After Libs of TikTok posted, at least 21 bomb threats follow

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

Those who do not prey upon children are more authoritative in my eyes.

Have 'liberal' child psychologists or sociologists been known to prey upon children?

Self-expression is the opposite of a priority worth any value. Regardless, you aren't being lynched. A prank phone call isn't a lynching. The absence of validation is not oppression.

I'd say calling a bomb threat on a school is a little more than just a "prank call."

[Uiiop]

Those who do not prey upon children are more authoritative in my eyes.

Have 'liberal' child psychologists or sociologists been known to prey upon children?

Self-expression is the opposite of a priority worth any value. Regardless, you aren't being lynched. A prank phone call isn't a lynching. The absence of validation is not oppression.

I'd say calling a bomb threat on a school is a little more than just a "prank call."

IIRC If you're french or in the sexology field or work in the juvie...then yes.
There's isn't that much overlap with hospital and school work per se tho. The sexologist are usually the ones bitter enough to join the bigots in particular.

[Distruzio]

Those who do not prey upon children are more authoritative in my eyes.

Have 'liberal' child psychologists or sociologists been known to prey upon children?

Self-expression is the opposite of a priority worth any value. Regardless, you aren't being lynched. A prank phone call isn't a lynching. The absence of validation is not oppression.

I'd say calling a bomb threat on a school is a little more than just a "prank call."

Yes

[Distruzio]

You're right. I did assume that.



A lesson I should apply to the other participants in this thread, as well. There doesn't have to be something meaningful to them believing the article cited in the OP.

There isn't. The facts stand on their own.

What I find contradictory is that... I had been far narrower in my conception of the conversation with others within this thread right up until the point where you began hammering this point. At that moment I broadened my scope without a second thought. Didn't even realize it until right now.

The thought process reacting to your point was:

Of course unhinged parents would overreact to learning a school may be promoting inappropriate books to children.
Of course unhinged hyper-concerned parents would overreact to learning a hospital may be promoting inappropriate medical procedures for children.

That was inappropriate. You kept the point narrow. I should have, as well.

Let me fix that now:



I am very clearly and specifically not talking about the childrens hospital.

You should be, it's very relevant to the topic at hand.

You're right, I should be. Given that there is a tweet from the ACLU of Colorado currently up declaring a lawsuit against CHCO for refusing top surgery for a transgender patient who began receiving "care" before they were 18... I can't imagine why an unhinged hyper-concerned parent (or even interested 3rd party) would react the way they do to news suggesting these procedures take place.

Thankfully, CHCO does not provide these surgeries to minors.

Thankfully, no unhinged hyper-concerned nutbag has overreacted in the case referenced by the ACLU of Colorado (so far).

My point: Libs of TikTok shares content created by the social Left that the average person finds reprehensible. Some of those average persons are unhinged. Some of those unhinged average persons call in fake bomb threats. Even IF Libs was incorrect about the procedures at the hospital you are concerned with, surely it cannot be beyond your ability to understand why parents might believe the procedures do happen given the news of the lawsuit from the ACLU (feel free to have a gander at their account).

[Ifreann]

There isn't. The facts stand on their own.


You should be, it's very relevant to the topic at hand.

You're right, I should be. Given that there is a tweet from the ACLU of Colorado

"Please be distracted and talk about this totally different case"
Nah

My point: Libs of TikTok shares content created by the social Left that the average person finds reprehensible.

No she doesn't. Making false claims about a children's hospital is not sharing "content created by the social Left". Very obviously not.

Really, I'm not sure there's any point to engaging with someone who engages in such unmitigated dishonesty.

[Distruzio]

You're right, I should be. Given that there is a tweet from the ACLU of Colorado

"Please be distracted and talk about this totally different case"
Nah

My point: Libs of TikTok shares content created by the social Left that the average person finds reprehensible.

No she doesn't. Making false claims about a children's hospital is not sharing "content created by the social Left". Very obviously not.

Really, I'm not sure there's any point to engaging with someone who engages in such unmitigated dishonesty.

You have always been a curious one from time to time.

[Cessarea]

Have 'liberal' child psychologists or sociologists been known to prey upon children?


I'd say calling a bomb threat on a school is a little more than just a "prank call."

Yes

Let it be stated on the record that instead of a simple "yes" you said, in full length and without any vagueness at all, that learning institutions are indeed filled with predators.

I found it funny at the time, but what's even funnier is your unwillingness to stick to your guns even now. It borders hilarity.

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

Have 'liberal' child psychologists or sociologists been known to prey upon children?


I'd say calling a bomb threat on a school is a little more than just a "prank call."

Yes

How many predators do you think fill the ranks of child psychologists and sociologists?

And who would you have take their place?

[Distruzio]

Yes

Let it be stated on the record that instead of a simple "yes" you said, in full length and without any vagueness at all, that learning institutions are indeed filled with predators.

I found it funny at the time, but what's even funnier is your unwillingness to stick to your guns even now. It borders hilarity.

Yes. Learning institutions are filled with predators.

But it was a slight deviation from the parameters of his question, so I altered the response.

[Distruzio]

Yes

How many predators do you think fill the ranks of child psychologists and sociologists?

And who would you have take their place?

One is too many.

For those disciplines? Puppies. Dogs are infinitely more valuable to the development of children than predators.

[Untecna]

Let it be stated on the record that instead of a simple "yes" you said, in full length and without any vagueness at all, that learning institutions are indeed filled with predators.

I found it funny at the time, but what's even funnier is your unwillingness to stick to your guns even now. It borders hilarity.

Yes. Learning institutions are filled with predators.

But it was a slight deviation from the parameters of his question, so I altered the response.

Hey look, someone else using the "predators" diversion. How fun.

[Cessarea]

How many predators do you think fill the ranks of child psychologists and sociologists?

And who would you have take their place?

One is too many.

For those disciplines? Puppies. Dogs are infinitely more valuable to the development of children than predators.

And with what authority do you make such bold claims on an entire scientific field?

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

How many predators do you think fill the ranks of child psychologists and sociologists?

And who would you have take their place?

One is too many.

For those disciplines? Puppies. Dogs are infinitely more valuable to the development of children than predators.

If having one child predator in an institution makes that entire institution irredeemable, then I have some very bad news about human civilization.

[Tungstan]

Yes. Learning institutions are filled with predators.

Do you have any evidence from a credible source for this?

[Distruzio]

One is too many.

For those disciplines? Puppies. Dogs are infinitely more valuable to the development of children than predators.

If having one child predator in an institution makes that entire institution irredeemable, then I have some very bad news about human civilization.

Now you're getting it.

One is too many.

For those disciplines? Puppies. Dogs are infinitely more valuable to the development of children than predators.

And with what authority do you make such bold claims on an entire scientific field?

Several scientific fields. Education, too.

But, the authority I claim is irrelevant. I don't trust the priests of progressivism/liberalism/secularism.

[The Land of the Ephyral]

Libs of TikTok did nothing wrong.

She shows how schools are filled with the pedophile groomers you guys love so much.

[Distruzio]

Yes. Learning institutions are filled with predators.

Do you have any evidence from a credible source for this?

It came to me in a dream.

[Untecna]

Libs of TikTok did nothing wrong.

She shows how schools are filled with the pedophile groomers you guys love so much.

Do you actually have evidence that such is true, or are you going to continue parroting a terrorist?

[The Land of the Ephyral]

Libs of TikTok did nothing wrong.

She shows how schools are filled with the pedophile groomers you guys love so much.

Do you actually have evidence that such is true, or are you going to continue parroting a terrorist?

She shows it to be true.

She's not a terrorist.

The "LGBTQ" movement are child rapists under civil rights protection.

[Tungstan]

Do you have any evidence from a credible source for this?

It came to me in a dream.

Well, can't argue with that. I guess learning institutions really are filled with predators.

[Untecna]

Do you actually have evidence that such is true, or are you going to continue parroting a terrorist?

She shows it to be true.

So you don't, got it. So what exactly is the "grooming" going on, then?

She's not a terrorist.

Because encouraging people to do acts of violence against a public institution isn't domestic terrorism, apparently.

The "LGBTQ" movement are child rapists under civil rights protection.

You have any evidence for that either? Or are you committed to being a bigot?

[The Land of the Ephyral]

She shows it to be true.

So you don't, got it. So what exactly is the "grooming" going on, then?

She's not a terrorist.

Because encouraging people to do acts of violence against a public institution isn't domestic terrorism, apparently.

The "LGBTQ" movement are child rapists under civil rights protection.

You have any evidence for that either? Or are you committed to being a bigot?

Why would I care about your standard of evidence when you are manifestly on the side of pedophiles.

Eat shit and die you scum

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

snip

I don't know which "movement" you're referring to, but I know many LGBTQ people and as far as I know, none of them are child rapists.

[DutchFormosa]

So you don't, got it. So what exactly is the "grooming" going on, then?


Because encouraging people to do acts of violence against a public institution isn't domestic terrorism, apparently.


You have any evidence for that either? Or are you committed to being a bigot?

Why would I care about your standard of evidence when you are manifestly on the side of pedophiles.

Eat shit and die you scum

If your response to genuine criticism is something like that, I'd say you have no valid reason towards hating us.

[Kernen]

So you don't, got it. So what exactly is the "grooming" going on, then?


Because encouraging people to do acts of violence against a public institution isn't domestic terrorism, apparently.


You have any evidence for that either? Or are you committed to being a bigot?

Why would I care about your standard of evidence when you are manifestly on the side of pedophiles.

Eat shit and die you scum

So you have no evidence.