The Ice States wrote:Yelda wrote:
I like the idea of a veto more than recommendations. Maybe during each term have one "hard" veto where the S-G can effectively kill a resolution in queue or at vote, then two "soft" vetoes where a vetoed proposal can pass if it has support from 2/3 of voters, as suggested by Ice States?
This seems fine; at least, as much as it can be if it applies to the GA.
You cannot possibly be serious with this? GenSec discards are already pretty bad, and they at least have good reasons. A SecGen veto, for, completely arbitrary reasons, is perhaps the most absurd suggestion in this entire thread. Absolutely not.