by Isteria » Thu May 10, 2012 9:06 am
by Samuraikoku » Thu May 10, 2012 9:08 am
by Ovisterra » Thu May 10, 2012 9:09 am
by Novaya Tselinoyarsk » Thu May 10, 2012 9:10 am
by Souseiseki » Thu May 10, 2012 9:11 am
by The Alma Mater » Thu May 10, 2012 9:14 am
by Northern Sunrise Islands » Thu May 10, 2012 9:16 am
The Alma Mater wrote:So... what is "adult" content ? Nipplegate ? The wikipedia article on vaginas ? Michelangelos David with the little peepee ?
by Rinderbraten » Thu May 10, 2012 9:16 am
by Isteria » Thu May 10, 2012 9:20 am
Souseiseki wrote:I thought it was an opt in thing?
It seems you've said that in a way, but I would suggest changing the wording of the OP to strongly emphasise the opt in part or at least use the phrase.
by The Alma Mater » Thu May 10, 2012 9:22 am
Northern Sunrise Islands wrote:The Alma Mater wrote:So... what is "adult" content ? Nipplegate ? The wikipedia article on vaginas ? Michelangelos David with the little peepee ?
I guess that the adult content would be those sites with flashing porn all over it. There is a discerniment line between those stuff and cultural things.
by Nadkor » Thu May 10, 2012 9:24 am
by Angleter » Thu May 10, 2012 9:25 am
by Risottia » Thu May 10, 2012 9:26 am
Isteria wrote:Recently, David Cameron has said that he may soon make ISPs (Internet Service Providers) ...
by The Ancient and Orthodox Potato Church » Thu May 10, 2012 9:28 am
Isteria wrote:Bear in mind that this is done mainly for families.
by Isteria » Thu May 10, 2012 9:31 am
Nadkor wrote:Er....your thread title is ridiculous. It bears no relation to reality.
At worst, the proposal (although even calling it a proposal is being generous and, no, David Cameron cannot "make" the ISPs do anything) would mean that when you're signing up for a broadband supplier you tick a wee box saying that you don't want adult content to be blocked.
by Christian Democrats » Thu May 10, 2012 9:31 am
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
by Chinese Regions » Thu May 10, 2012 9:32 am
by Chinese Regions » Thu May 10, 2012 9:32 am
Ovisterra wrote:I said the banning of pirate websites was just the start and they didn't believe me. They're coming for us. Revolt while you can!
Seriously though, having censorship as the default is not a good thing. It's not too serious, but it's not good.
by Glasgia » Thu May 10, 2012 9:34 am
by Angleter » Thu May 10, 2012 9:35 am
Isteria wrote:Nadkor wrote:Er....your thread title is ridiculous. It bears no relation to reality.
At worst, the proposal (although even calling it a proposal is being generous and, no, David Cameron cannot "make" the ISPs do anything) would mean that when you're signing up for a broadband supplier you tick a wee box saying that you don't want adult content to be blocked.
I just wanted to see how many people on NationStates mastu-I mean oppose the idea of adult censorship (or agree). I'm also not sure about how many people who secretly do masturbate are really open enough to tick the box to opt out. In my opinion, thats pretty much a BIG marker saying 'I jack off', and I wouldn't really be at liberty to disclose that with my ISP.
by Morrdh » Thu May 10, 2012 9:37 am
by Nadkor » Thu May 10, 2012 9:37 am
Isteria wrote:Nadkor wrote:Er....your thread title is ridiculous. It bears no relation to reality.
At worst, the proposal (although even calling it a proposal is being generous and, no, David Cameron cannot "make" the ISPs do anything) would mean that when you're signing up for a broadband supplier you tick a wee box saying that you don't want adult content to be blocked.
I just wanted to see how many people on NationStates mastu-I mean oppose the idea of adult censorship (or agree). I'm also not sure about how many people who secretly do masturbate are really open enough to tick the box to opt out. In my opinion, thats pretty much a BIG marker saying 'I jack off', and I wouldn't really be at liberty to disclose that with my ISP.
by The Alma Mater » Thu May 10, 2012 9:38 am
Isteria wrote:Nadkor wrote:Er....your thread title is ridiculous. It bears no relation to reality.
At worst, the proposal (although even calling it a proposal is being generous and, no, David Cameron cannot "make" the ISPs do anything) would mean that when you're signing up for a broadband supplier you tick a wee box saying that you don't want adult content to be blocked.
I just wanted to see how many people on NationStates mastu-I mean oppose the idea of adult censorship (or agree). I'm also not sure about how many people who secretly do masturbate are really open enough to tick the box to opt out. In my opinion, thats pretty much a BIG marker saying 'I jack off', and I wouldn't really be at liberty to disclose that with my ISP.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cessarea, Corporate Collective Salvation, Haganham, Ineva, Juristonia, Kostane
Advertisement