NATION

PASSWORD

Surge 2014: A debate on Illegal Immigration and US Policies.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jul 24, 2014 1:06 am

Socialist Xlyvania wrote:Personally, I find the situation extremely frustrating. I would not want my tax dollars to be spent on diapers and housing for the undocumented. The entire protocol of processing them and requiring the undocumented to appear at "immigration court" is outrageous. They are obviously guilty of unlawfully trespassing into another country and a court hearing is absolutely unnecessary. They need to be deported immediately without processing of any kind because they are too much of a drain on resources.

Stories like this greatly upset me because my parents lawfully immigrated to the United States from the Philippines and gave birth to me here. My parents earned their citizenship by working and waiting in line like other hard working families. To see these undocumented people who come and then protest for citizenship because they think they are entitled to it.

There should be absolutely no special laws to give any undocumented people any benefits of any kind because that would be a smack to the face to the people who waited years to earn their citizenship.


Naturalized Citizen here.

I don't feel it's a smack to the face to people who waited years to earn theirs. Stop lumping me with you or making me feel like this is my opinion because it's not. I could give a fuck less about "benefits" and how "bad" should I feel because we're giving immigrants a path to citizenship. I care more about what works, not any petty pride I should feel out of a piece of paper that doesn't stop other people from other races from being racist towards me anyhow.

And in case you should know, I only accepted to become a citizen so I could spit to all the racists in the face who told me I was never going to be accepted by them as an American and that they'd first kill me before they were going to accept me as a citizen; that I was nothing but trash because I was not a citizen and supported a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants. That's all it means to me, a piece of paper that I can wave at them and show them that I am not as racist, xenophobic, and idiotic as they are. So sorry to burst your bubble, but not all American Citizens feel as comfy and proud about their piece of paper as you make us seem; some of us do it out of necessity and sometimes - like me - out of to prove a point to people who are not too smart to get that they can't stop me.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Thu Jul 24, 2014 1:17 am, edited 7 times in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Thu Jul 24, 2014 5:12 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Othelos wrote:show me where i said that a declining population was a problem.


Based on your argument about white people's poor fertility rates, I thought you wanted to import immigrants to increase fertility rates and populations. This is a common pro-immigrant stance. I thought you were concerned about Germany's demographics (falling population and increasing age rates).

Also: I don't know why an older population is bad. 50 is the new 40. People are living longer so of course the average age should be expected to go up.


Aging populations increase the dependency ratio, which can cripple an economy.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Thu Jul 24, 2014 6:51 am

Salandriagado wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
Based on your argument about white people's poor fertility rates, I thought you wanted to import immigrants to increase fertility rates and populations. This is a common pro-immigrant stance. I thought you were concerned about Germany's demographics (falling population and increasing age rates).

Also: I don't know why an older population is bad. 50 is the new 40. People are living longer so of course the average age should be expected to go up.


Aging populations increase the dependency ratio, which can cripple an economy.


Only if they retire at the same age as in 1940. If they are living longer, they can work longer. A 70 year old is not useless in society. Maybe they could work part-time. Besides, if they live with their children and grandchildren, they can take care of the domestic chores of the home meaning no need to hire maids or babysitters. Their cost would not be high because they only need food and clothing and a few minor expenses. 3 generations under one roof is the way to go. It is done all the time in China and there are many benefits to this, one being cost savings.

Health care costs are an issue. The solution, only pay to treat the minor problems and if costs are too high for an elderly person, let the person die of natural causes as was done in 1940.
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Thu Jul 24, 2014 12:11 pm

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Aging populations increase the dependency ratio, which can cripple an economy.


Only if they retire at the same age as in 1940. If they are living longer, they can work longer. A 70 year old is not useless in society. Maybe they could work part-time. Besides, if they live with their children and grandchildren, they can take care of the domestic chores of the home meaning no need to hire maids or babysitters. Their cost would not be high because they only need food and clothing and a few minor expenses. 3 generations under one roof is the way to go. It is done all the time in China and there are many benefits to this, one being cost savings.

Health care costs are an issue. The solution, only pay to treat the minor problems and if costs are too high for an elderly person, let the person die of natural causes as was done in 1940.

That screams human rights violations. Instead, we'd save a lot of money with voluntary end of life euthanasia.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jul 24, 2014 12:21 pm

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Aging populations increase the dependency ratio, which can cripple an economy.


Only if they retire at the same age as in 1940. If they are living longer, they can work longer. A 70 year old is not useless in society. Maybe they could work part-time. Besides, if they live with their children and grandchildren, they can take care of the domestic chores of the home meaning no need to hire maids or babysitters. Their cost would not be high because they only need food and clothing and a few minor expenses. 3 generations under one roof is the way to go. It is done all the time in China and there are many benefits to this, one being cost savings.

Health care costs are an issue. The solution, only pay to treat the minor problems and if costs are too high for an elderly person, let the person die of natural causes as was done in 1940.


Have you ever thought some people are not into having sex in the next room from where their parents are sleeping?
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Thu Jul 24, 2014 12:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Thu Jul 24, 2014 5:22 pm

Othelos wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
Only if they retire at the same age as in 1940. If they are living longer, they can work longer. A 70 year old is not useless in society. Maybe they could work part-time. Besides, if they live with their children and grandchildren, they can take care of the domestic chores of the home meaning no need to hire maids or babysitters. Their cost would not be high because they only need food and clothing and a few minor expenses. 3 generations under one roof is the way to go. It is done all the time in China and there are many benefits to this, one being cost savings.

Health care costs are an issue. The solution, only pay to treat the minor problems and if costs are too high for an elderly person, let the person die of natural causes as was done in 1940.

That screams human rights violations. Instead, we'd save a lot of money with voluntary end of life euthanasia.


I meant optional, not forceful euthanasia for those with life-threatening diseases like cancer .
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Thu Jul 24, 2014 5:27 pm

We should be taking a page out of Europe's book and establish ties that bring the North American continent together financially.
Helping alleviate poverty as well as aiding in the Drug War is the to go I think.

User avatar
Fireye
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1245
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Fireye » Thu Jul 24, 2014 9:28 pm

The Scientific States wrote:
The 502nd SS wrote:Anyone has the capacity to commit crime. Immigrant or not. We can always deport those who commit crime.

Well the ILLEGALs have already committed a crime so when will they be deported?


The government is deporting undocumented immigrants, unfortunately. Deportation destroys families, and hurts people who risked their lived just to get to this country. If they really want to be here, we should offer undocumented immigrants a pathway to citizenship, it's only fair.

No. It's NOT fair. And I don't see how you can POSSIBLY believe that it is.

Fair is applying for an H-1B, L-1, PERM, etc., like anyone else who immigrates here.

Fair is not saying "fuck the line, I'm just going to walk into Americaland(tm) and not buy my ticket."

Edit: minor addition.
Last edited by Fireye on Thu Jul 24, 2014 9:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
http://www.politicaltest.net/test/result/235745/

Proud Member of the National Canine Association. We Defend Dogs and Dog Owners Alike

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:50 pm

Fireye wrote:
The Scientific States wrote:

The government is deporting undocumented immigrants, unfortunately. Deportation destroys families, and hurts people who risked their lived just to get to this country. If they really want to be here, we should offer undocumented immigrants a pathway to citizenship, it's only fair.

No. It's NOT fair. And I don't see how you can POSSIBLY believe that it is.

Fair is applying for an H-1B, L-1, PERM, etc., like anyone else who immigrates here.

Fair is not saying "fuck the line, I'm just going to walk into Americaland(tm) and not buy my ticket."

Edit: minor addition.


Eh, I don't speak about fairness because most of you flip your shit even though legal immigrants do not.

I just care to see the country thrive and if keeping them here is going to (read: yes it will) then it's best if we give them a path to at least permanent residency and let them apply like everyone else but still keep them here so they can work and contribute to our economy.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Arkinesia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13210
Founded: Aug 22, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkinesia » Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:27 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:Only if they retire at the same age as in 1940. If they are living longer, they can work longer. A 70 year old is not useless in society. Maybe they could work part-time. Besides, if they live with their children and grandchildren, they can take care of the domestic chores of the home meaning no need to hire maids or babysitters. Their cost would not be high because they only need food and clothing and a few minor expenses. 3 generations under one roof is the way to go. It is done all the time in China and there are many benefits to this, one being cost savings.

Health care costs are an issue. The solution, only pay to treat the minor problems and if costs are too high for an elderly person, let the person die of natural causes as was done in 1940.

Have you ever thought some people are not into having sex in the next room from where their parents are sleeping?

He probably thinks sex is evil or that it's a “luxury.”
Bisexual, atheist, Southerner. Not much older but made much wiser.

Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Fri Jul 25, 2014 7:22 am

Arkinesia wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:Have you ever thought some people are not into having sex in the next room from where their parents are sleeping?

He probably thinks sex is evil or that it's a “luxury.”


Having sex is not a luxury.

Having kids is a luxury though, don't have kids you can't afford. If you need the low-cost child labor in your home, get a kid from the local orphanage (especially applies to developing nations).

Plenty of people are willing to deal with the issue about having sex with parents next door. They manage in China. Besides, what about parents with children in the same home? Do they stop having sex because they have a child living in the home?
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Gig em Aggies
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7728
Founded: Aug 15, 2009
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Gig em Aggies » Fri Jul 25, 2014 11:48 am

Here's somethin interesting to ponder on. I found it while waiting for class to start

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-obama-impeachment-20140725-story.html
“One of the serious problems of planning against Aggie doctrine is that the Aggies do not read their manuals nor do they feel any obligations to follow their doctrine.”
“The reason that the Aggies does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the Aggies practices chaos on a daily basis.”
“If we don’t know what we are doing, the enemy certainly can’t anticipate our future actions!”

User avatar
The Re-Frisivisiaing
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1401
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Re-Frisivisiaing » Fri Jul 25, 2014 11:49 am

Let them all in, have them study up for the citizenship test, and let them live. They've decided that they want to be Americans and that's fine.
Yes, yes, I'm the Impeach, Ban, Legalize 2017 guy. Stop running my thing into the ground. It eats my life-force.

Frisivisia, justly deleted, 4/14/14.

User avatar
Threayce
Diplomat
 
Posts: 515
Founded: Jul 07, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Threayce » Fri Jul 25, 2014 11:52 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Arkinesia wrote:He probably thinks sex is evil or that it's a “luxury.”


Having sex is not a luxury.

Having kids is a luxury though, don't have kids you can't afford.

How in the hell does this work?

You have to have a luxury to make a non-luxury into a luxury?

That makes no goddamn sense.
Last edited by Threayce on Fri Jul 25, 2014 11:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Call Me John OOC
Freshman in High Skool
Blatant Capitalist
Accidental Left Winger
I am the Master of Oats

User avatar
Blakk Metal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6738
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Blakk Metal » Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:14 pm

The Re-Frisivisiaing wrote:let them live.

We're gonna kill them now? Is that why California has stopped putting murderers to death, to make room for illegal immigrants?

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:19 pm

Blakk Metal wrote:
The Re-Frisivisiaing wrote:let them live.

We're gonna kill them now? Is that why California has stopped putting murderers to death, to make room for illegal immigrants?


That is such a profound analysis of his argument.

Congratulations, you've outdone yourself.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Blakk Metal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6738
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Blakk Metal » Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:27 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Blakk Metal wrote:We're gonna kill them now? Is that why California has stopped putting murderers to death, to make room for illegal immigrants?


That is such a profound analysis of his argument.

I'm making fun of him for handling his words shittly.

User avatar
Threayce
Diplomat
 
Posts: 515
Founded: Jul 07, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Threayce » Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:31 pm

Blakk Metal wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
That is such a profound analysis of his argument.

I'm making fun of him for handling his words shittly.

Rhetoric: yr doin it wrng
Call Me John OOC
Freshman in High Skool
Blatant Capitalist
Accidental Left Winger
I am the Master of Oats

User avatar
Gig em Aggies
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7728
Founded: Aug 15, 2009
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Gig em Aggies » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:06 pm

Threayce wrote:
Blakk Metal wrote:I'm making fun of him for handling his words shittly.

Rhetoric: yr doin it wrng


Image


No he went to the Kim Jong ill school of engrish
“One of the serious problems of planning against Aggie doctrine is that the Aggies do not read their manuals nor do they feel any obligations to follow their doctrine.”
“The reason that the Aggies does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the Aggies practices chaos on a daily basis.”
“If we don’t know what we are doing, the enemy certainly can’t anticipate our future actions!”

User avatar
The Re-Frisivisiaing
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1401
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Re-Frisivisiaing » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:10 pm

Blakk Metal wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
That is such a profound analysis of his argument.

I'm making fun of him for handling his words shittly.

Let's not be pompous here, it was clear from my post that what I meant was that they should be allowed to live in the US with no fear of deportation.
Yes, yes, I'm the Impeach, Ban, Legalize 2017 guy. Stop running my thing into the ground. It eats my life-force.

Frisivisia, justly deleted, 4/14/14.

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:22 pm

Threayce wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
Having sex is not a luxury.

Having kids is a luxury though, don't have kids you can't afford.

How in the hell does this work?

You have to have a luxury to make a non-luxury into a luxury?

That makes no goddamn sense.


In case you didn't know, many people have sex and don't have kids. This can actually be planned and permanent. To be safe you can even get this:

http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health ... /vasectomy

http://www.hhs.gov/opa/reproductive-hea ... index.html

Yes, sterilization costs money (although I think the US govt. and other nations should subsidize if possible this but not reversals) but having a child usually costs a lot more money.

Maybe both are luxuries but having a child is a bigger luxury. It is like comparing buying a bicycle vs. a sports car.

The only time it might be worth having a child if you are poor is if you are planning to sell or hire out the child as some people do. However, in the USA this is illegal so the child can't usually earn their keep and they cost the family money.
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:31 pm

The Re-Frisivisiaing wrote:
Blakk Metal wrote:I'm making fun of him for handling his words shittly.

Let's not be pompous here, it was clear from my post that what I meant was that they should be allowed to live in the US with no fear of deportation.


Easily misunderstood.

'Let them live without fear of deportation' would have been easier to understand. Four extra words make a big difference in the sentence.

I agree, if they have the right education, the right amount of money in the bank, can make the right size donation to the US govt., don't come from an evil nation (a list should be made of uncivilized, violent nations with large numbers of terrorist supporters-list is subject to change, no Latin American nation should be on this list as of now) and don't have a serious criminal background (I am fine with overlooking most crimes but murderers and real rapists might not make the best citizens) and fill out the proper paperwork than they can live without the fear of deportation.

I agree with you but just added a few simple stipulations.
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:42 pm

Freiheit Reich wrote:
The Re-Frisivisiaing wrote:Let's not be pompous here, it was clear from my post that what I meant was that they should be allowed to live in the US with no fear of deportation.


Easily misunderstood.

'Let them live without fear of deportation' would have been easier to understand. Four extra words make a big difference in the sentence.

I agree, if they have the right education, the right amount of money in the bank, can make the right size donation to the US govt., don't come from an evil nation (a list should be made of uncivilized, violent nations with large numbers of terrorist supporters-list is subject to change, no Latin American nation should be on this list as of now) and don't have a serious criminal background (I am fine with overlooking most crimes but murderers and real rapists might not make the best citizens) and fill out the proper paperwork than they can live without the fear of deportation.

I agree with you but just added a few simple stipulations.


I think we should ask the same from them as we do out of any other person in America: to know and respect our laws, to have them pay back taxes if they have been here illegally for some period of time, and to have them working like everyone else.

You are assuming several things here with "right size donations"; you're assuming that for one, I and other immigrants got our citizenship through bribery, and that's insulting.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Threayce
Diplomat
 
Posts: 515
Founded: Jul 07, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Threayce » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:51 pm

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Threayce wrote:How in the hell does this work?

You have to have a luxury to make a non-luxury into a luxury?

That makes no goddamn sense.


In case you didn't know, many people have sex and don't have kids. This can actually be planned and permanent. To be safe you can even get this:

http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health ... /vasectomy

http://www.hhs.gov/opa/reproductive-hea ... index.html

Yes, sterilization costs money (although I think the US govt. and other nations should subsidize if possible this but not reversals) but having a child usually costs a lot more money.

Maybe both are luxuries but having a child is a bigger luxury. It is like comparing buying a bicycle vs. a sports car.

The only time it might be worth having a child if you are poor is if you are planning to sell or hire out the child as some people do. However, in the USA this is illegal so the child can't usually earn their keep and they cost the family money.

You are practically saying "They can't afford to be sterilized, and lack the means to get sterilized even if they had the money, but if they don't get sterilized, having a kid is their fault."

It. Does. Not. Work. Like. That.

As has been explained to you multiple times.
Call Me John OOC
Freshman in High Skool
Blatant Capitalist
Accidental Left Winger
I am the Master of Oats

User avatar
Threayce
Diplomat
 
Posts: 515
Founded: Jul 07, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Threayce » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:57 pm

Freiheit Reich wrote:
The Re-Frisivisiaing wrote:Let's not be pompous here, it was clear from my post that what I meant was that they should be allowed to live in the US with no fear of deportation.


Easily misunderstood.

'Let them live without fear of deportation' would have been easier to understand. Four extra words make a big difference in the sentence.

If you misunderstood that, you lack basic reading comprehension skills.
I agree, if they have the right education, the right amount of money in the bank, can make the right size donation to the US govt., don't come from an evil nation (a list should be made of uncivilized, violent nations with large numbers of terrorist supporters-list is subject to change, no Latin American nation should be on this list as of now) and don't have a serious criminal background (I am fine with overlooking most crimes but murderers and real rapists might not make the best citizens) and fill out the proper paperwork than they can live without the fear of deportation.

I agree with you but just added a few simple stipulations.

So essentially, you are suggesting we extort people coming to the nation, profile entire nations of people, and use the same broken bureaucracy that keeps people backlogged in the system for decades?
Call Me John OOC
Freshman in High Skool
Blatant Capitalist
Accidental Left Winger
I am the Master of Oats

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Daphomir, Diarcesia, E s t r u s, Google [Bot], Gorutimania, Jibjibistan, Likhinia, Pale Dawn, Port Carverton, Saint Neots, Senkaku, Tarsonis, The Black Forrest, Tiragrativ, Umeria, United Northen States Canada, Valrifall, Zetaopalatopia

Advertisement

Remove ads