Advertisement

by Bluth Corporation » Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:18 pm

by LOL ANARCHY NUBZ » Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:28 pm
Bluth Corporation wrote:There's more to being human than mere biology.
To be human, one must also live in a manner in accordance with that proper for humans: namely, to live by reason rather than by brute force.
It is absurd to claim that one is "human" when the referent has renounced the single most important attribute that distinguishes man from the lesser beasts.

by Alsatian Knights » Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:07 pm

by Callisdrun » Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:09 pm
Rhods wrote:what is the worst atrocity here in your opinon, and why?

by Alsatian Knights » Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:29 pm
) or b.) a potential threat (guys 

by NERVUN » Tue Oct 20, 2009 12:39 am

by Hamilay » Tue Oct 20, 2009 12:47 am

by Yink » Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:21 am

by Allbeama » Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:24 am

by Skibereen » Tue Oct 20, 2009 2:41 am
Rhods wrote:what is the worst atrocity here in your opinon, and why?

by Skibereen » Tue Oct 20, 2009 2:43 am
Bluth Corporation wrote:There's more to being human than mere biology.
To be human, one must also live in a manner in accordance with that proper for humans: namely, to live by reason rather than by brute force.
It is absurd to claim that one is "human" when the referent has renounced the single most important attribute that distinguishes man from the lesser beasts.

by Callisdrun » Tue Oct 20, 2009 2:47 am
Skibereen wrote:Bluth Corporation wrote:There's more to being human than mere biology.
To be human, one must also live in a manner in accordance with that proper for humans: namely, to live by reason rather than by brute force.
It is absurd to claim that one is "human" when the referent has renounced the single most important attribute that distinguishes man from the lesser beasts.
I thought it was our capacity for war, deception, and completely senseless destruction that distinguished us from lower beasts who always have genuine reason for force as opposed to the typical 'human' reasons.

by Skibereen » Tue Oct 20, 2009 2:49 am
by The Scandinvans » Tue Oct 20, 2009 3:09 am


by Blouman Empire » Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:00 am
Alexlantis wrote:Actually, the disease was meant.

by Blouman Empire » Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:01 am

by Skibereen » Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:15 am

by Blouman Empire » Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:17 am
Skibereen wrote:
What disease might that be?
The two primary diesease unleashed on the Native American Population were Small Pox and Influenza. However almost every European borne disease was vastly more efficient in harming the Native Americans for various logical reasons related to mutation. The same reason that leave the Europeans shrugging off anything encountered here.
So just what disease was it that you are speaking of?


by Skibereen » Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:26 am

by Blouman Empire » Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:30 am
Skibereen wrote:Ah, so you didnt have any idea what you were talking about. That figures. I should have realized coming from you there would be no insight. I must be tired to have considered you were aware of something I wasnt. Wow. You never disappoint.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Eahland, Fractalnavel, Infected Mushroom, Marenmia-Ocasia, Vassenor
Advertisement