Advertisement

by Bhang Bhang Duc » Mon May 12, 2025 1:11 pm
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..

by The West Pacific Master Dispatch » Sun May 25, 2025 4:06 pm



by Logical Stimulus » Mon May 26, 2025 10:01 pm

by The West Pacific Master Dispatch » Sat May 31, 2025 6:29 pm



by Western Arba Fir » Sun Jun 01, 2025 6:27 am

by The West Pacific Master Dispatch » Sun Jun 01, 2025 1:22 pm



by The West Pacific Master Dispatch » Fri Jun 13, 2025 9:05 pm



by The West Pacific Master Dispatch » Sun Jul 06, 2025 1:48 pm



by Logical Stimulus » Mon Jul 07, 2025 3:53 am

by The West Pacific Master Dispatch » Sun Aug 03, 2025 4:25 pm



by Jar Wattinree » Sun Aug 03, 2025 4:32 pm

by Bhang Bhang Duc » Mon Aug 04, 2025 1:18 am
Jar Wattinree wrote:Darn, the BBD is so terrible we need to implement a MAD (Mutually Assured Duc) doctrine to ensure this weapon cannot proliferate.
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..

by Klaus Devestatorie » Mon Aug 04, 2025 2:59 am

by The West Pacific Master Dispatch » Mon Sep 01, 2025 11:19 am



by Feux » Mon Sep 01, 2025 11:21 am
Ostlantis wrote:...one day you will realize your toaster is actually Feux. Your dog? It was Feux all along. Your entire family? 20+ year infiltration by Feux. Everything is Feux.

by Bhang Bhang Duc » Mon Sep 01, 2025 11:38 am
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..

by Comfed » Mon Sep 01, 2025 2:25 pm

by The West Pacific Master Dispatch » Wed Sep 03, 2025 12:46 pm



by The West Pacific Master Dispatch » Fri Sep 05, 2025 10:44 pm



by The West Pacific Master Dispatch » Sat Sep 13, 2025 1:48 am



by The West Pacific Master Dispatch » Sun Sep 21, 2025 6:11 pm

WHEREAS, the Signatories be both Feeder crews committed t' comin’ about when we be becalmed;
WHEREAS, the Signatories recognize an already strong bond through past 'n present chasing, crimping, and cracking Jenny’s tea cup, as well as o'er fourteen years o' continuously droppin’ anchor together;
NOW, THEREFORE, The North Pacific 'n The West Pacific (“the Signatories”) agree t' the followin':
Article I - Mutual Recognition
The West Pacific recognizes The North Pacific, represented by the Captain o' The North Pacific, as established under the Code o’ Conduct o' The North Pacific. The West Pacific will nah recognize any captain o' The North Pacific nah empowered by the Code.
The North Pacific recognizes The West Pacific, represented by Captain Varanius 'n his successors, as established under the Manners o' Governance o' The West Pacific. The North Pacific will nah recognize any captain o' The West Pacific other than dat o' Varanius 'n his chosen successors.
The Signatories will maintain thar established ports o’ call (i.e., on the NationStates land) 'n island hideouts (i.e., on thar respective regional waters) wit' each other.
Article II - Defense 'n Security
The Signatories will nah engage in any subterfuge, espionage, or scuttlebut against each other fer the purposes o' pilferin' booty or mutiny, as outlined in Article I.
The Signatories will nah engage in pillagin’ o’ boardin’ against one another. Participation on opposite sides of pillagin’ o’ boardin’ nah involvin' ships or ports owned, controlled, or otherwise protected by either Signatory shall nah constitute “engagin' in pillagin’ o’ boardin’ against one another” fer the purposes of dis parley.
The Signatories will provide mutual defense t' one another in times of crisis, 'n may call on one another fer pillagin’ 'n/o’ strategic assistance in the event of an attack on thar crew.
Whenever a Signatory discovers scuttlebut which may concern a credible threat t' the security of the other Signatory’s crew, said Signatory will provide all relevant information t' the concerned Signatory's captain.
Any such intelligence will be kept strictly confidential 'n be shared only wit' those individuals necessary t' respond t' the threat, unless the other Signatory consents t' its release.
Article III - Communicatin’ 'n Cooperatin’
The Signatories recognize occasional differences in thar approach t' privateerin’, but will endeavor t' support each other wit' acts of pardon, distractin’ Jack Tar, supplyin’, and/or other such efforts insofar as thar interests align.
The Signatories will, from time to time, as be proper, splice the mainbrace, partake in square meals, and other activities fer the purpose of promotin' cultural exchange between their crews.
The Signatories be encouraged to communicate and support one another through sharin' experiences and knowledge from captain to captain.
Article IV - Parley and Dissolution
This parley shall be bindin’ upon agreement by the captains o’ both crews.
Both captains may parley again upon agreement. New guidelines shall be agreed upon and bindin’ in the same manner as dis parley.
If a Signatory believes dat the other Signatory may nah 'ave followed through or reneged upon the agreements set forth herein, it shall reach out and attempt to parley prior to dissolvin' the agreement.
In the event of a failure to parley, a Signatory may scupper the agreement, whereupon it shall cease to give quarter to either Signatory.

by The West Pacific Master Dispatch » Fri Oct 10, 2025 9:40 am



by Logical Stimulus » Mon Nov 10, 2025 8:26 pm



by Ambroscus Koth » Tue Nov 11, 2025 3:23 pm
Logical Stimulus wrote:About 9 months ago I sent Vara a message. Since I left my previous gig, I never really stopped actively following gameplay, but I wanted to actually do something again. I had changed ideologically and I needed a new adventure. Ever since the Frontier/Stronghold update I haven't really felt the same about NS. I no longer feel any sympathy toward the natives I pretended to care about when it was politically convenient to do so. There is simply no excuse anymore for not securing your region. If you get raided, I'm pretty much of the opinion that it is one hundred percent your fault. I enjoy being a defender for the challenge, but I've also really come to love torching regions to the ground when they deserve it. So yeah, it didn't really make much sense to go back to defenders.
I mean I guess W&S might count in a way, he's snapped and doesn't even know why he hates raiders anymore but he doesn't do anything about it like a proper Joker
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Northern Slatavia
Advertisement