NATION

PASSWORD

Trump Gets Refund from an alleged Hooker

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Shofercia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31342
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Trump Gets Refund from an alleged Hooker

Postby Shofercia » Tue Oct 16, 2018 9:55 am

I don't usually quote CNN, but reading an article that they wrote through gritted teeth is hilarious: https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/15/politics ... index.html

Stormy Daniels and her attorney, Michael Avenatti, sued President Trump, and lost. Big time. Not only was the lawsuit a victory for Trump, but Daniels/Avenatti were ordered to pay Trump's attorney fees, leading to the joke that Trump is the only guy to get a refund from an alleged hooker.

A federal judge has dismissed adult film star Stormy Daniels' defamation lawsuit against President Donald Trump. Daniels sued Trump after he said in a tweet that her story of a man threatening her not to come forward with her story of her alleged affair with Trump was "a total con job."

Daniels argued Trump's tweet, posted April 18, "attacks the veracity of her account" of the incident and that Trump's statement was "false and defamatory, and that the tweet was defamation ... because it charged her with committing a serious crime," District Judge S. James Otero wrote in his opinion Monday. Trump had asked Otero to dismiss the lawsuit. "The Court agrees with Mr. Trump's argument because the tweet in question constitutes 'rhetorical hyperbole' normally associated with politics and public discourse in the United States. The First Amendment protects this type of rhetorical statement," Otero wrote. In addition to dismissing the lawsuit, Otero ruled Trump is entitled to attorney's fees...

Trump's attorney Charles J. Harder said in a statement to CNN, "No amount of spin or commentary by Stormy Daniels or her lawyer, Mr. Avenatti, can truthfully characterize today's ruling in any way other than total victory for President Trump and total defeat for Stormy Daniels. The amount of the award for President Trump's attorneys' fees will be determined at a later date..."


So a strip tease dancer is going to be paying the attorney's fees of Trump's lawyer named Harder. You can't make this shit up. Perhaps, in order to pay his fees, Daniels might create a stormy dance with the title "Trump Harder"... sorry, someone had to say it :P

Thoughts, NSG? I think it's hilarious, and brings much needed levity to the rather hefty political discourse of the day.
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.
Stonk Power! (North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia
I used pronouns until the mods made using wrong pronouns warnable, so I use names instead; if you see malice there, that's entirely on you, and if pronouns are no longer warnable, I'll go back to using them

User avatar
Flarbinia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5823
Founded: Apr 29, 2012
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Flarbinia » Tue Oct 16, 2018 9:58 am

Shofercia wrote:I don't usually quote CNN, but reading an article that they wrote through gritted teeth is hilarious: https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/15/politics ... index.html

Stormy Daniels and her attorney, Michael Avenatti, sued President Trump, and lost. Big time. Not only was the lawsuit a victory for Trump, but Daniels/Avenatti were ordered to pay Trump's attorney fees, leading to the joke that Trump is the only guy to get a refund from an alleged hooker.

A federal judge has dismissed adult film star Stormy Daniels' defamation lawsuit against President Donald Trump. Daniels sued Trump after he said in a tweet that her story of a man threatening her not to come forward with her story of her alleged affair with Trump was "a total con job."

Daniels argued Trump's tweet, posted April 18, "attacks the veracity of her account" of the incident and that Trump's statement was "false and defamatory, and that the tweet was defamation ... because it charged her with committing a serious crime," District Judge S. James Otero wrote in his opinion Monday. Trump had asked Otero to dismiss the lawsuit. "The Court agrees with Mr. Trump's argument because the tweet in question constitutes 'rhetorical hyperbole' normally associated with politics and public discourse in the United States. The First Amendment protects this type of rhetorical statement," Otero wrote. In addition to dismissing the lawsuit, Otero ruled Trump is entitled to attorney's fees...

Trump's attorney Charles J. Harder said in a statement to CNN, "No amount of spin or commentary by Stormy Daniels or her lawyer, Mr. Avenatti, can truthfully characterize today's ruling in any way other than total victory for President Trump and total defeat for Stormy Daniels. The amount of the award for President Trump's attorneys' fees will be determined at a later date..."


So a strip tease dancer is going to be paying the attorney's fees of Trump's lawyer named Harder. You can't make this shit up. Perhaps, in order to pay his fees, Daniels might create a stormy dance with the title "Trump Harder"... sorry, someone had to say it :P

Thoughts, NSG? I think it's hilarious, and brings much needed levity to the rather hefty political discourse of the day.

I agree. It is hilarious that a porn star tried to sue Trump, lost, and has to pay his legal fees.

User avatar
North Atlantropa
Attaché
 
Posts: 96
Founded: Jan 01, 2016
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby North Atlantropa » Tue Oct 16, 2018 9:59 am

too bad Daft Punk beat you too it with this https://youtu.be/GDpmVUEjagg

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68115
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Tue Oct 16, 2018 10:11 am

So a normal part of court procedure is hilarious now?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Arkhane
Diplomat
 
Posts: 909
Founded: Jul 29, 2012
Libertarian Police State

Postby Arkhane » Tue Oct 16, 2018 10:13 am

I remember a recent porn ad of Stormy Daniels.
She killed hundreds of thousands of boners online by showing her saggy silicone droops and her cavernous, expired hoo-ha.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163951
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Tue Oct 16, 2018 10:15 am

Wait, who's alleging Daniels to be a hooker?
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Sovaal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13695
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Sovaal » Tue Oct 16, 2018 10:16 am

Arkhane wrote:I remember a recent porn ad of Stormy Daniels.
She killed hundreds of thousands of boners online by showing her saggy silicone droops and her cavernous, expired hoo-ha.

Honestly don’t see as to why anyone would hire her but eh, different strokes for different folks.
Most of the time I have no idea what the hell I'm doing or talking about.

”Many forms of government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe.
No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is
the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried from time to time." -
Winston Churchill, 1947.

"Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon – so long as there is no answer to it – gives claws to the weak.” - George Orwell

User avatar
Valentine Z
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13041
Founded: Nov 08, 2015
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Valentine Z » Tue Oct 16, 2018 10:19 am

This is probably one of those things you would expect from The Onion.
Val's Stuff. ♡ ^_^ ♡ For You
If you are reading my sig, I want you to have the best day ever ! You are worth it, do not let anyone get you down !
Glory to De Geweldige Sierlijke Katachtige Utopia en Zijne Autonome Machten ov Valentine Z !
(✿◠‿◠) ☆ \(^_^)/ ☆

Issues Thread Photography Stuff Project: Save F7. Stats Analysis

The Sixty! Valentian Stories! Gwen's Adventures!

• Never trouble trouble until trouble troubles you.
• World Map is a cat playing with Australia.
Let Fate sort it out.

User avatar
Rostavykhan
Minister
 
Posts: 2187
Founded: Sep 30, 2017
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Rostavykhan » Tue Oct 16, 2018 10:22 am

I guess you could say that Trump is off the hook.
LEARN TO HATE ; TOTAL HATRED FOR TOTAL WAR
LIVE, LAUGH, LOVE | FEED, SEED, SNEED
 

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68115
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Tue Oct 16, 2018 10:27 am

Rostavykhan wrote:I guess you could say that Trump is off the hook.


Not really. That's not the only suit she has going and the decision is being appealed.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 112551
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Tue Oct 16, 2018 10:32 am

Ifreann wrote:Wait, who's alleging Daniels to be a hooker?

I was wondering that myself. *looks at Shofercia* Perhaps the title should be edited?
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Myuta
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 16
Founded: Jan 21, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Myuta » Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:00 am

Farnhamia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Wait, who's alleging Daniels to be a hooker?

I was wondering that myself. *looks at Shofercia* Perhaps the title should be edited?


Daniels calls herself a "Porn Star"Wikipedia Definition, wikipedia states and I quote:
A pornographic actor (or actress for female), or porn star, is a person who performs sex acts in video that is usually characterized as a pornographic movie.
.

A 'hooker' is defined Cambridge Dictionary, Collins Dictionary as 'A Prostitute' and likewise a 'prostitute is defined Oxford Dictionary, a person who engages in sexual activity for payment. The legal definition of 'Prositute' is covered in Blacks Law Dictionary as:

A woman who indiscriminately consorts with men for hire. Carpenter v. People, 8 Barb. (N. Y.) 611; State v. Stoyell, 54 Me. 24, 89 Am. Dec. 716.

with Prostitution being defined as:
Common lewdness; whoredom; the act or practice of a woman who permits any man who will pay her price to have sexual intercourse with her. See Com. v. Cook, 12 Mete. (Mass.) 97. Protectio trahit subjectionem, et sub- jectio protectiouem. Protection draws with it subjection, and subjection protection. 7 Coke, 5a. The protection of an individual by government is on condition of his submis- sion to the laws, and such submission on the other hand entitles the individual to the protection of the government Broom, Max. 78.


The argument can and has been succinctly made in a number of cases CNN, the difference or why Pornographic Actors are not arrested under Prostitution legislation, is not because they are not prostitutes, but because the law gives them a narrow exemption as the act of performing for a movie is protected under the First Amendment.

To lawyer this, 'If Stormy Daniels had refused to engage in sexual activity during the filming of her role, she would have been fired without pay.' The whole point of a pornographic actor is that they engage in sexual activity.

QED.

Disclaimer: I am not the op, I was just curious and immediate assumed that this was a Stormy Daniels case.

Edit:

Additionally there's evidence of other people and publications calling her a prostitute: http://thefederalist.com/2018/04/23/sto ... tuting-tv/, Houston Chronicles have a piece implying she is: https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinio ... 778283.php along with the miami herald (same opinion piece it seems). Philip Greenspun of Harvard: http://blogs.harvard.edu/philg/2018/03/ ... cologists/

While I wouldn't myself characterize her as a prostitute, in my opinion she's a Pornographic Actress, but I have no qualms with calling a spade a shovel.
Last edited by Myuta on Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:17 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 112551
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:03 am

Myuta wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:I was wondering that myself. *looks at Shofercia* Perhaps the title should be edited?


Daniels calls herself a "Porn Star"Wikipedia Definition, wikipedia states and I quote:
A pornographic actor (or actress for female), or porn star, is a person who performs sex acts in video that is usually characterized as a pornographic movie.
.

A 'hooker' is defined Cambridge Dictionary, Collins Dictionary as 'A Prostitute' and likewise a 'prostitute is defined Oxford Dictionary, a person who engages in sexual activity for payment. The legal definition of 'Prositute' is covered in Blacks Law Dictionary as:

A woman who indiscriminately consorts with men for hire. Carpenter v. People, 8 Barb. (N. Y.) 611; State v. Stoyell, 54 Me. 24, 89 Am. Dec. 716.

with Prostitution being defined as:
Common lewdness; whoredom; the act or practice of a woman who permits any man who will pay her price to have sexual intercourse with her. See Com. v. Cook, 12 Mete. (Mass.) 97. Protectio trahit subjectionem, et sub- jectio protectiouem. Protection draws with it subjection, and subjection protection. 7 Coke, 5a. The protection of an individual by government is on condition of his submis- sion to the laws, and such submission on the other hand entitles the individual to the protection of the government Broom, Max. 78.


The argument can and has been succinctly made in a number of cases CNN, the difference or why Pornographic Actors are not arrested under Prostitution legislation, is not because they are not prostitutes, but because the law gives them a narrow exemption as the act of performing for a movie is protected under the First Amendment.

To lawyer this, 'If Stormy Daniels had refused to engage in sexual activity during the filming of her role, she would have been fired without pay.' The whole point of a pornographic actor is that they engage in sexual activity.

QED.

Prostitutes are paid by the people with whom they have sex. Porn actors/actresses are paid by the people for whom they are making the movie. Kind of a difference there. I still suggest the title be changed.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163951
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:06 am

Myuta wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:I was wondering that myself. *looks at Shofercia* Perhaps the title should be edited?


Daniels calls herself a "Porn Star"Wikipedia Definition, wikipedia states and I quote:
A pornographic actor (or actress for female), or porn star, is a person who performs sex acts in video that is usually characterized as a pornographic movie.
.

A 'hooker' is defined Cambridge Dictionary, Collins Dictionary as 'A Prostitute' and likewise a 'prostitute is defined Oxford Dictionary, a person who engages in sexual activity for payment. The legal definition of 'Prositute' is covered in Blacks Law Dictionary as:

A woman who indiscriminately consorts with men for hire. Carpenter v. People, 8 Barb. (N. Y.) 611; State v. Stoyell, 54 Me. 24, 89 Am. Dec. 716.

with Prostitution being defined as:
Common lewdness; whoredom; the act or practice of a woman who permits any man who will pay her price to have sexual intercourse with her. See Com. v. Cook, 12 Mete. (Mass.) 97. Protectio trahit subjectionem, et sub- jectio protectiouem. Protection draws with it subjection, and subjection protection. 7 Coke, 5a. The protection of an individual by government is on condition of his submis- sion to the laws, and such submission on the other hand entitles the individual to the protection of the government Broom, Max. 78.


The argument can and has been succinctly made in a number of cases CNN, the difference or why Pornographic Actors are not arrested under Prostitution legislation, is not because they are not prostitutes, but because the law gives them a narrow exemption as the act of performing for a movie is protected under the First Amendment.

To lawyer this, 'If Stormy Daniels had refused to engage in sexual activity during the filming of her role, she would have been fired without pay.' The whole point of a pornographic actor is that they engage in sexual activity.

QED.

But who is alleging her to be a hooker?
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Shofercia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31342
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Shofercia » Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:07 am

North Atlantropa wrote:too bad Daft Punk beat you too it with this https://youtu.be/GDpmVUEjagg


I love Daft Punk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlUsMuz9_RU


Vassenor wrote:So a normal part of court procedure is hilarious now?


It can be: https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/20 ... l-standish

United States District Court judge Gail Standish is about to become something of a hero, among the Swiftian masses. Taylor Swift had been sued by musician Jessie Braham, who alleged that Swift had taken lyrics from his song, titled “Haters Gone Hate,” in writing her mega-hit “Shake It Off.” (Braham claimed that “92 percent” of the Swift song was derived from his own.) The case was dismissed today, as, per CNN, Braham was assessed to not have provided enough in the way of actual factual evidence. But—now here’s where things get fun—Standish used Swift lyrics in her dismissal.

“At present, the Court is not saying that Braham can never, ever, ever get his case back in court,” Standish wrote. “But, for now, we have got problems, and the Court is not sure Braham can solve them. As currently drafted, the Complaint has a blank space—one that requires Braham to do more than write his name. And, upon consideration of the Court's explanation . . . Braham may discover that mere pleading Band-Aids will not fix the bullet holes in his case. At least for the moment, Defendants have shaken off this lawsuit.”



Rostavykhan wrote:I guess you could say that Trump is off the hook.


Zing!


Farnhamia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Wait, who's alleging Daniels to be a hooker?

I was wondering that myself. *looks at Shofercia* Perhaps the title should be edited?


