NATION

PASSWORD

Do women ask to be sexually harrassed/assaulted?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Scalietti
Diplomat
 
Posts: 934
Founded: Oct 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Do women ask to be sexually harrassed/assaulted?

Postby Scalietti » Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:47 am

You read the question, allow me to elaborate.

It is the thought of many that younger girls who dress scantily and provocatively are inviting harrassment and other unwanted contact upon them. In other words, if the girls didn't dress this way, they wouldn't find themself in that predicament. The same could also be said about their carriage, if them acted decently, modestly, no unwanted contact would be thrust upon them either.

Thoughts NSG? I reckon these theories have merit, but certainly aren't the answer.
I don't have a signature.

User avatar
Barringtonia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9908
Founded: Feb 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Barringtonia » Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:50 am

Do you want honest debate or a series of angry insults?
I hear babies cry, I watch them grow
They'll learn much more than I'll ever know
And I think to myself, what a wonderful world



User avatar
Zephie
Senator
 
Posts: 4548
Founded: Oct 30, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Zephie » Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:52 am

If the men who harass them didn't behave inappropriately, they wouldn't be harassed. What a concept!
When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

User avatar
Prometheos
Diplomat
 
Posts: 750
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Prometheos » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:03 am

Zephie wrote:If the men who harass them didn't behave inappropriately, they wouldn't be harassed. What a concept!


^This, definitely.
------
Political Compass
★☆★☆★☆
FemaleFrenchNarcissistPegasister

Economic: Left/Right: 8.25
Social: Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51


User avatar
Lackadaisical2
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 50831
Founded: Mar 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Lackadaisical2 » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:06 am

Yes, the sluts.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

User avatar
Nobel Hobos
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7198
Founded: Jun 21, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Nobel Hobos » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:06 am

Scalietti wrote:
It is the thought of many that younger girls who dress scantily and provocatively are inviting harrassment and other unwanted contact upon them. In other words, if the girls didn't dress this way, they wouldn't find themself in that predicament. The same could also be said about their carriage, if them acted decently, modestly, no unwanted contact would be thrust upon them either.


Wow, I hope you don't mean unwanted physical contact. That's way out of line whatever she's wearing.

Their carriage? MODESTY? Have you been drinking Laudanum?
AKA & RIP BunnySaurus Bugsii, Lucky Bicycle Works, Mean Feat, Godforsaken Warmachine, Class Warhair, Pandarchy

I'm sure I was excited when I won and bummed when I lost, but none of that stuck. Cause I was a kid, and I was alternately stoked and bummed at pretty much any given time. -Cannot think of a name
Brown people are only scary to those whose only contribution to humanity is their white skin.Big Jim P
I am a Christian. Christianity is my Morality's base OS.DASHES
... when the Light on the Hill dims, there are Greener pastures.Ardchoille

User avatar
DaWoad
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9066
Founded: Nov 05, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby DaWoad » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:08 am

Canadai wrote:
Zephie wrote:If the men who harass them didn't behave inappropriately, they wouldn't be harassed. What a concept!

I'm stunned.

I agree with Zephie.

ditto
Official Nation States Trainer
Factbook:http://nationstates.wikia.com/wiki/User:Dawoad
Alliances:The Hegemony, The GDF, SCUTUM

Supporter of making [citation needed] the official NSG way to say "source?"

User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:13 am

Lackadaisical2 wrote:Yes, the sluts.


A black flag today? Have you joined us? :)

And to the OP... NO! Never! What will it take to drive certain concepts into peoples brains? Seriously, how do people even ask such questions in this day?
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
The Tavan Race
Minister
 
Posts: 3244
Founded: May 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tavan Race » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:15 am

You know, you're right, after all, if a woman wants some unwanted physical contact there's no better way to get it than by showing some skin. Hell, I bet some people even go out and try to get themselves raped for kicks.

No.
.[]__ta ilokune nunlasi a kiso'hoso'hei kaetin__[]
.[]__voika neinseil tenei luneva daishe__[]
.Our Factbook
Tavan is capitalized when referring to a societal construct, such as the military or language.
It is left lowercase when referring to an individual organism or a biological characteristic.

