NATION

PASSWORD

Proposal I Made

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Indiana Controlled Florida
Attaché
 
Posts: 80
Founded: Feb 20, 2021
Iron Fist Socialists

Proposal I Made

Postby Indiana Controlled Florida » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:13 pm

The World Assembly

General Assembly Resolution #10 “Nuclear Arms Possession Act” Shall Be Repealed

Realizing that this Resolution could lead to more violence and more hatred for WA member states

Noting that this Resolution grants the right to uranium mining that could lead to widespread cancer

Realizing that the World Assembly must take action to avoid violence,hatred, and death,

Hereby Repeals General Assembly Proposal # 10 “Nuclear Arms Possession Act”

Please Tell Me Mistakes I Made. Lets Have A Civil Discussion And Not An Argument Please.

User avatar
Indiana Controlled Florida
Attaché
 
Posts: 80
Founded: Feb 20, 2021
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Indiana Controlled Florida » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:22 pm

Does Anyone Have A Statement They Would Like To Make?

User avatar
Cavirfi
Envoy
 
Posts: 254
Founded: Feb 28, 2021
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Cavirfi » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:24 pm

The only mistake I can think of is the way you titled your thread, usually threads like this are titled as '[DRAFT] (Name of Proposal)'
My Storefronts | News | THE Barn

"Outcome Train go BOOM!" -John Taylor, COD BO3. Credits to Atheara

User avatar
Indiana Controlled Florida
Attaché
 
Posts: 80
Founded: Feb 20, 2021
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Indiana Controlled Florida » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:25 pm

Ah man! I messed up. Should I create another page or keep this one up?

User avatar
Frontier Isles
Secretary
 
Posts: 39
Founded: Jan 19, 2021
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Frontier Isles » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:27 pm

Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:The World Assembly,

General Assembly Resolution #10 “Nuclear Arms Possession Act” Shall Be Repealed

This first line is kind of redundent because the title of your proposal would be "Repeal 'Nuclear Arms Possession Act'"; it would be better if you recognized the passage of GAR #10, rather than saying that you're going to repeal it.

Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Realizing that this Resolution could lead to more violence and more hatred for among WA member states

Please elaborate.

Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Noting that this Resolution grants the right to uranium mining that could lead to widespread cancer

I mean, all nations have the right to mine for uranium, so I don't see a reason for adding this clause.

Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Realizing that the World Assembly must take action to avoid violence,hatred, and death,

I see what you mean, but it doesn't really explain why we should repeal it.
Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Hereby Repeals General Assembly Proposal # 10 “Nuclear Arms Possession Act”

Please Tell Me Mistakes I Made. Lets Have A Civil Discussion And Not An Argument Please.

If you want to repeal GAR #10, then you're going to have to explain why GAR #10 doesn't work. You have to acknowledge and explain the problems in GAR #10, not just state your opinion.

User avatar
Frontier Isles
Secretary
 
Posts: 39
Founded: Jan 19, 2021
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Frontier Isles » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:27 pm

Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Ah man! I messed up. Should I create another page or keep this one up?

Just edit the name of your first post. It will change the title.
Last edited by Frontier Isles on Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Indiana Controlled Florida
Attaché
 
Posts: 80
Founded: Feb 20, 2021
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Indiana Controlled Florida » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:31 pm

Frontier Isles wrote:
Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:The World Assembly,

General Assembly Resolution #10 “Nuclear Arms Possession Act” Shall Be Repealed

This first line is kind of redundent because the title of your proposal would be "Repeal 'Nuclear Arms Possession Act'"; it would be better if you recognized the passage of GAR #10, rather than saying that you're going to repeal it.

Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Realizing that this Resolution could lead to more violence and more hatred for among WA member states

Please elaborate.

Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Noting that this Resolution grants the right to uranium mining that could lead to widespread cancer

I mean, all nations have the right to mine for uranium, so I don't see a reason for adding this clause.

Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Realizing that the World Assembly must take action to avoid violence,hatred, and death,

I see what you mean, but it doesn't really explain why we should repeal it.
Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Hereby Repeals General Assembly Proposal # 10 “Nuclear Arms Possession Act”

Please Tell Me Mistakes I Made. Lets Have A Civil Discussion And Not An Argument Please.

If you want to repeal GAR #10, then you're going to have to explain why GAR #10 doesn't work. You have to acknowledge and explain the problems in GAR #10, not just state your opinion.

Made a lot of mistakes. Do you think in this current from the proposal, if passed by delegates, has a chance of repealing GR #10?

User avatar
Grays Harbor
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 18527
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Grays Harbor » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:33 pm

Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:
Frontier Isles wrote:This first line is kind of redundent because the title of your proposal would be "Repeal 'Nuclear Arms Possession Act'"; it would be better if you recognized the passage of GAR #10, rather than saying that you're going to repeal it.


Please elaborate.


I mean, all nations have the right to mine for uranium, so I don't see a reason for adding this clause.


I see what you mean, but it doesn't really explain why we should repeal it.

If you want to repeal GAR #10, then you're going to have to explain why GAR #10 doesn't work. You have to acknowledge and explain the problems in GAR #10, not just state your opinion.

Made a lot of mistakes. Do you think in this current from the proposal, if passed by delegates, has a chance of repealing GR #10?

