NATION

PASSWORD

The American South As A Russian Protectorate

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Yagon
Minister
 
Posts: 2213
Founded: May 27, 2017
Ex-Nation

The American South As A Russian Protectorate

Postby Yagon » Sat Jul 21, 2018 10:52 pm

It's probably silly for a lot of reasons, the very premise, but that said, a drunk Viet Nam vet at a bar just told me that a group with 16 chapters in Southern States of the US has stated formally they consider themselves the natural ally of Russia 'cause Russians are white apparently, or white enough, and they're Christian, apparently, or Christian enough, and mostly though the Russians are willing to fight the Muslims and would happily provide minefields and snipers for an ally's Southern border.

So they're basically saying they want to remnants of the Confederacy to defect to Russia.

This seems less plausible than Californian secession, and also less plausible than ancient aliens building Machu Pichu.

But suppose it were up to a vote in those confederate states, and they really could defect to the Russian side en masse.

What percentage could they get?

I'm betting less than 15%.

If Trump endorsed it, may 51% with margin for deliberate interference.

You're opinion?

User avatar
Bakery Hill
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11973
Founded: Jul 03, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Bakery Hill » Sat Jul 21, 2018 10:53 pm

Don't make this a meme for the lanyard types, please.
Founder of the Committee for Proletarian Morality - Winner of Best Communist Award 2018 - Godfather of NSG Syndicalism

User avatar
Sovaal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13695
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Sovaal » Sat Jul 21, 2018 10:54 pm

Yagon wrote:It's probably silly for a lot of reasons, the very premise, but that said, a drunk Viet Nam vet at a bar just told me that a group with 16 chapters in Southern States of the US has stated formally they consider themselves the natural ally of Russia 'cause Russians are white apparently, or white enough, and they're Christian, apparently, or Christian enough, and mostly though the Russians are willing to fight the Muslims and would happily provide minefields and snipers for an ally's Southern border.

So they're basically saying they want to remnants of the Confederacy to defect to Russia.

This seems less plausible than Californian secession, and also less plausible than ancient aliens building Machu Pichu.

But suppose it were up to a vote in those confederate states, and they really could defect to the Russian side en masse.

What percentage could they get?

I'm betting less than 15%.

If Trump endorsed it, may 51% with margin for deliberate interference.

You're opinion?

Im unaware of any substantial secessionist movements anywhere in the country, let alone the South. Anyway, don't see as to how the South is a 'natural ally' to Russia. This is just white supremacists being dumbasses because their idealogly is becomeing more and more outdated every year, even in the South.

E; Also, why would the South b the protectorate here? They'd be richer than Russia.
Last edited by Sovaal on Sat Jul 21, 2018 10:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Most of the time I have no idea what the hell I'm doing or talking about.

”Many forms of government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe.
No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is
the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried from time to time." -
Winston Churchill, 1947.

"Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon – so long as there is no answer to it – gives claws to the weak.” - George Orwell

User avatar
Yagon
Minister
 
Posts: 2213
Founded: May 27, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Yagon » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:00 pm

Sovaal wrote:
Yagon wrote:It's probably silly for a lot of reasons, the very premise, but that said, a drunk Viet Nam vet at a bar just told me that a group with 16 chapters in Southern States of the US has stated formally they consider themselves the natural ally of Russia 'cause Russians are white apparently, or white enough, and they're Christian, apparently, or Christian enough, and mostly though the Russians are willing to fight the Muslims and would happily provide minefields and snipers for an ally's Southern border.

So they're basically saying they want to remnants of the Confederacy to defect to Russia.

This seems less plausible than Californian secession, and also less plausible than ancient aliens building Machu Pichu.

But suppose it were up to a vote in those confederate states, and they really could defect to the Russian side en masse.

What percentage could they get?

I'm betting less than 15%.

If Trump endorsed it, may 51% with margin for deliberate interference.

You're opinion?

Im unaware of any substantial secessionist movements anywhere in the country, let alone the South. Anyway, don't see as to how the South is a 'natural ally' to Russia. This is just white supremacists being dumbasses because their idealogly is becomeing more and more outdated every year, even in the South.

E; Also, why would the South b the protectorate here? They'd be richer than Russia.


Suppose their support was aligned very much with white supremacists being dumbasses. How much support is that in the South?

I really hope 15% or less, but I dunno.

Russia can exist independently from the US, but a separated South could not survive without support from Russia. The Chinese are too brown for the white supremacists being dumbasses.

User avatar
Yagon
Minister
 
Posts: 2213
Founded: May 27, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Yagon » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:00 pm

Bakery Hill wrote:Don't make this a meme for the lanyard types, please.


What's a lanyard type?

User avatar
Sovaal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13695
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Sovaal » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:04 pm

Yagon wrote:
Sovaal wrote:Im unaware of any substantial secessionist movements anywhere in the country, let alone the South. Anyway, don't see as to how the South is a 'natural ally' to Russia. This is just white supremacists being dumbasses because their idealogly is becomeing more and more outdated every year, even in the South.

E; Also, why would the South b the protectorate here? They'd be richer than Russia.


Suppose their support was aligned very much with white supremacists being dumbasses. How much support is that in the South?

Very little if any.

I really hope 15% or less, but I dunno.
The most popular secessionist movement is Texas, and last I checked it wasn't even a whole 1% of the Texan population who supported them.

Russia can exist independently from the US, but a separated South could not survive without support from Russia. The Chinese are too brown for the white supremacists being dumbasses.
The Russians couldnt do shit for the South, just like Britian and France couldnt do anything for them.
Most of the time I have no idea what the hell I'm doing or talking about.

”Many forms of government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe.
No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is
the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried from time to time." -
Winston Churchill, 1947.

"Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon – so long as there is no answer to it – gives claws to the weak.” - George Orwell

User avatar
Bakery Hill
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11973
Founded: Jul 03, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Bakery Hill » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:05 pm

Yagon wrote:
Bakery Hill wrote:Don't make this a meme for the lanyard types, please.


What's a lanyard type?

Centrist establishment liberal types, usually young professionals, often associated with politics and public service, hence the lanyard.

As another put it:
Lanyards are DC dickheads who take special pride in their press or security lanyard, refer to themselves and their peers as "wonks," go on amphetemine+beer fueled twitter game theory rants, etc.
Founder of the Committee for Proletarian Morality - Winner of Best Communist Award 2018 - Godfather of NSG Syndicalism

User avatar
Sovaal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13695
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Sovaal » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:06 pm

Bakery Hill wrote:
Yagon wrote:
What's a lanyard type?

Centrist establishment liberal types, usually young professionals, often associated with politics and public service, hence the lanyard.

As another put it:
Lanyards are DC dickheads who take special pride in their press or security lanyard, refer to themselves and their peers as "wonks," go on amphetemine+beer fueled twitter game theory rants, etc.

Yah learn every day.
Most of the time I have no idea what the hell I'm doing or talking about.

”Many forms of government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe.
No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is
the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried from time to time." -
Winston Churchill, 1947.

"Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon – so long as there is no answer to it – gives claws to the weak.” - George Orwell

User avatar
-United Republic of Freedonia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 368
Founded: Jan 01, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby -United Republic of Freedonia » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:07 pm

No russians on my hemisphere. It's more better look on Iowa tiring to secede (really, keep an eye on these dildy doos)

Also, last time i read that the Russikes aren't white (on the eyes on the by-the-book racist).
The United Republic of Freedonia:
"I respect three things: Strength, Justice,America and Lasagna."
-Garfield

Join The Labyrinth, i'm not there anymore but they are cool, so check them out at least
i'm rebooting this shit, we are in Venus now
just a friend of vaspelia, really
>wO

User avatar
Sovaal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13695
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Sovaal » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:08 pm

-United Republic of Freedonia wrote:No russians on my hemisphere. It's more better look on Iowa tiring to secede (really, keep an eye on these dildy doos)

Also, last time i read that the Russikes aren't white (on the eyes on the by-the-book racist).

I dunno, most neo-nazis have seemed to have welcomed them into the fold.
Most of the time I have no idea what the hell I'm doing or talking about.

”Many forms of government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe.
No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is
the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried from time to time." -
Winston Churchill, 1947.

"Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon – so long as there is no answer to it – gives claws to the weak.” - George Orwell

User avatar
Khataiy
Minister
 
Posts: 2947
Founded: Apr 22, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Khataiy » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:15 pm

Sovaal wrote:
-United Republic of Freedonia wrote:No russians on my hemisphere. It's more better look on Iowa tiring to secede (really, keep an eye on these dildy doos)

Also, last time i read that the Russikes aren't white (on the eyes on the by-the-book racist).

I dunno, most neo-nazis have seemed to have welcomed them into the fold.

the original Nazis didn't and I'm sure a good amount of those anti-interracial marriage people upon finding out what biologically impure people Russians are they might reconsider calling them white or even human, than again I suppose in their eyes it's better than black or Hispanic or Arab or whatever.

User avatar
Bakery Hill
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11973
Founded: Jul 03, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Bakery Hill » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:20 pm

The ideological white nationalist types generally consider the Russians as good whites now, likewise with Greeks and Italians etc. The people who deny that are generally the old school fringe of that fringe. At any rate, thinking that the American South is the exclusive preserve of these types is a little sheltered. The 90s white nationalist revival was far bigger on the West Coast than elsewhere.
Last edited by Bakery Hill on Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Founder of the Committee for Proletarian Morality - Winner of Best Communist Award 2018 - Godfather of NSG Syndicalism

User avatar
-United Republic of Freedonia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 368
Founded: Jan 01, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby -United Republic of Freedonia » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:22 pm

Sovaal wrote:I dunno, most neo-nazis have seemed to have welcomed them into the fold.

Today's Neo-nazi view on X and Y race are just a mess. With Nazi slavs praising Mr. "I want to turn the slav horde into slaves" Hitler, nazis in latin america and asia and shit. Thanks to the dark gods that people isn't stupid to support them.

I read somewhere that the Nazis believied that the Iranians were "a lost Aryan people" and that Hitler said before killing himself that the Russians because they defeated him and were more strong during the war, they were a superior race as the Germans. I'm not sure about those things.
Last edited by -United Republic of Freedonia on Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The United Republic of Freedonia:
"I respect three things: Strength, Justice,America and Lasagna."
-Garfield

Join The Labyrinth, i'm not there anymore but they are cool, so check them out at least
i'm rebooting this shit, we are in Venus now
just a friend of vaspelia, really
>wO

User avatar
Yagon
Minister
 
Posts: 2213
Founded: May 27, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Yagon » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:24 pm

Bakery Hill wrote:The ideological white nationalist types generally consider the Russians as good whites now, likewise with Greeks and Italians etc. The people who deny that are generally the old school fringe of that fringe. At any rate, thinking that the American South is the exclusive preserve of these types is a little sheltered. The 90s white nationalist revival was far bigger on the West Coast than elsewhere.


This reminds me of Life o Brian where the radical group has a rival break-off group and a mutually hated break-off break-off group.

User avatar
Bakery Hill
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11973
Founded: Jul 03, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Bakery Hill » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:26 pm

Yagon wrote:
Bakery Hill wrote:The ideological white nationalist types generally consider the Russians as good whites now, likewise with Greeks and Italians etc. The people who deny that are generally the old school fringe of that fringe. At any rate, thinking that the American South is the exclusive preserve of these types is a little sheltered. The 90s white nationalist revival was far bigger on the West Coast than elsewhere.


This reminds me of Life o Brian where the radical group has a rival break-off group and a mutually hated break-off break-off group.

It's more commonly associated with the far left, but you really get this sort of purity politics whenever your political scene, whatever it is, is powerless and demoralised.
Founder of the Committee for Proletarian Morality - Winner of Best Communist Award 2018 - Godfather of NSG Syndicalism

User avatar
Yagon
Minister
 
Posts: 2213
Founded: May 27, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Yagon » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:37 pm

Bakery Hill wrote:
Yagon wrote:
This reminds me of Life o Brian where the radical group has a rival break-off group and a mutually hated break-off break-off group.

It's more commonly associated with the far left, but you really get this sort of purity politics whenever your political scene, whatever it is, is powerless and demoralised.


Apparently they're calling themselves the League of the South (probably not the first to do so, and probably many members who have been members of many now defunct groups).

User avatar
Bakery Hill
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11973
Founded: Jul 03, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Bakery Hill » Sun Jul 22, 2018 12:06 am

Yagon wrote:
Bakery Hill wrote:It's more commonly associated with the far left, but you really get this sort of purity politics whenever your political scene, whatever it is, is powerless and demoralised.


Apparently they're calling themselves the League of the South (probably not the first to do so, and probably many members who have been members of many now defunct groups).

They're an old 90s gen group who used to have some influence and connections with prominent figures. Odd people. Thought they were dead.
Founder of the Committee for Proletarian Morality - Winner of Best Communist Award 2018 - Godfather of NSG Syndicalism

User avatar
Delta-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1235
Founded: Jun 02, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Delta-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol » Sun Jul 22, 2018 12:07 am

Yagon wrote:It's probably silly for a lot of reasons, the very premise, but that said, a drunk...


Why should anyone pounder what a drunk guy said? As for the notion, not going to happen. :roll:
Last edited by Delta-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol on Sun Jul 22, 2018 12:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
Officially retired as of 8/10/2018. Don’t bother sending TG’s since I’m not coming back.

User avatar
San Marlindo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1877
Founded: Dec 01, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby San Marlindo » Sun Jul 22, 2018 10:46 am

Yagon wrote:It's probably silly for a lot of reasons, the very premise, but that said, a drunk Viet Nam vet at a bar just told me that a group with 16 chapters in Southern States of the US has stated formally they consider themselves the natural ally of Russia 'cause Russians are white apparently, or white enough, and they're Christian, apparently, or Christian enough, and mostly though the Russians are willing to fight the Muslims and would happily provide minefields and snipers for an ally's Southern border.

So they're basically saying they want to remnants of the Confederacy to defect to Russia.

This seems less plausible than Californian secession, and also less plausible than ancient aliens building Machu Pichu.

But suppose it were up to a vote in those confederate states, and they really could defect to the Russian side en masse.

What percentage could they get?

I'm betting less than 15%.

If Trump endorsed it, may 51% with margin for deliberate interference.

You're opinion?


Baloney. It's like people forgot the Cold War even existed. My father's family is about as old school Southern as they come, and when I visit with them they still associate Russia with communism and being an evil empire. Especially since it's being run by an ex KGB agent who called the fall of the Soviet Union the greatest disaster of the twentieth century. Once in a while my father still slips up and calls Russians Soviets.

Back during the Cold War, no Republican ever looked at the Soviet Union and said, "hey! we have a lot in common!" Despite the fact that to an uninformed observer there are some superficial similarities, including a love for the military, social conservatism, and emphasis on nationalism. They were still the enemy.

It's baffling to me now how people in America can look at the corrupt mob state run by Putin with a heavily over-regulated pseudo socialist economy inherited from the Soviets and think conservative Southerners want any thing to do with it. An unfree place with comparatively restrictive gun registration, where people disappear off the streets for being critical of the man in charge. Decades of Cold War rhetoric have also shaped attitudes on foreign policy in the South much more heavily than they did the North and the Midwest, meaning there's a lot of stigma attached to communism, socialism, and Russia and Red China.
"Cold, analytical, materialistic thinking tends to throttle the urge to imagination." - Michael Chekhov

User avatar
Sufokia
Attaché
 
Posts: 67
Founded: Nov 06, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Sufokia » Sun Jul 22, 2018 10:51 am

Yagon wrote:a drunk Viet Nam vet at a bar just told me

Great start to a thread.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~

Factbook (WIP!)

User avatar
Hammer Britannia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5390
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Hammer Britannia » Sun Jul 22, 2018 11:31 am

1. Trump wouldn't endorse any (American) succession.
2. Not even 15% of the entire South US wants to succeed, let alone become a Russian Puppet.
3. You really shouldn't make threads about what a drunk guy said. (Then again, by that logic I shouldn't make any threads)
Last edited by Hammer Britannia on Sun Jul 22, 2018 11:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
All shall tremble before me

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Sun Jul 22, 2018 11:32 am

Yagon wrote:It's probably silly for a lot of reasons, the very premise, but that said, a drunk Viet Nam vet at a bar just told me that a group with 16 chapters in Southern States of the US has stated formally they consider themselves the natural ally of Russia 'cause Russians are white apparently, or white enough, and they're Christian, apparently, or Christian enough, and mostly though the Russians are willing to fight the Muslims and would happily provide minefields and snipers for an ally's Southern border.

So they're basically saying they want to remnants of the Confederacy to defect to Russia.

This seems less plausible than Californian secession, and also less plausible than ancient aliens building Machu Pichu.

But suppose it were up to a vote in those confederate states, and they really could defect to the Russian side en masse.

What percentage could they get?

I'm betting less than 15%.

If Trump endorsed it, may 51% with margin for deliberate interference.

You're opinion?


im betting less than .001 %
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
Blakk Metal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6738
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Blakk Metal » Sun Jul 22, 2018 12:07 pm

Yagon wrote:If Trump endorsed it, may 51% with margin for deliberate interference.

Why a president from New York support Southern secession?

User avatar
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34994
Founded: Dec 18, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Sun Jul 22, 2018 12:36 pm

1% beacuse they would know better then to spit from the union.

User avatar
Sufokia
Attaché
 
Posts: 67
Founded: Nov 06, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Sufokia » Sun Jul 22, 2018 12:40 pm

Blakk Metal wrote:
Yagon wrote:If Trump endorsed it, may 51% with margin for deliberate interference.

Why a president from New York support Southern secession?

Sensationalism to some, it would seem. The equal and opposite person to someone who would support some sort of bizarre Trump secession scheme would probably be someone who thinks it's worthy news that Trump gets two scoops of ice cream.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~

Factbook (WIP!)

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Burnt Calculators, Glorious Freedonia, Google [Bot], Great Eddy, Ineva, Repreteop, The Revacholian Revolutionary Front, Tiami, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads