
by Really Is This Needed » Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:32 pm

by Rocky the Vigilante » Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:54 pm
Really Is This Needed wrote:Can a WA Delegate eject/ban the Founder of his/her region? Just a thought due to an inactive Founder.

by Really Is This Needed » Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:55 pm
Rocky the Vigilante wrote:Really Is This Needed wrote:Can a WA Delegate eject/ban the Founder of his/her region? Just a thought due to an inactive Founder.
I think even if he's banned or ejected the founder can still utilize the ban and ejection options on nations in his region. So even if he's banned or ejected he can still administer control over the region.
rocky the vigilante

by Rocky the Vigilante » Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:56 pm
Really Is This Needed wrote:Rocky the Vigilante wrote:I think even if he's banned or ejected the founder can still utilize the ban and ejection options on nations in his region. So even if he's banned or ejected he can still administer control over the region.
rocky the vigilante
So he could ban/eject me in return is a possibility?

by Really Is This Needed » Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:58 pm

by Rocky the Vigilante » Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:59 pm

by Frattastan » Sat Jul 09, 2011 12:44 am
Drop Your Pants wrote:I think raiders are cute, the way they think they're big and scary people who threaten others :)

by Really Is This Needed » Sat Jul 09, 2011 1:01 am
Frattastan wrote:Rocky is correct, except that the Delegate could eject the founder only if delegate controls/administrative powers were on. (executive delegate).

by Blademasters765 » Sat Jul 09, 2011 1:15 am

by Really Is This Needed » Sat Jul 09, 2011 1:16 am

by Blademasters765 » Sat Jul 09, 2011 1:17 am

by Really Is This Needed » Sat Jul 09, 2011 1:21 am

by Rocky the Vigilante » Sat Jul 09, 2011 1:22 am
Really Is This Needed wrote:Blademasters765 wrote:yes, even though you can eject the founder, you can't ban the founder, and the founder can control the administration of the region whilst their in a different region
Well that only seems slightly over powering as it seems they could become the WA Delegate of one region and control it while having control over the region which it once founded.

by Nullarni » Sat Jul 09, 2011 2:04 am
Rocky the Vigilante wrote:there is of course the possibility of the founder being non-executive; that meaning the WA Delegate has more control over regional administration than the founder.
rocky the vigilante

by Rocky the Vigilante » Sat Jul 09, 2011 2:11 am
Nullarni wrote:^
I
I
This is not true. There is no such thing as a "non-executive founder". If you eject the founder, he will be back and you, yourself will be ejected and probably banned as well.
the great halfrican alliance
founder:the psyker states of Uncorrupted and Free (non-executive)

by Commander Halcones » Sat Jul 09, 2011 2:14 am


by Bears Armed » Sat Jul 09, 2011 3:40 am

by Mahaj » Sat Jul 09, 2011 6:35 am
Bears Armed wrote:Although the Founder can use the regional controls from outside the region the Delegate (while present in the region) automatically has access to those controls as well -- even if previously limited to 'non-executive' status by the Founder -- in the Founder's absence.
<Koth> I'm still going by the assumption that Mahaj is Unibot's kid brother or something
Kandarin(Naivetry): You're going to have a great NS career ahead of you if you want it, Mahaj. :)
<@Eluvatar> Why is SkyDip such a purist raiderist
<+frattastan> Because his region was never raided.
<+maxbarry> EarthAway: I guess I might dabble in raiding just to experience it better, but I would not like to raid regions of natives, so I'd probably be more interested in defense and liberations

by Bears Armed » Sat Jul 09, 2011 11:56 am
Mahaj wrote:Bears Armed wrote:Although the Founder can use the regional controls from outside the region the Delegate (while present in the region) automatically has access to those controls as well -- even if previously limited to 'non-executive' status by the Founder -- in the Founder's absence.
Although fair to point out that a non-executive delegate can't kick out anybody.

by Really Is This Needed » Sat Jul 09, 2011 2:28 pm

by Rocky the Vigilante » Sat Jul 09, 2011 2:34 pm
Really Is This Needed wrote:Interesting thought, if I was to eject the founder then set up a password would that work to keep him out?

by Really Is This Needed » Sat Jul 09, 2011 2:39 pm

by Oliver the Mediocre » Sat Jul 09, 2011 3:26 pm
Really Is This Needed wrote:Has anyone ever heard of a coup d'état? Seriously, I need a way to control the region as a dictator..

by Opaloka » Sat Jul 09, 2011 3:30 pm

by Oliver the Mediocre » Sat Jul 09, 2011 3:33 pm
Opaloka wrote:If your founder is totally inactive why don't you wait until they 'die' & then refound the region? Saves all the potential fallout from 'ejecting' them.

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Lumeris
Advertisement