No.
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Head of the Grays Harbor WA delegation: Sir Henry Rodut, OHE, GHC
3-2-1 lets jam

User avatar
Indiana Controlled Florida
Attaché
 
Posts: 80
Founded: Feb 20, 2021
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Indiana Controlled Florida » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:33 pm

Grays Harbor wrote:
Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Made a lot of mistakes. Do you think in this current from the proposal, if passed by delegates, has a chance of repealing GR #10?

No.

Why do you think that?

User avatar
Jedinsto
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 418
Founded: Nov 12, 2020
New York Times Democracy

Postby Jedinsto » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:35 pm

It takes a while to draft stuff before sending it to the floor, unless it's something really simple and obvious.
My drafts
James DuBois
Capitalism, centrism, abortion, environment, civil rights
Communism, socialism, nukes, fascism, Trump

User avatar
Frontier Isles
Secretary
 
Posts: 39
Founded: Jan 19, 2021
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Frontier Isles » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:35 pm

Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:
Grays Harbor wrote:No.

Why do you think that?

The proposal is way to simple. There is no sufficient reasoning as to why we should repeal GAR #10.

User avatar
Indiana Controlled Florida
Attaché
 
Posts: 80
Founded: Feb 20, 2021
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Indiana Controlled Florida » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:37 pm

Guess I’ll go and delete it then and remake it
Last edited by Indiana Controlled Florida on Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Goraria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 356
Founded: Sep 17, 2020
New York Times Democracy

Postby Goraria » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:39 pm

Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Guess I’ll go and delete it then and remake it

You can’t delete it.
WIP Overview
Btw I don’t use NS stats. And also a big fan of Polandballs.
You might find me in forum 7. I also have no other social media because I suck. About the OOC thing, yeah no I’d rather keep that private. Ninja’d

News: A man has fallen into a river in lego city start by building the rescue helicopter. The weather today is 27°F in Forentria so make sure you bring a very thicc jacket. The weather is expected to go up around 30°F-38°F. I’ve fallen and I can’t get up!

User avatar
Frontier Isles
Secretary
 
Posts: 39
Founded: Jan 19, 2021
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Frontier Isles » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:40 pm

Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Guess I’ll go and delete it then and remake it

Just rewrite it in this forum.
Last edited by Frontier Isles on Sat Apr 03, 2021 4:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Indiana Controlled Florida
Attaché
 
Posts: 80
Founded: Feb 20, 2021
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Indiana Controlled Florida » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:41 pm

I submitted it yesterday
Last edited by Indiana Controlled Florida on Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Outer Sparta
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11517
Founded: Dec 26, 2014
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Outer Sparta » Tue Mar 02, 2021 7:35 pm

Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:I submitted it yesterday

Why did you submit it without proper feedback?
social democracy, environmental protection, universal healthcare, free college, social equality, LGBT, pro-choice,
GOP, corporate socialism, Trump, neoconservatism, white supremacy, extreme political views, corruption

User avatar
Junitaki-cho
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 60
Founded: Sep 21, 2020
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Junitaki-cho » Tue Mar 02, 2021 8:28 pm

For clarity, since nobody here is particularly helpful, WA proposals are usually posted in the forums for editing and feedback and go through multiple revisions before being formally submitted. Common practices are to format the thread title as [DRAFT] Proposal Name - which you can edit by going to your first post here - and to be responsive to input from other users. GAR#10 is probably a tough one to repeal since people have pretty strong feelings about it, so you'll want to really consider your arguments and writing to increase your odds.
Refugia Councillor of World Assembly Affairs

User avatar
Scalizagasti
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 157
Founded: Jun 15, 2019
Democratic Socialists

Postby Scalizagasti » Tue Mar 02, 2021 9:35 pm

Junitaki-cho wrote:For clarity, since nobody here is particularly helpful, WA proposals are usually posted in the forums for editing and feedback and go through multiple revisions before being formally submitted. Common practices are to format the thread title as [DRAFT] Proposal Name - which you can edit by going to your first post here - and to be responsive to input from other users. GAR#10 is probably a tough one to repeal since people have pretty strong feelings about it, so you'll want to really consider your arguments and writing to increase your odds.

Additionally the rule of thumb (at least from what I've heard) is two weeks minimum on the forums before submitting any resolutions. Usually you will want to take more than two weeks. Having a rushed proposal means you are more likely to make mistakes, allow for loopholes, etc. which would make any resolution impossible to pass. Take your time, don't rush, and wait for feedback.
Scalizagasti | iiwiki page | he/him

Overseer of the Assembly in the United Regions Alliance (URA)
Senator in Mariner Trench
Former President of The Great Experiment

Don't let them tell you it can't be done - Jack Layton

User avatar
Edrace
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 17
Founded: Mar 01, 2021
New York Times Democracy

Postby Edrace » Wed Mar 03, 2021 7:58 pm

I feel like you need to mention something about why the NAPA was made, and how nations outside the WA can take advantage of those within the WA.

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10336
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:35 am

The proposal is illegal because under the honest mistake rule. It asserts that Napa 'grants the right to uranium mining that could lead to widespread cancer'. Napa doesn't.

Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:
Grays Harbor wrote:No. [re whether this repeal would be voted through]

Why do you think that?

GA 10 won't be repealed because of politics; people like their nuclear weapons.
Last edited by Imperium Anglorum on Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

Author: 1 SC and 42 GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
Toxic villainous globalist kittehs
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley (EMW); OOC unless otherwise indicated
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Dastardly villain providing free services to the community sans remuneration


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads