Tea Party for Obama?

[Maurepas]

I'm kind of torn as to whether I'm surprised or not. On the one hand, I'm surprised that a group of Tea Partiers has seen the light on the subject, but on the other, I'm not really surprised because that light was bright as hell, so to speak.

[Jinos]

Obama is ruining America... He is putting America in greater debt! We need a true patriot America, A true leader we can trust.

Funny. Republicans weren't whining about the debt when Bush was doing it.

[OMGeverynameistaken]

Obama is ruining America... He is putting America in greater debt! We need a true patriot America, A true leader we can trust.

Funny. Republicans weren't whining about the debt when Bush was doing it.

Because that was good debt. Nice, healthy debt incurred killing ay-rabs and blowing up sand! None of this mucky debt we're getting from Obama trying to improve the healthcare system or helping poor people and Mexicans!

[Birkinghamia]

They're obviously racist against white people. (sarcasm)

[Mike the Progressive]

I'm kind of torn as to whether I'm surprised or not. On the one hand, I'm surprised that a group of Tea Partiers has seen the light on the subject, but on the other, I'm not really surprised because that light was bright as hell, so to speak.

*sighs*

[Maurepas]

I'm kind of torn as to whether I'm surprised or not. On the one hand, I'm surprised that a group of Tea Partiers has seen the light on the subject, but on the other, I'm not really surprised because that light was bright as hell, so to speak.

*sighs*

Coming from me that's a negative against Obama. I think he's conservative enough for them and they very well could have realized it.

On the other hand, I'm not sure if I believe its authenticity or not.

[The Republic of Lanos]

Equal opportunity extremism. Finally we're getting somewhere.

[Demphor]

Tea Party for Obama?

[Wikkiwallana]

Obama is ruining America... He is putting America in greater debt! We need a true patriot America, A true leader we can trust.

So you have anybody in mind, or just empty sloganeering?

[Southland]

Funny. Republicans weren't whining about the debt when Bush was doing it.

Because that was good debt. Nice, healthy debt incurred killing ay-rabs and blowing up sand! None of this mucky debt we're getting from Obama trying to improve the healthcare system or helping poor people and Mexicans!

Dude, just shut up. You choose to hate Obama, which is fine by me as we all have different opinions on him, but I will not tolerate you bringing up your xenophobic and racist into this.

[Gauthier]

Because that was good debt. Nice, healthy debt incurred killing ay-rabs and blowing up sand! None of this mucky debt we're getting from Obama trying to improve the healthcare system or helping poor people and Mexicans!

Dude, just shut up. You choose to hate Obama, which is fine by me as we all have different opinions on him, but I will not tolerate you bringing up your xenophobic and racist into this.

You really need to grasp the art of sarcasm.

[Wikkiwallana]

Because that was good debt. Nice, healthy debt incurred killing ay-rabs and blowing up sand! None of this mucky debt we're getting from Obama trying to improve the healthcare system or helping poor people and Mexicans!

Dude, just shut up. You choose to hate Obama, which is fine by me as we all have different opinions on him, but I will not tolerate you bringing up your xenophobic and racist into this.

[Natapoc]

The best thing about this is how annoyed the establishment liberals will be that some tea party people, who the hate, are on "their" side now.

Or

the best thing about this is how annoyed the establishment conservatives will be that their pet astroturf project got votes for obama.

Either way, this is funny.

[Ourfgenstan (Ancient)]

Does this mean we can put Obama on the Republican ticket instead?

I'd like a REAL progressive to run on the Democratic ticket, not some FAKE.

Has Obama even claimed to be a Progressive before? I remember he claimed to be a Blue dog, and he mocked progressives once talking about how Progressives were a problem.

[Dyakovo]

Yeah, they mean the 10% of Democrats who always votes Republican

So, there must be Republicans who vote Democrat, non?

Well, until last year, I was a registered Republican who voted Democrat or third-party more often than I voted Republican... Of course that was due to the fact that, where I live, you apparently aren't allowed to just leave a party...

[Dyakovo]

You think any of the other Democrats are better?

No seriously, are they? I don't know enough about them.

Hillary Clinton looked very promising.

[Yorick]

Well this shouldn't really be surprising. Obama acts like a typical neocon Republican anyway.

[Dyakovo]

Well this shouldn't really be surprising. Obama acts like a typical neocon Republican anyway.

Fixed.

[Yorick]

Well this shouldn't really be surprising. Obama acts like a typical neocon Republican anyway.

Fixed.

Well, certainly they infest both parties.

[Ourfgenstan (Ancient)]

Well this shouldn't really be surprising. Obama acts like a typical neocon Republican anyway.

I wouldn't go that far. He's more of a pushover Centrist.

[Dyakovo]

Well this shouldn't really be surprising. Obama acts like a typical neocon Republican anyway.

I wouldn't go that far. He's more of a pushover Centrist.

How is he a centrist when both the Republicans and Democrats are right-wing authoritarian parties?

[Maurepas]

Well this shouldn't really be surprising. Obama acts like a typical neocon Republican anyway.

I wouldn't go that far. He's more of a pushover Centrist.

He's a pushover centrist according to the US Voting Populace, but the US Voting Populace has a tendency to be authoritarian right-wing.

[Yorick]

Well this shouldn't really be surprising. Obama acts like a typical neocon Republican anyway.

I wouldn't go that far. He's more of a pushover Centrist.

Well let me put it this way, if Romney was President right now and Obama was running against him instead of the other way around would anything actually be different? I doubt it. Even ignoring them both wanting to bomb Syria and Iran for no good reason their stances on domestic issues like healthcare or corporate bail outs are the same.

[Dyakovo]

I wouldn't go that far. He's more of a pushover Centrist.

Well let me put it this way, if Romney was President right now and Obama was running against him instead of the other way around would anything actually be different? I doubt it. Even ignoring them both wanting to bomb Syria and Iran for no good reason their stances on domestic issues like healthcare or corporate bail outs are the same.

Where did you get the idea that Obama wants to bomb Syria and Iran?

[Yorick]

Well let me put it this way, if Romney was President right now and Obama was running against him instead of the other way around would anything actually be different? I doubt it. Even ignoring them both wanting to bomb Syria and Iran for no good reason their stances on domestic issues like healthcare or corporate bail outs are the same.

Where did you get the idea that Obama wants to bomb Syria and Iran?

http://nation.foxnews.com/president-oba ... e-straight
http://news.antiwar.com/2011/12/23/obam ... e-mean-it/
http://web.archive.org/web/200706091639 ... &cset=true

He's threatened to attack Iran with air strikes multiple times since 2007. He fact he just threatened to bomb them if they close the Strait of Hormuz recently. And Syria certainly perceives the US as seriously on the verge of retaliating against them which given the precedent set by Libya really isn't that implausible. Certainly his rhetoric has been very aggressive. The only thing I can really praise him on is that at least he knows Israel is being ridiculous about the settlement issue, even if the only way you would actually know that is through that conversation with Sarko that got leaked.