IC:
"What are the sessions?"
"Oh I'm only going to one"
"Which session?"
"The WCC and EWCC as Expressions of Halacha"
"You're not going to stay up later"
"Look, I may, but this is the most important session to see so let's do it"
"Ok then"
*At the session*
"Let's see the source sheet"
Source 1:
The Milchamian Constitution
Source 2:
WCC Constitution
Source 3:
The Beginning of the RP Thread
Source 4:
We broke rules?
Source 5:
https://outorah.org/p/6598/ (Sorry for the terrible citation but you can still find it at this link)
Rabbi Jack Abramowitz
Source 6:
The differences between football and cricket
...football has what are called rules while cricket calls them laws. The difference here is obvious, in one there are rules that you can break or bend whereas in the other there are only laws. Laws can be broken but there is a clear punishment for breaking a law, rules can be bent, punishments can change etc. Laws cannot. This has a huge effect on how the game is played...
"That's an interesting selection of sources, not sure what AI has to do with football"
"I don't think it's about AI"
"Shush he's about to start"
"So let's talk about rules for a minute. What's a rule?"
"A rule is a guide"
"Ok and what's a law?"
"A rule that is enforced by the state or a relevant substate authority"
"So what's the difference?"
"Both can be binding but one is much more binding than the other"
"So then let's look at some laws"
"Break into chevruta and talk about what you notice. As a note for our foreign readers, chevruta is a Jewish practice of studying where partners read a text together and then parse it. It is a formal and informal part of Jewish learning that is very important."
*People do chevruta things*
"Cool, now read source 2"
*People do chevruta things with source 2*
"So what do we see as similarities and differences between sources 1 and 2?"
"Weirdly, I think source 2 is more technical?"
"How so?"
"Well you can really read it, unlike Source 1 which seems bizarre and maybe a meme"
"Our Constitution is not a meme! Unlike some other Jewish states we actually wrote one!"
"Well, even so, the excerpt you used was less technical"
"I disagree, it was much more technical. Like the whole source is about how taxation works in a socialist manner. It's pretty complicated stuff, there's a reason we don't really look at that stuff until high school"
"I learned it in 8th grade!"
"Ok, whatever, it's not that much before high school. You learned other parts of the Constitution much earlier, the complicated economic bits are not the part we study earlier in school"
"Fair enough"
"What about the relationship between the two that matters?"
"Look, we have laws and rules here. The WCC has rules and a Constitution but can only mandate so much. It even says, specifically, that hosts may use certain things but not others. It's very clearly not attempting to be all encompassing, just broad enough to be used"
"Alright we're going to skip sources 3 and 4 because of time, let's move to source 5. Go do chevruta things"
*People do chevruta things for source 5*
"What's the relationship between mitzvot here?"
"That just saying something is a rule doesn't make it a rule?"
"Interesting, anybody else"
"I think that it's clear to the Rambam that just saying 'do this' isn't a command, it's just a violation of the command. Like, I know we skipped them, but I read it anyway, for source 3 there is no explicit prohibition in item number 1 but a strong rule against it. It's a rule not a law."
"How does that compare to what we see in sources 1 and 2?"
"What?"
"Ok, everybody looks confused, let me explain a bit more here. Is halacha like Rabbi Abramowitz talking about, more like rules or more like laws?"
"It's literally the Jewish law code, it's clearly laws"
"Why?"
"Because we have to follow them. Why are we at a Tikkun Leil? Because that's the law"
"Tikkun Leil isn't a law, it's a custom"
"Ok, fair enough, but we have to read a specific Torah portion and read Megillat Ruth because those are explicit laws given to us"
"What makes those conceptually binding and not just rules like in Source 2?"
"God and the tradition of being Jews"
"Is that binding?"
"It must be, otherwise we wouldn't do it. There are many aspects of Judaism that aren't done because they are bad, Judaism has laws around slavery that are not followed because we think them immoral. Jewish laws around land ownership are sorta anti socialist and we break them all the time in Milchama but it's necessary otherwise we would never be socialists. They are still binding to us and we can't just change them willy nilly. It's not theological"
"Then why do rabbis write new halachot?"
"Why do parliaments write new laws? Things change or need to be clarified or we need to change things as they see fit"
"Let's look then at soccer now. Go do chevruta things with Source 6"
*People do chevruta things on Source 6*
"What's our connection then to soccer?"
"Basically, we're trying to figure out if the WCC and EWCC are a bunch of rules or laws?"
"Yep"
"What do you think?"
"It's a Jewish seminar, there's no way you're getting a clear answer"
"Fair enough"
1. Parsing of rules as important
2. The question of tradition outside of formal rule making
3. Weird ephemera as a necessary condition to following laws



THURSDAY 28TH MAY, 2026








Tanirinthia 15
Dantopia 15
Eshialand 15
Auprussia 15
Lisander 15
Saperetia 15
Sudilia 15
Xanneria 15
Allamunnic States 15
Gwarkos 15 






































