The LGBT+ Thread: Rainbow Connections

by **DutchFormosa** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 9:00 am

Jolthig wrote:
DutchFormosa wrote:Supreme Court denies appeal to overturn same-sex marriage ruling.

We dodged a bullet in this area for now

For now is the important part.

We may have won this battle, but the war is far from over.

by **Ci Arovannea** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 9:37 am

Panplatina wrote:
Jolthig wrote:I finally decided what my pronouns will be: she/they. :3

Nicknames: Jolthena, Khloé
... Please reconsider your nicknames.

Btw you have yet to answer this. Why should she do any such thing?

by **The Anti-Delegate** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 9:38 am

Ci Arovannea wrote:
Panplatina wrote:... Please reconsider your nicknames.

Btw you have yet to answer this. Why should she do any such thing?

theyre just being rude to be rude
just wasting all our times

by **Jolthig** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 10:20 am

Ci Arovannea wrote:
Panplatina wrote:... Please reconsider your nicknames.

Btw you have yet to answer this. Why should she do any such thing?

The same individual that thinks every trans has dysphoria ("by medical standards") when they don't understand trans is a spectrum of a variety of feelings and experiences. No different than cis.

We're talking Blaire White logic

by **Jolthig** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 10:40 am

DutchFormosa wrote:
Jolthig wrote:We dodged a bullet in this area for now

For now is the important part.

We may have won this battle, but the war is far from over.

Much more work is needed to be done for sure.

by **Nea Skotia** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 10:54 am

Jolthig wrote:
Panplatina wrote:... Please reconsider your nicknames.

No.

I would advise rethinking one of them, but only because the spelling brings to mind a certain annoying family that only clings to relevancy because of a genre of TV that shouldn't exist... :unsure:

by **Aadhiris** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 11:48 am

Jolthig wrote:I finally decided what my pronouns will be: she/they. :3

Nicknames: Jolthena, Khloé

me and my 10 billion names that nobody's ever used:

DutchFormosa wrote:Supreme Court denies appeal to overturn same-sex marriage ruling.

i'm still kinda surprised.

DutchFormosa wrote:
Jolthig wrote:We dodged a bullet in this area for now

For now is the important part.

We may have won this battle, but the war is far from over.

Yep.
With every win comes ten more battles that we'll have to struggle through

by **Jolthig** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 12:00 pm

Nea Skotia wrote:
Jolthig wrote:No.

I would advise rethinking one of them, but only because the spelling brings to mind a certain annoying family that only clings to relevancy because of a genre of TV that shouldn't exist...

Ironically.....that spelling is the only known one I knew. Sure there is Chloé but I like the K lol

by **Free World Treaty Organization** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 12:20 pm

Jolthig wrote:
DutchFormosa wrote:Supreme Court denies appeal to overturn same-sex marriage ruling.

We dodged a bullet in this area for now

A much needed piece of good news from the US,

Which state do you guys think will be the next one to ban conversion therapy?

I think Kansas could do it if their democratic governor signs an executive order

by **Panplatina** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 1:21 pm

Jolthig wrote:
Ci Arovannea wrote:Btw you have yet to answer this. Why should she do any such thing?

The same individual that thinks every trans has dysphoria ("by medical standards") when they don't understand trans is a spectrum of a variety of feelings and experiences. No different than cis.

We're talking Blaire White logic

Blaire White is mostly correct on what she thinks.

by **Ci Arovannea** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 1:22 pm

Panplatina wrote:
Jolthig wrote:The same individual that thinks every trans has dysphoria ("by medical standards") when they don't understand trans is a spectrum of a variety of feelings and experiences. No different than cis.

We're talking Blaire White logic
Blaire White is mostly correct on what she thinks.

Can you answer the god-damn question?

by **Panplatina** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 1:23 pm

Ci Arovannea wrote:
Panplatina wrote:Blaire White is mostly correct on what she thinks.

Can you answer the god-damn question?

It's not up to me to baby her, but I'm just pointing out her choosen names are akin of that mother that named her daughter Daenerys.

by **DutchFormosa** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 1:24 pm

Panplatina wrote:
Jolthig wrote:The same individual that thinks every trans has dysphoria ("by medical standards") when they don't understand trans is a spectrum of a variety of feelings and experiences. No different than cis.

We're talking Blaire White logic
Blaire White is mostly correct on what she thinks.

About being a pick-me trans woman?

by **Ci Arovannea** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 1:24 pm

Panplatina wrote:
Ci Arovannea wrote:Can you answer the god-damn question?
It's not up to me to baby her, but I'm just pointing out her choosen names are akin of that mother that named her daughter Daenerys.

I ask you yet again, what's wrong with that?

Do we really have to have another Bobby? Is that a suitably "normal" name for your lacking taste?

by **Panplatina** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 1:25 pm

DutchFormosa wrote:
Panplatina wrote:Blaire White is mostly correct on what she thinks.

About being a pick-me trans woman?

God forbid a queer person has an original thought that goes against what the community thinks.

by **Ci Arovannea** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 1:26 pm

Panplatina wrote:
DutchFormosa wrote:About being a pick-me trans woman?
God forbid a queer person has an original thought that goes against what the community thinks.

god forbid we call someone who has stupid takes, an individual with stupid takes

by **DutchFormosa** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 1:26 pm

Panplatina wrote:
DutchFormosa wrote:About being a pick-me trans woman?
God forbid a queer person has an original thought that goes against what the community thinks.

Do you even know what her thoughts are?

by **Panplatina** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 1:28 pm

DutchFormosa wrote:
Panplatina wrote:God forbid a queer person has an original thought that goes against what the community thinks.

Do you even know what her thoughts are?

I used to follow her in 2020-2023, I fell out of touch but I still think she's based.

by **The Anti-Delegate** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 1:29 pm

Panplatina wrote:
DutchFormosa wrote:About being a pick-me trans woman?
God forbid a queer person has an original thought that goes against what the community thinks.

she's not a brave going against the flow bravely
she's a grifter grifting an audience that hates her own existence

by **DutchFormosa** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 1:29 pm

Panplatina wrote:
DutchFormosa wrote:Do you even know what her thoughts are?
I used to follow her in 2020-2023, I fell out of touch but I still think she's based.

Based is a great way to refer to how she doesn't see herself as a real woman, despite saying that she is, and wanting to be on the side of people who hate her very existence.

by **Ci Arovannea** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 1:29 pm

Panplatina wrote:
DutchFormosa wrote:Do you even know what her thoughts are?
I used to follow her in 2020-2023, I fell out of touch but I still think she's based.

you fell out of touch

mind checking up on whether she still thinks those things or...?

by **Panplatina** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 1:33 pm

The Anti-Delegate wrote:
Panplatina wrote:God forbid a queer person has an original thought that goes against what the community thinks.
she's not a brave going against the flow bravely
she's a grifter grifting an audience that hates her own existence

If the audience hated her own existence, you'd not be watching her. Similarly to how you'd not watch a nazi that talks positively about queer people. Maybe her audience actually likes her and the way she thinks and that's why they watch her? Crazy.

Ci Arovannea wrote:
Panplatina wrote:I used to follow her in 2020-2023, I fell out of touch but I still think she's based.
you fell out of touch

mind checking up on whether she still thinks those things or...?

From what I've gathered, she does. And that's based.

DutchFormosa wrote:
Panplatina wrote:I used to follow her in 2020-2023, I fell out of touch but I still think she's based.

Based is a great way to refer to how she doesn't see herself as a real woman, despite saying that she is, and wanting to be on the side of people who hate her very existence.

She self-identifies as a trans woman. She just does not believe she's equal in experience to a cis woman.

by **DutchFormosa** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 1:35 pm

Panplatina wrote:
DutchFormosa wrote:Based is a great way to refer to how she doesn't see herself as a real woman, despite saying that she is, and wanting to be on the side of people who hate her very existence.
She self-identifies as a trans woman. She just does not believe she's equal in experience to a cis woman.

Believing that people can be "inferior" to other people is a fucked up opinion to have.

by **Ci Arovannea** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 1:40 pm

Panplatina wrote:
The Anti-Delegate wrote:she's not a brave going against the flow bravely
she's a grifter grifting an audience that hates her own existence
If the audience hated her own existence, you'd not be watching her. Similarly to how you'd not watch a nazi that talks positively about queer people. Maybe her audience actually likes her and the way she thinks and that's why they watch her? Crazy.

Ci Arovannea wrote:you fell out of touch

mind checking up on whether she still thinks those things or...?
From what I've gathered, she does. And that's based.

DutchFormosa wrote:Based is a great way to refer to how she doesn't see herself as a real woman, despite saying that she is, and wanting to be on the side of people who hate her very existence.
She self-identifies as a trans woman. She just does not believe she's equal in experience to a cis woman.

what the fuck is the bar for "equal experience" though?

by **Juristonia** » Tue Nov 11, 2025 2:05 pm

Smells baity in here.

Again.

The LGBT+ Thread: Rainbow Connections

Who is online