Advertisement

by Arajaka » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:32 pm

by Nightkill the Emperor » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:32 pm
Arajaka wrote:Most of them have been pretty awful. I'd say a tie between Reagan and Dubyah.
Obama is not much better though since he's pretty much legitimized (and in some cases expanded upon) Bush's worst policies and consciously attempts to draw on the legacy and rhetoric of the Gipper (sorry liberals).
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Dinka Dinka Doo » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:33 pm
West Vandengaarde wrote:Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Andrew Jackson and Andrew Johnson.
Jackson was fucking awesome.
The only thing that he did that could be considered bad was Indian Relocation, which is very much excusable and does not even come close to making him worse than Harding, Coolidge, Hoover, Buchanan, Hayes, Grant, Polk, etc.

by Snot Sniper » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:33 pm

by New Embossia » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:34 pm
Lucantis wrote:I say that Obama and GWB. GWB because HE started the war wiith Iraq (or Iran. Correct me if I'm wrong.) and Obama has almost completely done nothing.
Here is a plan I think the US should follow:
[1]----Cut all foreign aid (FA).
[2]----Raise tarrifs enough to protect American Enterprise.
[3]----Give notice that outsourcing will soon be illegalized.
[4]----Use FA and tarrifs to; issue land and cash grants to American Companies, and to fund alternative energy research and utilization.
[5]----Increase trade with Canada and Latin America, with lower tarrifs.
[6]----Withdrawl all troops, unless deemed otherwise, from foreign soil and cut military funds (MF).
[7]----Use MF to further boost American Enterprise and to fund new energy research and utilization.
KEY & NOTES
FA= Foreign Aid
MF= Military Aid
Steps 1, 2, and 3 will happen simultaneously.
Step 4 will happen soon after step 3.
Step 5, 6, and 7 will happen a few months after step 4.
Step 5, 6, and 7 will happen simultaneously.
Hornesia wrote:Homosexuality may be a sin, but Jesus died for your sins. Therefore, feel free to gay it up.

by Inkarzikan » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:34 pm

by Minoriteeburg » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:35 pm

by Christmahanikwanzikah » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:37 pm

by Blazedtown » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:37 pm

by Lackadaisical2 » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:37 pm
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

by Christmahanikwanzikah » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:38 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Arajaka wrote:Most of them have been pretty awful. I'd say a tie between Reagan and Dubyah.
Obama is not much better though since he's pretty much legitimized (and in some cases expanded upon) Bush's worst policies and consciously attempts to draw on the legacy and rhetoric of the Gipper (sorry liberals).
No problem. Obama isn't a liberal.

by Minoriteeburg » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:39 pm

by Lucantis » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:39 pm
New Embossia wrote:Lucantis wrote:I say that Obama and GWB. GWB because HE started the war wiith Iraq (or Iran. Correct me if I'm wrong.) and Obama has almost completely done nothing.
Here is a plan I think the US should follow:
[1]----Cut all foreign aid (FA).
[2]----Raise tarrifs enough to protect American Enterprise.
[3]----Give notice that outsourcing will soon be illegalized.
[4]----Use FA and tarrifs to; issue land and cash grants to American Companies, and to fund alternative energy research and utilization.
[5]----Increase trade with Canada and Latin America, with lower tarrifs.
[6]----Withdrawl all troops, unless deemed otherwise, from foreign soil and cut military funds (MF).
[7]----Use MF to further boost American Enterprise and to fund new energy research and utilization.
KEY & NOTES
FA= Foreign Aid
MF= Military Aid
Steps 1, 2, and 3 will happen simultaneously.
Step 4 will happen soon after step 3.
Step 5, 6, and 7 will happen a few months after step 4.
Step 5, 6, and 7 will happen simultaneously.
Lolwut.
I swear your 'plan for the US' was already in a thread...

by Sibirsky » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:39 pm
Lucantis wrote:I say that Obama and GWB. GWB because HE started the war wiith Iraq (or Iran. Correct me if I'm wrong.) and Obama has almost completely done nothing.
Here is a plan I think the US should follow:
[1]----Cut all foreign aid (FA).
[2]----Raise tarrifs enough to protect American Enterprise.
[3]----Give notice that outsourcing will soon be illegalized.
[4]----Use FA and tarrifs to; issue land and cash grants to American Companies, and to fund alternative energy research and utilization.
[5]----Increase trade with Canada and Latin America, with lower tarrifs.
[6]----Withdrawl all troops, unless deemed otherwise, from foreign soil and cut military funds (MF).
[7]----Use MF to further boost American Enterprise and to fund new energy research and utilization.
KEY & NOTES
FA= Foreign Aid
MF= Military Aid
Steps 1, 2, and 3 will happen simultaneously.
Step 4 will happen soon after step 3.
Step 5, 6, and 7 will happen a few months after step 4.
Step 5, 6, and 7 will happen simultaneously.

by Lackadaisical2 » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:39 pm
Arajaka wrote:Most of them have been pretty awful. I'd say a tie between Reagan and Dubyah.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

by Lackadaisical2 » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:39 pm
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

by Minoriteeburg » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:40 pm

by Blazedtown » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:40 pm
Snot Sniper wrote:Except that unlike a canal, a fleet is a movable asset. They could and would sell it.
Snot Sniper wrote:Anyway, you seemed to miss my point entirely. The vast military superiority of the US means that the US can use the canal whether Panama likes it or not IF THERE IS A STRATEGIC NEED for that. And in the meantime, Panama has a huge financial incentive to keep the canal working and open to all.
Snot Sniper wrote:Do not assume that I'm as fanatical FOR the Carter canal treaty as you are fanatical AGAINST it ... I think there are arguments for and against and it might even fall on the "bad strategic move" side. I'm not saying it makes Carter a good President, merely that the canal alone is not enough to make him the worst ever.

by Christmahanikwanzikah » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:40 pm

by Distruzio » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:41 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Allen Iverson, Bhang Bhang Duc, Dumb Ideologies, Falkland Islands and British Antarctica, Ifreann, Kurgao, Lankeshmati, Liberty Martyred, Slavstonia, Wizlandia
Advertisement