Maurepas wrote:
Further its indicative of the overall problem, the idea that a major national company can come out in favor of discrimination is pretty revolting in and of itself. You don't dare see a company, regardless of viewpoint, coming out in favor of racial discrimination, we need that same attitude associated with things like this.
You know, there's a point there that's worth exploring. It really seems that the LGBTQ community is the last "acceptable" target.
If the CEO of a major company came out and not only said "you know, I just don't think that blacks should be able to marry white people. I support the 'traditional' version of marriage...to people of the same color" and revealed that he had donated money he earned from his customers to white power groups, there would have been a media shitstorm of, pardon the pun, biblical proportions. Every politician from the president on down to my local dog catcher would be SCREAMING. There'd by national boycots, and the business would be shuttered in a week. Nobody would have batted an eyelash at their local rerepresentatives comdemning that viewpoint, and many would be shocked if they didn't.
But when it's homsexual discrimination, because of "religion", well then, that's ok. And when a few brave politicians actually stand up and say "it would be unacceptable if it were about color, it would be unacceptable if it were about religion, it's unacceptable now when it's about sexuality" the poor widdle dears on the right wing are crying crodile tears about the mean government picking on them, oh no!
I support, FULLY, those members of the government who have stood up and declared, publically, that these attitudes have no place in civilized society, and that businesses that funnel money to those causes have no place in progressive cities. Discrimination is discrimination, bigotry is bigotry, regardless of its source, or its direction. Shame on these bigots who wrap themselves in "religion" to continue the perpetration of the 21st century's new racism.
Not in my city.