NATION

PASSWORD

Commend The Black Hawks

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
User avatar
Soaring Tikal
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Feb 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Commend The Black Hawks

Postby Soaring Tikal » Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:01 am

Commend The Black Hawks

A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a region.

Category: Commendation | Nominee: The Black Hawks | Proposed by: Soaring Tikal

Description:

The World Assembly,

NOTING that the Black Hawks have, since it's creation in 2004, become one of the most respected raider organizations in the World,

RECALLING the Black Hawks as an epitome that stands for Raider Unity,

PRAISING the recent achievement of accomplishing beyond 150 successful raids in little over a month,

IMPRESSED that the recent success of the Hawks has not resulted in the adoption of methods such as grieving and the expulsion of natives,

ASTONISHED at the thankfulness of some of the raided regions, and the revival of others, such as Republicans and 0000000000 CHRISTIAN TEENS,

RECOGNIZING the Black Hawks as an ideal elite raider organization,

HEREBY commends The Black Hawks for the above reasons.
Last edited by Soaring Tikal on Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:06 pm, edited 4 times in total.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:29 am

I wholeheartedly support this proposistion.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Wopruthien
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 468
Founded: Dec 05, 2007
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wopruthien » Thu Mar 10, 2011 5:21 am

Could of at least asked a fellow non-TBH member to propose it.
Last edited by Wopruthien on Thu Mar 10, 2011 5:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
Former Arch Chancellor of the The Founderless Regions Alliance
General of the Alliance
Founder of Mordor

User avatar
Aglrinia
Minister
 
Posts: 2848
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Aglrinia » Thu Mar 10, 2011 5:26 am

Wopruthien wrote:Could of at least asked a fellow non-TBH member to propose it.

Actually ones trying but the thread turned into more of a talk about flags instead.
Jakker wrote:TBH is Pro-bring Life to GP

User avatar
Cinistra
Diplomat
 
Posts: 863
Founded: Oct 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Cinistra » Thu Mar 10, 2011 5:39 am

You have the support of the Cinistran government.
"Send forth all legions! Do not stop the attack until the city is taken! Slay them all!"
>Can I invade other people's regions?

Yes. The practice of "region crashing," where a group of nations all move to a region with the aim of seizing the WA Delegate position, is part of the game. Certain groups within NationStates are particularly adroit at this, and can attack very quickly.
>Once I've taken over a region, can I eject everyone else?

You can try. Invader Delegates tend to have very little Regional Influence, which makes ejecting long-time residents difficult. But Delegates can be as kind, generous, evil, or despotic as they wish. It's up to regional residents to elect good Delegates.

User avatar
Face Dancers
Attaché
 
Posts: 96
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Face Dancers » Thu Mar 10, 2011 5:55 am

ASTONISHED at the thankfulness of some of the raided regions, and the revival of others,


How about listing some examples for this? I know 0000000000 CHRISTIAN TEENS thanked us... how about an example for regional revival?
Forever TBH


Unibot II wrote:TITO doesn't deploy against active raider delegates usually -- it's bad for morale, you're more likely to lose.

Just Guy wrote:On the other hand though, the UDL doesn't do defences because their troops are too lazy to watch and be online a whole update.

User avatar
Halcones
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 183
Founded: May 08, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Halcones » Thu Mar 10, 2011 7:50 am

There were old natives from Republicans who also thanked us for refounding their region.

A good proposal. Lets hope we get a commendation and a condemnation at the same time :p
Last edited by Halcones on Thu Mar 10, 2011 7:50 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Helghast Fleet
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Mar 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Helghast Fleet » Thu Mar 10, 2011 9:36 am

I support this.

User avatar
Soaring Tikal
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Feb 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Soaring Tikal » Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:03 am

Any advice regarding the proposal itself would be appreciated, it's the first I made for the NS World Assembly :)

User avatar
A Classless Society
Secretary
 
Posts: 29
Founded: May 05, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby A Classless Society » Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:23 am

I r supporter of this. :roll:

User avatar
Sedgistan
Site Director
 
Posts: 35475
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:32 am

As others have said, including examples of regions you've raided that were thankful and/or revived as a result would strengthen your proposal.

User avatar
Kain_The_Dragoon
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: May 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Kain_The_Dragoon » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:10 pm

I, His Chaotic Holiness, support this proposition.

-Signed,

Image

Addendum: I would try to follow suit with respect to the suggestions made above, Tikal.
Cde. Kain T. Dragoon

Zarvarza wrote:I would recommend, that if you want a world where everyone is friendly and informational, then you should invent the game 'hippistates' where everyone gets along,and raiding isn't a mechanic of the game.

User avatar
TableRase
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 409
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby TableRase » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:52 pm

I'd sooner compose a passionate condemnation of the Black hawks before every agreeing to this, The've wrecked NS Communist Party, and there's no knowing if they're a threat to my region.
Minister of Foreign Affairs and two term (non-consecutive) retired WA delegate of the Communist International League.
Economic Left/Right: -9.60
Social Authoritarian/Libertarian: -8.15

User avatar
Casl
Diplomat
 
Posts: 920
Founded: Nov 29, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Casl » Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:22 pm

TableRase wrote:I'd sooner compose a passionate condemnation of the Black hawks before every agreeing to this, The've wrecked NS Communist Party, and there's no knowing if they're a threat to my region.

You have a founder, do you not? No risk

TBHs are the vultures of this game, cleaning up the dead and making way for the new.

User avatar
Soaring Tikal
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Feb 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Soaring Tikal » Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:56 pm

Added references to Republicans and 0000000000 CHRISTIAN TEENS.

Any more suggestions?

User avatar
Halcones
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 183
Founded: May 08, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Halcones » Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:18 pm

We're just awesome :p

User avatar
Sedgistan
Site Director
 
Posts: 35475
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:23 pm

Soaring Tikal wrote:Any more suggestions?

You could add a more more emphasis to the fact that TBH has been around so long - it currently seems a bit too focused on the recent raids you've carried out.

User avatar
Rawrgirnia
Attaché
 
Posts: 72
Founded: Aug 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Rawrgirnia » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:14 pm

Casl wrote:
TableRase wrote:I'd sooner compose a passionate condemnation of the Black hawks before every agreeing to this, The've wrecked NS Communist Party, and there's no knowing if they're a threat to my region.

You have a founder, do you not? No risk

TBHs are the vultures of this game, cleaning up the dead and making way for the new.


That might be true if you allowed the regions to die so someone new can have the name. Instead you turn them into space-wasting "colonies".

Against.

User avatar
Jeux II
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 356
Founded: Sep 07, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jeux II » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:16 pm

I am alittle indifferent to this proposal, but I am leaning with Against. You say some of the regions are thankful for your raiding, but what about the others. Surely there are people pissed at the black hawks. I need more proof I think is what I am saying.
Always here and always bored. -_-
Wait I have an idea! Entertain me with your words!

Always loving Pacifica!

User avatar
Mahaj WA Seat
Minister
 
Posts: 2091
Founded: Nov 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mahaj WA Seat » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:20 pm

Jeux II wrote:I am alittle indifferent to this proposal, but I am leaning with Against. You say some of the regions are thankful for your raiding, but what about the others. Surely there are people pissed at the black hawks. I need more proof I think is what I am saying.

The only people pissed are the defenders, who are only pissed because they are The Black Hawks enemies.
Member of The South and Osiris
Representing Mahaj in the World Assembly.
The Mahaj Factbook.


Author of Missing Minors Act (Repealed) and In Regards to Cloning
Mike the Progressive wrote:
Brogavia wrote:Fuck bitches, get money.
You shall be my god.

Georgism wrote:Fuck off you cunt, I'm always nice.

NERVUN wrote:Yog zap!

Cool Egg Sandwich wrote:I am the Urinater..... I'll be back.

Jedi Utopians wrote:5) Now, saying that a nation couldn't be part of OPEC would be bold. AIPEC sounds like something you'd want to get checked out by a physician for.


User avatar
TableRase
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 409
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby TableRase » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:39 pm

Casl wrote:
TableRase wrote:I'd sooner compose a passionate condemnation of the Black hawks before every agreeing to this, The've wrecked NS Communist Party, and there's no knowing if they're a threat to my region.

