Sedgistan wrote:On a quick check, England, Canada and Mexico will apparently be available with this release...
Israel, too.
Advertisement
by New Hayesalia » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:13 am
Sedgistan wrote:On a quick check, England, Canada and Mexico will apparently be available with this release...
by Tim-Opolis » Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:35 am
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
by Flibbleites » Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:56 am
-The West Coast- wrote:So, [violet], does that mean we get the population of our current nation, or do we have to take the population of the nation of the nation we resurrect?
by Mesoland » Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:12 pm
Flibbleites wrote:-The West Coast- wrote:So, [violet], does that mean we get the population of our current nation, or do we have to take the population of the nation of the nation we resurrect?
As I understand it, neither. You're creating a new nation, it's just using a name that used to be unavailable.
by Flibbleites » Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:49 pm
[violet] wrote:Arumdaum wrote:I think that nations that have posted on the forum shouldn't be up for release as well....
As mentioned by others, these forums are only two years old, which is well under the five year limit.
In the future, though, it's possible that there will be ex-nations here whose names are re-used. It won't be a problem because the forums, unlike the game, identify accounts by ID number, not name. We may also rename the old nation's forum display name as "(Former) Testlandia" or something.
by Mesoland » Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:51 pm
Flibbleites wrote:Mesoland wrote:
So you don't inherit the age on the forum?
No, as [violet] said.[violet] wrote:As mentioned by others, these forums are only two years old, which is well under the five year limit.
In the future, though, it's possible that there will be ex-nations here whose names are re-used. It won't be a problem because the forums, unlike the game, identify accounts by ID number, not name. We may also rename the old nation's forum display name as "(Former) Testlandia" or something.
by Furry Folk » Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:31 pm
by [violet] » Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:55 pm
Lordieth wrote:Could the submitted nation name be part of the URL? Like; nation=Lordieth
Make it much easier to track the name we're after with bookmarking.
by Lordieth » Tue Sep 20, 2011 5:33 pm
[violet] wrote:Lordieth wrote:Could the submitted nation name be part of the URL? Like; nation=Lordieth
Make it much easier to track the name we're after with bookmarking.
Not completely sure what you're after, but the Boneyard does already work like that; e.g.:
http://www.nationstates.net/page=boneya ... n=lordieth
by Copenhagen Metropolis » Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:30 am
Diol wrote:Shoodn't the incredably childish names be removed?
Such nations as titties, boobies, dickhead, knockers, big boobs, retards, bitch...just immature, childish names.
I, for one, wouldn't like to shout "I'm a titties citizen!
by Charlotte Ryberg » Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:59 am
by The Murtunian Tribes » Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:10 pm
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:If a released name has its name re-used, and then CTEs due to inactivity, can the owner resurrect the country under standard procedure?
I approve this proposal for the record.
by Charlotte Ryberg » Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:16 pm
by Old Tyrannia » Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:21 pm
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:If a released name has its name re-used, and then CTEs due to inactivity, can the owner resurrect the country under standard procedure?
I approve this proposal for the record.
by Miley World » Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:38 pm
•Deleted nation Jennyland
Founded: Antiquity
Last activity: Mon Feb 10 2003
Population: 281 million
Reserved: This name was used by a former nation of significant size.
by Charlotte Ryberg » Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:42 pm
Old Tyrannia wrote:Charlotte Ryberg wrote:If a released name has its name re-used, and then CTEs due to inactivity, can the owner resurrect the country under standard procedure?
I approve this proposal for the record.
Do you mean the original owner or the re-user? In the case of the former, no. In the case of the latter, yes, at least, I presume so. Can't say for sure, of course.
by Katganistan » Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:51 pm
Kulverint wrote:In fact, as it turns out, all names relating to the groin area are available for use!
by Katganistan » Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:57 pm
by The Republic of Lanos » Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:58 pm
by Shanix » Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:01 pm
by Abcdefghijklmnopqrstuk » Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:42 pm
by South Benson » Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:51 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Havensky, Kingdom Of Englands, Nuevo Meshiko, Trotterdam
Advertisement