He still contributed greatly to the Worldview. Whether or not he called himself a Fascist doesn't matter, he shared the Worldview.
Advertisement
by Traditionalism » Sat May 21, 2016 4:33 pm
by Traditionalism » Sat May 21, 2016 4:34 pm
by The Grey Wolf » Sat May 21, 2016 4:34 pm
by Traditionalism » Sat May 21, 2016 4:37 pm
The Grey Wolf wrote:Traditionalism wrote:He still contributed greatly to the Worldview. Whether or not he called himself a Fascist doesn't matter, he shared the Worldview.
Evola criticized Futurism, National Syndicalism, and Giovanni Gentile, all three of which gave Fascism it's worldview. He saw the first one as "titanic," and the last two as "Marxist." So no, he would be offended that you thought he did.
by Traditionalism » Sat May 21, 2016 4:38 pm
by The Grey Wolf » Sat May 21, 2016 4:50 pm
Traditionalism wrote:The Grey Wolf wrote:
Evola criticized Futurism, National Syndicalism, and Giovanni Gentile, all three of which gave Fascism it's worldview. He saw the first one as "titanic," and the last two as "Marxist." So no, he would be offended that you thought he did.
I can't say I care at all if he was offended.
He contributed to the Worldview, and that's that.
by Living Stones » Sat May 21, 2016 4:55 pm
Traditionalism wrote:Northern Davincia wrote:What is being created? Who is creating it? When? How?
None of these things are being explained in-depth to us, hence the confusion. Other than that, we'll believe that a major tyrannical underground movement is on the march once we see it in action. Words rarely amount to much.
Then you may wait patiently for the day of justice, see it in action for yourself.
by Hurdegaryp » Sat May 21, 2016 4:56 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by The Grey Wolf » Sat May 21, 2016 4:57 pm
Hurdegaryp wrote:Looks like this thread is going to become part of NationStates history as yet another massive waste of effort, time and neurological activity.
by Hurdegaryp » Sat May 21, 2016 5:01 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Dushan » Sat May 21, 2016 5:05 pm
The Grey Wolf wrote:snip
by The Grey Wolf » Sat May 21, 2016 5:06 pm
by Hurdegaryp » Sat May 21, 2016 5:12 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by The Empire of Pretantia » Sat May 21, 2016 5:21 pm
Hurdegaryp wrote:Dushan wrote:Just this in: I do believe that there can be a synthesis of Tradition and Progress. Simplyfied: Cult of the Machine and Future on the material Level, Cult of Leadership and Tradition on the Metaphysical Level.
One day the former path shall merge with the later.
Many traditions die because they lack resilience and relevance in the modern age. This should not be mourned, for many traditions have withered away and been forgotten during tens of thousands of years for good reasons. The cultures that bring forth and improve machine technology are vastly superior to the obsolete traditional societies that come before them, if only because all this amazing technology allows us to communicate with each other easily. Machine supremacy is best supremacy!
by Grenartia » Sat May 21, 2016 5:37 pm
Hurdegaryp wrote:Dushan wrote:Just this in: I do believe that there can be a synthesis of Tradition and Progress. Simplyfied: Cult of the Machine and Future on the material Level, Cult of Leadership and Tradition on the Metaphysical Level.
One day the former path shall merge with the later.
Many traditions die because they lack resilience and relevance in the modern age. This should not be mourned, for many traditions have withered away and been forgotten during tens of thousands of years for good reasons. The cultures that bring forth and improve machine technology are vastly superior to the obsolete traditional societies that come before them, if only because all this amazing technology allows us to communicate with each other easily. Machine supremacy is best supremacy!
by Dushan » Sat May 21, 2016 5:45 pm
Grenartia wrote:snip
by Grenartia » Sat May 21, 2016 5:56 pm
Dushan wrote:Grenartia wrote:snip
I wasn't talking about Christmas Candles or other petty traditions. ^^
However you can't deny that Leadership and Tradition are necessary to be preserved even within a strictly technocratic apporeach... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzddAYYDZkk
by The Grey Wolf » Sat May 21, 2016 6:04 pm
Dushan wrote:Grenartia wrote:snip
I wasn't talking about Christmas Candles or other petty traditions. ^^
However you can't deny that Leadership and Tradition are necessary to be preserved even within a strictly technocratic apporeach... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzddAYYDZkk
by Dushan » Sat May 21, 2016 6:16 pm
The Grey Wolf wrote:There was never anything traditional about Mussolini or Fascist leadership, they were party-states lead by revolutionary leaders not based on birth or the liberal democratic process. What "traditions" are you referencing?
by Zoice » Sat May 21, 2016 6:30 pm
by Conscentia » Sun May 22, 2016 6:30 am
Kwaaal wrote:we should make a poll for le next OP
Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
by Pranovia » Sun May 22, 2016 6:51 am
The permissiveness of society must be balanced with authoritativeness. - Ferdinand MarcosPranovia is based on 1970s era Philippines, with some personal twists.
Read more at: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/autho ... arcos.html
by Great Kauthar » Sun May 22, 2016 7:11 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Icelander Peoples, Picairn, Valles Marineris Mining co
Advertisement