
by The BlAAtschApen » Mon Dec 15, 2025 3:55 am

by Unogonduria » Mon Dec 15, 2025 3:58 am

by A m e n r i a » Mon Dec 15, 2025 3:59 am

by Neu California » Mon Dec 15, 2025 4:05 am

by Second PEEnadian » Mon Dec 15, 2025 4:07 am
The BlAAtschApen wrote:https://www.msn.com/en-us/foodanddrink/other/in-n-out-officially-removes-number-67-from-its-ordering-system-after-viral-6-7-trend/ar-AA1RYioR
So In And Out Burger bans the number 67 from its ordering system. It also bans 69, because that number has not been a problem for years, if not decades. So obviously it needs to go. People would see 69 and think or maybe even say "nice", and go on with their day. It was a small chuckle or glimpse of happiness while indulging yourself with some mediocre(mid) fast food. But the 67 craze has now caused collateral damage.
It also means that 68 is the loneliest number. Take that, number 1.
This is beyond ridiculous. Like, I get being enthusiastic about something, but now another number gets ruined. And that is unacceptable.
But what say you, NSG?
NewsGlob |there's nothing|thank you son
by IZERN » Mon Dec 15, 2025 4:07 am

by Cleptonia » Mon Dec 15, 2025 4:40 am

by Cerespasia » Mon Dec 15, 2025 4:43 am
CERES (or Occidentia) IS BACK!
NSStats executed via full auto magdump from M55B Battle Rifle.

by The BlAAtschApen » Mon Dec 15, 2025 4:50 am
Meline wrote:We need to make every single number a meme, then we'll have achieved numerical abolition

by Salvant Karakavay Koraphi » Mon Dec 15, 2025 4:52 am
by Velstrania » Mon Dec 15, 2025 5:05 am

by The BlAAtschApen » Mon Dec 15, 2025 5:20 am
Velstrania wrote:I'm more concerned by you calling in n out mid fast food. It's the second best of the American burger chains.

by Andso Mangis » Mon Dec 15, 2025 5:30 am

by -Saiwania- » Mon Dec 15, 2025 5:33 am

by Sweway » Mon Dec 15, 2025 5:34 am
The BlAAtschApen wrote:https://www.msn.com/en-us/foodanddrink/other/in-n-out-officially-removes-number-67-from-its-ordering-system-after-viral-6-7-trend/ar-AA1RYioR
So In And Out Burger bans the number 67 from its ordering system. It also bans 69, because that number has not been a problem for years, if not decades. So obviously it needs to go. People would see 69 and think or maybe even say "nice", and go on with their day. It was a small chuckle or glimpse of happiness while indulging yourself with some mediocre(mid) fast food. But the 67 craze has now caused collateral damage.
It also means that 68 is the loneliest number. Take that, number 1.
This is beyond ridiculous. Like, I get being enthusiastic about something, but now another number gets ruined. And that is unacceptable.
But what say you, NSG?

by Ifreann » Mon Dec 15, 2025 5:35 am


by A m e n r i a » Mon Dec 15, 2025 6:46 am
Neu California wrote:In n Out overreacted badly and yes, it is completely stupid.
What's next, banning 3 and 16, because they're on the bottom of their cups? (Yes, they have a John 3:16 reference on their cups, which I find really dumb but generally don't care about).

by The Archregimancy » Mon Dec 15, 2025 6:54 am

by The BlAAtschApen » Mon Dec 15, 2025 7:08 am
The Archregimancy wrote:
Not much point to that story, I suppose, except that sometimes fiddling with numbers can have more serious consequences.

by The BlAAtschApen » Mon Dec 15, 2025 7:28 am
Nantoraka wrote:We should do something nice for 68 after both of its siblings were killed, like take it out to a movie date or surprise it with lunch.

by Slembana » Mon Dec 15, 2025 7:56 am
Nantoraka wrote:We should do something nice for 68 after both of its siblings were killed, like take it out to a movie date or surprise it with lunch.

by Alvosa » Mon Dec 15, 2025 8:13 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Borkmaster, Cheblonsk, Great Britain-and Northern Ireland, New Kisha, NewAlbion, Outer Armatonisdaristan, The Archregimancy, Velstrania
Advertisement