by Yagon » Sat Jul 21, 2018 10:52 pm
by Bakery Hill » Sat Jul 21, 2018 10:53 pm
by Sovaal » Sat Jul 21, 2018 10:54 pm
Yagon wrote:It's probably silly for a lot of reasons, the very premise, but that said, a drunk Viet Nam vet at a bar just told me that a group with 16 chapters in Southern States of the US has stated formally they consider themselves the natural ally of Russia 'cause Russians are white apparently, or white enough, and they're Christian, apparently, or Christian enough, and mostly though the Russians are willing to fight the Muslims and would happily provide minefields and snipers for an ally's Southern border.
So they're basically saying they want to remnants of the Confederacy to defect to Russia.
This seems less plausible than Californian secession, and also less plausible than ancient aliens building Machu Pichu.
But suppose it were up to a vote in those confederate states, and they really could defect to the Russian side en masse.
What percentage could they get?
I'm betting less than 15%.
If Trump endorsed it, may 51% with margin for deliberate interference.
You're opinion?
by Yagon » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:00 pm
Sovaal wrote:Yagon wrote:It's probably silly for a lot of reasons, the very premise, but that said, a drunk Viet Nam vet at a bar just told me that a group with 16 chapters in Southern States of the US has stated formally they consider themselves the natural ally of Russia 'cause Russians are white apparently, or white enough, and they're Christian, apparently, or Christian enough, and mostly though the Russians are willing to fight the Muslims and would happily provide minefields and snipers for an ally's Southern border.
So they're basically saying they want to remnants of the Confederacy to defect to Russia.
This seems less plausible than Californian secession, and also less plausible than ancient aliens building Machu Pichu.
But suppose it were up to a vote in those confederate states, and they really could defect to the Russian side en masse.
What percentage could they get?
I'm betting less than 15%.
If Trump endorsed it, may 51% with margin for deliberate interference.
You're opinion?
Im unaware of any substantial secessionist movements anywhere in the country, let alone the South. Anyway, don't see as to how the South is a 'natural ally' to Russia. This is just white supremacists being dumbasses because their idealogly is becomeing more and more outdated every year, even in the South.
E; Also, why would the South b the protectorate here? They'd be richer than Russia.
by Sovaal » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:04 pm
Yagon wrote:Sovaal wrote:Im unaware of any substantial secessionist movements anywhere in the country, let alone the South. Anyway, don't see as to how the South is a 'natural ally' to Russia. This is just white supremacists being dumbasses because their idealogly is becomeing more and more outdated every year, even in the South.
E; Also, why would the South b the protectorate here? They'd be richer than Russia.
Suppose their support was aligned very much with white supremacists being dumbasses. How much support is that in the South?
The most popular secessionist movement is Texas, and last I checked it wasn't even a whole 1% of the Texan population who supported them.I really hope 15% or less, but I dunno.
The Russians couldnt do shit for the South, just like Britian and France couldnt do anything for them.Russia can exist independently from the US, but a separated South could not survive without support from Russia. The Chinese are too brown for the white supremacists being dumbasses.
by Bakery Hill » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:05 pm
Lanyards are DC dickheads who take special pride in their press or security lanyard, refer to themselves and their peers as "wonks," go on amphetemine+beer fueled twitter game theory rants, etc.
by Sovaal » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:06 pm
Bakery Hill wrote:Yagon wrote:
What's a lanyard type?
Centrist establishment liberal types, usually young professionals, often associated with politics and public service, hence the lanyard.
As another put it:Lanyards are DC dickheads who take special pride in their press or security lanyard, refer to themselves and their peers as "wonks," go on amphetemine+beer fueled twitter game theory rants, etc.
by -United Republic of Freedonia » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:07 pm
by Sovaal » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:08 pm
-United Republic of Freedonia wrote:No russians on my hemisphere. It's more better look on Iowa tiring to secede (really, keep an eye on these dildy doos)
Also, last time i read that the Russikes aren't white (on the eyes on the by-the-book racist).
by Khataiy » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:15 pm
Sovaal wrote:-United Republic of Freedonia wrote:No russians on my hemisphere. It's more better look on Iowa tiring to secede (really, keep an eye on these dildy doos)
Also, last time i read that the Russikes aren't white (on the eyes on the by-the-book racist).
I dunno, most neo-nazis have seemed to have welcomed them into the fold.
by Bakery Hill » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:20 pm
by -United Republic of Freedonia » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:22 pm
Sovaal wrote:I dunno, most neo-nazis have seemed to have welcomed them into the fold.
by Yagon » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:24 pm
Bakery Hill wrote:The ideological white nationalist types generally consider the Russians as good whites now, likewise with Greeks and Italians etc. The people who deny that are generally the old school fringe of that fringe. At any rate, thinking that the American South is the exclusive preserve of these types is a little sheltered. The 90s white nationalist revival was far bigger on the West Coast than elsewhere.
by Bakery Hill » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:26 pm
Yagon wrote:Bakery Hill wrote:The ideological white nationalist types generally consider the Russians as good whites now, likewise with Greeks and Italians etc. The people who deny that are generally the old school fringe of that fringe. At any rate, thinking that the American South is the exclusive preserve of these types is a little sheltered. The 90s white nationalist revival was far bigger on the West Coast than elsewhere.
This reminds me of Life o Brian where the radical group has a rival break-off group and a mutually hated break-off break-off group.
by Yagon » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:37 pm
Bakery Hill wrote:Yagon wrote:
This reminds me of Life o Brian where the radical group has a rival break-off group and a mutually hated break-off break-off group.
It's more commonly associated with the far left, but you really get this sort of purity politics whenever your political scene, whatever it is, is powerless and demoralised.
by Bakery Hill » Sun Jul 22, 2018 12:06 am
Yagon wrote:Bakery Hill wrote:It's more commonly associated with the far left, but you really get this sort of purity politics whenever your political scene, whatever it is, is powerless and demoralised.
Apparently they're calling themselves the League of the South (probably not the first to do so, and probably many members who have been members of many now defunct groups).
by Delta-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol » Sun Jul 22, 2018 12:07 am
Yagon wrote:It's probably silly for a lot of reasons, the very premise, but that said, a drunk...
by San Marlindo » Sun Jul 22, 2018 10:46 am
Yagon wrote:It's probably silly for a lot of reasons, the very premise, but that said, a drunk Viet Nam vet at a bar just told me that a group with 16 chapters in Southern States of the US has stated formally they consider themselves the natural ally of Russia 'cause Russians are white apparently, or white enough, and they're Christian, apparently, or Christian enough, and mostly though the Russians are willing to fight the Muslims and would happily provide minefields and snipers for an ally's Southern border.
So they're basically saying they want to remnants of the Confederacy to defect to Russia.
This seems less plausible than Californian secession, and also less plausible than ancient aliens building Machu Pichu.
But suppose it were up to a vote in those confederate states, and they really could defect to the Russian side en masse.
What percentage could they get?
I'm betting less than 15%.
If Trump endorsed it, may 51% with margin for deliberate interference.
You're opinion?
"Cold, analytical, materialistic thinking tends to throttle the urge to imagination." - Michael Chekhov
by Hammer Britannia » Sun Jul 22, 2018 11:31 am
by Uxupox » Sun Jul 22, 2018 11:32 am
Yagon wrote:It's probably silly for a lot of reasons, the very premise, but that said, a drunk Viet Nam vet at a bar just told me that a group with 16 chapters in Southern States of the US has stated formally they consider themselves the natural ally of Russia 'cause Russians are white apparently, or white enough, and they're Christian, apparently, or Christian enough, and mostly though the Russians are willing to fight the Muslims and would happily provide minefields and snipers for an ally's Southern border.
So they're basically saying they want to remnants of the Confederacy to defect to Russia.
This seems less plausible than Californian secession, and also less plausible than ancient aliens building Machu Pichu.
But suppose it were up to a vote in those confederate states, and they really could defect to the Russian side en masse.
What percentage could they get?
I'm betting less than 15%.
If Trump endorsed it, may 51% with margin for deliberate interference.
You're opinion?
by Blakk Metal » Sun Jul 22, 2018 12:07 pm
Yagon wrote:If Trump endorsed it, may 51% with margin for deliberate interference.
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Sun Jul 22, 2018 12:36 pm
by Sufokia » Sun Jul 22, 2018 12:40 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Burnt Calculators, Glorious Freedonia, Google [Bot], Great Eddy, Ineva, Repreteop, The Revacholian Revolutionary Front, Tiami, Zurkerx
Advertisement