Slafstopia wrote:I don't like nuclear power simply because when it does fuck up, the results are catastrophic.
No different than, a dam bursting, or a coal power plant exploding
Advertisement
by Saint Kitten » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:06 pm
Slafstopia wrote:I don't like nuclear power simply because when it does fuck up, the results are catastrophic.
by Sapian » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:06 pm
Anachronous Rex wrote:Sapian wrote:
but with more investment it could be.. and there have been reactors made for the cold fusion process.. but you know.. great people that discover great things such as nikola tesla, end up like.. well, nikola tesla
No, you see: it is probably impossible.
Fusion itself, however, has much promise.
by Slafstopia » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:07 pm
by Slafstopia » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:08 pm
Sapian wrote:Anachronous Rex wrote:No, you see: it is probably impossible.
Fusion itself, however, has much promise.
is it really?
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/1563 ... ity-of-gas
and right.. for now they are called spacecraft.. but you see i'm a futurist.. i see them as spaceships
by Sapian » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:09 pm
Slafstopia wrote:Sapian wrote:I do believe nuclear energy is good.. but it will become much better, safer, and reliable if we used cold fusion how much simpler and easier the technology would become, it could be used on spaceships! to travel great distances! i say if we are going to use nuclear energy invest in cold fusion reactors
Three words: radioisotope thermoelectric generators. By the way, it's space CRAFT.
by The Corparation » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:09 pm
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Slafstopia » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:10 pm
by Sapian » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:12 pm
Slafstopia wrote:Sapian wrote:
is it really?
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/1563 ... ity-of-gas
and right.. for now they are called spacecraft.. but you see i'm a futurist.. i see them as spaceships
I assume you also think spacecraft travel in straight lines and we can go to any planet whenever we want? Enlighten us with your obvious psychic abilities.
by Anachronous Rex » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:12 pm
Sapian wrote:Anachronous Rex wrote:No, you see: it is probably impossible.
Fusion itself, however, has much promise.
is it really?
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/1563 ... ity-of-gas
and right.. for now they are called spacecraft.. but you see i'm a futurist.. i see them as spaceships
by Slafstopia » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:15 pm
Sapian wrote:Slafstopia wrote:
I assume you also think spacecraft travel in straight lines and we can go to any planet whenever we want? Enlighten us with your obvious psychic abilities.
lmao really?.. oOoooOoo yes they go so straight into the sky! so magical.. no sh#t they don't and if we really wanted to 1. we could make it to any location is this system.. imagine if all the worlds space programs worked together? 2. look at the ISS for example? imagine that in it's full potiential
by Silvadus » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:17 pm
Ceannairceach wrote:If I were optimistic, I'd never be pleasantly surprised.
by Sapian » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:17 pm
Anachronous Rex wrote:Sapian wrote:
is it really?
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/1563 ... ity-of-gas
and right.. for now they are called spacecraft.. but you see i'm a futurist.. i see them as spaceships
"The research paper, which hasn’t yet undergone peer review"
Get back to me when it's not just "because we said so."
by Slafstopia » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:19 pm
by Sapian » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:20 pm
Slafstopia wrote:Sapian wrote:
lmao really?.. oOoooOoo yes they go so straight into the sky! so magical.. no sh#t they don't and if we really wanted to 1. we could make it to any location is this system.. imagine if all the worlds space programs worked together? 2. look at the ISS for example? imagine that in it's full potiential
1. When you say we, do you mean humans, or just space programs?
2. That's like saying "You see this cardboard box? There could be ANYTHING inside!" then not giving examples.
by Slafstopia » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:22 pm
Sapian wrote:Slafstopia wrote:
1. When you say we, do you mean humans, or just space programs?
2. That's like saying "You see this cardboard box? There could be ANYTHING inside!" then not giving examples.
and i mean it as in humanity,
and why not be optimistic of all possibilities? i will always think that schoedinger's cat will come out alive lol it's just the way i see things
by The Corparation » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:22 pm
Sapian wrote:Anachronous Rex wrote:"The research paper, which hasn’t yet undergone peer review"
Get back to me when it's not just "because we said so."
here is another then!
http://ecat.com/ecat-products/ecat-1-mw
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Anachronous Rex » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:23 pm
Sapian wrote:Anachronous Rex wrote:"The research paper, which hasn’t yet undergone peer review"
Get back to me when it's not just "because we said so."
here is another then!
http://ecat.com/ecat-products/ecat-1-mw
by Sapian » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:24 pm
The Corparation wrote:
Somebody is selling something on the internet? With no second opinions or peer reviewed papers to back up their "science" Golly Gee! I guess that proves that Cold Fusion is a real marketable technology.
by Slafstopia » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:25 pm
by The Corparation » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:25 pm
Sapian wrote:The Corparation wrote:Somebody is selling something on the internet? With no second opinions or peer reviewed papers to back up their "science" Golly Gee! I guess that proves that Cold Fusion is a real marketable technology.
woops sorry this is the one i meant!
http://www.buildtheenterprise.org/ecat- ... ade-in-usa
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Sapian » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:27 pm
Slafstopia wrote:Sapian wrote:
and i mean it as in humanity,
and why not be optimistic of all possibilities? i will always think that schoedinger's cat will come out alive lol it's just the way i see things
1. ...That doesn't answer my question whatsoever. Do you mean people, or probes?
2. Optimism isn't how you be an astronomer. If you're doing science right, realism will make you happier than optimism. Optimism doesn't benefit astronomy.
by The Shadow Brotherhood » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:29 pm
by Slafstopia » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:29 pm
Sapian wrote:Slafstopia wrote:
1. ...That doesn't answer my question whatsoever. Do you mean people, or probes?
2. Optimism isn't how you be an astronomer. If you're doing science right, realism will make you happier than optimism. Optimism doesn't benefit astronomy.
Answers:
1. Why not both? much like we did with the moon and are planning to do with mars? thats a weird question
2. Who said i couldn't be optimistic about astronomy? lol
whats up with your questions?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhirisian Puppet Nation, Camtropia, Duvniask, Experina, Floofybit, Great Otter Empire, Oceasia, Stellar Colonies
Advertisement