by You-Gi-Owe » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:32 am
by Kobrania » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:34 am
by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:35 am
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.
by Tunizcha » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:35 am
by Bergnovinaia » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:35 am
You-Gi-Owe wrote:Hypothetical Situation:
The Evil Sarah Palin has left her husband and family, and then ensnared a brilliant-genius nerd scientist with her MILF charms.
Hearing gunshots, the police investigate and find Sarah standing over the body of the now deceased nerd with the smoking gun.
As they take her away, she cackles maniacally, "Bwa! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! President Obama dies in one hour! I've killed the only other person who knows how to stop it from happening!"
Given what is known about the now deceased nerd scientist, there's the possibility that the danger to President Obama is real.
So, would you use torture to get the information that would save President Obama from the plot of the evil Sarah Palin?
by Yootopia » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:35 am
by Maurepas » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:36 am
by Lancaster of Wessex » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:36 am
by Muravyets » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:36 am
by You-Gi-Owe » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:37 am
Bergnovinaia wrote:No I would just let Sarah Palin rot in prison. (I don't like this thread. I really like Obama and your thread [even though hypothetical] suggests he dies. )
by Maurepas » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:37 am
Muravyets wrote:The answer is 'No."
Now a question in return: Do you wear pants while you make up these threads? (You can treat that as rhetorical.)
by Yootopia » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:38 am
Muravyets wrote:The answer is 'No."
Now a question in return: Do you wear pants while you make up these threads? (You can treat that as rhetorical.)
by New Rogernomics » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:39 am
by Dimoniquid » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:39 am
by Yootopia » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:39 am
by Louis Van Boxel Woolf » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:39 am
by You-Gi-Owe » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:39 am
Muravyets wrote:The answer is 'No."
Now a question in return: Do you wear pants while you make up these threads? (You can treat that as rhetorical.)
by Saint Clair Island » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:41 am
by Muravyets » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:42 am
by New Rogernomics » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:42 am
Yootopia wrote:How's that a hypothetical -_-
by Voltairian Prospects » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:43 am
by Bergnovinaia » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:44 am
by Rolling squid » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:45 am
Hammurab wrote:An athiest doesn't attend mass, go to confession, or know a lot about catholicism. So basically, an athiest is the same as a catholic.
Post-Unity Terra wrote:Golly gosh, one group of out-of-touch rich white guys is apparently more in touch with the average man than the other group of out-of-touch rich white guys.
by Dimoniquid » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:45 am
by Maurepas » Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:47 am
Dimoniquid wrote:For, douchebag.
-Writes douchebag on Brian's grave.-
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Almighty Bureaucracy, BlazingAngel, El Lazaro, Godular, Gorutimania, Infected Mushroom, Kostane, Liberza, Olmanar, Statesburg, The Black Forrest, The Caleshan Valkyrie, Trump Almighty
Advertisement