Brodskopolis wrote:Why the hell shouldn't they marry?
Indeed.
Doesn't that remove them from the breeding pool?
Advertisement
by The Black Forrest » Fri Jul 15, 2011 7:28 pm
Brodskopolis wrote:Why the hell shouldn't they marry?
by Grave_n_idle » Fri Jul 15, 2011 7:31 pm
Haktiva wrote:i don't care
but if i was forced to voice my opinion, it's really up to the individual religious leader to marry them
by Guernseyland » Fri Jul 15, 2011 7:31 pm
by Ceannairceach » Fri Jul 15, 2011 7:31 pm
Haktiva wrote:i don't care
but if i was forced to voice my opinion, it's really up to the individual religious leader to marry them
by Ceannairceach » Fri Jul 15, 2011 7:32 pm
Guernseyland wrote:I agree that gay marriage is not wrong or anything. It is as right as straight marriage, and anyone who thinks otherwise is discriminating. However, it's the churchs desicion if they want to preform it. If it gets in the way of your religion, that religion sucks. Reform.
by Guernseyland » Fri Jul 15, 2011 7:32 pm
by Farnhamia » Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:13 pm
Guernseyland wrote:Athiests can marry. I would know 'cause I am one.
by Norstal » Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:15 pm
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
by The Alma Mater » Fri Jul 15, 2011 9:48 pm
Chesnova wrote:Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you against the revision of the word "marriage"?
because it is my belief. That word is holy in most religions and being a respectful agnostic to my religious friends, I see good reason why it shouldn't be revised. I have no problem with two people being together but not under "marriage".
by Connopolis » Fri Jul 15, 2011 10:07 pm
Christian Democrats wrote:Franco-Philia wrote:
What I meant is, it is no business of the state to judge consenting adults who are not harming one another. That is what is private about it. Being open about your sexuality doesn't mean you talk about it ALL the time and that it is the only defining characteristic about you.
I agree. The state should not judge relationships between (sometimes among) consenting adults. I simply don't understand why legal recognition of those relationships is necessary. Maybe the best compromise would be eliminating civil marriage all together (though, it's highly unlikely).
From the office of,
Mrs. Pamela Howell
GA Ambassador of the Connopolian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
by Tsal-Kar » Fri Jul 15, 2011 10:41 pm
by Dusk_Kittens » Fri Jul 15, 2011 10:46 pm
Haktiva wrote:i don't care
but if i was forced to voice my opinion, it's really up to the individual religious leader to marry them
Guernseyland wrote:I agree that gay marriage is not wrong or anything. It is as right as straight marriage, and anyone who thinks otherwise is discriminating. However, it's the churchs desicion if they want to preform it. If it gets in the way of your religion, that religion sucks. Reform.
by Connopolis » Fri Jul 15, 2011 10:48 pm
Tsal-Kar wrote:I don't give a damn who marries who. You want to marry your same-sex partner? Hell, I really don't care about polygamy, either - basically, the government should stay out of marriage
From the office of,
Mrs. Pamela Howell
GA Ambassador of the Connopolian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
by The Alma Mater » Fri Jul 15, 2011 11:04 pm
Tsal-Kar wrote:I don't give a damn who marries who. You want to marry your same-sex partner? Go ahead, see if I care. Hell, I really don't care about polygamy, either - basically, the government should stay out of marriage
by Dyakovo » Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:14 am
Dusk_Kittens wrote:The Alma Mater wrote:
This sentence seems to imply you think the government wants to do that. Can you give an example ?
Apologies if you already posted that, I have not read all posts yet.
The statement implies that some people in this thread are insisting that a legal definition of Legal Marriage" needs to include one or both of the following descriptors: "wholly secular" and/or "not religious."
by Dyakovo » Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:15 am
Ifreann wrote:Anyone else getting sick of "lolz, being married is torment" jokes?
by Dyakovo » Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:16 am
by Dyakovo » Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:18 am
Haktiva wrote:i don't care
but if i was forced to voice my opinion, it's really up to the individual religious leader to marry them
by Samuraikoku » Sat Jul 16, 2011 8:12 am
by Cthag-antil » Mon Jul 18, 2011 5:01 am
Enadail wrote:60% of the things in my room are brightly colored. Does this mean the next thing I buy will be brightly colored, regardless of what it is?
by Cthag-antil » Mon Jul 18, 2011 5:05 am
Enadail wrote:Statistics do not work that way. I was very clear on my reasoning for why your extrapolation was poor, but you ignored it and insulted me. I'm left to figure you don't understand statistics, or can only resort to insults when you have no arguments left. So how about this... you can try to regain some of your maturity and we can treat this like adults. Or you can continue to be childish, I guess, I can't force you into anything.
by Cthag-antil » Mon Jul 18, 2011 5:08 am
Memnoch de Marbulia wrote:Enadail wrote:
No, I said nothing special could be extrapolated. I can see you're getting frustrated now and have resorted to insults, and putting words in my mouth (you realize how pointless that is on a forum where you can look up the other persons words?). For someone big on honor, calling someone a coward is a pretty big insult, you should be ashamed, or is your honor meaningless?
60% of the things in my room are brightly colored. Does this mean the next thing I buy will be brightly colored, regardless of what it is?
Statistics do not work that way. I was very clear on my reasoning for why your extrapolation was poor, but you ignored it and insulted me. I'm left to figure you don't understand statistics, or can only resort to insults when you have no arguments left. So how about this... you can try to regain some of your maturity and we can treat this like adults. Or you can continue to be childish, I guess, I can't force you into anything.
Enadail...you are SO my new best friend.
by Cthag-antil » Mon Jul 18, 2011 5:23 am
Enadail wrote:For someone big on honor, calling someone a coward is a pretty big insult, you should be ashamed, or is your honor meaningless?
by Desperate Measures » Mon Jul 18, 2011 5:56 am
by Globexanter » Mon Jul 18, 2011 6:00 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, ARIsyan-, Based Illinois, Bienenhalde, Dresderstan, Forsher, Google [Bot], Hidrandia, Kerwa, La Xinga, Majestic-12 [Bot], New Temecula, New-Minneapolis, Ors Might, Pasong Tirad, Philjia, Port Carverton, Ravemath, Statesburg, Stratonesia, Tarsonis, The Canadian Commonwelth, The Grand World Order, The Jamesian Republic, Uiiop
Advertisement