Advertisement
by [violet] » Sat Feb 01, 2014 7:22 pm
by Saintland » Sat Feb 01, 2014 10:00 pm
by Leningrad Union » Thu Feb 13, 2014 2:00 pm
Saintland wrote:From what I can tell, the current forums date to May of 2009. Since names are currently released after 5 years, that means that the first nation names that made forum posts will be released in several months (such as this one, a nation that made 2 forum posts in May 2009 and CTEd). If, this July, somebody signs up with the same nation name as that nation from 2009, would they be credited with the previous nation of the same name's forum posts? If not, what would happen to those 2 forum posts?
by Leningrad Union » Sat Feb 15, 2014 1:04 pm
Percvania wrote:Awesome!
by Inventio » Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:08 pm
The Dreadite Horde wrote:What's a reserved name?
Sapin Military District wrote:If god doesn't exist, then why does a tissue pop up every time you take the old one out of the box?
Diviar wrote:Nah, Inventio isn't scared easily.
Divair wrote:Nonchalance is my default attitude.
by Jorji Cobrastan » Mon Mar 03, 2014 8:46 pm
by Reploid Productions » Mon Mar 03, 2014 8:50 pm
Jorji Cobrastan wrote:Well, I guess when the name "Sappluma" gets released, I'm going to grab it, then make a nation of more than 500 million people and abandon it, so then no one can use it
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by Riemstagrad » Wed Mar 05, 2014 10:49 am
Reploid Productions wrote:Jorji Cobrastan wrote:Well, I guess when the name "Sappluma" gets released, I'm going to grab it, then make a nation of more than 500 million people and abandon it, so then no one can use it
Do remember that just like mods can mark nation names as reserved, we can also unmark them.
by The Blaatschapen » Wed Mar 05, 2014 12:01 pm
by Congo-Cabinda » Sat Mar 08, 2014 9:16 pm
by -The Unified Earth Governments- » Sat Mar 08, 2014 11:37 pm
News - 10/27/2558: Deglassing of Reach is going smoother than expected. | First prototype laser rifle is beginning experimentation. | The Sangheili Civil War is officially over, Arbiter Thel'Vadam and his Swords of Sanghelios have successfully eliminated remaining Covenant cells on Sanghelios. | President Ruth Charet to hold press meeting within the hour on the end of the Sangheili Civil War. | The Citadel Council official introduces the Unggoy as a member of the Citadel.
by Jeckland » Sun Mar 09, 2014 3:51 am
Saintland wrote:From what I can tell, the current forums date to May of 2009. Since names are currently released after 5 years, that means that the first nation names that made forum posts will be released in several months (such as this one, a nation that made 2 forum posts in May 2009 and CTEd). If, this July, somebody signs up with the same nation name as that nation from 2009, would they be credited with the previous nation of the same name's forum posts? If not, what would happen to those 2 forum posts?
by The grand feline empire » Fri May 09, 2014 6:03 am
[violet] wrote:As long threatened, we're going to open up old nation names for re-use.
For a sneak preview, use this page to see if/when a particular nation name would become available:
http://www.nationstates.net/page=boneyard
Under the proposed rules, a name would be available for re-use unless the former owner:
- is active
- ceased to exist less than 5 years ago
- accumulated a population of 500 million or more (changed from 250 million in Spring 2013)
- founded an existing region
- is mentioned in the History of an existing region
- authored or was the subject of a WA resolution (incl. Historical ones)
- authored an Issue
- was a moderator or admin
- was deleted by a mod
- is marked as reserved by a Game Mod
There are a very large number of nation names that were used only briefly, and whose former owner is highly unlikely to ever return, so the feeling is that we should make those available for people who want them. Nations that hung around for a reasonable length of time, however, or ceased to exist relatively recently, or did something of particular note, should remain reserved in case the former owner one day wants to revive them.
If an old nation has its name re-used, it cannot be resurrected, even if the newer nation ceases to exist.
Please let me know your thoughts! There is some time before this will go live, and we can tweak in the meantime.
To anticipate a couple of questions:
Q: "250M population is too low." / "Five years is too long."
A: If the release goes well, we might look at loosening the restrictions in the future1 to make nations with slightly larger populations or more recent CTE dates available. But that's something to consider later.
Q: "Why does the Boneyard say different names will become available on different days?"
A: Just to spread things out, so we don't get hammered by everyone trying to reclaim an old name at once.
Q: "I really, really want this one name. Can't you make a special exemption and let me have it?"
A: No.
1Limit raised to 500M in Spring 2013
by The Blaatschapen » Fri May 09, 2014 6:11 am
The grand feline empire wrote:[violet] wrote:As long threatened, we're going to open up old nation names for re-use.
For a sneak preview, use this page to see if/when a particular nation name would become available:
http://www.nationstates.net/page=boneyard
Under the proposed rules, a name would be available for re-use unless the former owner:
- is active
- ceased to exist less than 5 years ago
- accumulated a population of 500 million or more (changed from 250 million in Spring 2013)
- founded an existing region
- is mentioned in the History of an existing region
- authored or was the subject of a WA resolution (incl. Historical ones)
- authored an Issue
- was a moderator or admin
- was deleted by a mod
- is marked as reserved by a Game Mod
There are a very large number of nation names that were used only briefly, and whose former owner is highly unlikely to ever return, so the feeling is that we should make those available for people who want them. Nations that hung around for a reasonable length of time, however, or ceased to exist relatively recently, or did something of particular note, should remain reserved in case the former owner one day wants to revive them.
If an old nation has its name re-used, it cannot be resurrected, even if the newer nation ceases to exist.
Please let me know your thoughts! There is some time before this will go live, and we can tweak in the meantime.
To anticipate a couple of questions:
Q: "250M population is too low." / "Five years is too long."
A: If the release goes well, we might look at loosening the restrictions in the future1 to make nations with slightly larger populations or more recent CTE dates available. But that's something to consider later.
Q: "Why does the Boneyard say different names will become available on different days?"
A: Just to spread things out, so we don't get hammered by everyone trying to reclaim an old name at once.
Q: "I really, really want this one name. Can't you make a special exemption and let me have it?"
A: No.
1Limit raised to 500M in Spring 2013
Please remove it
by Maltropia » Fri May 09, 2014 12:43 pm
by SFBA Campinia » Fri May 16, 2014 6:12 am
by The Blaatschapen » Fri May 16, 2014 6:14 am
SFBA Campinia wrote:I had nations cte in 2006 revived in 2011. It does happen.
by Herrebrugh » Fri May 16, 2014 6:47 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Apexiala, Aristokuvaa, Card Cleaver, Kentish Realm, Unmet Player, Vologda State, Western Balkania
Advertisement