Advertisement

by Populii » Thu Apr 19, 2012 10:31 pm

by New Heathera » Fri Apr 20, 2012 12:12 am
Pandemicia wrote:New Heathera wrote:But Fascist Europe is nolonger under occupation by The Internationale. What happened over a year ago isn't really useful now.
And alright, you proved members of The Internationale were involved in those raids. Now prove The Internationale's government was behind the actions of those nations.
It proves that The Internationale has participated in raiding and griefing, thusly showing that it is indeed a threat.
Seeing that The Internationale RMB does not state which nations are participating in governing the region (it does not even state that there is a government governing The Internationale) and that guests cannot access that information on their regional forum, that task is unfeasible. My case still stands.

by Marxingrad » Fri Apr 20, 2012 3:47 am


by Noemi Sanin » Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:08 am
Marxingrad wrote:Juan Manuel Santos, your posts suggest a certain level of desperation. Let's make a few points.
1. I'm using just 1 nation to make my comments, you're using at least two, why is that?
Marxingrad wrote:I've been entirely open and honest, I've refuted your claims, I've also provided lots of statements to testify the complete opposite to what you've claimed. You've failed to provide any concrete evidence to substantiate a single claim of yours, simply repeating yourself doesn't make it correct the 10th time you've stated your case.
Marxingrad wrote:3. Your continual use of words such as "fascist", "totalitarian", "discriminatory" are used to blur the lines and confuse the points. I (as have others) have suggested you are potentially a fascist in hiding, but we're careful to draw distinctions where required, you cannot simply throw out terms that mean next to nothing in the hope that it will win support for your cause. If you need help actually understanding Fascism then please ask away, I can fill you in on some gaps in your knowledge. One thing I can assure you, whatever ill you may think of The Internationale we're not fascist. The glove simply doesn't fit.
Marxingrad wrote:4. I see a "handful" of people seeking our condemnation, the majority of which I recognise, so am not wholly surprised (for the most part, upset fascists, nationalists, conservatives, oh and the odd social democrats who got their toes trodden on when they intervened where they shouldn't have!) to see them posting here, but in reality this post doesn't have too much support. Frankly, I expected a little more.![]()

Marxingrad wrote:5. I think you are actually getting mildly confused. Our region is a participant of "Antifa", a cross-regional organisation that undertakes a fight against Fascism. Not everyone in our region (in fact, it would probably be a minority) is a participant, and therefore your condemnation is really flawed on even it's most basic premise.
Marxingrad wrote:This condemnation is nothing but a flagrant attempt by a few misguided individuals, who are winging it with the support (if not outright collusion) of some fascists who've taken us to task, because frankly, they're completely unable to fight their own battles. The biggest hypocrisy is that (except for the person proposing, who has seemingly come out of nowhere to make this proposal, making it appear quite likely they're actually a puppet of some group far more sinister than the perceived front being displayed here) those popping out of the woodwork are mostly fascists who have been involved with the exploits of either GGR or older fascist regions, who have disregarded the regional sovereignty of a huge number of regions in an attempt to build a phony empire, if this goes through because of the malicious lies of a bunch of fascist hypocrits, then I'll be highly disappointed with the rest of the supposedly "free-thinking" NS community.

by Sedgistan » Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:37 am

by Marxingrad » Sat Apr 21, 2012 2:39 am

by Victor Victory » Sat Apr 21, 2012 11:33 am

by New Heathera » Sat Apr 21, 2012 2:54 pm
Victor Victory wrote:I agree with Marxingrad.
I also think those nations who support this poorly thought out condemnation are allowing their own bias to cloud their judgement.

by Of the Free Socialist Territories » Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:47 am

by Connopolis » Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:38 am
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:The Internationale raid really, really rarely - in fact, as far as I'm aware, they refound more than they raid, and they refound rarely. Some of their members may raid as members of The Red Fleet, or simply as part of Antifa. No-one is denying that. Those guys (Antifa etc.) raid like crazy, so condemn if you want, although it won't be appreciated by the Left, but you shouldn't condemn The Internationale because some of its members raid on behalf of an umbrella organisation to which The Internationale belongs.
From the office of,
Mrs. Pamela Howell
GA Ambassador of the Connopolian Ministry of Foreign Affairs

by Consejo de Indias » Sun Apr 22, 2012 2:49 pm

by New Heathera » Sun Apr 22, 2012 4:06 pm
Consejo de Indias wrote:I think there were enough arguments in this debate to realize that Republic of Colombia serves the interests of Brasil and The Greater German Reich ... And I have evidence of that!

by Juan Manuel Santos » Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:23 pm
New Heathera wrote:Consejo de Indias wrote:I think there were enough arguments in this debate to realize that Republic of Colombia serves the interests of Brasil and The Greater German Reich ... And I have evidence of that!
Now why the heck does that matter for any reason other than... well I don't even know why you said that.

by EMPIRE » Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:51 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Northern Cheek
Advertisement