How much would you rank AU’s sig?

[Krikill]

On a scale from 1 to 10, how would you rank AN’s sig?

I believe there was a thread on ranking sigs but the ebil autoprune likely ate it so this is a new thread.

Starting with UCP, UCP doesn’t have a sig if I have not been gaslighted, so it starts with BN.

[DutchFormosa]

The "Last edited by" was neat at first, but quickly outstayed its welcome the more I saw other people using it. Though the rest is pretty good, so 6/10

Actually, 5/10 for the lame rickroll

[Ineva]

I can't even touch on why, but, this has always been one of my favorite signatures. No, I am not being sarcastic. There is a really admirable simplicity to it, and the formatting is very accessible and pleasing to the eye. I have to give it an 8/10. It is this low only because it would be an insult to those who have contributed much more effort and length to their own, even though theirs, likely, do not meet the level of elegance this one does. /gushing.

[Yunogaku]

Finally, a sig where it's about roleplay and not some personal bs. A 8/10 here because it was simplistic unlike similar sigs that did too much. Not much else to say though

[Slavstonia]

A well written signature, that provides me with all IC information! and has links to factbooks too! I'd rate it at 8/10!!

[Krikill]

Slav’s sig is simple, not elaborate, minimalism does have its place, but I prefer elaborateness, so 4/10.

[Pax Brasiliana]

7/10

It begins with a joke, but things get somewhat serious in the spoiler. Yes, I said somewhat, because it has a very specific video. Anyway, it has relevant info and goes directly to the point.

[-Astoria-]

8/10: quite straightforward and well-ordered.

[Marenmia-Ocasia]

8/10: quite straightforward and well-ordered.

It’s well formatted, an 8/10 seems appropriate.

[Krikill]

5/10 because well, its not elaborate, although the facts are important, still could do better formatting.

[Krikill]

/bump

[Saarland-Westpalia]

Detailed and organized
8/10

[The Three Rivers Nations]

Fairly middle of the road as it goes, not awful but not a masterpiece either. 4/10, sorry.

[Atarashi Hanabi]

Ooh let’s see. So many colours, funny one-liner, gameplay roles, and quotes, even without any clear IC and OOC things, I’m still giving it a 8/10, really solid

[South Poopistan]

Very busy. Not bad, but the bright colors are... excessive. The text isn't bad, but aesthetically? I'll give it a 3/7 (or a 4 on a 10-point scale ig)
Ninja'd. I love this one! The colors work well and the stars are very nice. 6/7 (or an 8/10)

[Yunogaku]

It looks bad, it genuinely hurts my eyes due to how unpleasant it is for the naked eye. It was badly formatted and it just overwhelm me with AU personal life. I don't have anything else to say. 3/10, not the worst

[British Rangoon]

Everything, with the stuff to get to your IC Factbooks.

It's underwhelming, bare bones yet good.

7/10

[Dengist China]

Bit cluttered, but does the job. 6/10.

[Polonia Overlordship]

Spoilering it was a good move. 8/10, ought to spoiler mine too.

[Commonwealth Of Cursedland]

5/10 it’s certainly rich in information, but it lacks personality. It’s just a block of text under a spoiler

[Krikill]

It looks pretty long and cluttered; the spoilers are not organised and it takes a lot of space on my screen. 3/10.

[Krikill]

/bumpity pump

[Giggletickle will manifest on 11-15-27]

0/10

[Dengist China]

Well, it has an Americanized date in the sig, and it doesn't seem to mean anything. 1/10.

[Geraluden]

lots of leadership stuff. 5/10.