[Report] Name calling in |sandy hook thread.

by **TheDrunkenLlamas** » Sat Apr 30, 2016 5:09 am

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=374858&p=28562238#p28562238

Calling gun control advocates, 'lairs' and 'gun-grabbers'

by **Big Jim P** » Sat Apr 30, 2016 5:23 am

The last three time I was called out for something similar, I pointed out that the term "gun nut" is used far more often than any anti-gun-control advocate I have used. The situation has not changed.

Edit: Search found 1126 matches: "gun nut"
search.php?keywords=%22gun+nut%22&terms=all&author=&sc=1&sf=all&sr=posts&sk=t&sd=d&st=0&ch=300&t=0&submit=Search
Search found 178 matches: "gun grabber"
search.php?keywords=%22gun+grabber%22&terms=all&author=&sc=1&sf=all&sr=posts&sk=t&sd=d&st=0&ch=300&t=0&submit=Search

by **TheDrunkenLlamas** » Sat Apr 30, 2016 6:32 am

Big Jim P wrote:The last three time I was called out for something similar, I pointed out that the term "gun nut" is used far more often than any anti-gun-control advocate I have used. The situation has not changed.

Edit: Search found 1126 matches: "gun nut"
search.php?keywords=%22gun+nut%22&terms=all&author=&sc=1&sf=all&sr=posts&sk=t&sd=d&st=0&ch=300&t=0&submit=Search
Search found 178 matches: "gun grabber"
search.php?keywords=%22gun+grabber%22&terms=all&author=&sc=1&sf=all&sr=posts&sk=t&sd=d&st=0&ch=300&t=0&submit=Search

Tu quoque isn't a defense.

by **Big Jim P** » Sat Apr 30, 2016 7:13 am

TheDrunkenLlamas wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:The last three time I was called out for something similar, I pointed out that the term "gun nut" is used far more often than any anti-gun-control advocate I have used. The situation has not changed.

Edit: Search found 1126 matches: "gun nut"
search.php?keywords=%22gun+nut%22&terms=all&author=&sc=1&sf=all&sr=posts&sk=t&sd=d&st=0&ch=300&t=0&submit=Search
Search found 178 matches: "gun grabber"
search.php?keywords=%22gun+grabber%22&terms=all&author=&sc=1&sf=all&sr=posts&sk=t&sd=d&st=0&ch=300&t=0&submit=Search

Tu quoque isn't a defense.

If "gun-grabber" is an offense, then so is the far more often used term "gun-nut".

by **Kryozerkia** » Sat Apr 30, 2016 7:23 am

'Gun nut' is not actionable, and as 'gun grabber' is on par, it is equally not actionable.

by **TheDrunkenLlamas** » Sat Apr 30, 2016 9:29 am

Kryozerkia wrote:'Gun nut' is not actionable, and as 'gun grabber' is on par, it is equally not actionable.

Is name calling no longer against the rules?

by **Farnhamia** » Sat Apr 30, 2016 8:21 pm

TheDrunkenLlamas wrote:
Kryozerkia wrote:'Gun nut' is not actionable, and as 'gun grabber' is on par, it is equally not actionable.

Is name calling no longer against the rules?

It is against the rules. Those terms have been judged not actionable.

by **TheDrunkenLlamas** » Sun May 01, 2016 1:21 am

Farnhamia wrote:
TheDrunkenLlamas wrote:
Is name calling no longer against the rules?

It is against the rules. Those terms have been judged not actionable.

Why? It's a clear case of political nicknaming. I know I've been swatted for less. How is this different from Drumph or libtard?

by **UnjustlyBannedLlamas** » Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:15 am

TheDrunkenLlamas wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:It is against the rules. Those terms have been judged not actionable.

Why? It's a clear case of political nicknaming. I know I've been swatted for less. How is this different from Drumph or libtard?

Still waiting for a response to this Mods.

by **Katganistan** » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:36 am

You have had your response five months ago. Locking the gravedig.

[Report] Name calling in |sandy hook thread.

[Report] Name calling in |sandy hook thread.

Who is online