NATION

PASSWORD

I am new, what is Defender vs Raider?

Talk about regional management and politics, raider/defender gameplay, and other game-related matters.
Not a roleplaying forum.
User avatar
New Imperial Draconis
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Nov 26, 2021
Ex-Nation

I am new, what is Defender vs Raider?

Postby New Imperial Draconis » Fri Nov 26, 2021 8:59 pm

I keep seeing these terms on this forum, what does Defender and Raider mean?


Also, hello. I just joined this site. :)

User avatar
Republic Of Ludwigsburg
Diplomat
 
Posts: 863
Founded: Jun 26, 2021
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Republic Of Ludwigsburg » Fri Nov 26, 2021 9:02 pm

Basically, some regions "raid" other regions. The regions attacking are called raiders/invaders and the ones defending the attacks are called defenders. In a "raid" multiple people from the same region endorse one of their comrades and gain WA delegate which lets them ban people. Once they have done this they can WA ban many nations and password lock a region. This is a raid.
Pro: Social Democracy, EU, LGBTQ+ Rights, Labour Party, Ukraine
Anti: Fascism, State Capitalism, Stalinism, Tankies supporting Russia, Nazism
bumbling fool
Politiscales: this
South German Times: Friedrich Schonbrunn diagnosed with Stage 1 Head and Neck Cancer, Gottfried Hallemark to immediately succeed. GDR President Alfred Wolff in grave controversy after calling rival candidate Jakob Silberstein a "schwein" during debate. Joe Biden to host NATO meeting in New York regarding aid to Ukraine. Alpine mountaineer Valentina Giatte successfully summits Mt. Everest. Former Kanzler Johan Schauff to create new hot beverage company, "Schauffee". SPECIAL: The Curious Case of James Friedenwahl: To find out more, log on to timessgermany.eu

User avatar
New Imperial Draconis
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Nov 26, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby New Imperial Draconis » Fri Nov 26, 2021 9:06 pm

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:Basically, some regions "raid" other regions. The regions attacking are called raiders/invaders and the ones defending the attacks are called defenders. In a "raid" multiple people from the same region endorse one of their comrades and gain WA delegate which lets them ban people. Once they have done this they can WA ban many nations and password lock a region. This is a raid.



How is that allowed? I thought maybe it would be an in-character thing.

User avatar
Imperial Rifta
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1864
Founded: Sep 15, 2020
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Imperial Rifta » Fri Nov 26, 2021 9:09 pm

I personally have never participated in this, but I tested it out early on, and got the general idea.

In regions, there is a WA Delegate, which is filled by the nation with the most endorsements. Unless the founder or another Officer takes away the privileges of the position, anyone who gets endorsed enough can kick or change anything about the region.

Different raiding groups will join these regions, endorse one of their own, and then they have full control over the region, and are free to “colonize” or customize it to their own liking.

Defenders will notice this, and join the conquered region themselves. Once they’ve joined, they’ll endorse one of their own until this player is the WA delegate. The Defender delegate will then do whatever they can to get the original embers back, and kick out the invaders. Once the raiders are kicked out, the region is liberated.

I hope this explains the concept to you, and like I said, I have never participated, so I might have left some stuff out, or gotten some details wrong.
-
EDIT: I think some nations might make some of it IC, but it can be either.
Last edited by Imperial Rifta on Fri Nov 26, 2021 9:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Low quality posts from 2020-2023
Eagles - Braves - Crimson Tide - Kraken -

News: The Riftan Professional Bailball League’s playoffs begin and the headlines are stolen by the massive upset by the Etnasa Warhorses over the Proxima Purple Knights in the first round. Meanwhile, the Sarif Beasts topple the Cesar Red after a low scoring game culminating in a one-point victory.

User avatar
New Imperial Draconis
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Nov 26, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby New Imperial Draconis » Fri Nov 26, 2021 9:14 pm

Imperial Rifta wrote:I personally have never participated in this, but I tested it out early on, and got the general idea.

In regions, there is a WA Delegate, which is filled by the nation with the most endorsements. Unless the founder or another Officer takes away the privileges of the position, anyone who gets endorsed enough can kick or change anything about the region.

Different raiding groups will join these regions, endorse one of their own, and then they have full control over the region, and are free to “colonize” or customize it to their own liking.

Defenders will notice this, and join the conquered region themselves. Once they’ve joined, they’ll endorse one of their own until this player is the WA delegate. The Defender delegate will then do whatever they can to get the original embers back, and kick out the invaders. Once the raiders are kicked out, the region is liberated.

I hope this explains the concept to you, and like I said, I have never participated, so I might have left some stuff out, or gotten some details wrong.
-
EDIT: I think some nations might make some of it IC, but it can be either.



Yeah, that seems like harassment.

User avatar
Tim-Opolis
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6197
Founded: Feb 17, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Tim-Opolis » Fri Nov 26, 2021 9:16 pm

New Imperial Draconis wrote:
Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:Basically, some regions "raid" other regions. The regions attacking are called raiders/invaders and the ones defending the attacks are called defenders. In a "raid" multiple people from the same region endorse one of their comrades and gain WA delegate which lets them ban people. Once they have done this they can WA ban many nations and password lock a region. This is a raid.



How is that allowed? I thought maybe it would be an in-character thing.


Alas no, Raiders are able to do so fully within the scope of game rules and destroy the hard work of others. Defenders (such as myself and my region The Order of The Grey Wardens which I saw you joined!) do what we can to stop this, usually to great success. This works using the twice-daily "update cycles" of NationStates, when regions elect new World Assembly Delegates based on what nations have the most endorsements. We do our best to stop raider nations from taking the Delegacies of regions when we see it happening. Thankfully we're successful more often than not, but it's still pretty hard work keeping NS safe :) If you want to know more, feel free to shoot me a telegram sometime!
Last edited by Tim-Opolis on Fri Nov 26, 2021 9:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to be a hero? Join The Grey Wardens - Help Us Save Nationstates
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Commended by Security Council Resolution #420 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Author of SC#74, SC #203, SC #222, and SC #238 | Co-Author of SC#191
Founder of Spiritus | Three-Time Delegate of Osiris | Pharaoh of the Islamic Republics of Iran | Hero of Greece
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic

User avatar
Quebecshire
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1914
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Quebecshire » Fri Nov 26, 2021 9:21 pm

New Imperial Draconis wrote:I keep seeing these terms on this forum, what does Defender and Raider mean?


Also, hello. I just joined this site. :)

Hi!

Raiders (aka invaders) are individuals and organizations that invade regions. They do this by seizing the World Assembly delegacies of vulnerable regions. They then often vandalize the region's world factbook entry, destroy its embassies, and even ban it's native residents. They do this to innocent communities for literal reason beyond their own amusement. In-game, it's a pretty crappy practice.

Defenders stop raiders. They do their best to block raids, and to free regions under the control of raiders. When regions are under the threat of damage or destruction, active defender militaries do their best to save those regions from raider control.

This whole concept is called "military gameplay" and is a big part of NationStates.
PATRIOT OF THE LEAGUE REDEEMER OF CONCORD
Defender Moralist | Consul of the LDF | Warden-Lieutenant Emeritus | Commended
Benevolent Thomas wrote:I founded a defender organization out of my dislike of invaders, what invading represents, and my desire to see them suffer.
Pergamon wrote:I must say, you are truly what they deserve.

User avatar
New Imperial Draconis
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Nov 26, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby New Imperial Draconis » Fri Nov 26, 2021 9:25 pm

Tim-Opolis wrote:
New Imperial Draconis wrote:

How is that allowed? I thought maybe it would be an in-character thing.


Alas no, Raiders are able to do so fully within the scope of game rules and destroy the hard work of others. Defenders (such as myself and my region The Order of The Grey Wardens which I saw you joined!) do what we can to stop this, usually to great success. This works using the twice-daily "update cycles" of NationStates, when regions elect new World Assembly Delegates based on what nations have the most endorsements. We do our best to stop raider nations from taking the Delegacies of regions when we see it happening. Thankfully we're successful more often than not, but it's still pretty hard work keeping NS safe :) If you want to know more, feel free to shoot me a telegram sometime!



Yeah, I don't think I want to be involved in that sort of weird, OOC type attack on something that someone built and put work into. I want to try roleplaying on this site, though!

User avatar
New Imperial Draconis
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Nov 26, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby New Imperial Draconis » Fri Nov 26, 2021 9:26 pm

Quebecshire wrote:
New Imperial Draconis wrote:I keep seeing these terms on this forum, what does Defender and Raider mean?


Also, hello. I just joined this site. :)

Hi!

Raiders (aka invaders) are individuals and organizations that invade regions. They do this by seizing the World Assembly delegacies of vulnerable regions. They then often vandalize the region's world factbook entry, destroy its embassies, and even ban it's native residents. They do this to innocent communities for literal reason beyond their own amusement. In-game, it's a pretty crappy practice.

Defenders stop raiders. They do their best to block raids, and to free regions under the control of raiders. When regions are under the threat of damage or destruction, active defender militaries do their best to save those regions from raider control.

This whole concept is called "military gameplay" and is a big part of NationStates.



Hi. :)

Yeah, it seems like a pretty childish and miserable thing to do to someone.

User avatar
Imperial Rifta
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1864
Founded: Sep 15, 2020
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Imperial Rifta » Fri Nov 26, 2021 9:54 pm

New Imperial Draconis wrote:
Quebecshire wrote:Hi!