Bunch of people:

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinio ... 778283.php

Stormy Daniels may be a prostitute — but at least she’s honest


https://www.chron.com/national/article/ ... 784078.php

Pastor Greg Locke of Mt. Juliet, Tennessee sparked a Twitter debate when he tweeted, "The funny thing is @realDonaldTrump is still the President and she's still a hooker. #StormyDanielsDay"


https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-most- ... ref=scroll

Daniels doesn’t seem to have time to wrestle with the implications of Stormy Daniels, Resistance symbol—she’s too busy defending her reputation, being constantly attacked by internet trolls, and contending with potential retaliation and an uncertain future. Near the end of their interview, Cooper read Daniels a recent quote about her from Jenna Jameson: “The left looks at her as a whore and just uses her to try to discredit the president. The right looks at her like a treacherous rat. It’s a lose-lose. Should’ve kept her trap shut.” Daniels replied, “I think that she has a lotta wisdom in those words.”


Prostitute, whore, hooker, they're all synonyms. If political nicknaming was allowed, we'd get away with calling the President "Agent Orange", but since that's not allowed, no can do. However, if she didn't hook up with Trump, why'd he pay her over $100,000 for her silence?
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.
Stonk Power! (North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia
I used pronouns until the mods made using wrong pronouns warnable, so I use names instead; if you see malice there, that's entirely on you, and if pronouns are no longer warnable, I'll go back to using them

User avatar
Shofercia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31342
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Shofercia » Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:09 am

Farnhamia wrote:
Myuta wrote:
Daniels calls herself a "Porn Star"Wikipedia Definition, wikipedia states and I quote:
.

A 'hooker' is defined Cambridge Dictionary, Collins Dictionary as 'A Prostitute' and likewise a 'prostitute is defined Oxford Dictionary, a person who engages in sexual activity for payment. The legal definition of 'Prositute' is covered in Blacks Law Dictionary as:


with Prostitution being defined as:


The argument can and has been succinctly made in a number of cases CNN, the difference or why Pornographic Actors are not arrested under Prostitution legislation, is not because they are not prostitutes, but because the law gives them a narrow exemption as the act of performing for a movie is protected under the First Amendment.

To lawyer this, 'If Stormy Daniels had refused to engage in sexual activity during the filming of her role, she would have been fired without pay.' The whole point of a pornographic actor is that they engage in sexual activity.

QED.

Prostitutes are paid by the people with whom they have sex. Porn actors/actresses are paid by the people for whom they are making the movie. Kind of a difference there. I still suggest the title be changed.


I think that Myuta has conclusively proven that she is a porn star. If, after reading my post, you still want the title changed, I'll change it to: Trump Gets Refund from a Porn Star for Bad Services. Your call Farn.
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.
Stonk Power! (North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia
I used pronouns until the mods made using wrong pronouns warnable, so I use names instead; if you see malice there, that's entirely on you, and if pronouns are no longer warnable, I'll go back to using them

User avatar
Shofercia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31342
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Shofercia » Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:11 am

Vassenor wrote:
Rostavykhan wrote:I guess you could say that Trump is off the hook.


Not really. That's not the only suit she has going and the decision is being appealed.


You have to live in another galaxy to think that she's going to win that appeal. The President is a US Citizen, and his speech is protected by the First Amendment.
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.
Stonk Power! (North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia
I used pronouns until the mods made using wrong pronouns warnable, so I use names instead; if you see malice there, that's entirely on you, and if pronouns are no longer warnable, I'll go back to using them

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 112551
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:13 am

Shofercia wrote:
North Atlantropa wrote:too bad Daft Punk beat you too it with this https://youtu.be/GDpmVUEjagg


I love Daft Punk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlUsMuz9_RU


Vassenor wrote:So a normal part of court procedure is hilarious now?


