Lusitanic wrote:I think it’s a stretch to say banging a 9 year old is morally perfect.
Be careful. Traditionalists won't like your comment.
Advertisement
by Nihon Daiisuki Cartoons » Sun Oct 05, 2025 4:17 am
Lusitanic wrote:I think it’s a stretch to say banging a 9 year old is morally perfect.

by Unogonduria » Sun Oct 05, 2025 4:18 am
Europa Undivided wrote:Reino de Portvgal wrote:Islam isn't that great of a religion to begin with—and that's putting it mildly—but Islamism is simply horrible.
And no, you haven't debunked the fact that Aisha was a little girl when your prophet consummated the marriage, nor the innumerable contradictions in your faith.
Not to mention that Islamists have a tendency to randomly explode.

by Unogonduria » Sun Oct 05, 2025 4:19 am
Western European Khilafat wrote:Reino de Portvgal wrote:Islam isn't that great of a religion to begin with—and that's putting it mildly—but Islamism is simply horrible.
And no, you haven't debunked the fact that Aisha was a little girl when your prophet consummated the marriage, nor the innumerable contradictions in your faith.
-She was about 15, not 9.
-Even if she was, the fact that the Prophet peace be upon him was morally the ideal human at the time negates normal qualms.
Yes, one rule for others, another for the Prophet, BECAUSE HE IS THE PROPHET.

by New haven america » Sun Oct 05, 2025 4:57 am
Lusitanic wrote:Western European Khilafat wrote:-She was about 15, not 9.
-Even if she was, the fact that the Prophet peace be upon him was morally the ideal human at the time negates normal qualms.
Yes, one rule for others, another for the Prophet, BECAUSE HE IS THE PROPHET.
15 is still crazy though, especially for a man who claims to share the message of god, also we have no way of knowing when Muhammad banged her since it was over 1000 years ago, but most sources put the marriage to Aisha at age 6 and the consumption at 9.

by Tombourville » Sun Oct 05, 2025 5:03 am

by Fahran » Sun Oct 05, 2025 8:17 am

by Tombourville » Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:15 am
Fahran wrote:This might very well be a topic we should avoid discussing in immense detail. We can discuss the moral fallibility of Muhammad without tip-toeing around a forbidden topic, all y'all.
Posting as a player and thread participant, not as a mod.

by Western European Khilafat » Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:18 am
Unogonduria wrote:Western European Khilafat wrote:-She was about 15, not 9.
-Even if she was, the fact that the Prophet peace be upon him was morally the ideal human at the time negates normal qualms.
Yes, one rule for others, another for the Prophet, BECAUSE HE IS THE PROPHET.
1. Not true.
2. No, he is the perfect example for ALL of humanity - which would make pedophillia acceptable today too. Not to mention, not everywhere did children get married at the time, which would make him lowly for the 7th century as well.
Khan Younis (now deleted) wrote:With Our Blood, With Our Souls, We Will Redeem Al-Aqsa.

by Tombourville » Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:20 am
Western European Khilafat wrote:Unogonduria wrote:1. Not true.
2. No, he is the perfect example for ALL of humanity - which would make pedophillia acceptable today too. Not to mention, not everywhere did children get married at the time, which would make him lowly for the 7th century as well.
Not because of his morality, marry so and so.
Because of his morality, HE, GETS TO marry so and so, he can be trusted with her.
We are imperfect and cannot.

by Western European Khilafat » Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:22 am
Tombourville wrote:Western European Khilafat wrote:Not because of his morality, marry so and so.
Because of his morality, HE, GETS TO marry so and so, he can be trusted with her.
We are imperfect and cannot.
This is sounding increasingly cult leader-like. And increasingly fucked up. And if he is the pinnacle of morality and God’s will incarnate - why did God want him to take a child wife?
Khan Younis (now deleted) wrote:With Our Blood, With Our Souls, We Will Redeem Al-Aqsa.

by Jolthig » Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:22 am
Western European Khilafat wrote:Unogonduria wrote:1. Not true.
2. No, he is the perfect example for ALL of humanity - which would make pedophillia acceptable today too. Not to mention, not everywhere did children get married at the time, which would make him lowly for the 7th century as well.
Not because of his morality, marry so and so.
Because of his morality, HE, GETS TO marry so and so, he can be trusted with her.
We are imperfect and cannot.

by Lusitanic » Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:22 am
Western European Khilafat wrote:Unogonduria wrote:1. Not true.
2. No, he is the perfect example for ALL of humanity - which would make pedophillia acceptable today too. Not to mention, not everywhere did children get married at the time, which would make him lowly for the 7th century as well.
Not because of his morality, marry so and so.
Because of his morality, HE, GETS TO marry so and so, he can be trusted with her.
We are imperfect and cannot.

by Unogonduria » Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:22 am
Western European Khilafat wrote:Unogonduria wrote:1. Not true.
2. No, he is the perfect example for ALL of humanity - which would make pedophillia acceptable today too. Not to mention, not everywhere did children get married at the time, which would make him lowly for the 7th century as well.
Not because of his morality, marry so and so.
Because of his morality, HE, GETS TO marry so and so, he can be trusted with her.
We are imperfect and cannot.

by Lusitanic » Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:23 am


by Jolthig » Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:25 am
Western European Khilafat wrote:Tombourville wrote:This is sounding increasingly cult leader-like. And increasingly fucked up. And if he is the pinnacle of morality and God’s will incarnate - why did God want him to take a child wife?
-Protection
-None of the risks associated with it crop up.
-Child exploitation is haram.

by Western European Khilafat » Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:30 am
Jolthig wrote:Western European Khilafat wrote:Not because of his morality, marry so and so.
Because of his morality, HE, GETS TO marry so and so, he can be trusted with her.
We are imperfect and cannot.
I've read (and of course with help of google translate) from Arabic sites that commentate on that particular thing that because Muhammad was the perfect moral example, Muslims are free to imitate him so therefore, it's Sunnah or allowed. Not a good look for Islam
Khan Younis (now deleted) wrote:With Our Blood, With Our Souls, We Will Redeem Al-Aqsa.

by Lusitanic » Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:31 am
Western European Khilafat wrote:Jolthig wrote:I've read (and of course with help of google translate) from Arabic sites that commentate on that particular thing that because Muhammad was the perfect moral example, Muslims are free to imitate him so therefore, it's Sunnah or allowed. Not a good look for Islam
Yesnt.
Actions that are said to have been PERFORMED FOR THE PURPOSES OF DOING GOOD.
Not all actions.
Muhammad peace be upon him may have possibly drank water at 7:36 pm once, it doesn't mean we have to imitate that for good deeds.
That is a thing that happenedt

by Jolthig » Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:34 am
Western European Khilafat wrote:Jolthig wrote:I've read (and of course with help of google translate) from Arabic sites that commentate on that particular thing that because Muhammad was the perfect moral example, Muslims are free to imitate him so therefore, it's Sunnah or allowed. Not a good look for Islam
Yesnt.
Actions that are said to have been PERFORMED FOR THE PURPOSES OF DOING GOOD.
Not all actions.
Muhammad peace be upon him may have possibly drank water at 7:36 pm once, it doesn't mean we have to imitate that for good deeds.
That is a thing that happenedt

by Tombourville » Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:48 am
Lusitanic wrote:Western European Khilafat wrote:Yesnt.
Actions that are said to have been PERFORMED FOR THE PURPOSES OF DOING GOOD.
Not all actions.
Muhammad peace be upon him may have possibly drank water at 7:36 pm once, it doesn't mean we have to imitate that for good deeds.
That is a thing that happenedt
Drinking water should never be compared to having sex with a little girl.

by The Two Jerseys » Sun Oct 05, 2025 12:06 pm

by Armeriea » Sun Oct 05, 2025 12:13 pm

by Jolthig » Sun Oct 05, 2025 12:15 pm
Armeriea wrote:So people are saying it’s bad because…?
How? Because you believe in a different god. I’m not a Muslim but this is absolutely ridiculous

by Tombourville » Sun Oct 05, 2025 12:17 pm
Armeriea wrote:So people are saying it’s bad because…?
How? Because you believe in a different god. I’m not a Muslim but this is absolutely ridiculous
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bombadil, Cabestan, Cole Whyte-Gurney, Fartsniffage, Hanalia, Heavens Reach, Ineva, Kurgao, NewAlbion, Nimzonia, Outer Armatonisdaristan, Plandistria, USHALLNOTPASS, Vassenor, Viriske
Advertisement