It was a beautiful building and while I can sympathise with a feeling that one's ancestry is ''vanishing'' (as irrational as I feel it to be), arson is not a solution. I dunno how interested you are in BM and I may be being presumptious, but have you seen Until The Light Takes Us? really good documentary on the second wave, lots of interviews with dudes both cool (Fenris) and uncool (the Ulver guys, much as I like their music). It centres too much on Varg imo but I guess I can see why, he's the most eminent figure of the scene. It made me sad too. I don't know why. They all sounded so disillusioned and sad - I don't think anyone smiled for more than 5 seconds during the whole thing. But yeah I'm babbling.Schwabenreich wrote:Thats very fair, I kind of felt you meant the church jibe in humour. I can't say I'm a fan of those things either, expecially how Varg shot himself in the foot by burning a church that was perhaps, one of the best examples of his old norse style architexture (even if it was a christian church).
Yeah, while FW had the aesthetic they were definitely less...active, in their musical themes. Quorthorn was a great guy.Schwabenreich wrote:I don't know, I can think of a few reasons, but any to do with the personal conduct of early and modern black metal I think is totally wrong to hold against the genre.
I am not really a fan of Snowblind but clearly we like Black Sabbath for different reasons. I'm kind of on the fence but I am leaning to agreeing that that is a better cover.
I'd agree, actually, I'm not a huge Sabbath fan but they do have a few solid tracks.Schwabenreich wrote:I think paranoid is my favourite album from pre-Dio. As far as Black Sabbath albums go theres none with songs I like in entirety, I usually like a few off the album and could leave the rest.
tell me about it broSchwabenreich wrote:Thats a good compromise if I was a better person I might accept it, but it still feels wrong to try and associate it with metal. It hurts.
I just ignore it except when it's brought up here and then I go ''it's shit dwi nerds'' or something. Unless it's like thrash as I think I've well established what I think of it.
Yes, it's a compliment too.Schwabenreich wrote:(I'm assuming Swagenreich is a play on Schwabenreich)?
Well as I've said when I specify heavy metal I'm usually referring to the bands you mean. I'm pretty fine with metal being used as a descriptor of everything metal, I think it sounds better aesthetically anyway.Schwabenreich wrote:But I would definately say theres a huge overlap between NWOBHM and Traditional Heavy Metal. I'd mainly divide heavy metal into NWOBHM by 1# time period, 2# emulating british trends in heavy metal and 3# being british, and do not consider the terms mutually exclusive. I ofcourse, agree that using traditional heavy metal as a collective term for heavy metal of that style and period is fine. I would like to keep the heavy word in it however, as to honour and preserve its relation to the heavy metal movement. The term I believe has gained a meaning of its own, and means something to me and I want to preserve that.
too true!Schwabenreich wrote:If your band is good the lyrics shouldn't matter too much.
Schwabenreich wrote:I don't really see how thats possible. Its got so many elitists in it, myself included, and is such a diverse genre, but good luck in achieving the impossible.
Yep this correct too.
I am glad we can come to some agreement.