, that's a different topic. Turkey belongs to a different linguistic group, they use a different alphabet then all the others and they have their unique state ideology. Being Muslim doesn't mean that you're Middle Eastern - nobody would call Bosnia or Albania part of the ME.

But if Erdogan would have his way, Turkey would not only become part of the Middle East but its very heartland. He's probably angry that Turkey lost the Arabian lands after WW1 and is now seeking ways to reestablish the connection. Which means that the Turkish people have to get rid of him fucking pronto.
Oh, and give the Kurds more autonomy please, since Turkey apparently doesn't feel the need to protect them, let them do so themselves.


Erdogan is fearing IS will come, I think. That's why he isn't actively fighting ISIS.
Pro: tolerance, individualism, technocratism, democratism, freedom, freedom of speech and moderate religious expression, the ban on hate speech, constitutional monarchism, the Rhine model
Against: intolerance, radicalism, strong discrimination, populism, fascism, nazism, communism, totalitarianism, authoritarianism, absolutarianism, fundamentalism, strong religious expression, strong nationalism, police states

If you like philosophy, then here you can see what your own philosophical alignements are.

Ifreann wrote:That would certainly save the local regiment of American troops the trouble of plugging your head in ye olde shittere.
How scifi alliances actually work.

User avatar
Herargon
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7472
Founded: Apr 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Herargon » Fri Oct 17, 2014 12:59 am

Sebastianbourg wrote:
Germanic Templars wrote:Ladies and Gentlemen, I present you, 10 things you need to know about ISIS.

When Al-Qaeda says your too extreme you're just a normal guy...beheading journalists and aid workers.


Or you might be deemed normal... Returning from beheading-land.
Pro: tolerance, individualism, technocratism, democratism, freedom, freedom of speech and moderate religious expression, the ban on hate speech, constitutional monarchism, the Rhine model
Against: intolerance, radicalism, strong discrimination, populism, fascism, nazism, communism, totalitarianism, authoritarianism, absolutarianism, fundamentalism, strong religious expression, strong nationalism, police states

If you like philosophy, then here you can see what your own philosophical alignements are.

Ifreann wrote:That would certainly save the local regiment of American troops the trouble of plugging your head in ye olde shittere.
How scifi alliances actually work.

User avatar
Socialist Czechia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6183
Founded: Apr 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Czechia » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:01 am

A little offtopic, but is there any theoretical possibility of Ottoman's return? That Erdogan's approach would end with annexed Syria and Iraq and re-establishment of Ottoman Empire with sultan as a puppet?
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:03 am

Socialist Czechia wrote:A little offtopic, but is there any theoretical possibility of Ottoman's return? That Erdogan's approach would end with annexed Syria and Iraq and re-establishment of Ottoman Empire with sultan as a puppet?

Doubtful, considering that Araturk is still a factor.

User avatar
Herskerstad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10259
Founded: Dec 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Herskerstad » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:03 am

Socialist Czechia wrote:A little offtopic, but is there any theoretical possibility of Ottoman's return? That Erdogan's approach would end with annexed Syria and Iraq and re-establishment of Ottoman Empire with sultan as a puppet?


About the same chance as Spain going on a crusade to reconquer the Philippines.
Although the stars do not speak, even in being silent they cry out. - John Calvin

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:04 am

Socialist Czechia wrote:A little offtopic, but is there any theoretical possibility of Ottoman's return? That Erdogan's approach would end with annexed Syria and Iraq and re-establishment of Ottoman Empire with sultan as a puppet?


You mean, as in: a literal re-establishment of the Ottoman dynastic empire? Dude, please.
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
Herargon
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7472
Founded: Apr 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Herargon » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:04 am

Socialist Czechia wrote:A little offtopic, but is there any theoretical possibility of Ottoman's return? That Erdogan's approach would end with annexed Syria and Iraq and re-establishment of Ottoman Empire with sultan as a puppet?


No

Because:

Iraq and Syrian minorities
Most countries won't like a lebensraum annexation
Erdogans reputation
Pro-europeanism/secularism
Pro: tolerance, individualism, technocratism, democratism, freedom, freedom of speech and moderate religious expression, the ban on hate speech, constitutional monarchism, the Rhine model
Against: intolerance, radicalism, strong discrimination, populism, fascism, nazism, communism, totalitarianism, authoritarianism, absolutarianism, fundamentalism, strong religious expression, strong nationalism, police states

If you like philosophy, then here you can see what your own philosophical alignements are.

Ifreann wrote:That would certainly save the local regiment of American troops the trouble of plugging your head in ye olde shittere.
How scifi alliances actually work.

User avatar
Socialist Czechia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6183
Founded: Apr 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Czechia » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:11 am

The balkens wrote:
Socialist Czechia wrote:A little offtopic, but is there any theoretical possibility of Ottoman's return? That Erdogan's approach would end with annexed Syria and Iraq and re-establishment of Ottoman Empire with sultan as a puppet?

Doubtful, considering that Araturk is still a factor.


Well, people under his command are indoctrinated enough to believe, that ottoman hero, Mustafa Kemal Pasha, revolted from desperation, not because he was so much against Ottomans :D
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

User avatar
Socialist Czechia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6183
Founded: Apr 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Czechia » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:12 am

Herskerstad wrote:
Socialist Czechia wrote:A little offtopic, but is there any theoretical possibility of Ottoman's return? That Erdogan's approach would end with annexed Syria and Iraq and re-establishment of Ottoman Empire with sultan as a puppet?


About the same chance as Spain going on a crusade to reconquer the Philippines.


What about chance to re-conquer Spanish Morrocco, if they tried to annex Ceuta and Melila? :P
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

User avatar
Socialist Czechia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6183
Founded: Apr 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Czechia » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:13 am

Herargon wrote:
Socialist Czechia wrote:A little offtopic, but is there any theoretical possibility of Ottoman's return? That Erdogan's approach would end with annexed Syria and Iraq and re-establishment of Ottoman Empire with sultan as a puppet?


No

Because:

Iraq and Syrian minorities
Most countries won't like a lebensraum annexation
Erdogans reputation
Pro-europeanism/secularism


Well, Europe has no problem with half of Cyprus occupied by Turkish armed forces for decades. Syria as Turkish protectorate, de facto annexed? Why not.
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

User avatar
Papait
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1302
Founded: Jun 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Papait » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:31 am

Socialist Czechia wrote:A little offtopic, but is there any theoretical possibility of Ottoman's return? That Erdogan's approach would end with annexed Syria and Iraq and re-establishment of Ottoman Empire with sultan as a puppet?


No. Since turkwy has (with good reason) not mingled im the foght against IS. So the world will not allow them, and they problably dont want it either. More likely is Iran taking parts of iraq. Syria possibly losing small parts to lebanon but mostly remaining like it was, maybe with another man in xharge but still. Kurdistan will likely gain independence under iranian pressure
Positive: EU, Catalan Independence, Scottish Independence, Brabant Autonomy, Hezbollah, Fatah, Iran, Lebanon, LGB-Rights, Religion, Secularism, Kemalism, Facism
Neutral: The rights of T's, UN, Hamas, Capitalism, Socialism, Assad
Negative: USA, Israel, India, Saudi Arabia, Abortion, Theocracy, Tenchnocracy, Nazism, Racism, IS

Embassy: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=294523

User avatar
Herskerstad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10259
Founded: Dec 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Herskerstad » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:35 am

Socialist Czechia wrote:
The balkens wrote:Doubtful, considering that Araturk is still a factor.


Well, people under his command are indoctrinated enough to believe, that ottoman hero, Mustafa Kemal Pasha, revolted from desperation, not because he was so much against Ottomans :D


While it technically is possible that Turkey could become de-jure imperialist, and even probable that they will claim spheres of influence with directives to how the Ottoman empire used to be or part of it, becoming an Ottoman state would be committing international suicide, they'd lose any ties with the EU, the left-leaning portions of the nation would despise them, even though they are largely irrelevant at this point, and the relations with both internationally and regionally would decline rapidly.
Although the stars do not speak, even in being silent they cry out. - John Calvin

User avatar
Socialist Czechia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6183
Founded: Apr 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Czechia » Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:49 am

Herskerstad wrote:
Socialist Czechia wrote:
Well, people under his command are indoctrinated enough to believe, that ottoman hero, Mustafa Kemal Pasha, revolted from desperation, not because he was so much against Ottomans :D


While it technically is possible that Turkey could become de-jure imperialist, and even probable that they will claim spheres of influence with directives to how the Ottoman empire used to be or part of it, becoming an Ottoman state would be committing international suicide, they'd lose any ties with the EU, the left-leaning portions of the nation would despise them, even though they are largely irrelevant at this point, and the relations with both internationally and regionally would decline rapidly.


Which is highly probable, if (when) EU will collapse.

However, I presume, that irredentist Turkey would mean Third Balkan War and Siege of Istanbul, very at least: Greece and Bulgaria wouldn't tolerate Turkish inverventions and claims, and Iranian regime or Armenia would join them too.

(according to Erdogan, whole Cyprus and whole 'Rumelia' are Turkish already anyway :P )
Last edited by Socialist Czechia on Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:50 am

Socialist Czechia wrote:
Herargon wrote:
No

Because:

Iraq and Syrian minorities
Most countries won't like a lebensraum annexation
Erdogans reputation
Pro-europeanism/secularism


Well, Europe has no problem with half of Cyprus occupied by Turkish armed forces for decades. Syria as Turkish protectorate, de facto annexed? Why not.


"No problem" is hardly accurate. The EU has made it clear that there will be no Turkish EU entry until the Cyprus dispute is settled. And nobody recognizes Northern Cyprus, nor will anybody other than Turkey ever recognize it.

And there are a lot of players (The Kurds, Russia, Iran, Saudi-Arabia, Israel) who would categorically oppose any Turkish-occupied Syria scenario.
Last edited by Baltenstein on Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:51 am, edited 2 times in total.
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:53 am

Socialist Czechia wrote:
Herskerstad wrote:
While it technically is possible that Turkey could become de-jure imperialist, and even probable that they will claim spheres of influence with directives to how the Ottoman empire used to be or part of it, becoming an Ottoman state would be committing international suicide, they'd lose any ties with the EU, the left-leaning portions of the nation would despise them, even though they are largely irrelevant at this point, and the relations with both internationally and regionally would decline rapidly.


Which is highly probable, if (when) EU will collapse.

However, I presume, that irredentist Turkey would mean Third Balkan War and Siege of Istanbul, very at least: Greece and Bulgaria wouldn't tolerate Turkish inverventions and claims, and Iranian regime or Armenia would join them too.


Siege of Istanbul? Dude, The greater city area has almost as many citizens as Greece and Bulgaria combined. The Greeks and Bulgarians would be more busy with fortifying their borders from the flood of refugees in such a scenario.
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
Socialist Czechia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6183
Founded: Apr 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Czechia » Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:54 am

Baltenstein wrote:
Socialist Czechia wrote:
Which is highly probable, if (when) EU will collapse.

However, I presume, that irredentist Turkey would mean Third Balkan War and Siege of Istanbul, very at least: Greece and Bulgaria wouldn't tolerate Turkish inverventions and claims, and Iranian regime or Armenia would join them too.


Siege of Istanbul? Dude, The greater city area has almost as many citizens as Greece and Bulgaria combined. The Greeks and Bulgarians would be more busy with fortifying their borders from the flood of refugees in such a scenario.


If both states did join attack against Istanbul, I highly doubt turkish refugees would run towards artillery fire, machine guns and tank brigades :D
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Fri Oct 17, 2014 3:00 am

Socialist Czechia wrote:
Baltenstein wrote:
Siege of Istanbul? Dude, The greater city area has almost as many citizens as Greece and Bulgaria combined. The Greeks and Bulgarians would be more busy with fortifying their borders from the flood of refugees in such a scenario.


If both states did join attack against Istanbul, I highly doubt turkish refugees would run towards artillery fire, machine guns and tank brigades :D


Not only are you ignoring that Bulgaria and Greece are not exactly friendly neighbors (there are issues regarding FYROM and the Slavophone minority in Northern Greece), so there would hardly be a joint effort, you are not answering the question as to why those two would want to conquer a city which has a bigger Muslim population than their entire countries.
Last edited by Baltenstein on Fri Oct 17, 2014 3:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
Socialist Czechia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6183
Founded: Apr 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Czechia » Fri Oct 17, 2014 3:07 am

Baltenstein wrote:
Socialist Czechia wrote:
If both states did join attack against Istanbul, I highly doubt turkish refugees would run towards artillery fire, machine guns and tank brigades :D


Not only are you ignoring that Bulgaria and Greece are not exactly friendly neighbors (there are issues regarding FYROM and the Slavophone minority in Northern Greece), so there would hardly be a joint effort, you are not answering the question as to why those two would want to conquer a city which has a bigger Muslim population than their entire countries.


Despite Bulgarian imperialism, they were more than once anti-Ottoman allies. For example, my people doesn't like Poles much, but if they will invade Germany one day, we would help them, of course :D

And do you realize what would happen to Turkish state, if Istanbul was under artillery, rocket and gunfire and millions of it's inhabitants would try escape to Anatolia?

Of course this is all theoretical talk.
Today, only few people thinks that such destructive wars, Kursk-like battles or Leningrad-like sieges are gone forever, which is kinda silly assumption.
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Fri Oct 17, 2014 3:09 am

Socialist Czechia wrote:
Baltenstein wrote:
Not only are you ignoring that Bulgaria and Greece are not exactly friendly neighbors (there are issues regarding FYROM and the Slavophone minority in Northern Greece), so there would hardly be a joint effort, you are not answering the question as to why those two would want to conquer a city which has a bigger Muslim population than their entire countries.


Despite Bulgarian imperialism, they were more than once anti-Ottoman allies. For example, my people doesn't like Poles much, but if they will invade Germany one day, we would help them, of course :D

And do you realize what would happen to Turkish state, if Istanbul was under artillery, rocket and gunfire and millions of it's inhabitants would try escape to Anatolia?

Of course this is all theoretical talk.
Today, only few people thinks that such destructive wars, Kursk-like battles or Leningrad-like sieges are gone forever, which is kinda silly assumption.


Heh...HA...HAHAHAHHAHAHA.

No.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Andavarast, Daphomir, Floofybit, Fort Viorlia, Freezerville, Ifreann, Juristonia, Mtwara, Reantreet, Senkaku, Stellar Colonies

Advertisement

Remove ads