User avatar
Uusland
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 46
Founded: Aug 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Uusland » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:16 am

While I don't think any woman is asking to be harassed or assaulted because of her choice of attire, I do think we now live in such a hyper-sexualized society that too many women tend to use their attire as a "lure" for men. But, I think that has a significant amount to do with our media. Young girls are barraged with imagery of how to be thin and how to be beautiful and force fed the idea that their lives can only be fulfilling if they are the object of every man's desire. So many women now dress like prostitutes. I dunno, it just seems to me a pathetic and desperate plea for attention -- like those bleached yellow-haired, orange-skinned girls at the bar who are getting ignored for 5 minutes, so they begin a pseudo-lesbian display by kissing.

Not that men are any better, by any means. This sort of thuggish, stone-faced "bad ass" caricature that every man seems to play nowadays is equally as pathetic and stupid.

People...........meh.
Last edited by Uusland on Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:17 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Lackadaisical2
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 50831
Founded: Mar 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Lackadaisical2 » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:16 am

Natapoc wrote:
Lackadaisical2 wrote:Yes, the sluts.


A black flag today? Have you joined us? :)

I feel that I must note that I was joking, just in case. No I will never join the so-called anarchists. I simply have an extreme hatred which I felt only black could express.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

User avatar
Ermarian
Minister
 
Posts: 2783
Founded: Jan 11, 2004
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ermarian » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:17 am

While trying to avoid a stream of insults as much as possible:
1.) Blaming the victim of a crime, particularly a violent crime, is pretty disgusting.
2.) Sexual modesty is a repulsive religious concept that has no justified place anywhere outside the decrees of rabid Iranian mullahs, and should be rooted out even there. It certainly has no place in a country as allegedly free of theocratic rule as the United States.
The Endless Empire of Ermarian | Jolt Archives | Encyclopedia Ermariana | ( -6.38 | -8.56 ) | Luna is best pony.
"Without deeper reflection one knows from daily life that one exists for other people - first of all for those upon whose smiles and well-being our own happiness is wholly dependent, and then for the many, unknown to us, to whose destinies we are bound by the ties of sympathy." -Einstein
"Is there a topic for discussion here, or did you just want to be wrong in public?" -Ifreann

User avatar
Prometheos
Diplomat
 
Posts: 750
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Prometheos » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:17 am

The Tavan Race wrote:You know, you're right, after all, if a woman wants some unwanted physical contact there's no better way to get it than by showing some skin. Hell, I bet some people even go out and try to get themselves raped for kicks.

No.


Yes. You never know :shock:
------
Political Compass
★☆★☆★☆
FemaleFrenchNarcissistPegasister

Economic: Left/Right: 8.25
Social: Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51


User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:17 am

Lackadaisical2 wrote:
Natapoc wrote:
Lackadaisical2 wrote:Yes, the sluts.


A black flag today? Have you joined us? :)

I feel that I must note that I was joking, just in case. No I will never join the so-called anarchists. I simply have an extreme hatred which I felt only black could express.


Yes it was clear you were joking. So what is this extreme hatred about?
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
Kaledoria
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1634
Founded: Jul 06, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaledoria » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:20 am

Even a fat old dirtbag like me does not really argue, that provocatively dressed girls want to be raped/whatever.

I am arguing that they want to make men want to have sex with them and then sent these men away, laughing at them. They want to make the men horribly suffer from a pain coming from the conflict between their primitive desires they evoke and the social necessities to respect another person's autonomy.

Oh yeah and then they act all surprised when some victims of lesser strength of character fail their diabolic tests. [/misogyny-filled sarcasm]
Last edited by Kaledoria on Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:24 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Tavan Race
Minister
 
Posts: 3244
Founded: May 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tavan Race » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:21 am

Prometheos wrote:
The Tavan Race wrote:You know, you're right, after all, if a woman wants some unwanted physical contact there's no better way to get it than by showing some skin. Hell, I bet some people even go out and try to get themselves raped for kicks.

No.


Yes. You never know :shock:


I doubt this is the case with the majority of people, as most rape victims aren't very happy about the incident afterward.
.[]__ta ilokune nunlasi a kiso'hoso'hei kaetin__[]
.[]__voika neinseil tenei luneva daishe__[]
.Our Factbook
Tavan is capitalized when referring to a societal construct, such as the military or language.
It is left lowercase when referring to an individual organism or a biological characteristic.

User avatar
Dagnia
Senator
 
Posts: 3930
Founded: Jul 27, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Dagnia » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:23 am

Depends. Yes, I think certain things we do invite things upon ourselves. A woman who dresses provocatively is asking for any rude "sexually harassing" comments she gets, but I don't think she is deserving of rape, yet at least. However, there are situations when a woman calls it rape, when I think it is debatable, as the woman was egging the whole thing on. If the provocatively dressed woman responds positively to a catcall from a pervert and continues to lead him into an alley while making him think she wants him, then lifts her short skirt (no undergarments) to expose herself to him, then says "no" when he's pulling his pants down, she had better hope that I am not on the jury.
Unless it involves a child, mentally disabled person or some other helpless person, or the defendant was a real bastard in some other way, I would find it really difficult to say a rapist is guilty. About ten/fifteen years ago, there was a rape case at a major university in which a drunk, but not passed out, woman climbed on top of a male student and had sex with him. She later said he raped her, and he was found guilty. I don't remember his sentence, but it did not include jail time. I hope that bitch gets gangraped, and someone brings up her last case. Whenever I hear of a rape case, especially one involving college students, I think of that case. Did you know that at most colleges and universities, through their own disciplinary systems, the accused have no right to confront their accuser? I can just imagine: "I was raped, and it was so traumatic, I could not possibly face my accuser, so you'll just have to believe me" wink wink.
Wait an hour, and it will be now again

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 37056
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:25 am

Scalietti wrote:You read the question, allow me to elaborate.

It is the thought of many that younger girls who dress scantily and provocatively are inviting harrassment and other unwanted contact upon them. In other words, if the girls didn't dress this way, they wouldn't find themself in that predicament. The same could also be said about their carriage, if them acted decently, modestly, no unwanted contact would be thrust upon them either.

Thoughts NSG? I reckon these theories have merit, but certainly aren't the answer.

Are men children, completely incapable of controlling their behavior? Are they less able than dogs to be trained not to jump on people?

If you are saying that the women's style of dress is causing men to behave like monumental assholes, that says a lot -- and none of it good -- about men.

It is an excuse used by some men to justify disgusting behavior. Happily, there are many more men who act like mature, decent people and can manage to avoid manhandling, raping, or denigrating women for dressing sexily.

User avatar
Nobel Hobos
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7198
Founded: Jun 21, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Nobel Hobos » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:29 am

OP is very close to flamebait, surely?

Scarlietti isn't putting a point of view, but rather inviting debate of an inflammatory point of view which "it is thought of many". If that isn't flamebaiting then it's trolling!
AKA & RIP BunnySaurus Bugsii, Lucky Bicycle Works, Mean Feat, Godforsaken Warmachine, Class Warhair, Pandarchy

I'm sure I was excited when I won and bummed when I lost, but none of that stuck. Cause I was a kid, and I was alternately stoked and bummed at pretty much any given time. -Cannot think of a name
Brown people are only scary to those whose only contribution to humanity is their white skin.Big Jim P
I am a Christian. Christianity is my Morality's base OS.DASHES
... when the Light on the Hill dims, there are Greener pastures.Ardchoille

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 37056
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:32 am

Dagnia wrote:Depends. Yes, I think certain things we do invite things upon ourselves. A woman who dresses provocatively is asking for any rude "sexually harassing" comments she gets, but I don't think she is deserving of rape, yet at least. However, there are situations when a woman calls it rape, when I think it is debatable, as the woman was egging the whole thing on. If the provocatively dressed woman responds positively to a catcall from a pervert and continues to lead him into an alley while making him think she wants him, then lifts her short skirt (no undergarments) to expose herself to him, then says "no" when he's pulling his pants down, she had better hope that I am not on the jury.
Unless it involves a child, mentally disabled person or some other helpless person, or the defendant was a real bastard in some other way, I would find it really difficult to say a rapist is guilty. About ten/fifteen years ago, there was a rape case at a major university in which a drunk, but not passed out, woman climbed on top of a male student and had sex with him. She later said he raped her, and he was found guilty. I don't remember his sentence, but it did not include jail time. I hope that bitch gets gangraped, and someone brings up her last case. Whenever I hear of a rape case, especially one involving college students, I think of that case. Did you know that at most colleges and universities, through their own disciplinary systems, the accused have no right to confront their accuser? I can just imagine: "I was raped, and it was so traumatic, I could not possibly face my accuser, so you'll just have to believe me" wink wink.


1) What women, except in some vile misogynist's violent sexual fantasy, does this? I'd say -- none.

2 This statement is mindbogglingly sick, as well as violently misogynistic.
Last edited by Katganistan on Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:32 am

Dagnia wrote:Depends. Yes, I think certain things we do invite things upon ourselves. A woman who dresses provocatively is asking for any rude "sexually harassing" comments she gets, but I don't think she is deserving of rape, yet at least. However, there are situations when a woman calls it rape, when I think it is debatable, as the woman was egging the whole thing on. If the provocatively dressed woman responds positively to a catcall from a pervert and continues to lead him into an alley while making him think she wants him, then lifts her short skirt (no undergarments) to expose herself to him, then says "no" when he's pulling his pants down, she had better hope that I am not on the jury.


Nice fantasy you have there. I can see you put allot of effort into your narrative but don't confuse your fantasy with reality.

I believe erotic stories belong in another section of the forum however.
Last edited by Natapoc on Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
Zephie
Senator
 
Posts: 4548
Founded: Oct 30, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Zephie » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:33 am

Nobel Hobos wrote:OP is very close to flamebait, surely?

Scarlietti isn't putting a point of view, but rather inviting debate of an inflammatory point of view which "it is thought of many". If that isn't flamebaiting then it's trolling!

No, because he has an opinion contrary to yours (and mine too) does not mean it's trolling. I wish the internets were more tolerant of other opinions.
When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

User avatar
Geniasis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7531
Founded: Sep 28, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Geniasis » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:33 am

Scalietti wrote:You read the question, allow me to elaborate.

It is the thought of many that younger girls who dress scantily and provocatively are inviting harrassment and other unwanted contact upon them. In other words, if the girls didn't dress this way, they wouldn't find themself in that predicament. The same could also be said about their carriage, if them acted decently, modestly, no unwanted contact would be thrust upon them either.

Thoughts NSG? I reckon these theories have merit, but certainly aren't the answer.


I wasn't aware that scantily-clad women have the power to physically compel men to harass them. Hasn't happened to me so far.

That doesn't make me gay, does it?
Supporter of making [citation needed] the official NSG way to say "source?"

Myrensis wrote:I say turn it into a brothel, that way Muslims and Christians can be offended together.


DaWoad wrote:nah, she only fought because, as everyone knows, the brits can't make a decent purse to save their lives and she had a VERY important shopping trip coming up!


Reichskommissariat ost wrote:Women are as good as men , I dont know why they constantly whine about things.


Euronion wrote:because how dare me ever ever try to demand rights for myself, right men, we should just lie down and let the women trample over us, let them take awa our rights, our right to vote will be next just don't say I didn't warn ou

User avatar
Juristonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6503
Founded: Oct 30, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Juristonia » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:34 am

DaWoad wrote:
Canadai wrote:
Zephie wrote:If the men who harass them didn't behave inappropriately, they wouldn't be harassed. What a concept!

I'm stunned.

I agree with Zephie.

ditto


This.
I feel dirty. :(
From the river to the sea

Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
GMS Greater Miami Shores 1 wrote:What do I always say about Politics?

something incoherent

User avatar
Barringtonia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9908
Founded: Feb 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Barringtonia » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:35 am

Dagnia wrote: If the provocatively dressed woman responds positively to a catcall from a pervert and continues to lead him into an alley while making him think she wants him, then lifts her short skirt (no undergarments) to expose herself to him, then says "no" when he's pulling his pants down, she had better hope that I am not on the jury.


As absurd a scenario as this is, she still said 'no'.

The lengths people have to go to create a fantastical situation by which they might excuse rape..

I hope that bitch gets gangraped, and someone brings up her last case.


Charming, if I hoped it was your daughter would I be as offensive?
Last edited by Barringtonia on Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
I hear babies cry, I watch them grow
They'll learn much more than I'll ever know
And I think to myself, what a wonderful world



Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhirisian Puppet Nation, Australian rePublic, Avinis, Cerespasia, El Lazaro, Statesburg, Stellar Colonies, The Community of Cascadia, ThE VoOrIaPeN DiScOrD, Vanuzgard

Advertisement

Remove ads