Advertisement
by Holywarriors » Mon Nov 07, 2011 5:35 am
by Experiment 13 » Mon Nov 07, 2011 6:09 am
by Fortana » Mon Nov 07, 2011 6:11 am
ABHORRED that militants may terminate this individuals
by The Free Wolven People of the World » Mon Nov 07, 2011 6:19 am
by Flibbleites » Mon Nov 07, 2011 9:09 am
Fortana wrote:I recommend this is pulled for the grammar error and a revision of section 6.ABHORRED that militants may terminate this individuals
Very poor grammar.
Also section six means that if even one news branch says a bad thing about one nation then that nation can then invade the homeland of the reporter regardless of whether that is the offcial stance of the homeland government or not!
by Dranae » Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:55 am
by The Princess » Mon Nov 07, 2011 12:37 pm
by Dizyntk » Mon Nov 07, 2011 12:50 pm
by Weed » Mon Nov 07, 2011 12:56 pm
Dizyntk wrote:"Except that it does not protect any rights. All I need do is refuse to grant any permits to any so called correspondents and then my soldiers may legally pick them off at their leisure if they so choose."
by Flibbleites » Mon Nov 07, 2011 1:45 pm
Hicopland wrote:I are as much grammar stickler as anybody else" but we vote should on content of resolution and instead not grammar correctiveness.
by Friginfanatica » Mon Nov 07, 2011 2:53 pm
by The Eternal Kawaii » Mon Nov 07, 2011 3:50 pm
by Dizyntk » Mon Nov 07, 2011 4:08 pm
The Eternal Kawaii wrote:The "aye" votes on this are leading the "nays" by about 3 to 1. Didn't anyone remember that this body passed Resolution #122?
by Jedi8246 » Mon Nov 07, 2011 6:30 pm
Conservative Morality wrote:When you call Bieber feminine, you insult all women.
Agadar wrote:Next thing you know, God turns out to be some weird green space monster with tentacles and a monocle.
Khadgar wrote:Oddly enough, a lot of people who are plotting to harm other people aren't really interested in legal niceties.
by Antartica55 » Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:13 pm
by Discoveria » Tue Nov 08, 2011 6:47 am
Jedi8246 wrote:Sir William Hemsworth stands, smiling a little.
"It's nice to see this body propose a piece of legislation that should actually be regulated by this body. Actual international law. A firm aye, unless my region says otherwise."
He sits once more.
by Kaskatenadze » Tue Nov 08, 2011 10:29 am
by The Bruce » Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:18 pm
by Ardchoilleans » Tue Nov 08, 2011 11:37 pm
The Eternal Kawaii wrote:<snip> Didn't anyone remember that this body passed Resolution #122?
RECOMMENDS that national governments take the findings of their national offices seriously, ...
by Knootoss » Thu Nov 10, 2011 4:26 am
by Glen-Rhodes » Thu Nov 10, 2011 7:59 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement