Republicke wrote:Where were these guys when the Patriot Act was passed?
The TSA was born about a month after the Patriot Act passed.
Advertisement
by Imperium Neo Roma » Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:41 pm
Republicke wrote:Where were these guys when the Patriot Act was passed?
by Faith Hope Charity » Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:44 pm
Imperium Neo Roma wrote:Faith Hope Charity wrote:
So you are quite alright with the government treating people as if they are guilty before proven such.. i gotcha.. you arent innocent till we prove you are.. who wants to live under that? you might, but not me... you still havent cited a single example of TSA actually doing what they are out to do and catching a terrorist, and you cant refute everything else ive said.
Do you not fucking understand? Do you think any sane government, after a event like 9/11, would just stand by and let Extremists waltz right into a airport? No, you're the crackpot that thinks being frisked isn't worth the security of 3,000 people.
And YOU have yet to prove that you know ANYONE within the TSA, Do you really think that "Alaska, Hawaii, Michigan, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas and Washington" are going to be targets for Terrorists? Of course not, once they get rid of the TSA there, they'll be getting plenty of bombs.
No one takes some Hawaiian Reporter seriously, nor do they take you seriously. I think it's clear that you would rather have thousands dieing do to no security, just because you don't like going through Airport Security.
Pathetic.
by Republicke » Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:48 pm
Bramborska wrote:Muscular liberalism? He took my gay stripper name!
by Imperium Neo Roma » Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:51 pm
Faith Hope Charity wrote:Imperium Neo Roma wrote:
Do you not fucking understand? Do you think any sane government, after a event like 9/11, would just stand by and let Extremists waltz right into a airport? No, you're the crackpot that thinks being frisked isn't worth the security of 3,000 people.
And YOU have yet to prove that you know ANYONE within the TSA, Do you really think that "Alaska, Hawaii, Michigan, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas and Washington" are going to be targets for Terrorists? Of course not, once they get rid of the TSA there, they'll be getting plenty of bombs.
No one takes some Hawaiian Reporter seriously, nor do they take you seriously. I think it's clear that you would rather have thousands dieing do to no security, just because you don't like going through Airport Security.
Pathetic.
No one said no security, just the way its being done is beyond what should be considered acceptable. You honestly think i advocate no bag check? I never said that. But being frisked without a warrant or even being found guilty of doing anything shouldnt be considered acceptable behavior, and i find it disturbing that you actually advocate it. You honestly think "frisking" will stop another attack? you are crazy if you do, theres no way to stop it altogether.. so yes, i do think frisking people cuz of a terrorist attack and people dying is a poor excuse.. if anything profiling should be done, cuz honestly, granny and the little kid aint gonna be bombing. I refuse to live in paranoia of a terrorist attack.. in doing such they win already.
by Brandenburg-Altmark » Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:08 am
by Patriqvinia » Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:14 am
Imperium Neo Roma wrote:Faith Hope Charity wrote:
No one said no security, just the way its being done is beyond what should be considered acceptable. You honestly think i advocate no bag check? I never said that. But being frisked without a warrant or even being found guilty of doing anything shouldnt be considered acceptable behavior, and i find it disturbing that you actually advocate it. You honestly think "frisking" will stop another attack? you are crazy if you do, theres no way to stop it altogether.. so yes, i do think frisking people cuz of a terrorist attack and people dying is a poor excuse.. if anything profiling should be done, cuz honestly, granny and the little kid aint gonna be bombing. I refuse to live in paranoia of a terrorist attack.. in doing such they win already.
They do have a warrant, they're the Government, and it's legal to do their job. They're not coming into your home and forcing you to take a piss-test or be frisked, you're coming to them, it's a choice, if you don't like it you can wallow in sorrow while your family has a grand party without you.
Yes, remove frisking and put in profiling, I can't wait till 'granny and the little kid' are brainwashed or blackmailed into blowing up a plane, just because you don't want to be frisked (which rarely happens, actually).
If you don't like the U.S, go flock north to Canada. Terrorists don't give a shit about paranoia, they want blood, and they haven't gotten blood since the TSA was introduced.
by Aethyopea » Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:21 am
Patriqvinia wrote:Imperium Neo Roma wrote:
They do have a warrant, they're the Government, and it's legal to do their job. They're not coming into your home and forcing you to take a piss-test or be frisked, you're coming to them, it's a choice, if you don't like it you can wallow in sorrow while your family has a grand party without you.
Yes, remove frisking and put in profiling, I can't wait till 'granny and the little kid' are brainwashed or blackmailed into blowing up a plane, just because you don't want to be frisked (which rarely happens, actually).
If you don't like the U.S, go flock north to Canada. Terrorists don't give a shit about paranoia, they want blood, and they haven't gotten blood since the TSA was introduced.
Sigh... "Any society that would give a little liberty to gain a little security, will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
I know members of the 100-or-less club have difficulty understanding, or even entertaining, this sentiment; but I just couldn't help myself here (I think it was the bleating of a blind-folded sheep in a lion suit). Hitler came to power because of the same brand of paranoid hysteria embodied by the TSA.
Trotskylvania wrote:Political analogies are like bullshit. It doesn't matter how pretty or elegant you try to make them, it's still a lump of bullshit at the end of the day.
by Patriqvinia » Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:31 am
Aethyopea wrote:Patriqvinia wrote:Sigh... "Any society that would give a little liberty to gain a little security, will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
I know members of the 100-or-less club have difficulty understanding, or even entertaining, this sentiment; but I just couldn't help myself here (I think it was the bleating of a blind-folded sheep in a lion suit). Hitler came to power because of the same brand of paranoid hysteria embodied by the TSA.
Correction: They who can give up ESSENTIAL liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
It's a pretty big distinction to make. Everyone gives up a little liberty to obtain safety. It's called "laws". It's the essential ones you have to worry about. The right to free speech, freedom of religion, that kind of thing.
by Risottia » Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:05 am
by Blouman Empire » Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:08 am
Imperium Neo Roma wrote:Faith Hope Charity wrote:
Funny that you would have such a sentiment... I'm supposed to be going to a family reunion this summer in Maine.. i live in California.. guess whos not going to the family reunion cuz of TSA? Me. I refuse to subject myself to that crap.
It's not TSAs fault, you might as well be a terrorist from what I've gathered, trying to hide his attempts to blow up a Cali-Maine flight by saying it was a family reunion. If you can't handle walking through a metal detector, emptying your pockets, and getting your I.D checked, then perhaps you don't need to fly, you might harm the other passengers with your Far-Left Bullshit.
by The Corparation » Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:51 am
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: -Britain-, Atrito, Dumb Ideologies, Floofybit, Infected Mushroom, Lycom, Niolia, Sunemia, Umeria
Advertisement