You have a founder, do you not? No risk

TBHs are the vultures of this game, cleaning up the dead and making way for the new.

NS communist Party was wrecked via a sleeper who was wrongly trusted, and there were many active nations still in the region. A Black Hawk could come, preaching popular communist rhetoric, gain popularity, and destroy the CIL, maybe with some other Hawks to back him up, it's not implausible, and on the whole meaningless raiding in general is quite grituitous.
Minister of Foreign Affairs and two term (non-consecutive) retired WA delegate of the Communist International League.
Economic Left/Right: -9.60
Social Authoritarian/Libertarian: -8.15

User avatar
Cool Egg Sandwich
Diplomat
 
Posts: 795
Founded: Sep 04, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Cool Egg Sandwich » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:42 pm

Mahaj WA Seat wrote:
Jeux II wrote:I am alittle indifferent to this proposal, but I am leaning with Against. You say some of the regions are thankful for your raiding, but what about the others. Surely there are people pissed at the black hawks. I need more proof I think is what I am saying.

The only people pissed are the defenders, who are only pissed because they are The Black Hawks enemies.


Although we do not really tend to become involved in the affairs of the Security Council, the government of Cool Egg Sandwich can formally support this proposed Commendation of TBH for the reasons stated within the proposal, namely the favorable reception of many native regions to TBH. Furthermore, the art of raiding is not something that should be incessantly condemned within NationStates; contributing to this raiding community, TBH not only promotes the overall concept of 'raiding,' but also serves to clear the "deadwood" regions of the NS multiverse.

Full support.

Rgds.,
Last edited by Cool Egg Sandwich on Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mr. Mickey Darke,
Ambassador to the World Assembly from Cool Egg Sandwich

WA Delegate from The Dirty South
Phish phan and Student of History
Member of NatSov 2.0
Author
: GAR #139, GAR #152 (Repeal)

User avatar
Face Dancers
Attaché
 
Posts: 96
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Face Dancers » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:43 pm

Rawrgirnia wrote:
Casl wrote:You have a founder, do you not? No risk

TBHs are the vultures of this game, cleaning up the dead and making way for the new.


That might be true if you allowed the regions to die so someone new can have the name. Instead you turn them into space-wasting "colonies".

Against.


People seem to forget that Nationstates Communist Party had links to defenders in the past.

TBH's colonies comprise mostly of regions which were defender affiliated (The Crusaders of Justice, NationStates Communist Party...) and regions that provoked us into conflict with them (League of the Scaro Alliance, Hethrum, Durbanian Archipelago) This regions knew the risks in entering war with The Black Hawks. You can read my last post in Luke's Condemn TBH thread for reference. I'm not sure how to link it here.
Forever TBH


Unibot II wrote:TITO doesn't deploy against active raider delegates usually -- it's bad for morale, you're more likely to lose.

Just Guy wrote:On the other hand though, the UDL doesn't do defences because their troops are too lazy to watch and be online a whole update.

User avatar
Soaring Tikal
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Feb 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Soaring Tikal » Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:00 pm

Thank you for the advice Sedgistan, I have edited it, hopefully for the better :P

User avatar
Mahaj WA Seat
Minister
 
Posts: 2091
Founded: Nov 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mahaj WA Seat » Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:30 pm

Soaring Tikal wrote:Thank you for the advice Sedgistan, I have edited it, hopefully for the better :P

I like it.
Member of The South and Osiris
Representing Mahaj in the World Assembly.
The Mahaj Factbook.


Author of Missing Minors Act (Repealed) and In Regards to Cloning
Mike the Progressive wrote:
Brogavia wrote:Fuck bitches, get money.
You shall be my god.

Georgism wrote:Fuck off you cunt, I'm always nice.

NERVUN wrote:Yog zap!

Cool Egg Sandwich wrote:I am the Urinater..... I'll be back.

Jedi Utopians wrote:5) Now, saying that a nation couldn't be part of OPEC would be bold. AIPEC sounds like something you'd want to get checked out by a physician for.


Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads