by Scalietti » Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:47 am
by Barringtonia » Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:50 am
by Zephie » Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:52 am
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.
by Prometheos » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:03 am
Zephie wrote:If the men who harass them didn't behave inappropriately, they wouldn't be harassed. What a concept!
by Lackadaisical2 » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:06 am
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.
by Nobel Hobos » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:06 am
Scalietti wrote:
It is the thought of many that younger girls who dress scantily and provocatively are inviting harrassment and other unwanted contact upon them. In other words, if the girls didn't dress this way, they wouldn't find themself in that predicament. The same could also be said about their carriage, if them acted decently, modestly, no unwanted contact would be thrust upon them either.
by DaWoad » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:08 am
by Natapoc » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:13 am
Lackadaisical2 wrote:Yes, the sluts.
by The Tavan Race » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:15 am
by Uusland » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:16 am
by Lackadaisical2 » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:16 am
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.
by Ermarian » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:17 am
by Prometheos » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:17 am
The Tavan Race wrote:You know, you're right, after all, if a woman wants some unwanted physical contact there's no better way to get it than by showing some skin. Hell, I bet some people even go out and try to get themselves raped for kicks.
No.
by Kaledoria » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:20 am
by The Tavan Race » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:21 am
by Dagnia » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:23 am
by Katganistan » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:25 am
Scalietti wrote:You read the question, allow me to elaborate.
It is the thought of many that younger girls who dress scantily and provocatively are inviting harrassment and other unwanted contact upon them. In other words, if the girls didn't dress this way, they wouldn't find themself in that predicament. The same could also be said about their carriage, if them acted decently, modestly, no unwanted contact would be thrust upon them either.
Thoughts NSG? I reckon these theories have merit, but certainly aren't the answer.
by Nobel Hobos » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:29 am
by Katganistan » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:32 am
Dagnia wrote:Depends. Yes, I think certain things we do invite things upon ourselves. A woman who dresses provocatively is asking for any rude "sexually harassing" comments she gets, but I don't think she is deserving of rape, yet at least. However, there are situations when a woman calls it rape, when I think it is debatable, as the woman was egging the whole thing on. If the provocatively dressed woman responds positively to a catcall from a pervert and continues to lead him into an alley while making him think she wants him, then lifts her short skirt (no undergarments) to expose herself to him, then says "no" when he's pulling his pants down, she had better hope that I am not on the jury.
Unless it involves a child, mentally disabled person or some other helpless person, or the defendant was a real bastard in some other way, I would find it really difficult to say a rapist is guilty. About ten/fifteen years ago, there was a rape case at a major university in which a drunk, but not passed out, woman climbed on top of a male student and had sex with him. She later said he raped her, and he was found guilty. I don't remember his sentence, but it did not include jail time. I hope that bitch gets gangraped, and someone brings up her last case. Whenever I hear of a rape case, especially one involving college students, I think of that case. Did you know that at most colleges and universities, through their own disciplinary systems, the accused have no right to confront their accuser? I can just imagine: "I was raped, and it was so traumatic, I could not possibly face my accuser, so you'll just have to believe me" wink wink.
by Natapoc » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:32 am
Dagnia wrote:Depends. Yes, I think certain things we do invite things upon ourselves. A woman who dresses provocatively is asking for any rude "sexually harassing" comments she gets, but I don't think she is deserving of rape, yet at least. However, there are situations when a woman calls it rape, when I think it is debatable, as the woman was egging the whole thing on. If the provocatively dressed woman responds positively to a catcall from a pervert and continues to lead him into an alley while making him think she wants him, then lifts her short skirt (no undergarments) to expose herself to him, then says "no" when he's pulling his pants down, she had better hope that I am not on the jury.
by Zephie » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:33 am
Nobel Hobos wrote:OP is very close to flamebait, surely?
Scarlietti isn't putting a point of view, but rather inviting debate of an inflammatory point of view which "it is thought of many". If that isn't flamebaiting then it's trolling!
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.
by Geniasis » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:33 am
Scalietti wrote:You read the question, allow me to elaborate.
It is the thought of many that younger girls who dress scantily and provocatively are inviting harrassment and other unwanted contact upon them. In other words, if the girls didn't dress this way, they wouldn't find themself in that predicament. The same could also be said about their carriage, if them acted decently, modestly, no unwanted contact would be thrust upon them either.
Thoughts NSG? I reckon these theories have merit, but certainly aren't the answer.
Reichskommissariat ost wrote:Women are as good as men , I dont know why they constantly whine about things.
Euronion wrote:because how dare me ever ever try to demand rights for myself, right men, we should just lie down and let the women trample over us, let them take awa our rights, our right to vote will be next just don't say I didn't warn ou
by Juristonia » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:34 am
Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.
by Barringtonia » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:35 am
Dagnia wrote: If the provocatively dressed woman responds positively to a catcall from a pervert and continues to lead him into an alley while making him think she wants him, then lifts her short skirt (no undergarments) to expose herself to him, then says "no" when he's pulling his pants down, she had better hope that I am not on the jury.
I hope that bitch gets gangraped, and someone brings up her last case.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhirisian Puppet Nation, Australian rePublic, Avinis, Cerespasia, El Lazaro, Statesburg, Stellar Colonies, The Community of Cascadia, ThE VoOrIaPeN DiScOrD, Vanuzgard
Advertisement