NATION

PASSWORD

A question for the ladies of NS.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Great Yorkshire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 541
Founded: May 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Yorkshire » Sun May 20, 2012 2:26 pm

Grasswalkia wrote:
Great Yorkshire wrote:Just saying... that's how people tend to work subconsciously, they see someone doing something differently, and they jump to the conclusion they are doing it worse... on the other hand people sometimes project their own problems on to their partner and try to change them in ways they should be changing themselves. Either way it's bad...


I don't like... How you say that. It gives me the impression that you just generally hate change. If I has a partner, and I tried to change him, you can't automatically assume it's some psychological issue on my end.

Paradox: You're trying to change someone from changing someone, that is changing someone, in turn is bad. .-.
Well trying to 'fix-up' an adult is undeniably arrogant. But I'm just giving you 2 common examples, that are traps I think people fall into accidentally and should watch out for.
The Queen of quips, the Sultan of snickering, the President of puns, the Generalissimo of jollity, the Tsar of zingers, the Guru of guffaws, the Jam Sahib of jokes, the Maharajah of mirth, the Chhatrapati of cheer, the Poligar of punch lines, the Rao Bahadur of revelry, the Baivarapatish of bullshit, the Chief Executive of chuckles, the Managing Director of merriment, the Deputy Financial Officer of damn funny observations, the Satrap of satire, who'll never give you a flat tire, 'cos she's not that dire, she used to have testicles, she still wears spectacles, the Edith Piaf of amateur table tennis (she regrets nothing about her backhand smashes) and the self-declared inventor of the prawn burrito... The one, the only... The chunter hunter... Great Yorkshire.

User avatar
Kaleer
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 179
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaleer » Sun May 20, 2012 2:26 pm

Prizyetsa wrote:
Crazy girl wrote:My psychiatrist says it's not my fault.

Please tell me you're serious! (Toe nou...)

But if you want to "re-shape" the tool, why not find another?

Because sometimes we like the over-all package, just not that one detail.

User avatar
Sedgistan
Site Director
 
Posts: 38551
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Sun May 20, 2012 2:28 pm

Nationstatelandsville wrote:
Crazy girl wrote:My psychiatrist says it's not my fault.


No one ever accused Sedge of being a competent psychiatrist. :p

I was expecting to be accused of being her partner, not her psychiatrist :blink:

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Sun May 20, 2012 2:28 pm

Same reason some men try to change the woman (or man) they are with. People like to be in control. Not in a master or domination sense, just control in general, from their routines to their surroundings to the things that happen to them. Some more so than others.
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
Grasswalkia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 115
Founded: Feb 13, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grasswalkia » Sun May 20, 2012 2:28 pm

Great Yorkshire wrote:
Grasswalkia wrote:
I don't like... How you say that. It gives me the impression that you just generally hate change. If I has a partner, and I tried to change him, you can't automatically assume it's some psychological issue on my end.

Paradox: You're trying to change someone from changing someone, that is changing someone, in turn is bad. .-.
Well trying to 'fix-up' an adult is undeniably arrogant. But I'm just giving you 2 common examples, that are traps I think people fall into accidentally and should watch out for.


So you're saying that, if I try to help my partner who has a phobia, that I'm undeniably arrogant and have psychological issues that you mentioned before? I disagree.

I think that people have the right to change their partner, with the partner's consent.
I cannot detect sarcasm, sorry. >.<
Telegram me - I don't subscribe/check forums all the time.

User avatar
Nui-ta
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1612
Founded: Feb 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nui-ta » Sun May 20, 2012 2:28 pm

Prizyetsa wrote:As the title stated, this is un question pour les dammes of NationStates.

Why do some girls/women drive to change the guy they're with? For example, a woman will keep asking a guy to do the same thing over and over even though the answer has always been, and always will be, no. I have trouble understanding this concept, as women expect us gentlemen to be flexible and accept them as they are, but it seems the same courtesy isn't always extended to us. I'm well aware that this probably isn't the case with all women, but I'd like to know why it occurs with some of you wonderful ladies of the world.

Please keep this a serious thread, as I'm intrigued to know why this occurs. Takk.


Some women are just unsatisfied...

I don't do this. I know a girl that used to do it every two weeks though.
Someone cares? Okay then. Economic Left/Right: -2.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.85

INFP-T personality, quite heavy on the I,P, and T.

User avatar
Gallade
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53389
Founded: Jul 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Gallade » Sun May 20, 2012 2:28 pm

Prizyetsa wrote:Wow, this really took off.

Yes, it is true that its a two way street, but I'd like to figure out why its done. I'll admit that we (men) can be twats at times, but not always.

Gallade, you mentioned constructive nagging, does that only cover hygiene, or does it reach out to other aspects of life as well? I do personally think that hygiene is important, not only because of the general health aspect of it, but also because of the idea of looking presentable. I'm not a big fan of going out smelling like a dirty wash hamper, so I shower every day. (Just an example)

Cleanliness isnt the only issue, but, along with laziness, it seems like the most common problem.

The first few months of my current relationship seemed to be a never-ending argument about him leaving clothes everywhere, not rinsing his dishes and being a general slob.

He learned to see things my way in the end. Of course, im sure many guys aren't like this.
|| Miss me with that factional BS || RIP Dyakovo. You were a true friend, you will be forever missed. ||

Français, en guerriers magnanimes, portez ou retenez vos coups! Épargnez ces tristes victimes à regret s'armant contre nous
My TG box is for friends, not food
Feel like making a direct change rather than just bickering over crises?
Help give orphaned children a safe environment to grow
Combat Homelessness

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 56476
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Sun May 20, 2012 2:29 pm

Nui-ta wrote:Some women are just unsatisfied...

There are non-PG-13 solutions to that issue.
nangiqatigillugu kalaałłiit nunaanni
je soutiens le canada / i stand with canada
estoy con panamá

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16012
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Sun May 20, 2012 2:29 pm

Sedgistan wrote:
Nationstatelandsville wrote:
No one ever accused Sedge of being a competent psychiatrist. :p

I was expecting to be accused of being her partner, not her psychiatrist :blink:


The two aren't mutually exclusive.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Prizyetsa
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1305
Founded: Mar 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Prizyetsa » Sun May 20, 2012 2:30 pm

Kaleer wrote:Because sometimes we like the over-all package, just not that one detail.

I suppose so.

So what I gather so far is that you ladies try to change us, driving us to the brink of insanity in some cases, because you love everything except a few details about us?

User avatar
Northwest Slobovia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12570
Founded: Sep 16, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Northwest Slobovia » Sun May 20, 2012 2:30 pm

Chinese Regions wrote:In the hope of appeasement, they think men are like Chamberlain and Daladier.

Well, not everybody can be Der Führer.

But in general, if you're trying to negotiate with somebody, reciprocity is a good idea. If they want you to do something that you don't like, ask if you can do something you want but that they don't like. Be careful about what you ask for though, you perv. ;)
Gollum died for your sins.
Power is an equal-opportunity corrupter.

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Sun May 20, 2012 2:30 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Prizyetsa wrote:As the title stated, this is un question pour les dammes of NationStates.

Why do some girls/women drive to change the guy they're with? For example, a woman will keep asking a guy to do the same thing over and over even though the answer has always been, and always will be, no. I have trouble understanding this concept, as women expect us gentlemen to be flexible and accept them as they are, but it seems the same courtesy isn't always extended to us. I'm well aware that this probably isn't the case with all women, but I'd like to know why it occurs with some of you wonderful ladies of the world.

Please keep this a serious thread, as I'm intrigued to know why this occurs. Takk.

because we want you to be different.

But I'm already different!
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
Great Yorkshire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 541
Founded: May 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Yorkshire » Sun May 20, 2012 2:32 pm

Grasswalkia wrote:
Great Yorkshire wrote:Well trying to 'fix-up' an adult is undeniably arrogant. But I'm just giving you 2 common examples, that are traps I think people fall into accidentally and should watch out for.


So you're saying that, if I try to help my partner who has a phobia, that I'm undeniably arrogant and have psychological issues that you mentioned before? I disagree.

I think that people have the right to change their partner, with the partner's consent.
Nope, obviously a phobia is something you might want to work through together, but in most cases just assuming that 'you know best' (and more often than not, not even bothering to let your partner know how you want them to change or why It's important to you) is pretty much the definition of arrogant.
Last edited by Great Yorkshire on Sun May 20, 2012 2:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Queen of quips, the Sultan of snickering, the President of puns, the Generalissimo of jollity, the Tsar of zingers, the Guru of guffaws, the Jam Sahib of jokes, the Maharajah of mirth, the Chhatrapati of cheer, the Poligar of punch lines, the Rao Bahadur of revelry, the Baivarapatish of bullshit, the Chief Executive of chuckles, the Managing Director of merriment, the Deputy Financial Officer of damn funny observations, the Satrap of satire, who'll never give you a flat tire, 'cos she's not that dire, she used to have testicles, she still wears spectacles, the Edith Piaf of amateur table tennis (she regrets nothing about her backhand smashes) and the self-declared inventor of the prawn burrito... The one, the only... The chunter hunter... Great Yorkshire.

User avatar
Crazy girl
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 7460
Founded: Antiquity
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Crazy girl » Sun May 20, 2012 2:32 pm

On a more serious note, why is it always considered bad? A friend of mine was changed by her current husband. But instead of a shy girl who was always busy trying to please others, she now does what she wants and isn't afraid to show herself. She is still the dear friend I've known for years now, but so much more confident about herself. I'm sure that also works the other way. So trying to change someone can work out badly, but it can also help someone improve and even feel better about themselves. It all depends on what the change is and why you are trying to change the other person.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16012
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Sun May 20, 2012 2:33 pm

Crazy girl wrote:On a more serious note, why is it always considered bad? A friend of mine was changed by her current husband. But instead of a shy girl who was always busy trying to please others, she now does what she wants and isn't afraid to show herself. She is still the dear friend I've known for years now, but so much more confident about herself. I'm sure that also works the other way. So trying to change someone can work out badly, but it can also help someone improve and even feel better about themselves. It all depends on what the change is and why you are trying to change the other person.


Indeed. Change can be good or bad.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Prizyetsa
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1305
Founded: Mar 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Prizyetsa » Sun May 20, 2012 2:35 pm

While change can be good or bad, I'd like to concentrate on why it happens. After that we can delve off into the effects it has on people, both good and bad. :)

User avatar
Grasswalkia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 115
Founded: Feb 13, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grasswalkia » Sun May 20, 2012 2:35 pm

Great Yorkshire wrote:
Grasswalkia wrote:
So you're saying that, if I try to help my partner who has a phobia, that I'm undeniably arrogant and have psychological issues that you mentioned before? I disagree.

I think that people have the right to change their partner, with the partner's consent.
Nope, obviously a phobia is something you might want to work through together, but in most cases just assuming that 'you know best' (and more often than not, not even bothering to let your partner know how you want them to change or why It's important to you) is pretty much the definition of arrogant.


See. Now that's not what you said at first. >.>

Anyway. Glad you did have the similar idea to me. *Hugs*
I cannot detect sarcasm, sorry. >.<
Telegram me - I don't subscribe/check forums all the time.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sun May 20, 2012 2:37 pm

It is a two way street and natural in a relationship, both people have expectations for their partners. Women in general just seem to more capably vocalizing the need for change in their partner.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Sun May 20, 2012 2:38 pm

Prizyetsa wrote:
Kaleer wrote:Because sometimes we like the over-all package, just not that one detail.

I suppose so.

So what I gather so far is that you ladies try to change us, driving us to the brink of insanity in some cases, because you love everything except a few details about us?

the important thing to remember is that you dont have to put up with a girlfriend who wants to change you. if you dont like it MOVE ON.
whatever

User avatar
Great Yorkshire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 541
Founded: May 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Yorkshire » Sun May 20, 2012 2:38 pm

Grasswalkia wrote:See. Now that's not what you said at first. >.>

Anyway. Glad you did have the similar idea to me. *Hugs*

Tbh I've still yet to get used to just how fundamentally ones words are taken on this forum...
The Queen of quips, the Sultan of snickering, the President of puns, the Generalissimo of jollity, the Tsar of zingers, the Guru of guffaws, the Jam Sahib of jokes, the Maharajah of mirth, the Chhatrapati of cheer, the Poligar of punch lines, the Rao Bahadur of revelry, the Baivarapatish of bullshit, the Chief Executive of chuckles, the Managing Director of merriment, the Deputy Financial Officer of damn funny observations, the Satrap of satire, who'll never give you a flat tire, 'cos she's not that dire, she used to have testicles, she still wears spectacles, the Edith Piaf of amateur table tennis (she regrets nothing about her backhand smashes) and the self-declared inventor of the prawn burrito... The one, the only... The chunter hunter... Great Yorkshire.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Sun May 20, 2012 2:39 pm

Wikkiwallana wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:because we want you to be different.

But I'm already different!

youre PERFECT! no wonder youre already taken!
whatever

User avatar
Northwest Slobovia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12570
Founded: Sep 16, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Northwest Slobovia » Sun May 20, 2012 2:42 pm

Great Yorkshire wrote:
Grasswalkia wrote:See. Now that's not what you said at first. >.>

Anyway. Glad you did have the similar idea to me. *Hugs*

Tbh I've still yet to get used to just how fundamentally ones words are taken on this forum...

"Words, words... they're all we have to go on!"
--Tom Stoppard, Rosenkrantz and Guilderstern are Dead.
Gollum died for your sins.
Power is an equal-opportunity corrupter.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Sun May 20, 2012 2:48 pm

If someone would tell me what I need to change, then I would do an effort to try. Sadly, no one tells me anything... :(

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Sun May 20, 2012 2:53 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Wikkiwallana wrote:But I'm already different!

youre PERFECT! no wonder youre already taken!

I wish I was taken. :(
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26253
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Sun May 20, 2012 2:53 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:If someone would tell me what I need to change, then I would do an effort to try. Sadly, no one tells me anything... :(

You need to change. Confidence being something I'd instill into you.
Last edited by Condunum on Sun May 20, 2012 2:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
password scrambled

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: -Saiwania-, Elejamie, Fjordlandia, Google [Bot], Grinning Dragon, Last optionland, Neder Islands, Pasong Tirad, Plandistria, Slembana, The Empire of the Fatherland, Valrifell, Yorsa II

Advertisement

Remove ads