And don't forget the 'religious-in-name-only' types. Who are still counted as religious but in reality don't follow anything about it anymore.
Advertisement
by F1-Insanity » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:06 am
by Horsefish » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:09 am
Dukis wrote:1. Evolutionism is a religion because five of the six parts of evolutionism can not be proven scientifically. Therefore it is a belief that evolutionism is real it is not science. You believe in evolutionism like you believe in any other religion you have your arguments for it and against it but it is your choice to believe in it.
2. The term dinosaur was actually created in 1841 and it pretty much means big lizard. In the evolutionist point of view man and dinosaurs never actually existed on the earth together. But dinosaurs are one of the most prominent myths in human society. They are actually not referred to as dinosaurs however they are called dragons. Dragons are in many religious texts and are real. The Chinese calendar has 11 real animals and then the dragon. If dragons are dinosaurs then that makes sense. But for that to work then humans and dinosaurs lived on the earth at the same time in order for people to know about them. In the 1600s the emperor of China actually appointed a royal dragon caretaker. When Marco Polo went to china he reported that some carts were pulled by large lizards aka dragons or dinosaurs. If dinosaurs went extinct millions of years ago then this is not possible and if evolutionists are right then everyone in Asia is crazy and so were most of the people in the middle ages. All of that is evidence that dragons actually went extinct in the last few hundred years.
3. No carbon dating doesn't work once two pieces of the same mammoth were carbon dated and they came out several million years apart.
4. How scientist tell how old things are.
How do you determine how old a layer of rock is?
By the fossils that are in it.
How do you tell how old the fossils are?
By the layer of rock that it is in.
Fail.
Areopagitican wrote:I'm not an expert in the field of moron, but what I think he's saying is that if you have to have sex with Shakira (or another dirty ethnic), at the very least, it must be part of a threesome with a white woman. It's a sacrifice, but someone has to make it.
Geniasis wrote:Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go bludgeon some whales to death with my 12-ft dick.
The Western Reaches wrote:I learned that YOU are the reason I embarrassed myself by saying "Horsefish" instead of "Seahorse" this one time in school.
by Salandriagado » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:12 am
Dukis wrote:1. Evolutionism is a religion because five of the six parts of evolutionism can not be proven scientifically. Therefore it is a belief that evolutionism is real it is not science. You believe in evolutionism like you believe in any other religion you have your arguments for it and against it but it is your choice to believe in it.
2. The term dinosaur was actually created in 1841 and it pretty much means big lizard. In the evolutionist point of view man and dinosaurs never actually existed on the earth together.
But dinosaurs are one of the most prominent myths in human society. They are actually not referred to as dinosaurs however they are called dragons. Dragons are in many religious texts and are real. The Chinese calendar has 11 real animals and then the dragon. If dragons are dinosaurs then that makes sense. But for that to work then humans and dinosaurs lived on the earth at the same time in order for people to know about them.
In the 1600s the emperor of China actually appointed a royal dragon caretaker.
When Marco Polo went to china he reported that some carts were pulled by large lizards aka dragons or dinosaurs.
If dinosaurs went extinct millions of years ago then this is not possible
and if evolutionists are right then everyone in Asia is crazy and so were most of the people in the middle ages. All of that is evidence that dragons actually went extinct in the last few hundred years.
3. No carbon dating doesn't work once two pieces of the same mammoth were carbon dated and they came out several million years apart.
4. How scientist tell how old things are.
How do you determine how old a layer of rock is?
By the fossils that are in it.
How do you tell how old the fossils are?
By the layer of rock that it is in.
Fail.
by Dukis » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:17 am
by Dukis » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:20 am
4. How scientist tell how old things are.
How do you determine how old a layer of rock is?
By the fossils that are in it.
How do you tell how old the fossils are?
By the layer of rock that it is in.
Fail.
The last line is correct, except in the perpetrator of the fail in question. Accurate version:
How do you determine how old a layer of rock is?
Using a vast number of radiometric and other dating methods, plus a knowledge of the evolution of the geology of the earth.
How do you tell how old the fossils are?
Using a vast number of radiometric and other dating methods, plus a knowledge of the species, plus a knowledge of the rock strata and nature.
by Saikyosia » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:22 am
Dukis wrote:Darwin didn't actually believe in evolutionism he just wrote the book that someone else interpreted into evolutionism that we see today.
by Farnhamia » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:22 am
Dukis wrote:I was simplifying.
Gosh some of you people are so defensive against Evolutionism.
Darwin didn't actually believe in evolutionism he just wrote the book that someone else interpreted into evolutionism that we see today.
by Dukis » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:25 am
Farnhamia wrote:Dukis wrote:I was simplifying.
Gosh some of you people are so defensive against Evolutionism.
Darwin didn't actually believe in evolutionism he just wrote the book that someone else interpreted into evolutionism that we see today.
Oh, he believed in it. Did someone tell you he recanted on his death bed? Never happened. Charles Darwin was fully behind the theory. But just for kicks, who interpreted the book into evolutionism (which doesn't exist the way creationism does, by the way)?
by Ceannairceach » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:26 am
Dukis wrote:I was simplifying.
Gosh some of you people are so defensive against Evolutionism.
Darwin didn't actually believe in evolutionism he just wrote the book that someone else interpreted into evolutionism that we see today.
Dukis wrote:Yes dragons and dinosaurs are the same thing. I can provide more proof of humans living with dinosaurs but I didn't feel like taking up a whole page.
After the flood the conditions on earth were very different. One of those changes was more radiation from the sun witch would throw off any guess made by carbon dating if it was beyond 4400 years ago.
Evolutionism is forced upon educated people because they have to take science classes. But that doesn't mean that educated people can't follow some other religion.
by Dukis » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:27 am
by Salandriagado » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:28 am
I was simplifying.
Gosh some of you people are so defensive against Evolutionism.
Darwin didn't actually believe in evolutionism he just wrote the book that someone else interpreted into evolutionism that we see today.
Kind of. Religious texts are not in the bible they were created from the bible. I think that is what you ment. Mormans and other people like that took some of their religion from the bible and then believe in something like that.
by Dukis » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:29 am
by Samuraikoku » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:30 am
Dukis wrote:I have a challenge for you evolutionist people.
Disprove Jesus.
People have tried and failed believe me.
by Dukis » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:31 am
Salandriagado wrote:I was simplifying.
Gosh some of you people are so defensive against Evolutionism.
Darwin didn't actually believe in evolutionism he just wrote the book that someone else interpreted into evolutionism that we see today.
No, you were lying. Now go back and answer the rest of the points, rather than just pulling bullshit out of your arse.
by Samuraikoku » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:32 am
Dukis wrote:Im trying to answer your questions but it is hard with one of me and several of you.
by Ceannairceach » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:32 am
Dukis wrote:I have a challenge for you evolutionist people.
Disprove Jesus.
People have tried and failed believe me.
by Dukis » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:32 am
by Samuraikoku » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:33 am
Dukis wrote:Samuraikoku wrote:
Challenge accepted.
Simple: Jesus existed. He was just an ordinary man not unlike you and me.
You have the basic idea but did you know that hundreds of other people from that time also claimed to be the son of god. Why do we remember Jesus and not all of them. Simple Jesus came back to life.
by Ceannairceach » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:33 am
Dukis wrote:Samuraikoku wrote:
Challenge accepted.
Simple: Jesus existed. He was just an ordinary man not unlike you and me.
You have the basic idea but did you know that hundreds of other people from that time also claimed to be the son of god. Why do we remember Jesus and not all of them. Simple Jesus came back to life.
by Salandriagado » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:35 am
Dukis wrote:I have a challenge for you evolutionist people.
Disprove Jesus.
People have tried and failed believe me.
by Dukis » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:35 am
Ceannairceach wrote:Dukis wrote:I have a challenge for you evolutionist people.
Disprove Jesus.
People have tried and failed believe me.
Well, there is a fabulous lack of evidence for him around his lifetime, so I don't see why we have to assume he was alive.
This said, it has nothing to do with evolution. Don't change the subject when you're failing to provide subsistence for your bullshit.
by Feral Land » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:35 am
by Samuraikoku » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:35 am
Ceannairceach wrote:Dukis wrote:
You have the basic idea but did you know that hundreds of other people from that time also claimed to be the son of god. Why do we remember Jesus and not all of them. Simple Jesus came back to life.
Proof? Why haven't other people risen from the dead, in the same fashion and time period? The reason people haven't is because he didn't.
by Free Soviets » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:36 am
Dukis wrote:I have a challenge for you evolutionist people.
Disprove Jesus.
People have tried and failed believe me.
by Samuraikoku » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:37 am
Dukis wrote:Actually there is more evidence about Jesus (not counting the bible) then most roman cesars. Diarys and other textual evidence.
I am having a problem with some of my research because most scientific religious sites tend to get illegally deleted for some reason.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bovad, Google [Bot], La Xinga, Likhinia, Mutualist Chaos, Nu Elysium, Ors Might, The Black Forrest, The Vooperian Union, Tungstan
Advertisement