NATION

PASSWORD

The case for primitivism

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
The Backcountry Confederacy
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 16
Founded: Feb 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

The case for primitivism

Postby The Backcountry Confederacy » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:15 am

In today's political debate, despite the large differences in opinions, everyone seems to take the continued existence of agriculture and industrial civilization for granted. Furthermore, they even seem to universally agree that it as a good thing. I completely disagree; I believe that a return to the primitive, pre-agricultural lifestyle is the best thing we can do for humanity in the long term, and the only possible route we can go if we even want to survive at all, instead of producing our own extinction and causing an end to the entirety of life on this planet.

Industrial civilization is unsustainable. We are riding a massive ten-thousand-year economic bubble which is soon going to pop if we continue on the course of industrial civilization. We have already far exceeded the earth's carrying capacity, and we are only able to carry on for the time being due to the fact that we have repeatedly bought ourselves a bit more time through the use of drastic artificial interventions that are simply not sustainable. We are quickly draining the earth of its resources faster than it can regenerate itself. Modern industrial civilization is simply a massive house of cards built on top of the continued extraction of oil, and this is something that simply can not be avoided or worked around. When we run out of oil, which will happen very soon, the entire house of cards will collapse, leaving us in ruins. It will be the worst catastrophe that humanity has ever seen.

Agriculture and industry are immensely harmful for the environment. Since the first seeds were planted ten thousand years ago, the human species has dramatically transformed the natural world, and not in a beneficial way. Agriculture is a massively polluting human activity that wreaks immense havoc and destruction on the natural environment. It requires the clear cutting of huge tracts of forest, it depletes the soil of its natural nutrients, it causes severe erosion, and through the use of irrigation it diverts enormous quantities of water from natural habitats where it is sorely needed. The impact of agriculture has only gotten worse in the last hundred years or so, with the advent of such things as factory farming, genetically modified crops, industrial agriculture, and pesticides.

Industry is so incredibly bad for the environment that even the horrors of agriculture are dwarfed in comparison. It requires the mass extraction of oil, which is unspeakably horrible for the natural ecosystem, and industrial corporations care nothing about the health of the environment. Chemicals regularly are dumped into rivers, toxic pollution is released into the atmosphere, contaminants are spread throughout critical natural habitats... the list goes on and on. In recent decades, the impact of the human activities of agriculture and industry have gotten so bad that global warming threatens us with an unstoppable runaway greenhouse effect that could very likely turn the Earth into a second Venus.

Agricultural and industrial civilization have been significantly harmful for humanity. Technology is worshiped with an almost cultlike passion in today's modern world, but almost everyone overlooks the horrors that technology brings. Since the dawn of the Industrial Age, we have created such things as chemical and biological weapons, industrial agriculture, nuclear technologies such as nuclear weapons and nuclear energy, the chemical industry, and industrial-scale mass warfare. Technologists claim that technology is beneficial to us, but whatever benefits we see are simply an unrepresentative facade that does not tell the story, and is outweighed by the massive negatives.

Technology and scientific progress have also had negative effects on the social fabric of human interactions. The internet may enable us to talk to people all the way around the world, but is that really so necessary or important? Consider that this same Internet has utterly destroyed face-to-face human interaction; you can rarely go anywhere without seeing literally almost everyone with their faces right up to their phones, oblivious to everything around them besides the three-inch bright screen directly in front of their faces. Also, instead of going out, seeing the world, and proactively making changes in your lifestyle for the better, people simply pop pills as a "solution" to every minor problem that they face, and this removes them from the true holistic experience of a fulfilling life that is in touch with nature.

Furthermore, many of the diseases we suffer today are solely diseases of civilization: heart disease, cancer, asthma, allergies, depression, liver failure, kidney failure, obesity, and much more. In pre-agricultural society, people lived long and fulfilled lives, and almost everyone was healthy and physically fit. The latter is something that can certainly not say about today.

The agricultural and industrial civilization of today disconnects humans from nature. This has serious tangible harmful effects that will come back to bite us if we do not change our ways. Ever since the dawn of agriculture, we have been evolving at an extremely fast rate. This is simply unsustainable: there is no way to get around this. Up until ten thousand years ago, humans were evolving very slowly, and this allowed our natural environments to co-evolve with us in a symbiotic manner, so that both man and nature benefited. However, ever since the giant mistake of agriculture began, we have been evolving far too quickly for the rest of the Earth to co-evolve. This has separated us from our place in the natural order, and the resulting imbalance, along with our massive deliberate destruction of the environment, has caused great damage to the earth. By returning to a primitive pre-agricultural lifestyle, we acknowledge and accept our humble yet special place in the natural order, returning us to a mutually beneficial relationship with the great natural world.

I firmly believe that the only way that humanity can survive in the long run is to end agriculture, dismantle industry, and embrace primitivism as our way of life. The notion of "progress" is simply not sustainable, and will doom us in the long run if we do not set it aside.

For me, personally, the only real question remaining is how we reach this in the best possible manner.

Do you agree with my support for a primitive way of life? What do you think? What are your views on the primitivist ideology?
Last edited by The Backcountry Confederacy on Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:19 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Meowfoundland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5962
Founded: Mar 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Meowfoundland » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:19 am

Who's gonna kill the 6.5 billion people necessary to make this viable?
This was formerly a signature. One day, it may return to its splendid past. In the meantime, enjoy some pictures of my cats.

User avatar
Towson
Minister
 
Posts: 2408
Founded: Oct 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Towson » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:20 am

Meowfoundland wrote:Who's gonna kill the 6.5 billion people necessary to make this viable?

Flappy Birds.
Factbook
If Harry Potter and Luke Skywalker had a Deathbattle,Chuck Norris Would Win
15,White,Male,Straight,American,Agnostic,Progressive Republican
Not a Supporter of Bashar al-Assads Regime's fight against Democracy
Flappy Birds will cause Human Extinction
Generation 36, the first time you see this copy and paste it to your sig and add 1 to the generation
Political Compass 4.62 Right -0.15 Libertarian and http://www.politicaltest.net/test/graph ... 13_eng.jpg

Likes: Capitalism,Neoliberalism,Liberties and Freedoms,Democracy,Secularism,Science,America,Canada,The European Union,Australia,The FSA,BBC News
Dislikes: Communism,Socialism,Authoritarianism,Anarchism,Dictatorships,Racism,Homophobia,Religious People,Russia,Cuba and China,The Syrian Government,RT.

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:22 am

Am I the only one thats thinking about how ridicilous an anarcho-primitivist is speaking on the internet?
Last edited by Blasveck on Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
Wytenigistan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1905
Founded: Sep 12, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Wytenigistan » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:22 am

We can be agricultural without being industrial...just make agriculture sustainable so the ground wont become useless after a few years, problem solved.
Union busting is anti-capitalist, unpatriotic and self-destructive.
The Honker Banditess
Your mom's ***** was kosovo last night, just ask her how much iraq.
Right: 2.89
Libertarian: 5.23
Non-interventionist: 5.93
Cultural liberal: 3.22
United Timelines Outpost Number 99999999 wrote:When the Landfill comes to town, old people congeal to their rocking chairs and branch out like meat fungus.

Neoconstantius wrote:NSG: ad hoc ad hominem ad nauseum

Estado Paulista wrote:You can never have too much Xanax.

Kebaballah!

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:23 am

Blasveck wrote:Am I the only one that an anarcho-primitivist is speaking on the internet?


Yes, you're the only one surprised by that.
Last edited by Luveria on Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:23 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:23 am

The Backcountry Confederacy wrote:In today's political debate, despite the large differences in opinions, everyone seems to take the continued existence of agriculture and industrial civilization for granted. Furthermore, they even seem to universally agree that it as a good thing. I completely disagree; I believe that a return to the primitive, pre-agricultural lifestyle is the best thing we can do for humanity in the long term, and the only possible route we can go if we even want to survive at all, instead of producing our own extinction and causing an end to the entirety of life on this planet.

Industrial civilization is unsustainable. We are riding a massive ten-thousand-year economic bubble which is soon going to pop if we continue on the course of industrial civilization. We have already far exceeded the earth's carrying capacity, and we are only able to carry on for the time being due to the fact that we have repeatedly bought ourselves a bit more time through the use of drastic artificial interventions that are simply not sustainable. We are quickly draining the earth of its resources faster than it can regenerate itself. Modern industrial civilization is simply a massive house of cards built on top of the continued extraction of oil, and this is something that simply can not be avoided or worked around. When we run out of oil, which will happen very soon, the entire house of cards will collapse, leaving us in ruins. It will be the worst catastrophe that humanity has ever seen.

Agriculture and industry are immensely harmful for the environment. Since the first seeds were planted ten thousand years ago, the human species has dramatically transformed the natural world, and not in a beneficial way. Agriculture is a massively polluting human activity that wreaks immense havoc and destruction on the natural environment. It requires the clear cutting of huge tracts of forest, it depletes the soil of its natural nutrients, it causes severe erosion, and through the use of irrigation it diverts enormous quantities of water from natural habitats where it is sorely needed. The impact of agriculture has only gotten worse in the last hundred years or so, with the advent of such things as factory farming, genetically modified crops, industrial agriculture, and pesticides.

Industry is so incredibly bad for the environment that even the horrors of agriculture are dwarfed in comparison. It requires the mass extraction of oil, which is unspeakably horrible for the natural ecosystem, and industrial corporations care nothing about the health of the environment. Chemicals regularly are dumped into rivers, toxic pollution is released into the atmosphere, contaminants are spread throughout critical natural habitats... the list goes on and on. In recent decades, the impact of the human activities of agriculture and industry have gotten so bad that global warming threatens us with an unstoppable runaway greenhouse effect that could very likely turn the Earth into a second Venus.

Agricultural and industrial civilization have been significantly harmful for humanity. Technology is worshiped with an almost cultlike passion in today's modern world, but almost everyone overlooks the horrors that technology brings. Since the dawn of the Industrial Age, we have created such things as chemical and biological weapons, industrial agriculture, nuclear technologies such as nuclear weapons and nuclear energy, the chemical industry, and industrial-scale mass warfare. Technologists claim that technology is beneficial to us, but whatever benefits we see are simply an unrepresentative facade that does not tell the story, and is outweighed by the massive negatives.

Technology and scientific progress have also had negative effects on the social fabric of human interactions. The internet may enable us to talk to people all the way around the world, but is that really so necessary or important? Consider that this same Internet has utterly destroyed face-to-face human interaction; you can rarely go anywhere without seeing literally almost everyone with their faces right up to their phones, oblivious to everything around them besides the three-inch bright screen directly in front of their faces. Also, instead of going out, seeing the world, and proactively making changes in your lifestyle for the better, people simply pop pills as a "solution" to every minor problem that they face, and this removes them from the true holistic experience of a fulfilling life that is in touch with nature.

Furthermore, many of the diseases we suffer today are solely diseases of civilization: heart disease, cancer, asthma, allergies, depression, liver failure, kidney failure, obesity, and much more. In pre-agricultural society, people lived long and fulfilled lives, and almost everyone was healthy and physically fit. The latter is something that can certainly not say about today.

The agricultural and industrial civilization of today disconnects humans from nature. This has serious tangible harmful effects that will come back to bite us if we do not change our ways. Ever since the dawn of agriculture, we have been evolving at an extremely fast rate. This is simply unsustainable: there is no way to get around this. Up until ten thousand years ago, humans were evolving very slowly, and this allowed our natural environments to co-evolve with us in a symbiotic manner, so that both man and nature benefited. However, ever since the giant mistake of agriculture began, we have been evolving far too quickly for the rest of the Earth to co-evolve. This has separated us from our place in the natural order, and the resulting imbalance, along with our massive deliberate destruction of the environment, has caused great damage to the earth. By returning to a primitive pre-agricultural lifestyle, we acknowledge and accept our humble yet special place in the natural order, returning us to a mutually beneficial relationship with the great natural world.

I firmly believe that the only way that humanity can survive in the long run is to end agriculture, dismantle industry, and embrace primitivism as our way of life. The notion of "progress" is simply not sustainable, and will doom us in the long run if we do not set it aside.

For me, personally, the only real question remaining is how we reach this in the best possible manner.

Do you agree with my support for a primitive way of life? What do you think? What are your views on the primitivist ideology?

No. I think you have an incredible ignorant and naive view of what pre-agricultural life was like. It's absolutely moronic.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Towson
Minister
 
Posts: 2408
Founded: Oct 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Towson » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:24 am

Blasveck wrote:Am I the only one that an anarcho-primitivist is speaking on the internet?


My Irony meter is off the roof!
Factbook
If Harry Potter and Luke Skywalker had a Deathbattle,Chuck Norris Would Win
15,White,Male,Straight,American,Agnostic,Progressive Republican
Not a Supporter of Bashar al-Assads Regime's fight against Democracy
Flappy Birds will cause Human Extinction
Generation 36, the first time you see this copy and paste it to your sig and add 1 to the generation
Political Compass 4.62 Right -0.15 Libertarian and http://www.politicaltest.net/test/graph ... 13_eng.jpg

Likes: Capitalism,Neoliberalism,Liberties and Freedoms,Democracy,Secularism,Science,America,Canada,The European Union,Australia,The FSA,BBC News
Dislikes: Communism,Socialism,Authoritarianism,Anarchism,Dictatorships,Racism,Homophobia,Religious People,Russia,Cuba and China,The Syrian Government,RT.

User avatar
The Backcountry Confederacy
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 16
Founded: Feb 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Backcountry Confederacy » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:24 am

Wytenigistan wrote:We can be agricultural without being industrial...just make agriculture sustainable so the ground wont become useless after a few years, problem solved.

Even then, agriculture requires the mass clearing of huge tracts of land. Agriculture is simply not sustainable in the long term, and any form of agriculture that claims to be "sustainable" is simply buying some more time.

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:25 am

Blasveck wrote:Am I the only one thats thinking about how ridicilous an anarcho-primitivist is speaking on the internet?

Pretty much all of them do so irony is now lost its meaning... ;)

Meowfoundland wrote:Who's gonna kill the 6.5 billion people necessary to make this viable?

We just turn off the food supply and let nature take care of that minor issue. What could go wrong?
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Wytenigistan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1905
Founded: Sep 12, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Wytenigistan » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:26 am

The Backcountry Confederacy wrote:
Wytenigistan wrote:We can be agricultural without being industrial...just make agriculture sustainable so the ground wont become useless after a few years, problem solved.

Even then, agriculture requires the mass clearing of huge tracts of land. Agriculture is simply not sustainable in the long term, and any form of agriculture that claims to be "sustainable" is simply buying some more time.

How is it not sustainable if we work the land so that we don't have to clear more tacts of land...that was my whole point. If we are sustainable we won't have to do that.
Union busting is anti-capitalist, unpatriotic and self-destructive.
The Honker Banditess
Your mom's ***** was kosovo last night, just ask her how much iraq.
Right: 2.89
Libertarian: 5.23
Non-interventionist: 5.93
Cultural liberal: 3.22
United Timelines Outpost Number 99999999 wrote:When the Landfill comes to town, old people congeal to their rocking chairs and branch out like meat fungus.

Neoconstantius wrote:NSG: ad hoc ad hominem ad nauseum

Estado Paulista wrote:You can never have too much Xanax.

Kebaballah!

User avatar
Towson
Minister
 
Posts: 2408
Founded: Oct 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Towson » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:26 am

The Backcountry Confederacy wrote:
Wytenigistan wrote:We can be agricultural without being industrial...just make agriculture sustainable so the ground wont become useless after a few years, problem solved.

Even then, agriculture requires the mass clearing of huge tracts of land. Agriculture is simply not sustainable in the long term, and any form of agriculture that claims to be "sustainable" is simply buying some more time.

What about small tracks land that are less then 10 acres or communal framing or eating less?
Factbook
If Harry Potter and Luke Skywalker had a Deathbattle,Chuck Norris Would Win
15,White,Male,Straight,American,Agnostic,Progressive Republican
Not a Supporter of Bashar al-Assads Regime's fight against Democracy
Flappy Birds will cause Human Extinction
Generation 36, the first time you see this copy and paste it to your sig and add 1 to the generation
Political Compass 4.62 Right -0.15 Libertarian and http://www.politicaltest.net/test/graph ... 13_eng.jpg

Likes: Capitalism,Neoliberalism,Liberties and Freedoms,Democracy,Secularism,Science,America,Canada,The European Union,Australia,The FSA,BBC News
Dislikes: Communism,Socialism,Authoritarianism,Anarchism,Dictatorships,Racism,Homophobia,Religious People,Russia,Cuba and China,The Syrian Government,RT.

User avatar
Meowfoundland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5962
Founded: Mar 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Meowfoundland » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:27 am

The Backcountry Confederacy wrote:Furthermore, many of the diseases we suffer today are solely diseases of civilization: heart disease, cancer, asthma, allergies, depression, liver failure, kidney failure, obesity, and much more. In pre-agricultural society, people lived long and fulfilled lives, and almost everyone was healthy and physically fit. The latter is something that can certainly not say about today.

You're right. Dying from an infected cut because disinfectant didn't exist is pretty much the definition of health.
This was formerly a signature. One day, it may return to its splendid past. In the meantime, enjoy some pictures of my cats.

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:28 am

The Backcountry Confederacy wrote:
Wytenigistan wrote:We can be agricultural without being industrial...just make agriculture sustainable so the ground wont become useless after a few years, problem solved.

Even then, agriculture requires the mass clearing of huge tracts of land. Agriculture is simply not sustainable in the long term, and any form of agriculture that claims to be "sustainable" is simply buying some more time.

That is what entire existence is. Nothing is truly sustainable; every form of energy transfer, every action that is taken is contributing towards entropy increase and eventual heat death of the universe. Our best bet is to advance technology to such an extent that first we can escape this solar system before sun blows up then hopefully creating some form of artificial "pocket" universe for when this one goes down.
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
The Backcountry Confederacy
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 16
Founded: Feb 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Backcountry Confederacy » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:29 am

Meowfoundland wrote:
The Backcountry Confederacy wrote:Furthermore, many of the diseases we suffer today are solely diseases of civilization: heart disease, cancer, asthma, allergies, depression, liver failure, kidney failure, obesity, and much more. In pre-agricultural society, people lived long and fulfilled lives, and almost everyone was healthy and physically fit. The latter is something that can certainly not say about today.

You're right. Dying from an infected cut because disinfectant didn't exist is pretty much the definition of health.

The idea of poor health before modern society is simply a myth. Because everyone was so much healthier back then, they could easily use natural immunity to fight off infections without requiring the artificial interventions that don't even work that we have today. People grossly underestimate the natural healing power of the human body.

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:30 am

The Backcountry Confederacy wrote:
Wytenigistan wrote:We can be agricultural without being industrial...just make agriculture sustainable so the ground wont become useless after a few years, problem solved.

Even then, agriculture requires the mass clearing of huge tracts of land. Agriculture is simply not sustainable in the long term, and any form of agriculture that claims to be "sustainable" is simply buying some more time.


It's not like the alternative is any better, especially given the surprising developments in the agriculture industry, such as vertical farming.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
The Backcountry Confederacy
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 16
Founded: Feb 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Backcountry Confederacy » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:30 am

Great Nepal wrote:
The Backcountry Confederacy wrote:Even then, agriculture requires the mass clearing of huge tracts of land. Agriculture is simply not sustainable in the long term, and any form of agriculture that claims to be "sustainable" is simply buying some more time.

That is what entire existence is. Nothing is truly sustainable; every form of energy transfer, every action that is taken is contributing towards entropy increase and eventual heat death of the universe. Our best bet is to advance technology to such an extent that first we can escape this solar system before sun blows up then hopefully creating some form of artificial "pocket" universe for when this one goes down.

Or, we could not advance technology at all and therefore not create energy transfers large enough to cause such a thing. Mass-scale energy production is unsustainable and unavoidably bad for the environment, anyways.

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:32 am

The Backcountry Confederacy wrote:
Meowfoundland wrote:You're right. Dying from an infected cut because disinfectant didn't exist is pretty much the definition of health.

The idea of poor health before modern society is simply a myth. Because everyone was so much healthier back then, they could easily use natural immunity to fight off infections without requiring the artificial interventions that don't even work that we have today. People grossly underestimate the natural healing power of the human body.

Wonder why most people died before age of 30 during 1850's instead of relying on this natural healing power...
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Meowfoundland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5962
Founded: Mar 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Meowfoundland » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:32 am

The Backcountry Confederacy wrote:
Meowfoundland wrote:You're right. Dying from an infected cut because disinfectant didn't exist is pretty much the definition of health.

The idea of poor health before modern society is simply a myth. Because everyone was so much healthier back then, they could easily use natural immunity to fight off infections without requiring the artificial interventions that don't even work that we have today. People grossly underestimate the natural healing power of the human body.

And then the magical unicorns came down from the sky, and everyone rode them around as they shimmered and threw glitter and pure happiness through the air, while a million rainbows appeared around them in a comforting blanket of love.
This was formerly a signature. One day, it may return to its splendid past. In the meantime, enjoy some pictures of my cats.

User avatar
Towson
Minister
 
Posts: 2408
Founded: Oct 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Towson » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:32 am

The Backcountry Confederacy wrote:
Meowfoundland wrote:You're right. Dying from an infected cut because disinfectant didn't exist is pretty much the definition of health.

The idea of poor health before modern society is simply a myth. Because everyone was so much healthier back then, they could easily use natural immunity to fight off infections without requiring the artificial interventions that don't even work that we have today. People grossly underestimate the natural healing power of the human body.


Citation/Prof Please? From like a Real Doctor,A Respected Health Organization or a Respected and Real Medical Website.
Factbook
If Harry Potter and Luke Skywalker had a Deathbattle,Chuck Norris Would Win
15,White,Male,Straight,American,Agnostic,Progressive Republican
Not a Supporter of Bashar al-Assads Regime's fight against Democracy
Flappy Birds will cause Human Extinction
Generation 36, the first time you see this copy and paste it to your sig and add 1 to the generation
Political Compass 4.62 Right -0.15 Libertarian and http://www.politicaltest.net/test/graph ... 13_eng.jpg

Likes: Capitalism,Neoliberalism,Liberties and Freedoms,Democracy,Secularism,Science,America,Canada,The European Union,Australia,The FSA,BBC News
Dislikes: Communism,Socialism,Authoritarianism,Anarchism,Dictatorships,Racism,Homophobia,Religious People,Russia,Cuba and China,The Syrian Government,RT.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:33 am

The Backcountry Confederacy wrote:
Great Nepal wrote:That is what entire existence is. Nothing is truly sustainable; every form of energy transfer, every action that is taken is contributing towards entropy increase and eventual heat death of the universe. Our best bet is to advance technology to such an extent that first we can escape this solar system before sun blows up then hopefully creating some form of artificial "pocket" universe for when this one goes down.

Or, we could not advance technology at all and therefore not create energy transfers large enough to cause such a thing. Mass-scale energy production is unsustainable and unavoidably bad for the environment, anyways.


If you don't want technology advanced at all, you shouldn't be on a PC.

User avatar
Meowfoundland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5962
Founded: Mar 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Meowfoundland » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:34 am

Towson wrote:
The Backcountry Confederacy wrote:The idea of poor health before modern society is simply a myth. Because everyone was so much healthier back then, they could easily use natural immunity to fight off infections without requiring the artificial interventions that don't even work that we have today. People grossly underestimate the natural healing power of the human body.


Citation/Prof Please? From like a Real Doctor,A Respected Health Organization or a Respected and Real Medical Website.

No no you see, they can't possibly tell you the truth because they are part of the health-industrial complex that actually causes disease instead of germs.
This was formerly a signature. One day, it may return to its splendid past. In the meantime, enjoy some pictures of my cats.

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:34 am

The Backcountry Confederacy wrote:
Great Nepal wrote:That is what entire existence is. Nothing is truly sustainable; every form of energy transfer, every action that is taken is contributing towards entropy increase and eventual heat death of the universe. Our best bet is to advance technology to such an extent that first we can escape this solar system before sun blows up then hopefully creating some form of artificial "pocket" universe for when this one goes down.

Or, we could not advance technology at all and therefore not create energy transfers large enough to cause such a thing. Mass-scale energy production is unsustainable and unavoidably bad for the environment, anyways.

No, human contribution is minute and even if all humans ceased to exist tomorrow heat death will happen. Maybe few minutes latter but that's about it. This world, this solar system and this universe is doomed. Only solution is to escape it and that is only possible by massive technological advances.
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Towson
Minister
 
Posts: 2408
Founded: Oct 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Towson » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:34 am

Luveria wrote:
The Backcountry Confederacy wrote:Or, we could not advance technology at all and therefore not create energy transfers large enough to cause such a thing. Mass-scale energy production is unsustainable and unavoidably bad for the environment, anyways.


If you don't want technology advanced at all, you shouldn't be on a PC.


Or live in a Building.
Factbook
If Harry Potter and Luke Skywalker had a Deathbattle,Chuck Norris Would Win
15,White,Male,Straight,American,Agnostic,Progressive Republican
Not a Supporter of Bashar al-Assads Regime's fight against Democracy
Flappy Birds will cause Human Extinction
Generation 36, the first time you see this copy and paste it to your sig and add 1 to the generation
Political Compass 4.62 Right -0.15 Libertarian and http://www.politicaltest.net/test/graph ... 13_eng.jpg

Likes: Capitalism,Neoliberalism,Liberties and Freedoms,Democracy,Secularism,Science,America,Canada,The European Union,Australia,The FSA,BBC News
Dislikes: Communism,Socialism,Authoritarianism,Anarchism,Dictatorships,Racism,Homophobia,Religious People,Russia,Cuba and China,The Syrian Government,RT.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:35 am

The Backcountry Confederacy wrote:
Meowfoundland wrote:You're right. Dying from an infected cut because disinfectant didn't exist is pretty much the definition of health.

The idea of poor health before modern society is simply a myth.

The ignorance and disconnect from reality demonstrated here is hilarious.
http://wholehealthsource.blogspot.com/2 ... th-of.html
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Atrito, Bovad, Carolina Sur, Google [Bot], Guinea-Bassoon, Hrstrovokia, Niolia, Risottia, Sarduri, Snowish Republic, The Two Jerseys

Advertisement

Remove ads