It can be: https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/20 ... l-standish

United States District Court judge Gail Standish is about to become something of a hero, among the Swiftian masses. Taylor Swift had been sued by musician Jessie Braham, who alleged that Swift had taken lyrics from his song, titled “Haters Gone Hate,” in writing her mega-hit “Shake It Off.” (Braham claimed that “92 percent” of the Swift song was derived from his own.) The case was dismissed today, as, per CNN, Braham was assessed to not have provided enough in the way of actual factual evidence. But—now here’s where things get fun—Standish used Swift lyrics in her dismissal.

“At present, the Court is not saying that Braham can never, ever, ever get his case back in court,” Standish wrote. “But, for now, we have got problems, and the Court is not sure Braham can solve them. As currently drafted, the Complaint has a blank space—one that requires Braham to do more than write his name. And, upon consideration of the Court's explanation . . . Braham may discover that mere pleading Band-Aids will not fix the bullet holes in his case. At least for the moment, Defendants have shaken off this lawsuit.”



Rostavykhan wrote:I guess you could say that Trump is off the hook.


Zing!


Farnhamia wrote:I was wondering that myself. *looks at Shofercia* Perhaps the title should be edited?


Bunch of people:

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinio ... 778283.php

Stormy Daniels may be a prostitute — but at least she’s honest


https://www.chron.com/national/article/ ... 784078.php

Pastor Greg Locke of Mt. Juliet, Tennessee sparked a Twitter debate when he tweeted, "The funny thing is @realDonaldTrump is still the President and she's still a hooker. #StormyDanielsDay"


https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-most- ... ref=scroll

Daniels doesn’t seem to have time to wrestle with the implications of Stormy Daniels, Resistance symbol—she’s too busy defending her reputation, being constantly attacked by internet trolls, and contending with potential retaliation and an uncertain future. Near the end of their interview, Cooper read Daniels a recent quote about her from Jenna Jameson: “The left looks at her as a whore and just uses her to try to discredit the president. The right looks at her like a treacherous rat. It’s a lose-lose. Should’ve kept her trap shut.” Daniels replied, “I think that she has a lotta wisdom in those words.”


Prostitute, whore, hooker, they're all synonyms. If political nicknaming was allowed, we'd get away with calling the President "Agent Orange", but since that's not allowed, no can do. However, if she didn't hook up with Trump, why'd he pay her over $100,000 for her silence?

He paid her for her silence so it wouldn't hurt his chances in the election. Don't be disingenuous. Besides, knowing what we know about him, even if Trump promised to pay her for sex, he wouldn't pay her. All you've shown are other people calling her a prostitute but nothing that says she's ever taken money from her sex partner. Anyway, it was merely a suggestion.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Myuta
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 16
Founded: Jan 21, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Myuta » Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:24 am

I uh edited my post to add in some stuff at the bottom.

Farnhamia wrote:Prostitutes are paid by the people with whom they have sex. Porn actors/actresses are paid by the people for whom they are making the movie. Kind of a difference there. I still suggest the title be changed.


This is not a definition that is accepted in American law or even international common law. A person who receives money for "sexual activity" is a prostitute, that's the oxford dictionary definition and the common meaning that we use today.

The People's Law Dictionary
n. a person who receives payment for sexual intercourse or other sexual acts, generally as a regular occupation. Although usually a prostitute refers to a woman offering sexual favors to men, male prostitutes may perform homosexual acts for money or receive payment from women for sexual services. A woman prostitute who is sent on a "date" to the hotel room or residence of a male customer is commonly referred to as a "call girl."


Please note the lack of qualifier that it must be paid by the person receiving the activity.

LectLaw.com
The giving or receiving of the body for sexual activity for hire but excludes sexual activity between spouses. (Fla. Statutes '94)

Performing for hire, or offering or agreeing to perform for hire where there is an exchange of value, any of the following acts: Sexual intercourse; sodomy, or; manual or other bodily contact stimulation of the genitals of any person with the intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desires of the offender or another.(Kansas Statutes '95)

The common lewdness of a woman for gain.

In all well regulated communities this has been considered a heinous offence, for which the woman may be punished, and the keeper of a house of prostitution may be indicted for keeping a common nuisance.

