Looking this picture leaves me puzzled, how are you supposed to hit anything with anti-gravity bullets?
But that is propably for other thread.

Advertisement
by Immoren » Sun Oct 16, 2011 6:29 am

discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Samozaryadnyastan » Sun Oct 16, 2011 6:31 am
Immoren wrote:
Looking this picture leaves me puzzled, how are you supposed to hit anything with anti-gravity bullets?
But that is propably for other thread.

Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.
by Immoren » Sun Oct 16, 2011 6:36 am
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:I use the image for artistic purposes only
Even assuming such a thing as an opposing gravity field were possible, the rounds still wouldn't work as intended due to curvature of the earth, ground speed etc. Just use a missile, lol.
However, aesthetically speaking, that image is exactly how my HAV-3 SPAAG looks.
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Samozaryadnyastan » Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:29 am
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.

by United States of PA » Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:42 am
Anemos Major wrote:Judge it for yourself, it's done now.

by Anemos Major » Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:42 am
United States of PA wrote:Anemos Major wrote:Judge it for yourself, it's done now.
While i applaud you for going the extra mile in your research/writeup, Lince still has you beat in terms of length by miles.
Imperial Factbook | Diplomatic Communications Channel | A Collection of Essays
Anemonian State Arms Export Authority | Aeryr IECpl | Imperial College Ismalyr

by Volatilis votum » Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:46 am


by Galla- » Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:47 am
Fashiontopia wrote:Look don't come here talking bad about Americans, that will get you cussed out faster than relativity.
Besides: Most posters in this thread are Americans, and others who are non-Americans have no problems co-existing so shut that trap...

by Anemos Major » Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:49 am
Galla- wrote:Anemos Major wrote:
Who?
Macabees' Lince.
http://z4.invisionfree.invalid.com/NSDraftroom/ ... topic=1718
Imperial Factbook | Diplomatic Communications Channel | A Collection of Essays
Anemonian State Arms Export Authority | Aeryr IECpl | Imperial College Ismalyr
by Immoren » Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:50 am
Unless there is something I missed.discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Volatilis votum » Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:55 am

by Licana » Sun Oct 16, 2011 12:04 pm
United States of PA wrote:Anemos Major wrote:Judge it for yourself, it's done now.
While i applaud you for going the extra mile in your research/writeup, Lince still has you beat in terms of length by miles.

Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".
by Immoren » Sun Oct 16, 2011 12:18 pm
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Volatilis votum » Sun Oct 16, 2011 12:28 pm
Immoren wrote:Volatilis votum wrote:
Yep. Range, power, and accuracy are very important IMHO. It fires and displaces rather quickly, too.
Main battle tanks are meant to destroy enemy materiel and personel they have line of sight to, and are armoured to take fire all but heaviest/dedicated anti-tank weapons.
Self-propelled artillery, either gun or howitzer, are meant to destroy targets beyond line of sight and are on lightly armoured, usually against fragments and infatry small arms.
AS-90 is Self-propelled gun(?)
If you don't know what MBT you want, Challenger I/II probably would go with AS-90.

by Licana » Sun Oct 16, 2011 12:32 pm
Volatilis votum wrote:Yes, but if I keep them out of range and mobile, they can rain hell on the enemy without having to take fire. Why would I waste money sending turtles with less effective guns into the front lines?
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".

by Volatilis votum » Sun Oct 16, 2011 12:49 pm
Licana wrote:Volatilis votum wrote:Yes, but if I keep them out of range and mobile, they can rain hell on the enemy without having to take fire. Why would I waste money sending turtles with less effective guns into the front lines?
You won't be able to keep them out of range when there's nothing to stop them from plowing through the lines to get to you.
MBT's can keep pace with, and even outrun, SPGs, so you're not going to have any mobility advantages.
A 120mm ETC gun is more than sufficient for most NS MBTs, so it's not really a less effective gun, and since you're not wasting a massive 155mm HE round on an Abrams/Leo2/whatever, it probably is a more efficient gun.
Really, the only thing an SPG has on an MBT is a big gun, which simply is not enough.


by Moriskov » Sun Oct 16, 2011 5:34 pm

by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Sun Oct 16, 2011 5:37 pm
Moriskov wrote:Quick question. I decided to take a venture into making a super-heavy tank that i dubbed 'armor superiority assault tank.' Now I'm wondering If I should use 255mm smooth-bore or rifled. I'll post the pic at a later date for comments

by Moriskov » Sun Oct 16, 2011 5:39 pm
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Moriskov wrote:Quick question. I decided to take a venture into making a super-heavy tank that i dubbed 'armor superiority assault tank.' Now I'm wondering If I should use 255mm smooth-bore or rifled. I'll post the pic at a later date for comments
Why such an odd number, and why such a large number? Go 180mm ERFB, and fire LOLSAT sized GLATGMs as well as plain HE, spin stabilized HEAT (with a Gold liner instead of a copper liner), and APFSDS.

by Munathanura » Sun Oct 16, 2011 5:49 pm
Moriskov wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Why such an odd number, and why such a large number? Go 180mm ERFB, and fire LOLSAT sized GLATGMs as well as plain HE, spin stabilized HEAT (with a Gold liner instead of a copper liner), and APFSDS.
Oh! TI never thought of firing LOLSAT sized GLATGM's....... That sounds quite fun actually. Yes that will do. Question is, How long do think the barrel should be? In fact I need to find a measuring system.
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:

by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Sun Oct 16, 2011 5:53 pm
Moriskov wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Why such an odd number, and why such a large number? Go 180mm ERFB, and fire LOLSAT sized GLATGMs as well as plain HE, spin stabilized HEAT (with a Gold liner instead of a copper liner), and APFSDS.
Oh! TI never thought of firing LOLSAT sized GLATGM's....... That sounds quite fun actually. Yes that will do. Question is, How long do think the barrel should be? In fact I need to find a measuring system.

by Senestrum » Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:01 pm
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Moriskov wrote:Quick question. I decided to take a venture into making a super-heavy tank that i dubbed 'armor superiority assault tank.' Now I'm wondering If I should use 255mm smooth-bore or rifled. I'll post the pic at a later date for comments
Why such an odd number, and why such a large number? Go 180mm ERFB, and fire LOLSAT sized GLATGMs as well as plain HE, spin stabilized HEAT (with a Gold liner instead of a copper liner), and APFSDS.

by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:04 pm

by Moriskov » Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:09 pm


by Indeos » Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:10 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Great Britain-and Northern Ireland
Advertisement