Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:Flib's a socialist?
Only because the GA keeps passing Human Rights resolutions.
Advertisement
by Flibbleites » Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:02 pm
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:Flib's a socialist?
by A mean old man » Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:21 pm
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:A mean old man wrote:This is OOC and therefore doesn't apply to the Security Council, whether it is true or not.
EDIT: Clearer: You can't make a Security Council proposal that revolves around a moderator's administrative duties, since they are technically not in-game (roleplay-wise).
viewtopic.php?p=782267#p782267
by A mean old man » Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:24 pm
A mean old man wrote:Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:A mean old man wrote:This is OOC and therefore doesn't apply to the Security Council, whether it is true or not.
EDIT: Clearer: You can't make a Security Council proposal that revolves around a moderator's administrative duties, since they are technically not in-game (roleplay-wise).
viewtopic.php?p=782267#p782267
oh lol.
by The Most Glorious Hack » Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:22 am
I'd rather just go whine in Moderation about it.
Kat's insane; Ard's confused; Rep's the forum administrator, so it is her job.Here we go with the technicalities... You know, it doesn't stop Kat, Ard or Reppy.
by Blluedevil » Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:09 pm
NOTING that The Most Glorious Hack has contributed little if anything to the forum as a whole since the Great Migration;
RECOGNISING the inaction and unwillingness of this nation to perform his modly duties in any way;
AWARE that this rogue nation is an unrepentant, filthy capitalist;
This resolution hereby condemns the Most Glorious Hack on the charge of being negligent in his modly duties.
Moderators know when to have fun and when to do their job. Well, most of us do. Some of us like The Most Glorious Hack only want to have fun. Someone was not doing his job... and one of us had to call him on it. Perhaps others would like to join in the call for greater action by those who are so wilfully neglecting their sacred Max-sanctioned duties?
by Enn » Mon Oct 19, 2009 4:24 pm
Blluedevil wrote:First of all, this proposal is poorly written and second why does it matter if he is a capitalist, socialist or a fascist? There is no reason to have that included in this proposal. It would be better in a resolution condemning capitalism. Also, you do not make it clear as to what this Great Migration is and why it's relevant to this resolution. All this resolution does is show that this a personal attack with little evidence to even back that up.
by Ardchoille » Mon Oct 19, 2009 4:35 pm
The Most Glorious Hack wrote:Kat's insane; Ard's confused; Rep's the forum administrator, so it is her job.
by Gauntleted Fist » Fri Oct 23, 2009 2:40 am
by The Palentine » Tue Oct 27, 2009 10:40 am
Bahgum wrote:That's so not fair. Ardchoille made me pay for that treatment
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement