NATION

PASSWORD

Anti-TSA Caucus?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Imperium Neo Roma
Diplomat
 
Posts: 578
Founded: Mar 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperium Neo Roma » Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:41 pm

Republicke wrote:Where were these guys when the Patriot Act was passed?

The TSA was born about a month after the Patriot Act passed.
It is not these well-fed long-haired men that I fear, but the pale and the hungry-looking.-Julius Caesar
Germany has reduced savagery to a science, and this great war for the victorious peace of justice must go on until the German cancer is cut clean out of the world body, -Theodore Roosevelt

User avatar
Faith Hope Charity
Minister
 
Posts: 2027
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Faith Hope Charity » Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:44 pm

Imperium Neo Roma wrote:
Faith Hope Charity wrote:
So you are quite alright with the government treating people as if they are guilty before proven such.. i gotcha.. you arent innocent till we prove you are.. who wants to live under that? you might, but not me... you still havent cited a single example of TSA actually doing what they are out to do and catching a terrorist, and you cant refute everything else ive said.


Do you not fucking understand? Do you think any sane government, after a event like 9/11, would just stand by and let Extremists waltz right into a airport? No, you're the crackpot that thinks being frisked isn't worth the security of 3,000 people.

And YOU have yet to prove that you know ANYONE within the TSA, Do you really think that "Alaska, Hawaii, Michigan, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas and Washington" are going to be targets for Terrorists? Of course not, once they get rid of the TSA there, they'll be getting plenty of bombs.

No one takes some Hawaiian Reporter seriously, nor do they take you seriously. I think it's clear that you would rather have thousands dieing do to no security, just because you don't like going through Airport Security.

Pathetic.


No one said no security, just the way its being done is beyond what should be considered acceptable. You honestly think i advocate no bag check? I never said that. But being frisked without a warrant or even being found guilty of doing anything shouldnt be considered acceptable behavior, and i find it disturbing that you actually advocate it. You honestly think "frisking" will stop another attack? you are crazy if you do, theres no way to stop it altogether.. so yes, i do think frisking people cuz of a terrorist attack and people dying is a poor excuse.. if anything profiling should be done, cuz honestly, granny and the little kid aint gonna be bombing. I refuse to live in paranoia of a terrorist attack.. in doing such they win already.
Je Suis Geller
Economic Right: 10.00
Social Libertarian: -6.77

People who denounce the free market and voluntary exchange, and are for control and coercion, believe they have more intelligence and superior wisdom to the masses. What's more, they believe they've been ordained to forcibly impose that wisdom on the rest of us. Of course, they have what they consider good reasons for doing so, but every tyrant that has ever existed has had what he believed were good reasons for restricting the liberty of others.
-Walter E. Williams

http://www.isidewith.com/results/426705837

User avatar
Republicke
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1288
Founded: Nov 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Republicke » Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:48 pm

Imperium Neo Roma wrote:
Republicke wrote:Where were these guys when the Patriot Act was passed?

The TSA was born about a month after the Patriot Act passed.


Sorry for the misunderstanding: I'm not praising, I'm pointing out if they cared about liberty there probably would be a Anti-PATRIOT caucus right about now.
Economic Left/Right: -6.00, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.85

"Never apologize for showing feeling. When you do so, you apologize for truth."
- B. Disraeli

Bramborska wrote:Muscular liberalism? He took my gay stripper name!

User avatar
Imperium Neo Roma
Diplomat
 
Posts: 578
Founded: Mar 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperium Neo Roma » Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:51 pm

Faith Hope Charity wrote:
Imperium Neo Roma wrote:

Do you not fucking understand? Do you think any sane government, after a event like 9/11, would just stand by and let Extremists waltz right into a airport? No, you're the crackpot that thinks being frisked isn't worth the security of 3,000 people.

And YOU have yet to prove that you know ANYONE within the TSA, Do you really think that "Alaska, Hawaii, Michigan, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas and Washington" are going to be targets for Terrorists? Of course not, once they get rid of the TSA there, they'll be getting plenty of bombs.

No one takes some Hawaiian Reporter seriously, nor do they take you seriously. I think it's clear that you would rather have thousands dieing do to no security, just because you don't like going through Airport Security.

Pathetic.


No one said no security, just the way its being done is beyond what should be considered acceptable. You honestly think i advocate no bag check? I never said that. But being frisked without a warrant or even being found guilty of doing anything shouldnt be considered acceptable behavior, and i find it disturbing that you actually advocate it. You honestly think "frisking" will stop another attack? you are crazy if you do, theres no way to stop it altogether.. so yes, i do think frisking people cuz of a terrorist attack and people dying is a poor excuse.. if anything profiling should be done, cuz honestly, granny and the little kid aint gonna be bombing. I refuse to live in paranoia of a terrorist attack.. in doing such they win already.


They do have a warrant, they're the Government, and it's legal to do their job. They're not coming into your home and forcing you to take a piss-test or be frisked, you're coming to them, it's a choice, if you don't like it you can wallow in sorrow while your family has a grand party without you.

Yes, remove frisking and put in profiling, I can't wait till 'granny and the little kid' are brainwashed or blackmailed into blowing up a plane, just because you don't want to be frisked (which rarely happens, actually).

If you don't like the U.S, go flock north to Canada. Terrorists don't give a shit about paranoia, they want blood, and they haven't gotten blood since the TSA was introduced.
It is not these well-fed long-haired men that I fear, but the pale and the hungry-looking.-Julius Caesar
Germany has reduced savagery to a science, and this great war for the victorious peace of justice must go on until the German cancer is cut clean out of the world body, -Theodore Roosevelt

User avatar
Brandenburg-Altmark
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5813
Founded: Nov 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Brandenburg-Altmark » Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:08 am

I've made my position clear before. If we've allowed a terrorist plot to get to the point where it's up to the TSA to stop them at the fucking gate we've already failed miserably in our war on terror. We should be stopping these people before they are already at the fucking airport, not picking people out of lines who look middle eastern and giving them strip searches or detaining them for days.

EDIT: Guess what, Imperium Neo Roma, every fucking nation on earth has experienced a massive drop in terrorist attacks. It's not because of the TSA, it's because the terrorists are not making more fucking attacks. Our intervention in Afghanistan has got them on the run, and we're burning down the poppy fields they make money with in A-stan. They can't attack us on our homeland when they're worrying about us coordinating with local governments and bombing the piss out of them in Yemen/Afghanistan. TSA has shit all to do with it, and the underwear bomber everyone was so concerned about wasn't even carrying enough C4 to damage the plane.
Last edited by Brandenburg-Altmark on Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: -7.50 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.21
TOKYONI UNJUSTLY DELETED 19/06/2011 - SAY NO TO MOD IMPERIALISM
Tanker til Norge.
Free isam wrote:
United Dependencies wrote:Where's inda? Or Russa for that matter?

idot inda is asias gron and russa is its hat ok :palm:

User avatar
Patriqvinia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1336
Founded: Oct 08, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Patriqvinia » Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:14 am

Imperium Neo Roma wrote:
Faith Hope Charity wrote:
No one said no security, just the way its being done is beyond what should be considered acceptable. You honestly think i advocate no bag check? I never said that. But being frisked without a warrant or even being found guilty of doing anything shouldnt be considered acceptable behavior, and i find it disturbing that you actually advocate it. You honestly think "frisking" will stop another attack? you are crazy if you do, theres no way to stop it altogether.. so yes, i do think frisking people cuz of a terrorist attack and people dying is a poor excuse.. if anything profiling should be done, cuz honestly, granny and the little kid aint gonna be bombing. I refuse to live in paranoia of a terrorist attack.. in doing such they win already.


They do have a warrant, they're the Government, and it's legal to do their job. They're not coming into your home and forcing you to take a piss-test or be frisked, you're coming to them, it's a choice, if you don't like it you can wallow in sorrow while your family has a grand party without you.

Yes, remove frisking and put in profiling, I can't wait till 'granny and the little kid' are brainwashed or blackmailed into blowing up a plane, just because you don't want to be frisked (which rarely happens, actually).

If you don't like the U.S, go flock north to Canada. Terrorists don't give a shit about paranoia, they want blood, and they haven't gotten blood since the TSA was introduced.

Sigh... "Any society that would give a little liberty to gain a little security, will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
I know members of the 100-or-less club have difficulty understanding, or even entertaining, this sentiment; but I just couldn't help myself here (I think it was the bleating of a blind-folded sheep in a lion suit). Hitler came to power because of the same brand of paranoid hysteria embodied by the TSA.
Last edited by Patriqvinia on Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Диявол любить ховатися за хрест
+: Voluntarism/panarchism.
-: Authoritarian stuff.
Economic: +8.44 right
Social: +8.89 libertarian
Foreign-Policy: +10 non-interventionist
Cultural: +2.24 liberal

*This anti-subsidy, anti-IP persona brought to you by your friends at Monsanto[TM][R] and Koch Industries[TM][R]!*

User avatar
Aethyopea
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1123
Founded: Sep 02, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Aethyopea » Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:21 am

Patriqvinia wrote:
Imperium Neo Roma wrote:
They do have a warrant, they're the Government, and it's legal to do their job. They're not coming into your home and forcing you to take a piss-test or be frisked, you're coming to them, it's a choice, if you don't like it you can wallow in sorrow while your family has a grand party without you.

Yes, remove frisking and put in profiling, I can't wait till 'granny and the little kid' are brainwashed or blackmailed into blowing up a plane, just because you don't want to be frisked (which rarely happens, actually).

If you don't like the U.S, go flock north to Canada. Terrorists don't give a shit about paranoia, they want blood, and they haven't gotten blood since the TSA was introduced.

Sigh... "Any society that would give a little liberty to gain a little security, will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
I know members of the 100-or-less club have difficulty understanding, or even entertaining, this sentiment; but I just couldn't help myself here (I think it was the bleating of a blind-folded sheep in a lion suit). Hitler came to power because of the same brand of paranoid hysteria embodied by the TSA.

Correction: They who can give up ESSENTIAL liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
It's a pretty big distinction to make. Everyone gives up a little liberty to obtain safety. It's called "laws". It's the essential ones you have to worry about. The right to free speech, freedom of religion, that kind of thing.
POLITICS, n. A strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage.
Ambrose Bierce: The Devil's Dictionary

•"The Catholic and the Communist are alike in assuming that an opponent cannot be both honest and intelligent."
George Orwell

"There is always an easy solution to every human problem--neat, plausible, and wrong."
-H.L. Mencken; The Sage of Baltimore


Trotskylvania wrote:Political analogies are like bullshit. It doesn't matter how pretty or elegant you try to make them, it's still a lump of bullshit at the end of the day.

User avatar
Patriqvinia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1336
Founded: Oct 08, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Patriqvinia » Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:31 am

Aethyopea wrote:
Patriqvinia wrote:Sigh... "Any society that would give a little liberty to gain a little security, will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
I know members of the 100-or-less club have difficulty understanding, or even entertaining, this sentiment; but I just couldn't help myself here (I think it was the bleating of a blind-folded sheep in a lion suit). Hitler came to power because of the same brand of paranoid hysteria embodied by the TSA.

Correction: They who can give up ESSENTIAL liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
It's a pretty big distinction to make. Everyone gives up a little liberty to obtain safety. It's called "laws". It's the essential ones you have to worry about. The right to free speech, freedom of religion, that kind of thing.

(That particular quote does have a few minor variations) Yeah, there's some truth to that; though, I don't think any of the founders would have ever said that they believed anyone was ever at liberty to commit wanton murder or theft (under their natural law).
Last edited by Patriqvinia on Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Диявол любить ховатися за хрест
+: Voluntarism/panarchism.
-: Authoritarian stuff.
Economic: +8.44 right
Social: +8.89 libertarian
Foreign-Policy: +10 non-interventionist
Cultural: +2.24 liberal

*This anti-subsidy, anti-IP persona brought to you by your friends at Monsanto[TM][R] and Koch Industries[TM][R]!*

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55305
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:05 am

Lackadaisical2 wrote:
Faith Hope Charity wrote:guess whos not going to the family reunion cuz of TSA? Me. I refuse to subject myself to that crap.

Could take the train, or bus.


Or he could work harder , earn more, and buy HIS OWN PRIVATE airplane instead of relying on Gov't-subsided transportation like a social parasite!

*oh, and add a random free market fairy, btw*
.

User avatar
Blouman Empire
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16184
Founded: Sep 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Blouman Empire » Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:08 am

Imperium Neo Roma wrote:
Faith Hope Charity wrote:
Funny that you would have such a sentiment... I'm supposed to be going to a family reunion this summer in Maine.. i live in California.. guess whos not going to the family reunion cuz of TSA? Me. I refuse to subject myself to that crap.


It's not TSAs fault, you might as well be a terrorist from what I've gathered, trying to hide his attempts to blow up a Cali-Maine flight by saying it was a family reunion. If you can't handle walking through a metal detector, emptying your pockets, and getting your I.D checked, then perhaps you don't need to fly, you might harm the other passengers with your Far-Left Bullshit.


Except it is more then that and you know it
You know you've made it on NSG when you have a whole thread created around what you said.
On the American/United Statesian matter "I'd suggest Americans go to their nation settings and change their nation prefix to something cooler." - The Kangaroo Republic
http://nswiki.net/index.php?title=Blouman_Empire

DBC26-Winner

User avatar
The Corparation
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34142
Founded: Aug 31, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Corparation » Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:51 am

The patdowns are silly and should stop. The full body scanners, metal detectors and odor sensors should be fine for checking a person without touching anywhere near their groin.
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting)
Orbital Freedom Machine Here
A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc.Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia-
Making the Nightmare End 2020 2024 WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety This Cell is intentionally blank.

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: -Britain-, Atrito, Dumb Ideologies, Floofybit, Infected Mushroom, Lycom, Niolia, Sunemia, Umeria

Advertisement

Remove ads