So much does the law abhor this offence, that a landlord cannot recover for the use and occupation of a house let for the purpose of prostitution.

In a figurative sense, it signifies the bad use which a corrupt judge makes of the law, by making it subservient to his interest; as, the prostitution of the law, the prostitution of justice.


To put my neck on the line. I am calling Stormy Daniels a Prostitute. I don't mean that in a pejorative sense, I do not intend to insult her, I state it as a sign of respect that this is her chosen profession and she makes a lot of money out of it.
Last edited by Myuta on Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Petrasylvania
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10647
Founded: Oct 20, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Petrasylvania » Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:34 am

If porn stars are prostitutes then the entire industry would either be shut down, relocate to Nevada, or worst of all go underground.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be proof of a pan-Islamic plot and Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand, crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of mentally ill lone wolves who do not represent their professed belief system at all.
The probability of someone secretly participating in homosexual acts is directly proportional to the frequency and loudness of their publicly professed disapproval and/or disgust for homosexuality.
If Donald Trump accuses an individual of malfeasance without evidence, it is almost a certainty either he or someone associated with him has in fact committed that very same malfeasance to a greater degree.

New Flag Courtesy of The Realist Polities

User avatar
Weed
Diplomat
 
Posts: 898
Founded: Oct 23, 2011
Capitalizt

Postby Weed » Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:39 am

I mean... She probably didn't have sex with Trump out of extreme physical attraction to a 60 year old. She probably was aware there was some financial gain to be had through the act from the (then) businessman. And It seems she was paid (well) for it though admittedly later. And it doesn't seem like anyone recorded it at all (thank god).

Probably not as blatantly transnational as what comes to mind when you think of "Hooker", but also not as big of a stretch as others are making it out to be.
I prefer not to be called that
Ex-Defender
Former WASC Author
----V----
Weed
LIVE FREE

User avatar
Shofercia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31342
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Shofercia » Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:40 am

Petrasylvania wrote:If porn stars are prostitutes then the entire industry would either be shut down, relocate to Nevada, or worst of all go underground.


They're not prostitutes under the US set of legal definitions, the same set of definitions where a corporation is a person. We don't usually think of McDonald's as a human being, but under Citizen's United...
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.
Stonk Power! (North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia
I used pronouns until the mods made using wrong pronouns warnable, so I use names instead; if you see malice there, that's entirely on you, and if pronouns are no longer warnable, I'll go back to using them

User avatar
Painisia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1594
Founded: Nov 02, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Painisia » Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:43 am

Now, a bizarre cartoonish case about a porn star and a buffoon can turn the US upside down......
-Christian Democrat
-Syncretic
-Distributist
-Personalist
-Ecologism
-Popolarismo
-Corporatist
Formerly, the nation of Painisia November 2017 - August 2019

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:47 am

What's the thread? Trump was awarded attorney's fees. Okay. So now we argue about what is and is not a prostitute? We laugh at a the idea of Trump getting a refund even though that's in no way what happened? I don't see the substance.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Kernen
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9967
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Kernen » Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:50 am

Vassenor wrote:So a normal part of court procedure is hilarious now?

To be fair, most court procedure is pretty funny at one level or another. I still giggle a little when court opinions say "duty."

Heh. Duty. Doody.
From the throne of Khan Juk i'Behemoti, Juk Who-Is-The-Strength-of-the-Behemoth, Supreme Khan of the Ogres of Kernen. May the Khan ever drink the blood of his enemies!

Lawful Evil

Get abortions, do drugs, own guns, but never misstate legal procedure.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BEEstreetz, Kostane, Liverland, Miami Jai-Alai 3, New Temecula, Ohnoh, Pauctonia Proutchiristan, Port Carverton, Sheizou, Statesburg, The Mighty Sun, Tiami, Turkish Commune, Xind

Advertisement

Remove ads