Raiders (aka invaders) are individuals and organizations that invade regions. They do this by seizing the World Assembly delegacies of vulnerable regions. They then often vandalize the region's world factbook entry, destroy its embassies, and even ban it's native residents. They do this to innocent communities for literal reason beyond their own amusement. In-game, it's a pretty crappy practice.

Defenders stop raiders. They do their best to block raids, and to free regions under the control of raiders. When regions are under the threat of damage or destruction, active defender militaries do their best to save those regions from raider control.

This whole concept is called "military gameplay" and is a big part of NationStates.



Hi. :)

Yeah, it seems like a pretty childish and miserable thing to do to someone.

If you have password lock your region, as well as remove the delegate’s powers, you can shut down most raids.
Low quality posts from 2020-2023
Eagles - Braves - Crimson Tide - Kraken -

News: The Riftan Professional Bailball League’s playoffs begin and the headlines are stolen by the massive upset by the Etnasa Warhorses over the Proxima Purple Knights in the first round. Meanwhile, the Sarif Beasts topple the Cesar Red after a low scoring game culminating in a one-point victory.

User avatar
WayNeacTia
Senator
 
Posts: 4330
Founded: Aug 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby WayNeacTia » Fri Nov 26, 2021 10:49 pm

New Imperial Draconis wrote:
Tim-Opolis wrote:
Alas no, Raiders are able to do so fully within the scope of game rules and destroy the hard work of others. Defenders (such as myself and my region The Order of The Grey Wardens which I saw you joined!) do what we can to stop this, usually to great success. This works using the twice-daily "update cycles" of NationStates, when regions elect new World Assembly Delegates based on what nations have the most endorsements. We do our best to stop raider nations from taking the Delegacies of regions when we see it happening. Thankfully we're successful more often than not, but it's still pretty hard work keeping NS safe :) If you want to know more, feel free to shoot me a telegram sometime!



Yeah, I don't think I want to be involved in that sort of weird, OOC type attack on something that someone built and put work into. I want to try roleplaying on this site, though!

Wise decision my friend. Unless you want to be drawn onto a quagmire of toxicity you are best to sat out of the R/D side.
Sarcasm dispensed moderately.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac

wait

User avatar
Queen Yuno
Diplomat
 
Posts: 918
Founded: Dec 30, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Queen Yuno » Fri Nov 26, 2021 11:57 pm

New Imperial Draconis wrote:
Quebecshire wrote:Hi!

Raiders (aka invaders) are individuals and organizations that invade regions. They do this by seizing the World Assembly delegacies of vulnerable regions. They then often vandalize the region's world factbook entry, destroy its embassies, and even ban it's native residents. They do this to innocent communities for literal reason beyond their own amusement. In-game, it's a pretty crappy practice.

Defenders stop raiders. They do their best to block raids, and to free regions under the control of raiders. When regions are under the threat of damage or destruction, active defender militaries do their best to save those regions from raider control.

This whole concept is called "military gameplay" and is a big part of NationStates.



Hi. :)

Yeah, it seems like a pretty childish and miserable thing to do to someone.



Look please don't buy 100% into what the defenders are saying that make it sound like raiders are trolls.

Max Barry the game creator and mods ruled raiding as legal. It's a valid game mechanic.

You know how games sometimes have in-game scammers and that's legal and encouraged in certain games because the game creator likes the drama? That's basically NS. Only no drama comes out of this because practically all raided regions don't even notice that they've been raided, because they're all so dead and abandoned with no one there.

Plus most regions are unraidable. Regions only become raidable after the founder stops logging in for 28 or 60 consecutive days, and then it's still very hard to raid. Then there's nothing to gain either. Just some billboard space and sending the natives over to the rejected realms region (you can't steal nations). Honestly it's good that these regions get raided, they're basically unmoderated if there's no founder, it's basically the Wild West free for all.

Most of raiding is just tagging dead regions by changing their regional billboard to advertise raiding, but if the founder is active (which he isn't because only regions where the founder has abandoned it, tends to get raided), he/she can just change it back.
Stop giving misogynistic abusers a platform. Anyone who sides with Tiktok Star Andrew Tate even 1% of what he says will be treated as enemy who should be shamed out of society. Impressions+Views+Videowatches=$. Nothing he says is new or revolutionary. I don't care if he said "some good stuff", it's still bad because: the more you watch him, the more ad revenue MONEY and algorithm BOOSTS you're giving him to traffick victims. And don't say the victim lied, a young man stupidly told me that the victim confessed to lying, I told em to link me proof, articles or the Audio of her confession, he googled and found 0 proof 0 articles, and he realized he was spreading fake rumors he heard and BELIEVED without fact-check. Don't brand victims as liars without GOOGLING. Debated here

User avatar
Quebecshire
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1914
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Quebecshire » Fri Nov 26, 2021 11:59 pm

Queen Yuno wrote:Look please don't buy 100% into what the defenders are saying that make it sound like raiders are trolls.

Max Barry the game creator and mods ruled raiding as legal. It's a valid game mechanic.

Where did we say that raiders were trolls or contest it as a game mechanic? Feel free to point out where I said anything that is wrong by any objective measure. Best of luck.
PATRIOT OF THE LEAGUE REDEEMER OF CONCORD
Defender Moralist | Consul of the LDF | Warden-Lieutenant Emeritus | Commended
Benevolent Thomas wrote:I founded a defender organization out of my dislike of invaders, what invading represents, and my desire to see them suffer.
Pergamon wrote:I must say, you are truly what they deserve.

User avatar
Queen Yuno
Diplomat
 
Posts: 918
Founded: Dec 30, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Queen Yuno » Sat Nov 27, 2021 6:16 am

Quebecshire wrote:
Queen Yuno wrote:Look please don't buy 100% into what the defenders are saying that make it sound like raiders are trolls.

Max Barry the game creator and mods ruled raiding as legal. It's a valid game mechanic.

Where did we say that raiders were trolls or contest it as a game mechanic? Feel free to point out where I said anything that is wrong by any objective measure. Best of luck.


Please, if you want to get all technical on me, where did I say that you claimed raiders are trolls or contested it as a game mechanic?

I said you, rather your prejudiced idea of raiders, make raiders SOUND like trolls.

And I already did point out how you were wrong :)

Nice try though.
Stop giving misogynistic abusers a platform. Anyone who sides with Tiktok Star Andrew Tate even 1% of what he says will be treated as enemy who should be shamed out of society. Impressions+Views+Videowatches=$. Nothing he says is new or revolutionary. I don't care if he said "some good stuff", it's still bad because: the more you watch him, the more ad revenue MONEY and algorithm BOOSTS you're giving him to traffick victims. And don't say the victim lied, a young man stupidly told me that the victim confessed to lying, I told em to link me proof, articles or the Audio of her confession, he googled and found 0 proof 0 articles, and he realized he was spreading fake rumors he heard and BELIEVED without fact-check. Don't brand victims as liars without GOOGLING. Debated here

User avatar
RiderSyl
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6309
Founded: Jan 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby RiderSyl » Sat Nov 27, 2021 8:26 am

New Imperial Draconis wrote:I keep seeing these terms on this forum, what does Defender and Raider mean?


Also, hello. I just joined this site. :)


Raiders use a loophole in the WA mechanic to take control of people's regions temporarily and vandalize it. Defenders uses this same loophole but use it to fight the raiders. Being really good at the loophole is valued more than anything, so you've got some folks that ride their talent to the top while being real jerks to everyone, making the whole community an awful place to be. Like Wayneactia said, it's better to sit out of it.

Also, admin/staff ruled the loophole as a legal thing, so raiders aren't breaking rules with their raids. If you've got an issue with that, you can get in line with roleplayers and other folks. I think the line is like 10 years long, at least.
R.I.P. Dyakovo
Sylvia Montresor

Ashmoria
Karpathos
~ You may think I’m small, but I have a universe inside my mind. ~

User avatar
Porflox
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 55
Founded: Sep 24, 2020
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Porflox » Sun Nov 28, 2021 9:58 am

Queen Yuno wrote:
New Imperial Draconis wrote:

Hi. :)

Yeah, it seems like a pretty childish and miserable thing to do to someone.



Look please don't buy 100% into what the defenders are saying that make it sound like raiders are trolls.

Max Barry the game creator and mods ruled raiding as legal. It's a valid game mechanic.

You know how games sometimes have in-game scammers and that's legal and encouraged in certain games because the game creator likes the drama? That's basically NS. Only no drama comes out of this because practically all raided regions don't even notice that they've been raided, because they're all so dead and abandoned with no one there.

Plus most regions are unraidable. Regions only become raidable after the founder stops logging in for 28 or 60 consecutive days, and then it's still very hard to raid. Then there's nothing to gain either. Just some billboard space and sending the natives over to the rejected realms region (you can't steal nations). Honestly it's good that these regions get raided, they're basically unmoderated if there's no founder, it's basically the Wild West free for all.

Most of raiding is just tagging dead regions by changing their regional billboard to advertise raiding, but if the founder is active (which he isn't because only regions where the founder has abandoned it, tends to get raided), he/she can just change it back.

A legal troll is still a troll, and some raiders ceretainly are. Whether or not this vocal minority is actually representative of how most people who are involved in raiding feel is another story though, and I haven't been here long enough to comment on that.
All views are my own unless otherwise stated


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Gameplay

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads