Advertisement
by Isla bonitas » Sat Dec 12, 2015 1:41 pm
by Isla bonitas » Sat Dec 12, 2015 1:51 pm
Isla bonitas wrote:isla bonitas formally condemns Den for their appalling actions. Whatever support we can offer is extended to those nations. freedom animus may be used as a safe haven for any people seeking shelter from the attacks.
by SpitfireYG » Sat Dec 12, 2015 2:10 pm
by Dark Commander » Sat Dec 12, 2015 2:32 pm
We Are Not the NSA wrote:Dark Commander wrote:I understand, it was relatively well written when compared with many other commendations/condemnations. Notably, this actually included several specific examples.
It was well written compared to many proposals, but it is a joke compared to other passed resolution. As a draft it has potential, but not as a resolution. I only partially blame the author for that though, because they could have posted this version before submitting it, so at least the grammar could have been corrected, or have it removed after the errors were pointed out here. I'm more pissed off at the number of people who voted for it, because I doubt half of the game even read it. I've seen a guy campaigning on some rmbs that it makes us give up our refounds, which is an outright lie.
by The Silver Sentinel » Sat Dec 12, 2015 2:46 pm
Dark Commander wrote:We Are Not the NSA wrote:It was well written compared to many proposals, but it is a joke compared to other passed resolution. As a draft it has potential, but not as a resolution. I only partially blame the author for that though, because they could have posted this version before submitting it, so at least the grammar could have been corrected, or have it removed after the errors were pointed out here. I'm more pissed off at the number of people who voted for it, because I doubt half of the game even read it. I've seen a guy campaigning on some rmbs that it makes us give up our refounds, which is an outright lie.
Agreed. Part of my wariness towards this resolutions comes from the lies some people have said as a result of this proposal. Although, I am impressed that Christmas obviously did his homework, which is a large part of why I support this proposal.
by Dark Commander » Sat Dec 12, 2015 3:37 pm
The Silver Sentinel wrote:Dark Commander wrote:Agreed. Part of my wariness towards this resolutions comes from the lies some people have said as a result of this proposal. Although, I am impressed that Christmas obviously did his homework, which is a large part of why I support this proposal.
Homework? Don't make me laugh. It was common knowledge.
by Wallenburg » Sat Dec 12, 2015 3:59 pm
by Maltropia » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:24 pm
by SpitfireYG » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:01 pm
by Mayakava » Sat Dec 12, 2015 6:06 pm
SpitfireYG wrote:We in the Den alliance would like to thank the author of this "condemnation" for advertising us.
Thanks
by Consular » Sun Dec 13, 2015 12:47 am
by Cormac Stark » Sun Dec 13, 2015 3:01 am
Consular wrote:Wow. Guess big vote delegates don't completely decide these things
by Consular » Sun Dec 13, 2015 7:23 am
Cormac Stark wrote:Consular wrote:Wow. Guess big vote delegates don't completely decide these things
Which is unfortunate, because when they don't we get inaccurate, incomplete proposals filled with spelling and grammatical errors passed by a horde of lemmings who don't care about quality and just hate DEN. Obviously we're better off when big vote Delegates chosen by elitist forum oligarchies are making the decisions, because the average on-site NationStates player isn't capable of discerning between a quality proposal and populist garbage.
by The Silver Sentinel » Sun Dec 13, 2015 11:49 am
Consular wrote:Cormac Stark wrote:Which is unfortunate, because when they don't we get inaccurate, incomplete proposals filled with spelling and grammatical errors passed by a horde of lemmings who don't care about quality and just hate DEN. Obviously we're better off when big vote Delegates chosen by elitist forum oligarchies are making the decisions, because the average on-site NationStates player isn't capable of discerning between a quality proposal and populist garbage.
Not sure if you're being genuine or sarcastic at this point
by Wallenburg » Sun Dec 13, 2015 12:35 pm
Cormac Stark wrote:Consular wrote:Wow. Guess big vote delegates don't completely decide these things
Which is unfortunate, because when they don't we get inaccurate, incomplete proposals filled with spelling and grammatical errors passed by a horde of lemmings who don't care about quality and just hate DEN. Obviously we're better off when big vote Delegates chosen by elitist forum oligarchies are making the decisions, because the average on-site NationStates player isn't capable of discerning between a quality proposal and populist garbage.
by Paffnia » Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:55 pm
by Kaboomlandia » Sun Dec 13, 2015 2:51 pm
CookieCrew wrote:Im even part of DEN, But even I hate them.
Im voting yes!
by Blood stream » Sun Dec 13, 2015 4:16 pm
by Cormac Stark » Sun Dec 13, 2015 4:32 pm
Consular wrote:Cormac Stark wrote:Which is unfortunate, because when they don't we get inaccurate, incomplete proposals filled with spelling and grammatical errors passed by a horde of lemmings who don't care about quality and just hate DEN. Obviously we're better off when big vote Delegates chosen by elitist forum oligarchies are making the decisions, because the average on-site NationStates player isn't capable of discerning between a quality proposal and populist garbage.
Not sure if you're being genuine or sarcastic at this point
by Consular » Sun Dec 13, 2015 5:19 pm
by Cybershield » Sun Dec 13, 2015 6:45 pm
by Weaponized Confederation of States » Mon Dec 14, 2015 12:39 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement