Advertisement

by The Huskar Social Union » Wed Oct 16, 2024 2:02 am

by El Lazaro » Wed Oct 16, 2024 3:58 pm

by Kerwa » Wed Oct 16, 2024 4:24 pm
Forsher wrote:Tinhampton wrote:
You say that, but just the other day when I was explaining why Chris Hipkins will never win an election, one of the reasons I cited was that he's a ginger man. There's a bias you know (despite the above anecdote I am not speaking from personal experience: I may have a reddish beard, but I have brown hair... this is my genuine observation from observing the way the world interacts with hair colours).

by The Notorious Mad Jack » Wed Oct 16, 2024 4:32 pm
El Lazaro wrote:First poll showing the Conservatives tied with Labour
Does Labour really miss being the opposition that much?

by El Lazaro » Wed Oct 16, 2024 4:43 pm
The Notorious Mad Jack wrote:El Lazaro wrote:First poll showing the Conservatives tied with Labour
Does Labour really miss being the opposition that much?
Do polls five years out from elections really matter?

by Tinhampton » Wed Oct 16, 2024 7:55 pm

by Forsher » Wed Oct 16, 2024 11:18 pm

by El Lazaro » Wed Oct 16, 2024 11:36 pm
Forsher wrote:You say that, but just the other day when I was explaining why Chris Hipkins will never win an election, one of the reasons I cited was that he's a ginger man. There's a bias you know (despite the above anecdote I am not speaking from personal experience: I may have a reddish beard, but I have brown hair... this is my genuine observation from observing the way the world interacts with hair colours).

by Emotional Support Crocodile » Wed Oct 16, 2024 11:41 pm

by The Notorious Mad Jack » Wed Oct 16, 2024 11:52 pm
Emotional Support Crocodile wrote:Apparently if Robert Jenrick wins, he wants to make Jacob Rees-Mogg chairman of the Conservative Party. Proof his head is full of mince.

by The Archregimancy » Thu Oct 17, 2024 1:11 am
Forsher wrote:You say that, but just the other day when I was explaining why Chris Hipkins will never win an election, one of the reasons I cited was that he's a ginger man. There's a bias you know (despite the above anecdote I am not speaking from personal experience: I may have a reddish beard, but I have brown hair... this is my genuine observation from observing the way the world interacts with hair colours).

by Camtropia » Thu Oct 17, 2024 2:38 am
Tinhampton wrote:"Reeves eyeing £40bn in tax rises and spending cuts." Well, that's one way to plug a £22bn black hole.
Camtropia is a young, left-leaning, democratic nation located in Southern Central/Eastern Europe, or somewhere similar.
Almost all stats and policies are canon.
Population: 52 million.
CBC News | Heatwave leads to surge in portable air conditioner sales -- Minister of Agriculture resigns after affair scandal with secretary -- Local man unable to think up headlines 
by Mtwara » Thu Oct 17, 2024 3:21 am

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Thu Oct 17, 2024 3:24 am
Mtwara wrote:Low opinion poll ratings for Labour at this stage are a bit of a big “so what?”.

by Mtwara » Thu Oct 17, 2024 3:43 am

by Forsher » Thu Oct 17, 2024 3:46 am
The Archregimancy wrote:Forsher wrote:You say that, but just the other day when I was explaining why Chris Hipkins will never win an election, one of the reasons I cited was that he's a ginger man. There's a bias you know (despite the above anecdote I am not speaking from personal experience: I may have a reddish beard, but I have brown hair... this is my genuine observation from observing the way the world interacts with hair colours).
Winston Churchill, Robin Cook, Calvin Coolidge, Oliver Cromwell (alright, so didn't win an election as such), James Garfield, Alexander Hamilton, Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, Yitzhak Rabin, William Howard Taft, Martin Van Buren...
El Lazaro wrote:Jokes aside, which countries and time period does your theory apply to? It’s too vague to be testable.

by The Notorious Mad Jack » Thu Oct 17, 2024 4:21 am
Forsher wrote:The Archregimancy wrote:
Winston Churchill, Robin Cook, Calvin Coolidge, Oliver Cromwell (alright, so didn't win an election as such), James Garfield, Alexander Hamilton, Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, Yitzhak Rabin, William Howard Taft, Martin Van Buren...
Anyone since the advent of (a) colour photography or (b) young enough that they still had red hair?

by Forsher » Thu Oct 17, 2024 4:41 am

by The Huskar Social Union » Thu Oct 17, 2024 11:55 am
Exclusive: Party drops plan for formal recognition laid out last year by David Lammy, who will visit Beijing on Friday
Labour has backtracked on plans to push for formal recognition of China’s treatment of the Uyghurs as genocide in the run-up to David Lammy’s trip to the country this weekend.
The foreign secretary is expected to arrive in Beijing on Friday for high-level meetings before travelling to Shanghai on Saturday.
The trip marks a shift in the British government’s approach to China, with ministers seeking to improve engagement and build closer economic ties. Trade between the UK and China is worth £110bn a year.
Senior government figures are bullish about their approach, pointing out that allies including the US and the EU have maintained high-level engagement with China in recent years while the UK has fallen behind.
As part of this diplomatic rapprochement, Labour has dropped its tough stance towards Beijing over its treatment of the Uyghur Muslim minority.
China has detained Uyghurs at camps in the north-west region of Xinjiang, where for years there have been allegations of torture, forced labour and sexual abuse. The Chinese government claims the camps carry out “re-education” to combat terrorism.
The European parliament passed an emergency resolution this week censuring China’s repression of the Uyghurs and calling for the release of detainees.
In opposition, Labour backed a Commons motion that declared China’s conduct genocide and urged the government to seek formal recognition of this through the UN and with other countries.
Stephen Kinnock, then shadow Asia minister, said in 2021 that it was not enough to leave the matter to international courts because China would have to consent to an investigation.
“Ideally, a competent international court would examine this evidence, but there is no prospect that either the ICC or the international court of justice will be able to do so, as this would require the consent of China,” Kinnock told the Commons.
=CONTINUES=

by Tinhampton » Thu Oct 17, 2024 12:00 pm

by Ifreann » Thu Oct 17, 2024 12:02 pm
Tinhampton wrote:I'm hearing that Boris Johnson's new book isn't available in the EU because of Brexit? That's the first time I've ever heard something like this.

by Tinhampton » Thu Oct 17, 2024 12:04 pm

by Ifreann » Thu Oct 17, 2024 12:05 pm
Tinhampton wrote:Ifreann wrote:Don't think that's true.
Heard it on X first but somehow didn't find anything about it in the New European. Managed to snare up a link from Left Foot Forward about it which basically explains that it was not available, in some stores, for a week because they had to go through customs processing first. Carry on.

by Imperializt Russia » Thu Oct 17, 2024 2:00 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:Ifreann wrote:Sure would be nice if people were getting access to medicine based on their healthcare needs rather than based on the expected economic gains.
You think the NHS was a purely altruistic gesture? Healthy workers after a world war means the economy getting on its feet faster. There has always been a cost benefit analysis when approving drugs and how they are prescribed within the NHS.

by Fartsniffage » Fri Oct 18, 2024 7:14 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
You think the NHS was a purely altruistic gesture? Healthy workers after a world war means the economy getting on its feet faster. There has always been a cost benefit analysis when approving drugs and how they are prescribed within the NHS.
There is an impossibly vast gulf between the provision of healthcare where for many, it previously no longer existed - bettering those people to enable them to achieve the economic value they wanted to - and medicated people into work for the sake of extracting economic value from them.
"If you don't take this injection, we will sanction you".
That is literally dystopic.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: -Saiwania-, Camtropia, Dumb Ideologies, Greater German Confederate, Hurdergaryp, Ifreann, Ineva, Kriegsreich of Iron, Might Delete Later, Orcuo, Orlavia, Philjia, Slembana, The Archregimancy, The Two Jerseys, Velstrania, Vienio
Advertisement